NOTICE OF Council MEETING
The Meeting of
Parramatta City Council will be held in the Council Chamber, Fourth Floor,
Dr. Robert Lang
Chief Executive
Officer
Phone 02 9806 5050 Fax 02 9806 5917 DX 8279
ABN 49 907 174 773
www.parracity.nsw.gov.au
“Think Before You Print”
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
|
The Lord Mayor Clr Antoine (Tony) Issa, OAM –
Woodville Ward |
Dr. Robert Lang, Chief Executive Officer - |
|
Sue Coleman – Group Manager City Services |
|
|
Assistant Minutes Clerk – Michael Wearne |
|
|
|
|
Minutes Clerk – Grant Davies |
|
Marcelo Occhuizzi – Acting Group Manager Outcomes
& Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clr Paul Barber – Caroline Chisholm Ward |
|
|
Clr |
|
Clr Mark Lack – Elizabeth Macarthur Ward |
|
|
Clr John Chedid – Elizabeth Macarthur Ward |
|
Clr Glenn Elmore – Woodville Ward |
|
|
Clr Andrew Wilson – |
|
Clr Pierre Esber– |
|
|
Clr Scott Lloyd – Caroline Chisholm Ward |
|
Clr Prabir Maitra – Arthur Phillip Ward |
|
|
Clr Andrew Bide – Caroline Chisholm Ward |
|
Clr Julia Finn – Arthur Phillip Ward |
Clr Michael McDermott - Elizabeth Macarthur Ward |
Clr Paul Garrard, Deputy Lord Mayor – Woodville Ward |
Clr Chiang Lim – Arthur Phillip Ward |
|
Staff |
|
|
Staff |
GALLERY
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
ITEM SUBJECT PAGE
NO
1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Regulatory Council -
2 APOLOGIES
3 DECLARATIONS
OF INTEREST
4 Minutes of Lord Mayor
5 Public Forum
6 PETITIONS
7 Rescission Motions
7.1
8 COUNCIL MATTERS TO BE
ADOPTED WITHOUT DISCUSSION
9 Regulatory Reports
9.3 First
Home-Owners Boost Scheme - Fast Tracking Development Applications
10 City Development
10.1 Merrylands
RDS Area (Further Report)
11 Roads Paths Access and Flood Mitigation
11.1 Review
of M4 Toll
11.2
11.3 Traffic
Engineering Advisory Group - 6 November 2008
12 Culture and Leisure
12.1 Naming
of an Unnamed Public Reserve in
12.2
12.3 Sir Thomas
Mitchell Reserve, 21B
12.4 Proposed
Additional Dog Off-Leash Areas
13 Community Care
13.1 Response
to Council Request to Report on Advisory Committee Achievements
14 City Leadership and Management
14.1 Presentation
of 2007/08 Financial report to the Public
14.2 Investments
Report for September 2008
14.3 2008/09
Management Plan - September Quarterly Review
14.4 Status
Report of Implementation of ICAC Recommendations
14.5 Tender
No 29/2008 Westpool/UIP Service Providers Broking and Claims Management
14.6 Affirmation
and Review of Civic Office Expenses and Facilities Policy
15 Notices of Motion
15.1 Congratulations
to Councillor Prabir Maitra
15.2 Traffic
Congestion in Epping
15.3 Annual
Christmas Lights Decorations Competition beginning 2009
15.4 Protecting
the Privacy of Individuals Submitting Objections to Development Applications
15.5 Internal
Council Ombudsman
15.6 Delegations
from Council
15.7 Whistleblower
Protection Policy
16 Closed Session
16.1 Proposed
Developer Contributions Framework -
This report is
confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government act
1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a
commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or
proposes to conduct) business.
16.2 Tender
This report is
confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government act
1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature
that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the
Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.
16.3 Tender
This report is
confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government act
1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature
that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the
Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.
16.4 Tender
No. 23/2008
This report is
confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government act
1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature
that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the
Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.
16.5 Tender
for Security Services
This report is
confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government act
1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature
that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the
Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.
17 DECISIONS FROM CLOSED SESSION
18 QUESTION TIME
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
Rescission Motions
7.1
Item 7.1 |
RESCISSION MOTION
ITEM NUMBER 7.1
SUBJECT
REFERENCE DA/514/2008 -
D01072248
REPORT OF Manager Development Services
To be Moved by Councillor L E Wearne and Seconded by Councillors A A Wilson and J Chedid:- |
“That the resolution of the Regulatory Council Meeting held on 10 November 2008 regarding the Development Application for 20 Rawson Street, Epping, namely:- (a) That Council grant consent to Development
Application No. 514/2008 subject to standard conditions and the following
extraordinary condition: 1. The premises being used exclusively as a
single dwelling house and not being adapted for, or used as a dual occupancy.
Reason:
To ensure the premises is used as a
sole occupancy. (b) Further, that the objectors be advised of
Council’s determination of the application. be and is hereby rescinded.” |
1View |
Copy of previous report considered by Council at its Meeting on |
24 Pages |
|
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
Regulatory
PLEASE NOTE: This
matter was considered at the Council Meeting on
9.3 First Home-Owners Boost Scheme - Fast
Tracking Development Applications
Item 9.1 |
REGULATORY
ITEM NUMBER 9.1
SUBJECT
DESCRIPTION Section 96(1)(A)
Modification to an approved outdoor dining for 180 chairs. The modification
seeks to relocate 4 tables and associated chairs, erection of an awning and
extension of hours of operation. (Location Map - Attachment 2)
REFERENCE DA/26/2006/C - Submitted:
APPLICANT/S Meat and Wine
Company (
OWNERS
REPORT OF Manager Development Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: To determine an application which seeks to modify Development Consent
No. 26/2006 in the following manner: (i) Relocation of 4 tables and associated
chairs, (ii) Construction of an awning and (iii) Extension of hours of trading of the
outdoor area from the approved ( The application has been assessed by an independent consultant town
planner and referred to Council due to Council being the applicant and owner
of the site. The modifications recommended for approval as it is consistent with
the aims and objectives of the zoning applying to the land, and is generally
consistent with Council’s City Centre LEP 2007 and City Centre DCP 2007. In
addition, it will contribute to an improved functionality, service and presentation
of the restaurant. PLEASE NOTE: This
matter was considered at the Council Meeting on |
That Council modify Development Consent No. 26/2006 as follows. 1. Replace condition 1 with the
following: “1. The development is to be carried out in compliance with the
following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s
stamp, as amended by the conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure the event is carried out in
accordance with the approved plans.” 2. Replace condition 7 with the
following: 7. The hours of operation of the outdoor area being
restricted to Reason: To minimise the impact on the amenity
of the area. 3. Replace condition 15 with the
following: 15. The outdoor dining area is to be enclosed on a maximum of
three sides and the PVC screens are only to be used in rainy or windy
weather, in accordance with Council’s Outdoor Dining Policy 2003 or between
10pm and midnight as required by the recommendations of the “Extended
Existing Trading Hours Transistor Café 353A Church Street, Parramatta
Environmental Noise Assessment”, prepared by Acoustic Logic Consultancy,
dated 21 August 2006. 4. Replace condition 17 with the
following: 17. No live entertainment is to be provided within the external
dining area or within the associated restaurant. Reason: To minimise the impact on the amenity
of the area. 5. Replace condition 18 with the
following: 18. The restaurant and associated outdoor dining area shall at
all times be operated in accordance with the recommendations of the “Extended
Existing Trading Hours Transistor Café 353A Church Street, Parramatta
Environmental Noise Assessment”, prepared by Acoustic Logic Consultancy,
dated 21 August 2006” and the “Transistor Café, 353A Church Street,
Parramatta Noise Management Plan and House Policy”, prepared by Karima
Catering Enterprises Pty Ltd, dated 21 August 2006 as amended by the
conditions of this consent.” Reason: To minimise the impact on
the amenity of the area.” 6. The following additional conditions
be included in the consent: 19. A
noise complaints register is to be maintained on the premises and is to
identify all noise complaints and the response taken to such complaints. The
register is to be made available for viewing upon request by Council officers
or Police. Reason: Ensure appropriate ongoing
management of noise issues. 20. The semi-transparent plastic sheets extending from the
northern-most segment of the Reason: To maintain amenity of the streetscape. 21. A 2m wide path of travel is to be maintained to the exit
door adjoining the relocated tables and chairs and the existing approved
tables and chairs. Reason: To ensure public safety. 22. Approval is required under section 126 the Roads Act 1993 and
an activity approval under Section 68 Part E the Local Government Act 1993 is
also required for the proposed works. Reason: To fulfil requirements under the legislation. |
SITE
& LOCALITY
1. The site is known as 353A-C Church
Street,
PROPOSAL
2. DA/26/2006/C
seeks to modify Development Consent No. 26.2006 in the following manner:
(a) Relocate 4 tables and the associated 6 chairs
from the northern most section of the outdoor dining area along the
(b) Provide a new awning to shelter the new tables
and chairs,
(c) The modification also seeks to use the
outdoor area (existing and proposed area) between 7am and 12midnight, 7 days a
week being an increase of 2 hours. It is noted that the internal part of the
restaurant currently has approval to operate to 12midnight.
3. The
modification also seeks to use all of the 44 tables and 176 chairs between 7am
and 12midnight 7 days a week, being an increase of 2 hours per day over the
currently approved
4. As such, the
application seeks approval to modify:
Condition 1 which identifies the approved plans,
by amending the approved plans to show the new location of the seating and
structures
Condition 7 which sets the hours of use, by
increasing the hours of use to
Condition 18 which limits the period for the extended
trading hours, by deleting the condition.
STATUTORY
CONTROLS
5. The site is part zoned B4 Mixed Use
(353A-C Church Street) and part unzoned (road reserves) under Parramatta City
Centre Local Environmental Plan 2007. The use as a restaurant is permitted in
the B4 Mixed Use zone with consent and pursuant to clause 13 of the City Centre
LEP 2007 is also permitted on unzoned land.
6. The proposal is consistent with the
objectives of the B4 Mixed Use zone and does not alter the number of tables and
chairs and as such the car parking provisions of clause 22C of the City Centre
LEP 2007 are not relevant to the assessment of the application.
7. Clause 13 of the City Centre LEP 2007
applies to unzoned land and requires Council to consider the following prior to
the approval of any use on that land:
(a) must consider whether the development
will impact on adjoining zoned land and, if so, consider the objectives for
development in the zones of the adjoining land, and
(b) must
be satisfied that the development is appropriate and is compatible with
permissible land uses in any such adjoining land.
8. The adjoining zone is B4 Mixed Use and
the use for seating for the restaurant is only sustainable with the operation
of the restaurant on the adjoining site. As such the proposed use of the
unzoned land is supportive of the use of the adjoining land and is consistent
with the objectives of the Mixed Use zone. Given the use is to operate in
conjunction with the restaurant on the adjoining land, it is compatible with
the use on the adjoining land.
9. Clause 22G of the City Centre LEP 2007
requires Council to ensure development identified as being within Special Areas
is compatible with the character and significance of the Special Areas,
reinforces the specific attributes and qualities of the Special Area and has
regard to the objectives of the Special Area identified in the City Centre DCP.
10. Whilst the site is located within the
Prince Alfred Park Special Area, the nature of the proposal is so minor that
there are no specific controls of relevance under the City Centre DCP. The
proposal is consistent with the objectives for the Prince Alfred Park Special
Area.
11. Due to the minor nature of the works
proposed the majority of the City Centre DCP does not apply to the application,
including the Building Form, Access, Parking and Servicing and Environmental
Management sections. The potentially relevant sections are Section – Pedestrian
Amenity and Section 7 – Controls for Special Areas, which are addressed
following.
12. Two controls within Section 3 of the City
Centre DCP – Pedestrian Amenity apply to the application. The relevant controls
identify the site as being one upon which outdoor dining is encouraged and
require that clear lines of sight be provided for pedestrians.
13. The site currently contains a significant
amount of outdoor dining and this is continued in the application, consistent
with this control.
14. The amended layout of the outdoor dining
is being proposed to provide an improved line of sight for vehicles approaching
the pedestrian crossing on
15. Section 7 – Controls for Special Areas of
the City Centre DCP provides specific controls for the Prince Alfred Park
Special Area, in which the site is located, however none of the controls are
relevant given the minor nature of the works proposed. The proposal is
consistent with the objectives and desired future character for the Prince
Alfred Park Special Area.
CONSULTATION
16. In accordance with
Council’s Notification Development Control Plan, the proposal was notified
between 11 August and
17. The footpath area is already affected and
no more area should be provided for the restaurant.
The
proposal does not result in an increased area of usage of the footpath, but
rather seeks to relocate the area of usage given concerns raised in relation to
sight line distances from vehicles to pedestrians using the pedestrian crossing
on
18. The exhaust from the kitchen does not work
and odours and fumes come into
This is not a matter that is
relevant to the assessment of the application as no amendments are being sought
to the kitchen or odour systems. .
19. Existing
use results in unacceptable impact to bedrooms of
Potential impacts
of the increased trading hours would be a loss of amenity to nearby residences
due to noise from patrons (whilst on the premises and after leaving the
premises) and noise from staff during closing up of the premises, removal of
glasses, removal and storage of tables and chairs and cleaning of the premises.
Such activities may result in additional noise impacts upon nearby residences
that could lead to sleep disturbances.
Acoustic reports
lodged with previous modification requests for the extended trading hours have
addressed the potential for noise disturbances due to patrons on the site, both
within the premises and within the outdoor dining area and have found likely
noise impacts to be within acceptable noise ranges, subject to use of the drop
down plastic sheets after 10pm (to be conditioned). The site has been operating
on extended hours for over twelve months, both in its previous form as a café
and in its current form as a more up-market steak house, without any
significant level of complaint. The operation as a restaurant which also caters
for the theatre goers of the adjoining theatre is less likely to result in
noisy or rowdy patron behaviour and as such, given the previous two trial periods
did not result in significant amenity impacts for nearby residents, it is
unlikely the restaurant will.
REFERRALS
NSW Police
20. Given the potential for the extended
trading hours to affect the Liquor Licence for the premises and to result in
problems with noise and patron behaviour, the application was referred to the
Police for comments. The Police raised no objections to the proposal in their
response to the notification.
Traffic
21. The application was referred to the
Traffic Engineer to address the issue of sight distance to the pedestrian
crossing on
Property
22. The application was referred to the
Property Section as the proposal is located on a Council owned road reserve.
The Property Section raise no objections to the proposal subject to conditions
that have been included in the recommendation. As a result of the revised
external dining layout, a revised outdoor permit is required to be obtained.
Discussions have commenced with the operator in regards to the revised permit.
ISSUES
Pedestrian Safety
23. The likely impacts of the proposed changes to the layout of
the outdoor dining and associated structures have been addressed previously in
this report, being an improvement in pedestrian safety through the provision of
improved sight distances to pedestrians using the
Noise
24. The remaining potential impacts would
result from the proposed permanent increase in outdoor trading hours from
25. Acoustic reports lodged with previous modification
requests for the extended trading hours have addressed the potential for noise
disturbances due to patrons on the site, both within the premises and within
the outdoor dining area and have found likely noise impacts to be within
acceptable ranges, subject to use of the drop down plastic sheets after 10pm
(to be conditioned).
26. No additional information has been
provided to support the request for additional hours, and whilst the previous
reports addressed the need for staff to carryout packing away and cleaning up
the area for closure of the restaurant in a quiet manner and managing patrons
to minimise the chances of noise disturbances to neighbours, such measures
cannot prevent such disturbances completely. Such measures, particularly in relation
to patrons, can only seek to reduce the length and frequency of such
disturbances.
27. However, the site has been operating on
the extended hours for over twelve months, both in its previous form as a café
and in its current form as a more up-market steak house, without any
significant level of complaint. The operation as a restaurant, which also
caters for the theatre goers of the adjoining theatre, is less likely to result
in noisy or rowdy patron behaviour and as such, given the previous two trial periods
did not result in significant amenity impacts for nearby residents, it is
unlikely the restaurant will.
28. However, it is noted that the current
consent does not incorporate the recommendations of the acoustic report and the
Noise Management Plan and House Policy as conditions of consent and it would be
appropriate for any modification of the consent to include both as conditions
of consent. Further, an ongoing maintenance of logs of reported disturbances
should also occur, to allow appropriate management responses to noise
complaints. Further, given the change in nature of the operation, it is
appropriate that a condition of consent prevent live music from being performed
from the site.
29. Subject to all of the above recommended
conditions to ensure a suitable level of amenity is maintained for nearby
residents, and which have been agreed to by the applicant, and given the
successful trial periods previously, it is considered appropriate to allow
trading to midnight 7 days a week for this use in this location.
Kerry
Gordon
Director
Kerry
Gordon Planning Services
1View |
Plans and Elevations |
5 Pages |
|
2View |
Locality Map |
1 Page |
|
3View |
History of Application |
1 Page |
|
4View |
DSU 14/2006 - Regulatory Council Report for DA/26/2006 - |
9 Pages |
|
5View |
DSU 152/2006 - Regulatory Council Report for DA/26/2006/A - |
6 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 9.2 |
REGULATORY
ITEM NUMBER 9.2
SUBJECT
DESCRIPTION Demolition and
construction of a 2 storey mixed use development containing a supermarket and 9
residential units over basement parking for 66 vehicles. (Locality Map
attachment 1)
REFERENCE DA/212/2008 - Submitted
APPLICANT/S Milestone
Management Pty Ltd
OWNERS Mr K
Lewis, Mrs K Scully, Ms D Esber, Mr N Esber, Councillor P Esber, Mr D Petratos,
Mrs P Petratos, Mr E Jones, Mrs M Campbell.
REPORT OF Manager Development Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To determine Development
Application No. 212/2008 which seeks approval for demolition and the
construction of a mixed used development containing 9 residential units and a
supermarket. The application was referred to
Council’s Drainage Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Environmental Health Officer,
Urban Designer and Landscape Officer, who support the proposal, subject to
conditions. Councillor Pierre Esber is a
joint owner of No. 34 Briens Road Northmead. To ensure transparency in the
development assessment process this report has been peer reviewed by an
external planning consultant. The peer review concurs with the recommendation
of this report. The peer review is attachment No. 8. Seventeen objections, a petition with 18 signatures, and a
petition with 466 signatures were received in respect of this application. The application has been
referred to Council for determination due to the number of submissions
received. Mixed use development is a
permissible use in the zone and the site is suitable for this type of use.
Whilst the site is located in close proximity to a major intersection the
development consent will require the construction of a median island and
roundabout which aim to minimise negative impacts on the operation of the
road network. Accordingly, approval of the development application is
recommended. |
(a) That
Development Application No. 212/2008 be approved, subject to standard and the
following extraordinary conditions: 1. Deliveries to the supermarket may only occur
between the hours of Reason: To
protect the amenity of the adjoining residential flat building in 2. The trading hours of the supermarket are
restricted to Reason: To
protect the amenity of the area. 3. The fence/wall to the southern side of
the patios for units 2-8 is to have a minimum height of 1600mm above the
level of the adjacent pedestrian pathway. Reason: To
provide adequate privacy to the patios. 4. Two
of the proposed units are to be adaptable dwellings in accordance with the
Australian Standard No. 4299. Revised plans demonstrating compliance with
this requirement are to be submitted for the approval by the Principal
Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. Reason: To ensure compliance with Part 4.4.3
‘Housing Diversity and Choice’ of Parramatta DCP 2005. 5. The
garbage compactor shall only be used during the hours of Reason: To
protect the amenity of the area. 6. A
roundabout is to be constructed at the intersection of A
detailed plan for the construction of the roundabout and the concrete median
island, including associated signposting and linemarking, is to be submitted
to Council for approval at least 4 months prior to occupation of the
building. The approval for the
construction of the roundabout is to be obtained prior to the issue of the
construction certificate. The construction of the roundabout and concrete
median island is to be completed to Council’s satisfaction prior to
occupation of the building. All
costs associated with the design and construction of the roundabout and the
median are to be borne by the consent holder. Reason: Traffic Safety. 7. Seventy-four (74) off-street parking spaces (including 2
disabled parking spaces) are to be provided, permanently marked on the pavement and used
accordingly, as per the approved plans. The dimensions for resident’s and
customer parking spaces and aisle width to be in accordance with AS
2890.1-2004 (2.4m wide x 5.4m long clear of columns plus 300mm clearance
adjacent walls & 6.2m aisle width minimum). The disabled parking spaces are to have
dimensions of 3.8m wide x 5.5m long in accordance with Parramatta DCP 2005 as
indicated on the approved plans. Reason: Traffic Safety. 8. The combined entry and exit driveway for
the at grade parking area and loading dock access, plus the driveway for
basement access is to be provided in accordance with the approved plans. The
driveway is to be constructed according to AS 2890.1- 2004 and Council’s
specification. Traffic
calming devices (speed humps or similar) are to be provided within the
carparking area in the basement for safety reasons. Reason: Traffic Safety. 9. Driveway and ramp gradients shall comply with Clause 2.5.3
and Clause 3.3 of AS2890.1-2004. Column locations to be in accordance with AS
2890.1-2004. Traffic facilities, such as; wheel stops, bollards, kerbs,
signposting, pavement markings, lighting and speed humps, shall comply with
AS2890.1-2004. Details of compliance with this condition are to be included
on the plans submitted with the application for construction certificate. Reason: Traffic Safety. 10. Clear sight lines shall be provided at the property boundary
line to ensure adequate visibility between vehicles leaving the carpark and
pedestrians along the Reason: Traffic Safety. 11. The minimum available headroom clearance for the basement
carpark is to be signposted at all entrances and clearance is to be a minimum
of 2.2m (for cars and light vans including all travel paths to and from
parking spaces for people with disabilities) measured to the lowest
projection of the roof (fire sprinkler, lighting, sign, and ventilation),
according to AS 2890.1-2004. Details of compliance with this condition are to
be included on the plans submitted with the application for construction
certificate. Reason: Traffic Safety. 12. A convex mirror to be installed within the
ramp access for the basement carpark (one near the entry driveway and one at
the bottom of the ramp access) with its height and location adjusted to allow
an exiting driver a full view of the driveway in order to see if another
vehicle is coming through. Details of compliance with this condition are to be included on
the plans submitted with the application for construction certificate. Reason: Traffic Safety. 13. For footpath construction and/or
restoration, if included as part of the final DA Consent Conditions, shall
require a Road Occupancy Permit and Road Opening Permit. The applicant shall
submit an application for a Road Occupancy Permit through Council’s Traffic
& Transport Services and a Road Opening Permit through Council’s
Restoration Engineer, prior to carrying out the construction/restoration
works. Reason: Traffic Safety. 14. Full
time "No Stopping" restrictions are to be implemented along the Reason: Traffic Safety. 15. Full
time "No Stopping" restrictions to be installed along the site's
entire Kleins Road frontage and full time "No Parking" restrictions
to be installed along the site's entire Howard Avenue frontage, subject to
the approval of the Parramatta Traffic Committee under Delegated Authority,
prior to final occupation of the premises.
Details are to be submitted to Council for approval at least 4 months
prior to occupation of the building.
The “No Stopping” and “No Parking” restrictions are to be implemented
prior to occupation of the building. Reason: Traffic Safety. 16. A pedestrian crossing is to be marked on
the pavement from the at grade staff parking area to the kerb ramp that
provides access to the pedestrian ramps. The at-grade car parking spaces are
to be used and signposted for employees only. The linemarking and provision
of signage is to occur prior to the issue of the occupation certificate. Reason: Traffic Safety. 17. Prior
to the issue of a construction certificate a detailed plan showing the
surface treatments for the at grade car park shall be submitted to Council
for approval. The plan shall include details of the colours and/or textures
that will be used to provide an aesthetically appealing surface treatment to
the car park. Reason: To ensure that the development has an
acceptable impact on the visual qualities of the streetscape. (b) Further, that objectors be advised of Councils decision. |
SITE & LOCALITY
1. The site is comprised of six individual
allotments, No.’s
2. A three storey mixed use development is
located at
3. A local shopping area is located on the
western side of
4. That part of Northmead on the southern
side of
PROPOSAL
5. The proposal incorporates the demolition
of existing structures and the construction of a two storey mixed use
development over a single level of basement carparking with a supermarket at
the ground floor level and 9 residential units on the first floor level. The
building has frontage to
6. The
proposed store hours are
STATUTORY CONTROLS
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 –
Development Standards (SEPP 1) &
7. An
objection under the provisions of SEPP 1 was lodged as the proposed development
provides 13 more car spaces than the maximum number of parking spaces permitted
by Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 28. The SEPP 1 objection is worthy of
Council’s endorsement and is discussed in further detail within this report.
Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 28
8. The
site is within the ‘Primary Centre’ area as defined by SREP 28. In the ‘Primary
Centre’ area the parking controls are maximums rather than minimums. SREP No.
28 limits the maximum number of parking spaces for the development to 61. The
development provides a total of 72 spaces which exceeds the maximum number of
spaces by 11. The applicant has provided a SEPP 1 objection in support of the
departure from the development standard.
9. The site is zoned Mixed Use 10 under
Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2001. The development is defined as a ‘mixed
use development’. The proposal is permissible within the Mixed Use 10 zone with
the consent of Council. The proposed development is consistent with the
objectives of the PLEP 2001.
10. The provisions of Parramatta Development
Control Plan 2005 have been considered in the assessment of the proposal. The
development is consistent with the aims and objectives of the DCP. Non
compliances with the requirements of the DCP are addressed in the ‘ISSUES’
section of the report.
ISSUES
Traffic
11. A
Traffic Report was submitted with the development application. The application
was referred to the RTA in accordance with the requirements of SEPP
(Infrastructure), and the application has also been reviewed by Council’s Traffic
Engineer.
12. The
applicant’s Traffic Consultant conducted traffic counts on a Friday afternoon
and at
13. The
traffic report indicates that the intersection of
14. The RTA
has advised Council that the intersection of
15. Residents
have advised Council that they experience significant delays whilst queuing at
the Briens Road/Kleins Road intersection and that people are using residential
streets including
16. The
planning controls which apply to the Mixed Use 10 zone allow significantly
higher densities than what was previously permissible in the area. A maximum
building height of 3 storeys and a floor space ratio of 1.5:1 applies to the
Mixed Use 10 zone. The proposed development has a height of 2 storeys and a FSR
of 0.67:1. A commercial development with a gross floor area of 5133m2 is
potentially permissible on the development site. The gross floor area of the
proposed development is 2352m2, 54% less than the maximum gross floor area
permitted. The density of the development and therefore the amount of traffic
generated by the development is significantly less than the maximum permitted
by the planning controls. Providing that the development does not result in a
dangerous traffic situation or otherwise unduly impede the safe and efficiency
flow of traffic in the surrounding road network, it would not be possible to
refuse the development due to the amount of traffic it would generate.
17. To
ensure that the development has minimal impact on the road network Council’s
Traffic Engineer has recommended that a median island be constructed in
18. As
vehicles forced to turn left out of the site due to the median island may wish
to join the north bound lane in
Traffic Committee
19. The conditions regarding
the construction of the median island in
Car Parking
20. The
maximum number of car spaces permitted under the provisions of SREP No. 28 is
48 for the retail component and 13 spaces for resident and resident visitor
parking. A maximum of 61 spaces are permitted by the SREP. The development
provides a total of 74 car spaces. The car parking allocation is 13 for
residents and resident visitors, 53 for supermarket customers, and 8 spaces for
employees. The applicant is seeking approval for 13 more car spaces than
permitted by SREP No. 28. The applicant has submitted a SEPP 1 objection in
support of the variation of the development standard for car parking.
21. The
applicant has put forward the following reasons in support of the SEPP 1
objection:
21.1 The
supermarket use is one which generally requires people to use their cars, as
the volume of goods purchased makes it difficult for people to walk or use
public transport.
21.2 A high
proportion of the customers will be people stopping off at the supermarket on
their way to and from work or home, they will not be making special trips for
the sole purpose of shopping at the supermarket.
21.3 The
proposed development will strengthen the level of service of the local shops on
21.4 The
additional car parking is short term parking for shoppers rather than long term
parking for commuters, the additional car parking would not discourage the use
of public transport.
21.5 A
reduction in car parking spaces to comply with the SREP would reduce the
convenience of the store for customers and result in increased on street car
parking. The demand for on street car parking will increase in the future due
to zonings which permit higher density development in the area.
22. The
parking controls are within Part 10 ‘Transport’ of SREP 28. Clause 54 of SREP
28 puts forward the following aims in relation to Part 10, ‘Transport’.
“(a) to facilitate growth of the Parramatta Primary Centre mainly by
the use of public transport, particularly by improving public transport access
to and from Parramatta, by promoting efficient circulation of transport within
Parramatta, and by supporting policies that encourage greater public transport
use,
(b) to achieve an overall mode split of 50% between public transport
and private vehicles for the Parramatta Primary Centre (allowing for
adjustments between Precincts) with a mode split of 60% for the City Centre
Precinct favouring public transport (including walking and cycling) for the
journey to work when employment growth reaches 60,000 in the Parramatta City
Centre,
(c) to assist in reducing transport vehicle kilometres travelled over
western
(d) to encourage appropriate public transport infrastructure in order
to achieve a high-quality public transport system,
(e) to implement parking policies that discourage continued reliance on
private vehicle use, reduce traffic congestion and improve pedestrian amenity.”
23. The
principal objective of the parking controls in SREP No. 28 is to encourage the
use of public transport. In areas well serviced by public transport and with
high density office/commercial development this is achieved by reducing the
number of commuter car parking spaces. Council has previously resolved to adopt
a similar approach in the Parramatta CBD by interpreting the parking controls
in Parramatta City Centre LEP 2007 as maximums. The subject site is not located
in a CBD and is not in close proximity to a railway line. The subject site is
in close proximity to a major road and the main form of public transport is
buses.
24. A
supermarket use is not one which lends itself to being serviced predominantly
by public transport. Customers doing a weekly shop are likely to purchase a
significant number of goods and to transport these goods they are likely to
require the use of a car. It is considered unlikely that people would use
public transport for trips to the supermarket if their intention was to purpose
a small number of goods as it would be more convenient to make small purchases
at a shop in close proximity to their home or workplace.
25. The
applicant has advised that most ALDI supermarkets require approximately 60 car
parking spaces. The recently approved ALDI supermarket in
26. Land and
26.1 Compliance
with the standard may encourage customers to use the existing on street parking
on
26.2 Compliance
with the standard may encourage customers to use the existing on street parking
on
26.3 Additional
demand for on street parking may affect the safety of the road network by
increasing congestion and encouraging risky vehicle manoeuvres.
26.4 Reducing
the number of car spaces is unlikely to encourage the use of public transport
because the supermarket shoppers are likely to require a private vehicle to
transport the goods they purchase from the store.
27. For the
above reasons it is recommended that Council uphold the SEPP 1 objection and
allow a variation of the development standard for car parking because
compliance is considered unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of
this case.
B Doubles
28. On
Delivery Times
29. The
statement of environmental effects suggested that deliveries would occur
between the hours of 6.00am and 10.00pm whilst part 7.1 ‘Loading Dock’ of the
acoustic report states that deliveries should only to be carried during the
hours of 7.00am to 10.00pm.
30. The RTA and Council’s traffic engineer have
recommended that deliveries should not take place during peak traffic periods.
Whilst this view is not without merit, the operating requirements of the
supermarket require a delivery of produce in the morning prior to the store
opening. Council’s Traffic Engineer has also advised that the issue of queuing
at the Kleins Road/Briens Road intersection is more pronounced in the morning
peak than the afternoon/evening peak period. Accordingly it is recommended that
deliveries be restricted to the hours of
Street Setback
31. Part 3.2
of
32. The
objective of the nil setback control is to provide a built edge to the
properties zoned Mixed Use 10. No‘s 1-15 Kleins Road and No. 38 Briens Road are
zoned Mixed Use 10.
33. Whilst
the development could be amended to provide a built edge to the Kleins Road
frontage of the site the design of any built form would be compromised by the
requirement to provide an opening 9.8m in width for the driveway to the at
grade parking area and loading dock, and an opening 5.5m in width for the
driveway which provides access to the basement car park. It is considered that
the design quality of any built form would be compromised to such an extent by
the access requirements that it would have a negative impact on the visual
qualities of the streetscape.
34. The
applicant has amended the landscape plan by deleting the car space which
adjoins the Kleins Road frontage and creating an enlarged landscaped area with
revised tree planting consisting of Sydney Blue Gums with a potential mature
height of more than 15m. The applicant also submitted an amended plan with a 5m
high by 3m wide pylon sign and 2.4m high wall to the
35. The
plans do not specify the proposed finish for the at grade parking area accessed
from Kleins Road, the section drawings suggest that the surface of the car park
will be the concrete slab that forms the roof of the basement. Having regard to
the proximity of the parking area to the street and the size of this area,
concern is raised that a surface treatment such as plain concrete would have a
negative impact on the visual quality of the streetscape. A condition is
recommended requiring a detailed paving plan to be submitted to Council’s
satisfaction prior to the construction certificate being issued.
36. The
combination of the additional landscaping and an improved surface treatment to
the car park will ensure that the development makes a reasonable contribution
to the visual quality of the streetscape. Having regards to the constraints of
the site, the type of development proposed, and the condition requiring an
improved surface treatments to the car park, the non compliance with the street
setback requirement is considered acceptable.
Solar Access
37. A
recently completed 4 storey mixed use development is located to the south of
the subject site at
38. At the
present time unit No. 7 only receives direct solar access from
39. At the
present time unit No. 8 receives solar access from
40. At the
present time Unit No. 13 receives solar access from
41. To
determine whether the impact of the development on solar access is acceptable
or warrants refusal of the application, the first issue to consider is whether
the form of the development is in accordance with the planning controls. This
approach is based on the principle that impacts caused by non compliant
development is less likely to be acceptable than impacts caused by compliant
development. Overshadowing is influenced by three main factors; solar orientation,
height and the distance between buildings.
42. The
ground floor units at
43. The
planning controls permit a height of 3 storeys. The proposed development has a
height of 2 storeys. Measured in metres, the portions of the development which
cast a shadow over the ground floor units have a height of 8.3m for the screen
around the mechanical plant area and 10.6m for the parapet over the resident
lift and fire stair area. The height of the development in metres is equivalent
to, or slightly less than, the height a 3 storey building.
44. The DCP
requires that the ground and first floor levels of the development have a
minimum setback of 1.5m from the northern boundary of
45. The loss
of solar access to units 7, 8 and 13 at
45.1 The
windows of the units are highly vulnerable to overshadowing.
45.2 The
height and setback of the proposed development meet or exceed the requirements
of the planning controls.
45.3 The
overshadowing is restricted to the late afternoon in winter at a time when the
sun will have minimal positive impact in terms of providing natural heat for
the units.
45.3 The
residential flat design code produced by the Department of Planning suggests
that living rooms for a minimum of 70% of units within a development should
receive 3 hours solar access. This requirement is less onerous than the
requirement of Parramatta DCP 2005 which requires all units to achieve 3 hours
solar access
Rear Setback
46. Part 3.2
of
47. At the
ground floor level portions of the at grade car park are located within the
required setback area. At the basement level the piled wall and the supply fan
room are located within the required setback area. The piled wall has a setback
of 4.4m from the boundary. The depth of soil above the basement ceiling and
piled wall is between 770mm and 1500mm.
48. The
encroachments of the basement into the rear setback zone are due to car park
aisle width restrictions and the encroachments of the car park are due to the
manoeuvring requirements of the 19m delivery trucks.
49. The
objectives of the DCP which relate to the deep soil zone controls include
encouraging the provision of mature vegetation including large and medium sized
trees, to provide for continuous vegetation corridors, to provide for the
infiltration of water to the water table and minimising run-off.
50. The
landscape plan indicates that 3 X
51. Despite
the encroachment of the basement car park and the paved area into the rear
setback zone the proposed rear setback area will achieve the objectives of the
development control plan.
Communal Open Space
52. Parramatta DCP 2005 requires that 10m2 of
communal open space be provided for each dwelling within a mixed use
development. As there are 9 dwellings within the development 90m2 of communal
open space is required. Each unit within the development is provided with a
36m2 patio in addition to a 12m2 balcony. No communal open space has been
provided.
53. Depending on the size of a development,
communal open space may facilitate areas for landscaping and active or passive
recreation. Communal open space in large developments may incorporate BBQ’s and
seating areas which allow for entertaining or playgrounds for children.
54. The patio provided for each unit has
dimensions of 6m by 6m, for a total area of 36m2. The Residential Flat Design Code suggests
that minimum private open space area for an apartment at ground level or
similar space on a structure, such as a podium should be 25m2. The area of the
proposed patios exceeds this requirement by 11m2. Parramatta DCP 2005 requires
a townhouse to have a minimum private open space area of 40m2. The proposed
patios are only slightly smaller in area than the minimum private open space
area required for a townhouse.
55. The proposed patios will allow for a range
of leisure activities including entertaining, and providing a space for small
children to play. Having regard to the quality of the private open space proposed,
the lack of any communal open space is considered to be acceptable.
Archaeology
56. At the pre-lodgement stage the applicant was
advised that the site is located within Archaeological Management Unit AM2918.
This Archaeological Management Unit has been identified as having moderate
archaeological potential within the Parramatta Historical Archaeological
Landscape Management Study.
57. An Initial Archaeological Assessment report
was submitted with the development application. The report includes a history
of the development of the site. The report concludes that the likelihood of
Aboriginal Relics being located on the site is low and that the relics likely
to be found on the site relate to the initial development of the allotments
which occurred in the 1920’s.
58. A condition will be imposed requiring the
applicant/developer to obtain an exception to the requirement to obtain an
excavation permit from the NSW Heritage Office under S139 of the Heritage Act
prior to the commencement of excavation works.
CONSULTATION
59. In accordance with Council’s Notification Development Control
Plan, the proposal was notified between
There
is no need for another supermarket
60. The ‘need’ for a development is not a
relevant matter for consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental
Planning and Assessment Act. The zoning of the site allows the proposed use.
The
supermarket will impact on the viability of other businesses in the area
61. The decision of the High Court of Australia
in the matter of Kentucky Fried Chicken V Gantidis established the planning
principle that the economic impact of a proposed use on other similar uses is
not a relevant town planning consideration. Economic impact is only a relevant
consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment
Act where the proposed development may result in the loss of services that
would otherwise be unavailable to the community. There is no evidence that the
proposed supermarket would result in the loss of services that are not
available elsewhere in the locality.
The
development will increase traffic
62. The zoning of the site allows development
with a significantly higher density than the existing building on the site. A
development application cannot be refused due the likelihood of increased traffic
when the density of the development is significantly less than the maximum
permitted by the planning controls.
The
development will reduce the number of car spaces available to the customers of
the local shops on
63. The development site is within the ‘Primary
Centre’ area as defined by Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 28. Parking
requirements in the Primary Centre are maximum rather than minimum requirements
to encourage the use of public transport. The proposed development contains
more than the maximum number of car spaces permitted by Sydney Regional
Environmental Plan No. 28. The applicant has sought approval for the number of
parking spaces that are usually provided to other similar ALDI stores. In the
applicant’s experience the proposed number of car spaces is sufficient for the
size of the supermarket proposed. A customer of the supermarket would need to
cross
The
dwelling mix is not acceptable
64. Parramatta DCP 2005 provides a desirable
dwelling mix for developments which contain 10 or more dwellings. The DCP
allows the dwellings mix to be varied for smaller developments providing that a
range of dwellings sizes are represented. The proposed development is comprised
of 8 X 2 bedroom dwellings and 1 X 3 bedroom dwelling. The footprint of the
first floor level makes if difficult to provide 1 bedroom dwellings. The
proposed unit mix is considered acceptable.
The
amenity of the proposed residential units is not acceptable
65. Each unit is provided with a 12m2 north
facing balcony and a 36m2 south facing patio. A north facing clerestory window
will provide solar access to the living area. The internal layout of the units
must balance the need for good solar access with protecting the unit from road
traffic noise. The private open space for each unit exceeds the 10m2
requirement of the DCP. It is considered that the amenity of the units is
acceptable having regard to the constraints of the site.
ON
SITE MEETING
66. Council, at its meeting of
Has a traffic risk assessment been prepared? Will the development
contribute to increased accidents?
67. A traffic report prepared
by Colston Budd Hunt and Kafes Pty Ltd was submitted with the development
application. There is no statutory basis for the preparation of a traffic risk
assessment. Increased traffic generated by the development is well within that
anticipated by the zoning which applies to the site.
68. An increase in traffic is a
consequence of rezonings which permit higher density development. The
application could not be refused because the development would increase
traffic.
There are regular accidents at the corner of
69. A condition of development
consent will require a roundabout to be constructed at this intersection. This
is likely to reduce the number of accidents at the intersection.
Does the scope of the traffic report include an analysis of the impact
on the intersection of
70. The traffic report includes
an analysis of the impact of the development on this intersection. This report
was reviewed by Council’s Traffic Engineer who supports the proposal.
Does the traffic report consider the increased traffic generated by the
new developments nearby (which contain over 230 apartments) that are under
construction?
71. Following the on site
meeting a revised traffic report was submitted which included an assessment of
the additional traffic generated by nearby developments which are currently
under construction or unoccupied. The assessment showed that the development
would increase traffic by between 20-25 vehicles per hour (two way) on
Where does ALDI think the traffic will be coming from? They think its
all from the north but it will be from the south as well. This needs to be
considered.
72. The traffic report assumes
that the traffic to the store will be coming from the north, south, and west.
Trucks will arrive at the site during morning peak hour and will cause
traffic chaos as they try to enter the site.
73. Only a single delivery will
be permitted during the morning peak hours. This single delivery is unlikely to
adversely effect the traffic movements during the morning peak hours.
All nearby intersections have a high level of saturation.
74. The traffic report
concluded that only the intersection of Briens Road/Kleins Road had a high
level of saturation.
Westbus on
75. This is a private matter
for Westbus to consider.
A dedicated right hand turning lane from
76. The RTA have advised
Council that accident data does not support the provision of a dedicated right
turn lane and that provided a dedicated right turning lane would require road
widening.
77. This is an existing issue.
The proposed development is permissible and the increased traffic from the
development does not warrant refusal of the application.
Speed humps should be provided in
78. This issue is not relevant
to the assessment of the development application.
One resident stated that development on the site was inevitable and
ALDI should be commended for providing the basement car park.
79. This comment was noted.
The laneway behind the
80. This comment was noted.
This issue does not relate to the proposed development.
More parking is required in the area and Council should consider
purchasing land to provide a car park.
81. This issue is not relevant
to the assessment of this development application.
How will ALDI control the use of the car park and ensure that it is
only used by ALDI customers?
82. Access to the car park will
be controlled by boom gates that will be open during the store trading hours.
Outside the store trading hours access will be restricted to the residents of
the units and their visitors.
Are left and right turns permitted out of the store? What happens if
people cannot make a right turn?
83. A condition of consent
requires the construction of a median in
The surveys done for the traffic report were not at true the peak
hours.
84. The traffic surveys were
done at the times when the store would be busiest and thus generating the most
amount of traffic. Council’s Traffic Engineer has not raised any objections to
the times the surveys were carried out.
The increased traffic would contribute to increased difficulties in
accessing the parking spaces opposite the local shops.
85. As sufficient on site
parking is provided to the proposed mixed use development it is unlikely that
there would be a significant increase in demand for on street parking spaces.
Will the report be considered before or after the Council elections?
86. This report is being
considered after the Council elections.
The ALDI store will compete with existing businesses in the area,
including the existing shops on the western side of
87. The economic impact of a proposed use on
other similar uses is not a relevant matter for consideration under Section 79C
of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.
There are already a number of ALDI stores in the area.
88. This issue is not a relevant town planning consideration.
The ALDI store should be located in a different area, such as the
industrial area at the end of
89. A supermarket is not a
permissible landuse in the industrial area at the southern end of
Councillors and staff should visit the site at
90. Council’s Traffic Engineer
has inspected the site on a number of occasions.
A resident asked whether the builder would be the same as the builders
currently working in the area. Concern was raised that buildings in the area
were not of satisfactory quality.
91. A standard condition of
consent will require the development to be constructed in accordance with the
requirements of the Building Code of Australia.
One resident raised concerns with the quality of the apartments,
particularly the southerly aspect of the living area, the bedrooms facing the
road and queried what would be done in terms of acoustic protection.
92. Whilst the living room of
the units does face south, a north facing clerestory window will provide
sunlight into the living room. A standard condition will be imposed requiring
acoustic protection to be provided to the units in accordance with the relevant
Australian Standards.
Will the ALDI development be making contributions and where will the
money be spent?
93. Both the residential and
retail component of the development attracts the payment of section 94
contributions which will total approximately $51,000. The section 94
contributions received by Council are pooled so it is impossible to specify
whether the contributions for this development will be spent in the same area.
Does Frank Sartor have the final say?
94. The resident was advised
that Parramatta Council was the consent authority for the development.
There are 200 elderly residents in a DOH complex on
95. This comment was noted.
Is Council planning further re-zonings in the area?
96. The issue of future
re-zonings is not relevant to the assessment of this development application.
Jonathon Goodwill
Development Assessment Officer
1View |
Locality Map |
1 Page |
|
2View |
Zoning Map |
1 Page |
|
3View |
Advice from the RTA |
3 Pages |
|
4View |
Traffic Report prepared by applicant's consultant |
19 Pages |
|
5View |
Applicant's response to the traffic issues raised at the on site
meeting |
4 Pages |
|
6View |
Traffic comments from Council's Traffic Engineer |
6 Pages |
|
7View |
Plans and Elevations |
14 Pages |
|
8View |
Peer Review by ENSR Pty Ltd |
3 Pages |
|
9View |
Development Application History |
1 Page |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 9.3 |
REGULATORY
ITEM NUMBER 9.3
SUBJECT First Home-Owners Boost Scheme - Fast
Tracking Development Applications
DESCRIPTION
REFERENCE F2004/07400 -
APPLICANT/S
OWNERS
REPORT OF Manager Development Services
PURPOSE: To seek endorsement of a change to changing delegations to facilitate the fastrack of DAs that are subject to the Federal Government’s First Home Owner’s Boost Grant Scheme as recently resolved by Council. SUMMARY The Federal Government in October 2008 announced the First
Home Owner Boost Scheme. This government initiative will assist first home
buyers to purchase their first home. The scheme is administered by the NSW
Government and is in addition to the $10,000 First Home Owner Grant. First home buyers building a new home or purchasing a
newly constructed home may be eligible for the $14,000 boost in addition to
the existing $10,000 grant, bringing the total benefits to $24,000. The Fist Home Owner Boost Scheme is time limited, with
eligibility criteria requiring contracts for the purchase or construction of
singe dwellings being entered into between Council has committed to the timely determination of
development applications for the construction of single dwellings where the
applicant may be eligible for the First Home Owner Boost Scheme. To ensure
that this commitment is achieved administrative changes have been made to the
development assessment process. Changes include: · Identification
at lodgement of DA of applicant’s eligibility under the First Home Owner
Boost Scheme and file is to be marked accordingly; · Review
by team leader within 2 days of lodgement to determine neighbour notification
required and identification of any issues with plans; · Immediate
referral of DA to a planner (following review by team leader) for assessment;
· Site
inspection is to take place within 7 days of lodgement of DA; · Assessment
of the application is to be carried out during the 14 day neighbour
notification period; However, in cases where more than 3 submissions are
received staff can not determine the development application. The referral of
the application to a Council meeting will add at least 3 weeks to the
determination time. In cases where more than 7 submissions are received a
site meeting is also required to be held. The combined site meeting and
referral to a Council meeting process will add at least 2 months to the
determination time. This is unsatisfactory and does not assist on the timely
determination of these minor applications. Accordingly, it is recommended that amendments be made to
delegations and the on-site meeting process be suspended for development
applications that seek approval to the construction of single dwelling houses
in cases where the applicant is eligible for the ‘First Home Owner Boost
Scheme’. |
(a) That the CEO be delegated the
function of Council to 1. Approve development applications for the
construction of single dwelling houses in cases where the applicant is
eligible for the ‘First Home Owner Boost Scheme’ irrespective of the number
of submissions received for the period (b) Further,
that the current on-site meeting process be suspended for development
applications that seek approval to the construction of single dwelling house
in cases where the applicant is eligible for the ‘First Home Owner Boost
Scheme’ for the period |
BACKGROUND
1 Council at its meeting of
(a) That
as a matter of urgency, the CEO set about introducing a system which can fast
track development approvals for applicants who may wish to satisfy the Federal
Government’s recently announced initiative to provide a $21,000 grant to people
who wish to build a single dwelling as their first home.
(b) That
such a system be aimed at reducing the bureaucratic ‘red tape’ within the
approval process and that such a system remain in place for the duration of the
period to which the Federal Government refers to in relation to the scheme.
(c) Further,
that the CEO report to Council at the first available meeting on what processes
have been put in place to address this initiative and, if necessary, for
Council to review any specific delegations required in order for this policy to
be actioned.
REPORT
First Home Owner Boost Scheme
2 The First Home Owner Boost Scheme is an
Australian Government initiative to assist first home buyers to purchase their
first home. The scheme is administered by the NSW Government and is in addition
to the $10,000 First Home Owner Grant.
3 First home buyers building a new home or
purchasing a newly constructed home may be eligible for the $14,000 boost in
addition to the existing $10,000 grant, bringing the total benefits to $24,000.
4 Where a newly constructed home is being
purchased, it must be the first sale of that home. The home must also never
have been previously occupied as a place of residence, including occupation by
the builder, a tenant or other occupant.
5 Substantially renovated homes may be
considered as a new home. Where a substantially renovated home is being
purchased, it must be the first sale of the home since it was substantially
renovated. The home, since being substantially renovated, must also have been
never previously occupied as a place of residence, including occupation by the
builder, a tenant or other occupant.
6 Substantial renovations of a building are
renovations where the entire building, or substantially all of the building,
has been removed or replaced.
Eligibility
criteria
7 To be eligible for a First Home Owner
Boost benefit, first home buyers must satisfy the requirements of the existing
$10,000 First Home Owner Grant and the additional First Home Owner Boost
requirements.
Additional
criteria for First Home Owner Boost
8 New
homes being purchased under a contract
To be eligible for the $14,000
boost benefit for the purchase of a newly constructed home, first home buyers
must have entered into a contract for the purchase of a newly constructed home
between
9 New
homes being built under a building contract
To be eligible for the $14,000 boost benefit for building a new home,
first home buyers must have entered into a contract for building a home between
10 In
addition:
· construction
must commence within 26 weeks of the contract.
· the contract
must specify a completion date for building work within 18 months of the
construction commencing or construction must be completed within 18 months of
the construction commence.
11 New homes being purchased ‘off the plan’
To be eligible for the $14,000 boost benefit for building a new home
‘off the plan’ the contract must be made between
12 New homes being built by an owner builder
To be eligible for the $14,000 boost benefit for building a new home as
an owner builder, construction (i.e. laying foundation) must commence between
Administrative Changes to Assessment Process
13 Council has committed to the timely
determination of development applications for the construction of single
dwellings where the applicant may be eligible for the First Home Owner Boost
Scheme. To ensure that this commitment is achieved administrative changes have
been made to the development assessment process.
14 Changes include:
· Identification
at lodgement of DA of applicant’s eligibility under the First Home Owner Boost
Scheme. Applicants are required to complete a declaration advising of
eligibility under the scheme. The DA file is to be marked accordingly;
· Review
by team leader within 2 days of lodgement to determine neighbour notification
required and identification of any issues with plans;
· Immediate
referral of DA to a planner (following review by team leader) for assessment;
· Site
inspection is to take place within 7 days of lodgement of DA;
· Assessment
of the application is to be carried out during the 14 day neighbour
notification period;
· In
the event that any submissions are received within the 14 day notification
period the issues are to be assessed and considered within 7 days and
assessment of the DA finalised.
15 These administrative changes will greatly
assist in the timely and ‘fast’ determination of these minor development
applications, however the improvements to processing times can only be made where
the number of submissions is no greater than 3.
16 In cases where more than 3 submissions are
received staff can not determine the development application. The referral of
the application to a Council meeting will add at least 3 weeks to the determination
time. In cases where more than 7 submissions are received a site meeting is
also required to be held. The combined site meeting and referral to a Council
meeting process will add at least 2 months to the determination time. This is
unsatisfactory and does not assist on the timely determination of these minor
applications.
17 Accordingly, it is recommended that the CEO
be delegated the function of Council to approve development applications for
the construction of single dwelling houses in cases where the applicant is
eligible for the ‘First Home Owner Boost Scheme’ irrespective of the number of
submissions received for the period 14 October 2008 to 30 June 2009
(inclusive).
18 It is also recommended that the current
on-site meeting process be suspended for development applications that seek
approval to the construction of single dwelling house in cases where the
applicant is eligible for the ‘First Home Owner Boost Scheme’ for the period
Louise Kerr
Manager Development
Services
There are no
attachments for this report.
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
City Development
10.1 Merrylands RDS Area (Further Report)
Item 10.1 |
CITY DEVELOPMENT
ITEM NUMBER 10.1
SUBJECT Merrylands
RDS Area (Further Report)
REFERENCE F2006/01198 - D01049777
REPORT OF
PURPOSE: This report seeks
Council’s endorsement of draft planning controls for the centre of Merrylands
for inclusion in draft Parramatta Local Environmental Plan (LEP) 2008.
Council previously considered the draft planning controls for this centre at
its meeting on the Council should
adopt draft planning controls for Merrylands so that these can be included in
draft Parramatta LEP 2008 and be provided to the Department of Planning for
consideration along with the rest of the draft plan as part of the process of
gaining approval to exhibit the draft plan. |
(a) That Council adopt the
draft planning controls for the RDS Centre of Merrylands as shown at Attachment 2 (Option 1), and that
these be incorporated into the draft Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2008
prior to its exhibition. |
BACKGROUND
1. As provided in the detailed
report at Attachment 1, Council
previously considered draft planning controls for Merrylands (known as options
1 and 2) at its meeting on
2. At the meeting of the
(a) That
Council adopt the draft planning controls for the RDS Centres of Carlingford
and East Rydalmere, as shown at Attachment 2 of Manager Land Use &
Transport Planning Report, and that these be incorporated into the draft
Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2008 prior to its exhibition.
(b) That
the draft planning controls for Merrylands be deferred and council officers
undertake further analysis of the petitions tabled tonight, particularly in
relation to the width of Smythe Street and in this regard, an audit of Smythe
Street width be undertaken.
(c) That
an analysis be undertaken
of new areas per zone in each of the scenarios.
(d) Further,
that the petition from residents of
SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS
Petitions, submissions and public forum
3. Three (3) petitions and one
(1) submission were made to Council in respect of the draft planning controls.
One petition and one submission were in support of Option 1, a second petition
was in support of Option 1, subject to
4. A detailed plan of
5. Smythe Street is intended
as a slow vehicle movement area and it is considered that the current
configuration of
6. A number of residents of
Area per zone
7. As required by Council’s resolution of
PREFERRED OPTION
8. The recommended planning
controls, being Option 1, will focus increased residential density in the
northern portion of the precinct, whilst retaining the southern portion as a
low density residential area, underpinning the area’s potential to accommodate
further residential development in the longer term. It provides a practical and
sustainable approach to planning and recognises that redevelopment of the
Merrylands RDS centre should be allowed to proceed in stages.
NEXT STEPS
9. This report details the
preferred zoning, height and density options for Council to consider. Once the
draft planning controls have been adopted by Council they will be included as
part of draft Parramatta LEP 2008. The draft LEP must undergo a review by the
Department of Planning as part of the process of seeking State Government
approval to place the plan on public exhibition. It is anticipated this review
will be completed in the coming months, following which the draft LEP will be
reported to Council for endorsement enabling a formal request to the Department
of Planning for approval to exhibit. Subject to this process it is anticipated
that the draft LEP and DCP could be exhibited in early to mid 2009.
10. Draft DCP controls will also
be formulated, to provide more detailed planning guidance on built form
outcomes, desired streetscape, building setbacks, future character, desired
future pedestrian connections etc and will be reported for Council’s
consideration.
Diane Galea Sue
Stewart
Project Officer Acting
Manager
Land Use & Transport Planning Land
Use & Transport Planning
1View |
Detailed Report Deferred Areas November 2008 |
7 Pages |
|
2View |
Option 1 Merrylands |
3 Pages |
|
3View |
Option 2 Merrylands |
4 Pages |
|
4View |
Detailed Report Deferred Areas June 2008 |
8 Pages |
|
5View |
Public Forum Address & Reply |
3 Pages |
|
6View |
|
1 Page |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
Roads Paths Access and
Flood Mitigation
11.1 Review of M4 Toll
11.2
11.3 Traffic Engineering Advisory Group - 6
November 2008
Item 11.1 |
ROADS PATHS ACCESS AND FLOOD MITIGATION
ITEM NUMBER 11.1
SUBJECT Review
of M4 Toll
REFERENCE F2008/01549 - D01071410
REPORT OF Senior Project Officer - Transport Planning
PURPOSE: This
report is in response to a Notice of Motion and seeks Council endorsement of
a submission to the Roads & Traffic Authority (RTA) on the M4 toll. The submission suggests possible scenarios
as there is no clear indication from State Government on the future of the
toll. The M4 passes to RTA ownership
in 2010 and significantly impacts on the road network in Parramatta LGA
especially |
(a) That Council adopt this report as a submission to the
Roads & Traffic Authority (Attachment
1) for its consideration of the future operation of the M4 with the
following summary recommendations: 1. the
RTA consider a Sydney-wide toll system that is equitable, 2. the
RTA retain the M4 toll as demand management tool, 3. the
Cashback scheme be withdrawn after 2010 and the budget reallocated to fund
transport improvements in 4. the toll be electronic payment collection only to reduce traffic
congestion and increase capacity, 5. a
distance based toll be introduced between the 6. and
additional access ramps to the M4 be considered at (b) Further, that
Council forwards the submission to local State and Federal MPs and local
Councils for their consideration and support. |
BACKGROUND
1. This report responds to a Notice of Motion
by Clr Wilson on
2. The M4 links Penrith to
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
4. If the RTA removes the M4 toll after 2010
then the Cashback scheme will not be applicable. Removing the toll is not recommended as this
will result in more traffic congestion on the M4 and surrounding roads. The toll should remain as a demand management
tool by pricing its use competitively with public transport fares to encourage
it as an alternative more sustainable form of transport.
5. The M4/M5 Cashback scheme is effectively a
private car subsidy with a 2008/09 budget of $102m. By 2010, when the M4 passes to the RTA, the
budget for the Cashback scheme since introduction is likely to have exceeded
$1bn. If the toll is retained then it is
suggested that the Cashback scheme not be extended beyond 2010 as it subsides
and promotes car use over public transport which is more environmentally sustainable
and its use reduces road traffic congestion.
It is also against State Government policy on promoting public transport
in addition to the scheme’s increasing cost.
Budget savings could be used to improve transport in
6. The RTA is moving towards electronic
payment only tolling (e-tag or e-pass) to reduce congestion at toll plazas
related to cash payments. Electronic
only payments also reduces the cost of toll collection.
7. The M4 toll as with most toll roads is of
the flat fee type, the M7 is the exception which is distance based. On the M4, a proportion of drivers avoid the
toll at Silverwater and use alternative routes which contribute to traffic
congestion on
8. A second reason for congestion on
9. There are numerous possible future
scenarios that the RTA may consider for the M4 after February 2010. The detailed report (attachment 1) considers
the likely impacts of these scenarios and suggests to the RTA that ideally it
should retain the M4 toll as a distance based electronic payment only toll and
withdrawn Cashback scheme (and use the budget to fund transport improvements in
Western Sydney).
CONSULTATION & TIMING
10. The issue of the M4 toll was briefly
discussed at a Councillor workshop on the draft Integrated Transport Plan for
Parramatta City Centre on
11. The M4 passes ownership from Statewide Roads
Limited to RTA control on
David Gray
Senior Project Officer - Transport Planning
Land Use & Transport
Planning
1View |
Detail Report - Review of the M4 Toll |
7 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 11.2 |
ROADS PATHS ACCESS AND FLOOD MITIGATION
ITEM NUMBER 11.2
SUBJECT
REFERENCE F2004/06921 - D01072336
REPORT OF Traffic and Transport Investigations Engineer
PURPOSE: To exercise the
Delegation of Authority from the Road and Traffic Authority to regulate
traffic |
That:- (a) Council
adopt the recommendations of the Parramatta Traffic Committee held on (b) That staff work with the
assistance of the Chairperson of the Parramatta Traffic Committee, to ensure
that reports forwarded to Council from the Committee are more concise and its
recommendations made more clear in future. |
BACKGROUND
1. A
meeting of the Parramatta Traffic Committee was held in the Council Chambers on
2. That the proposals/recommendations of the Parramatta Traffic
Committee are attached to this report of the Parramatta Traffic Committee.
Rosemarie Barretto
Traffic and Transport Investigations Engineer
1View |
Report of the Parramatta Traffic Committee held on |
78 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 11.3 |
ROADS PATHS ACCESS AND FLOOD MITIGATION
ITEM NUMBER 11.3
SUBJECT Traffic
Engineering Advisory Group -
REFERENCE F2004/06921 - D01072341
REPORT OF Traffic and Transport Investigations Engineer
PURPOSE: To provide advice to Council regarding traffic
related matters. |
That:- (a) Council adopt the recommendations
of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group meeting held on (b) That staff work with the
assistance of the Chairperson of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group, to
ensure that reports forwarded to Council from the Advisory Group are more
concise and its recommendations made more clear in future. |
BACKGROUND
1. A
meeting of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group was held in the Council
Chambers on
2. That
the proposals/recommendations of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group are
attached to this report of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group.
Rosemarie Barretto
Traffic and Transport Investigations Engineer
1View |
Report of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group Meeting - |
41 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
Culture and Leisure
12.1 Naming of an Unnamed Public Reserve in
12.2
12.3 Sir Thomas Mitchell Reserve, 21B
12.4 Proposed Additional Dog Off-Leash Areas
Item 12.1 |
CULTURE AND LEISURE
ITEM NUMBER 12.1
SUBJECT Naming
of an Unnamed Public Reserve in
REFERENCE F2008/01238 - D01054190
REPORT OF Recreation Planner
PURPOSE: To name the currently unnamed public reserve
located at the end of Broughton and Pemberton Streets in |
(a) That the unnamed public reserve at
the end of
Broughton and Pemberton Streets in Parramatta be endorsed in principle as
Baludarri Wetland, and be referred to
the Geographical Names Board of NSW for formal assignment under the
Geographical Names Act 1966. (b) That if approval is granted by the Geographical Names Board, a
park name sign be erected at the reserve, to be funded from the parks
improvement capital works budget. (c) Further, that any
persons who lodged a submission in relation to the proposed name be
advised of Council’s decision. |
BACKGROUND
1. Mr N McGrath from the Pemberton
Street Bushcare Group requested that Council name the unnamed public reserve
located at the end of Broughton and Pemberton Streets in
2. The reserve proposed
to be renamed is approximately 1.5 ha in size and comprises of Lot 1 DP 1239, Lot
5 DP 20765, Lots 1-2 DP 566807 and Lot 141 DP 537053. (Attachment 2) It is located on the northern side of the
3. A report recommending the name Warrigal
Wetland was submitted to Council on the
4. Council staff have now undertaken further
consultation with members of the Parramatta Aboriginal Advisory Committee and
the Darug Peoples Advisory Committee (DPAC) regarding the interpretation and
suitability of the proposed name. DPAC has recommended the name Baludarri Wetland as more appropriate for the
reserve as Baludarri was an important Aboriginal identity and had a connection
to the area in which the reserve is located. (Attachment 3)
5. Baludarri (also known as Balloderree
or Ballooderry) was the eldest son of Burramattagal elder, Maugoran and
his wife Gooroobera, who were displaced from
6. Baludarri was one of the first indigenous Australians
to develop friendly relations with early colonists and was befriended by
Governor Phillip. In April 1791, he and another Aboriginal man assisted the
Governor’s expedition up the
7. In December 1791 Baludarri became ill and
passed away. He was buried in the Governor’s garden at one of the first
cross-cultural funerals conducted between Aboriginal and European people. His
body was wrapped in an English jacket and jumper, instead of the traditional
paperbark, and laid in his canoe together with his spears as he was carried to
his final resting place.
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
8. A number of parks and reserves within
the Parramatta Local Government Area have been named in connection with
significant Aboriginal people who originally inhabited the area. In view of the
size, location and significance of this public reserve it is appropriate for it
to have a formal name.
9. The proposed Baludarri Wetland
name is supported in view of his connection and significance with the area in
which the reserve is located. It also complies with the NSW Geographical Names
Board’s ‘Guidelines for Place Names’.
CONSULTATION & TIMING
10. The DPAC recommended name
was discussed with Council’s Aboriginal staff, Mr McGrath and all respondents
who provided comments on the original proposal (Attachment 4), all of
whom were supportive of the new name.
Troy Holbrook
Recreation Planner
1View |
Warrigal Wetland Naming Request - |
1 Page |
|
2View |
Map of Proposed Baludarri Wetland |
1 Page |
|
3View |
Darug Peoples Advisory Committee Minutes & Baludarri Naming
Suggestion |
2 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 12.2 |
CULTURE AND LEISURE
ITEM NUMBER 12.2
SUBJECT
REFERENCE F2007/02363 - D01072226
REPORT OF Arts and Cultural Project Officer - Animating
the City - City Culture, Tourism and Recreation.
PREVIOUS ITEMS 10.6 - Election of
Councillors to Internal/External Organisations/Boards/Committees - Regulatory
Council -
PURPOSE: Council at its Regulatory meeting on “The
appointment of Councillors to the Parramatta Cultural Trust Advisory
Committee be deferred for 1 month pending a report from existing Councillor
members of the Trust, with assistance from staff, on the Trust’s successes
and works to date, together with advice of future plans”. |
(a) That Council receive and
note the contents of this report outlining the Cultural Trust’s proposed
staged approach to its development (b) Further,
that Council re-nominate the Lord Mayor and two Councillors to
Parramatta Cultural Trust Advisory Committee |
BACKGROUND
1. Parramatta Council in implementing its 10
year Arts Plan for the City has recently established The Parramatta Cultural
Trust. (See attached Trust Deed– Appendix 1).The principle intentions of the
Cultural Trust are to:
a. Create a public permanent and continuous
investment fund that would enable Council to leverage its contribution as well
as attract and yield an annual revenue stream for distribution to major and minor cultural and arts
projects;
b. Act as an incentive to increase philanthropy
towards the arts and culture in
c. Create a stewardship of civic, business and
cultural leaders to demonstrate leadership in the preservation, promotion and
development of arts and culture in
2. The Trust is a formal separate legal
entity listed on the Register of Cultural Organisations (ROCO) as held by the
Australian Government. Its primary
purpose is to promote culture through literature, music, the performing arts,
visual arts, craft, design, film, television, radio, community arts, Aboriginal
arts and moveable cultural heritage.
3. The Trust as an independent organisation
from Council has been granted tax exempt status in respect of its income and
capital gains from donations, investment of capital or other receipts derived
by the entity and can further provide incentive to people or entities to make
donations to the entity by offering a tax deduction for the donations.
4. The vision for the Cultural Trust is that
it will provide a significant vehicle for financial investment, sustainability
to and promotion of cultural activity in
5. The Parramatta Cultural Trust is unique
and the first of its kind in
6. Council opened the Cultural Trust’s primary
public gift fund with the commitment in the 2007/08 financial year of $200,000
as its first principle investment. This investment has been transferred to the
Trust and is now governed by the Trustee as set out in its Trust Deed.
7. The Trust is currently governed by one
Trustee (currently the Lord Mayor) and is assisted by an Advisory
Committee. The interim committee
consists of the Chair, two Councillors, the Lord Mayor and Council’s Chief
Executive Officer. The Advisory Committee has only met twice since formation
meeting in March and July of this year.
8. A further $100,000 has been committed by Council in this current 2008/09
Management Plan for the principal purpose of assisting in the start up process
of the Trust. Discussion and decisions from
the first two Advisory Committee meetings has resulted in a proposal to appoint
a specialist consultant to facilitate a program of workshops to deliver on a
path forward for the Trust.
9. Council is very fortunate to have
attracted a very experienced consultant to assist in this process. David Fishel
of Positive Solutions Pty Ltd has led business and strategic planning processes
for many cultural organisations. He has
delivered training in board development, management and leadership skills,
arts-business partnerships and strategic planning. He is author of "Book of the
Board", has been a board member of several cultural organisations in
10. Importantly, he and his team have a good
understanding of the cultural vision for Parramatta through the development of
the Business Plan for the Parramatta Artists Studios, and also ably assisted on
the submission for the New Generation Centre and Gallery for Civic Place, that
resulted in the recent $5 million commitment by the NSW State Government to
this project.
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
11. It is proposed that once the Trust’s
Advisory Committee is reformed a program of facilitated workshops will begin.
As the Cultural Trust remains very much early in its evolution, it is proposed
that the Advisory Committee will deliver on a staged approach to secure the
Trust’s early development over the next six to eight months. Subject to further discussion and refinement
it proposed the following timetable and steps be taken to address the tasks
identified is listed in Appendix 2.
12. A proposed Stage One will essentially be to
firmly bed down the operating fundamentals of the Trust. Clarity of objectives
and roles are considered as the most important single element in energising the
Advisory Committee, and moving the Trust onto an active fundraising footing. It
is understood that there is a need to develop a clear, succinct Strategic Plan
to guide the Trust’s early development, including:
a. the bedrock values and articulated purposes
b. the fundraising and development objectives
c. a fundraising plan
d. a marketing and communications plan
e. financial and administrative processes for
the Trust
This process
will act to strengthen the fundamental thrust of the Trust and assist with its
scope as a
13. It is proposed that these actions and tasks
will be further supplemented by articulation of a Terms of Reference for the
Advisory Committee, ‘duty statements’ for the current and proposed Advisory
Committee members, and recruitment strategies for Advisory Committee (and
possibly Trust) members.
14. In preparation of these planning workshops
(focused on the Trust’s mission, goals, and brand and positioning issues)
Council officers along with the consultant have begun to undertake benchmarking
amongst other trusts and foundations, and to prepare brief discussion
documents, in order to focus the Committee’s time and energy.
15. It is proposed that Stage One would be
completed in approximately ten weeks at an anticipated cost of between $15,000
-$20,000.
16. Building off a solid platform from the above
tasks, a proposed Stage Two will involve how the Trust will effectively
communicate and have resonance with the community. Fundamentally, tasks proposed in Stage Two
will concentrate on product/service and donor benefit definition by actively
recruiting the first potential patrons/ambassadors/board members through a
targeted marketing plan.
17. One proposal has been to consider the active
recruitment of high profile ambassadors to assist in wide spread promotion and
relationship building for the Trust that could then serve to attract a number
of new Advisory Committee members. (See Appendix 3)
18. It is envisaged that these ambassadors
should personify passion, leadership, achievement and contribution, and embody
a personal connection to
19. Once considerable momentum is built through
a strong dialogue of support for the Trust, further resourcing will enable
strong long term relationships with donors and with the business, and arts
communities.
20. To date there has been a considerable amount
of Council investment of resources into the initial establishment of the
Parramatta Cultural Trust. The Trust remains an important mechanism for our
communities to be actively involved and to own the City’s cultural needs and aspirations.
It also provides the business community with an opportunity to connect with the
City’s creative energy and be a part of the current renaissance now happening
in
21. A reaffirmation of Councillors to the
Advisory Committee will enable the Cultural Trust to move forward to a solid
operating platform and begin its mission to build a solid investment fund that
is then distributed to promote and encourage a wide range of arts and cultural
practices in
CONSULTATION & TIMING
22. Existing Councillor members of the Trust, namely Councillor Lim and Councillor Barber, along with relevant Council staff have prepared this report for Council’s consideration.
Andrew Overton
Arts and Cultural Project Officer - Animating the City
- City Culture, Tourism and Recreation.
1View |
Trust Deed |
18 Pages |
|
2View |
Draft Task Outline |
2 Pages |
|
3View |
Advisory Committee Criteria |
1 Page |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 12.3 |
CULTURE AND LEISURE
ITEM NUMBER 12.3
SUBJECT Sir
Thomas Mitchell Reserve, 21B
REFERENCE F2008/03679 - D01072292
REPORT OF Property Program Manager
PURPOSE: The purpose of the report is to
seek Council’s acceptance to a transfer of land title for Sir Thomas Mitchell
Reserve from the Department of Housing. |
(a) That Council accepts the transfer of land titles
for Sir Thomas Mitchell Reserve at 21B (b) Further, that the Lord Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer be
authorised to affix the Council seal to the documentation for transferring
Lot W DP 36696, Lots 1134 and V DP 36698 being the land titles for Sir Thomas
Mitchell Reserve, to Council. |
BACKGROUND
1 The subject lots were
created in 1960s when the area was subdivided by The Housing Commission of NSW
for residential development. By way of
gazette notices in 1959 and 1963, these three parcels of land were dedicated by
the Housing Commission of NSW as open space and vested in Parramatta City
Council.
2 An agreement has been
reached with the NSW Department of Housing to transfer the subject land to
Council, at no cost.
3 A detailed submission and
a location plan of the subject land are at Attachments 1 and 2.
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
4 The
CONSULTATION & TIMING
5 The proposed land transfer
has the support of Council’s City Assets & Environment Unit.
Kwok Leung
Property Program Manager
1View |
Detailed submission |
1 Page |
|
2View |
Location plan |
1 Page |
|
Item 12.4 |
CULTURE AND LEISURE
ITEM NUMBER 12.4
SUBJECT Proposed
Additional Dog Off-Leash Areas
REFERENCE F2005/00856 - D01074043
REPORT OF Supervisor Open Space
PURPOSE: To recommend that Further, to seek Council
endorsement to place proposals for two additional off-leash areas at |
(a) That Council approve additional
dog leash free areas at (b) That
the above sites be provided with appropriate disposal facilities for dog
faeces and be signposted accordingly. (c) That Council adopt two additional
dog leash free sites at (d) Further, that following the public
exhibition period a further report regarding the sites be presented to
Council for consideration. |
BACKGROUND
1. The Companion Animals Act 1998, was
established to encourage responsible animal ownership and management. The Act
placed additional responsibilities on councils to provide dog off-leash areas.
In response to this Act, Council established off-leash areas in three
locations;
a.
b.
c. Wolseley Street Reserve (
2. A report regarding the provision of
additional dog leash free areas was presented to Council in July 2008. In
summary the report recommended that due to the significant social and health
benefits to dogs and their owners of leash free areas, that Council place on
public exhibition a proposal to establish four additional sites at;
a.
b. Dan Mahoney Reserve (
c. Darcy Road Reserve (Westmead)
d.
3. The
original Council officer’s report can be found at Attachment 1. The subsequent Council resolution can be found at Attachment 2.
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
Publicly Exhibited Sites
4. Council
resolved on the 28 July 2008 to place on
public exhibition a proposal for four (4) additional dog leash free areas at
Barnett Park (Winston Hills), Dan Mahoney Reserve (North Parramatta), Darcy
Road Reserve (Westmead) and George Kendall Riverside Park (Ermington).
5. The public exhibition took
place between the 13 August and
6. An analysis of submissions indicated
strong support for dog off-leash areas at Dan Mahoney Reserve (62%) and
a. Current lack of local accessible off-leash
areas
b. Dog socialisation and exercise opportunities
c. Owner socialisation and exercise
opportunities
7. However,
local residents are generally unsupportive of the Darcy Road Reserve proposal
(87.5%). The main issues raised
against the proposal included:
a. Lack of owner responsibility / control
b. Dogs dangerous for children / other park
users
c. Dog Noise
d. Dog faeces
e. Fencing
On the basis of these responses, officers
are recommending against proceeding with the leash free area at this site.
8. A similar number of both supportive (4) and unsupportive (5)
submissions were received in relation to the
Fencing
9. Fencing of dog off-leash areas was raised in a number of
submissions, particularly where they are to be located adjacent to a busy road.
In consideration of the characteristics of each site and the substantial cost
of fencing, the following is recommended for the proposed off-leash areas:
a. Dan
Mahoney Reserve – Currently fully fenced
b.
c.
The partial fencing of
10. Council resolved on the
I. At
least three bins for placement of dog faeces;
II. Ordinance
signs including advice that savage dogs should not be unleashed;
III. Plastic
bags for collection of dog faeces.”
Installing
these facilities at the three proposed sites will require a total of nine (9)
bins at approximately $100 each, plus installation. In addition, Council would
be required to install three regulatory signs per site, with an overall
estimated total cost of $1,800 for nine (9) signs. These costs can be funded from the Parks
Improvement Capital Works budget. Other associated minor costs to be incurred
would include the maintenance of rubbish receptacles and the restocking of
plastic bags for the collection of dog faeces. These costs will be funded from
the City Operations Cleansing and Parks Maintenance operational budgets as well
as the Open Space Parks Improvement budget.
Proposed Additional Sites
11. On the 28 July Council resolved that “staff examine options for additional dog leash free areas in Harris
Park,
12.
13. It was also resolved by Council on the
14. On the
15. Council also resolved on the
16. In relation to sandy dog urinals (also
called ‘pooch patches’), Council officers have contacted Wyong and Warringah
Councils, who have trialled the use of these facilities at their dog off-leash
areas. They consist of a patch of sand with a central post provided within the
off-leash area. The sand and post encourage the dogs to defecate (Refer
Attachment 7). Dog owners can then dispose of the faeces in the bins provided
nearby. However, feedback received from both Wyong and Warringah indicated a
varying level of success, and did not recommend the use of them due to a number
of problems associated with their provision, including vandalism and children
using the area as a sandpit.
CONSULTATION & TIMING
17. Community consultation has been an important component in the
proposed establishment of additional dog off-leash areas. Council has promoted
an open, transparent approach, providing opportunities for all interest groups
and members of the community to contribute comments and to discuss specific
issues.
18. The proposal was placed on public exhibition at Council’s
administration building, libraries and website from
19. During the public exhibition period, 48 submissions were received
from local residents and relevant organisations regarding the four proposed dog
leash-free areas. All the written submissions have been reviewed, an assessment
made of the issues and the level of support for each of the proposed off-leash
locations.
20. If approval is granted to proceed with the public exhibition of the two
(2) additional locations, letters will be forwarded to the local
residents surrounding the two proposed additional off-leash sites, inviting
them to comment. Information will also be displayed at Council libraries,
posted on the Council website and temporary notification signs erected in all
of the proposed reserve locations. The results of the public consultation will
then be provided in a further report to Council.
James Smallhorn
Supervisor Open Space
1View |
28 July Council Report - Additional Dog Leash Free Areas |
3 Pages |
|
2View |
Council Minute - Additional Dog Leash Free Areas |
1 Page |
|
3View |
Dog Off-Leash Submission Summary Graph |
1 Page |
|
4View |
Map of Proposed Scout Memorial Park Dog Off-Leash Area |
1 Page |
|
5View |
Petition requesting Dog Off-Leash area at |
5 Pages |
|
6 |
Map of Proposed |
1 Page |
|
7 |
Pooch Patch Example Photos |
1 Page |
|
8 |
Dog Off-Leash Area Public Exhibition Display Poster |
1 Page |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
Community Care
13.1 Response to Council Request to Report on
Advisory Committee Achievements
Item 13.1 |
COMMUNITY CARE
ITEM NUMBER 13.1
SUBJECT Response
to Council Request to Report on Advisory Committee Achievements
REFERENCE F2005/01941 - D01070320
REPORT OF
PURPOSE: At the Council
meeting of This report
provides information on the achievements, strengths and weaknesses of
Council’s Advisory Committees and members of the
Committees are to be commended for the skills, knowledge and expertise that
they freely provide on a regular basis.
It is recognised, however, that the Advisory Committee format presents
a number of the limitations and challenges.
A number of new strategies are proposed, to either complement or replace
the role of Advisory Committees and to enable Council to more effective
engage with the broader community. |
(a) That Council recognises that whilst Advisory Committees were relevant
at the time they were established, a range of other, more appropriate and
contemporary community engagement strategies are currently being implemented
and will continue to be developed to ensure communication between Council and
community is as efficient and effective as possible. (b) That the Access Committee is not re-established
in its current form and that access issues are addressed in a range of
community forums to be established by the CCB Team. (c) That Council not
re-establish in its current form the Arts Advisory Committee and that the
City Culture, Tourism and Recreation Unit staff establish a broader community
engagement strategy across the arts Community that will involve regular
forums and other consultation mechanisms. (d) That the · a shorter term Council NAIDOC/Sorry Day Advisory Group convened
annually for a four month period by the Community Capacity Building (CCB) and
Events Teams · quarterly community forums organised by the CCB Team for ATSI
communities across the LGA · the establishment and resourcing by the CCB Team of a Parramatta
Aboriginal Service Providers Network. (e) That the Community Safety Advisory Committee is not re-established in its
current form and that the previous membership is integrated appropriately
into the Community Safety Precinct Committee and the Leadership Group which
will oversee progress on the (f) That the
Cycleways Committee is not re-established in its current form and that as
part of a broader community engagement strategy cycling issues are addressed
in a range of community forums to be established by the Transport Planning
Team. (f) That the Heritage
Committee is continued in its current form and Council proceed with
membership recruitment in accordance with the Committee’s Terms of Reference. (g) That the Multicultural
Advisory Committee is not re-established in its current form and the previous
members be invited to join the Residents Panel to increase the number of (h) That the Youth Advisory Committee
is not re-established in its current form and the CCB Team continue to
develop and implement a range of other, more appropriate community engagement
strategies for young people. (i) Further that Council write to all retiring members of the Community Advisory
Committees thanking them for their support during the previous Council term
and inviting them to join the Residents Panel. |
BACKGROUND
1. Advisory Committees have been part of Parramatta City
Council’s community engagement processes since 1991 and have assisted Council
in the development and implementation of a range of policies, projects and
activities. Current Advisory Committees
exist for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Access, Arts, Community
Safety, Cycleways, Heritage, Multicultural and Youth. Meetings are held regularly with the minutes
and any recommendations subsequently reported to Council.
2. All Councillors are welcome to attend Advisory Committee
meetings as they are ex-officio members of all Advisory Committees. While community membership varies between
Committees, the term of membership is generally four years to coincide with the
Council term.
3. At the Council meeting of
4. The following
indicators have been used to describe each Committee’s achievements:
(a) representation
of membership (Average attendance/ Profile of membership/ Councillor
attendance)
(b) examples
of activities of Committees (Committee driven events, Advice/ input into Council processes, Advice/
input to external agencies)
REVIEW
FINDINGS
5. An
audit of the work of the Advisory Committees over the last 4 years indicates
that:
(a) For the
majority, the same issues are raised regularly, often by the same members.
These include issues that are outside of Council’s scope.
(b) No formal
process is in place to ensure that issues raised in meetings are related to the
Committees’ terms of reference, or Council’s Parramatta Twenty25 Strategy.
(c) The Advisory
Committees provide a limited opportunity to a small number of individuals (an
average attendance of 6) to discuss and/or comment on a range of issues. By its very nature the committee structure
limits or narrows Council's ability to garner information on a wider range of
issues, including those that are complex and difficult to address (such as
domestic violence and neighbourhood cohesion) and those that emerge as critical
issues (such as mortgage stress, and racial violence).
6. The findings on
each Committee are summarised in Attachment 1.
The conclusions suggested by each review include:
(a) Members of the Access Advisory Committee are
a valued resource to Council as they advocate to increase the awareness of
Council staff and help to embed access considerations in relevant Council
processes. They provide expertise and
bring experience to access related issues.
However the current structure of the Committee limits its effectiveness.
(b) The
Arts Advisory Committee has achieved considerable positive outcomes for Council
and the
(c) The
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (
(d) The
Community Safety Advisory Committee has been a valuable resource in the
development of the
However Community Safety Precinct Committees
are currently being established in all Police Local Area Commands and will
provide NSW Police, government agencies, local Members of Parliament, Council,
community and business members with a formal process through which information
can be exchanged and local safety concerns identified and addressed.
Further, the
(e) The
Cycleways Advisory Committee includes a number of active members committed to
local cycling issues but there are several key organisations and groups who are
not currently represented. The existing
structure does not effectively and efficiently serve the growing needs of the
community.
(f) The Heritage Committee is
considered to be functioning efficiently and effectively. The Committee make a
valuable contribution that promotes heritage and conservation issues ensuring
such matters are key considerations in Council decisions e.g. input into
Residential Development Strategy.
(g) The focus of the
Multicultural Advisory Committee has not been easy to maintain. However it did
successfully implement the Religious Understanding Project 2007 and its
membership is active in a number of other multicultural networks within the
area. Parramatta is fortunate in having
a number of highly effective community organisations that provide a broad range
of leadership on multicultural issues and activities that have direct bearing
on the wellbeing of many families in the Parramatta LGA, and while the
establishment of the Multicultural Advisory Committee was timely in it’s day,
it is pleasing to note that there are now a range of resources available to the
community that have developed since this committee was first established.
(h) The Youth Advisory
Committee includes a number of active members committed to youth issues.
However membership is not representative of the diverse groups of young people
in our communities and attendance is poor given the significant number of
commitments many of the young people have.
The formal committee structure is one of the least effective ways to
engage with young people today, and we need to explore other types of
engagement strategies such as electronic media, Internet options (ie chat
rooms), community forums and engagement with educational institutions in the
area. The CCB Team has a number of alternative engagement strategies with young
people in place and which it is developing, including the Youth 4 Youth Fiesta
Council, Step to the Future Forum 2008 and the Civics Education Program.
ISSUES
7. The Community Advisory Committees were established prior to
Council’s Residents Panel program which now generates a significant amount of
input from a representative base of over 2000 Parramatta residents coupled with
the extensive consultation and engagement process that has been undertaken in
the preparation of Council’s Twenty25 Strategy over the past 5 years; the LGA
wide consultation with all community agencies located in or servicing the
Parramatta LGA undertaken by the Community Capacity Building Team; as well a
range of local consultative forums such as the Community Spirit events held in
2006 and 2007. These new community
engagement initiatives have to varying degrees lessened the role and impact of
the Advisory Committee structure and outcomes such as obtaining expert advice
and gauging community opinion in relation to critical or emerging issues.
8. The Advisory Committee structures are relatively labour and
resource intensive, requiring a convenor, a member of the executive support
team, on occasion representatives/guest speakers from other Council
departments, room hire, refreshment costs and follow up time for convenors to
chase up any matters raised and prepare a Council Report for each meeting. The conservative
estimate cost for the eight committees across a 12 month period is $30,000
(average cost of each Committee meeting ($475).
9. The CCB Team has developed
a number of alternate community engagement strategies for Council’s
consideration as outlined in the table below.
Advisory
Committee |
Current
engagement strategies include |
Additional
engagement strategies to be implemented |
Aboriginal & Torres Strait
Islander ( |
· Individual
and small group consultations eg.
‘Welcome to Country Protocol’ · Range
of community based activities including LGA wide and place based · Issues
based forums eg. · Burramatta
NAIDOC (including Council Information stalls) · Sorry
Day |
· · Quarterly
· Increase
|
Community Safety |
· Attend
· Currently
developing partnerships and strategies in areas such as the prevention of non
domestic violence alcohol related assaults |
· Community
Safety Precinct Committees · Ongoing
development of partnerships and strategies in areas such as Justice Precinct
Planning; co-ordinate response to social need in city centre · Implementation
of the |
Cycleways |
· Public
exhibition of selected proposed schemes |
· Internet
user group · Encourage
use of Council’s Service Request system to deal with cycle maintenance issues · Increase
membership of cyclists on the Residents Panel · LUTP
Team arrange community forums on strategic issues on an as needs basis
(suggested 2 per year) |
Multicultural |
· Collaborative
projects with local service providers working directly with · Membership
Multicultural Interagency · Step
to the Future |
· Increase
· CCB
Team increase engagement with external · Issues
Forums as per schedule to be resolved by Council each year |
Access |
· International
Day for People with Disabilities · Expert
input on Council projects on needs basis |
· Increase membership of people with a disability on
Residents Panel · On needs basis, CCB Team establish a range of
community forums · Current members retained and accessed for their
expert advice as the need arises by relevant Council Depts. |
Youth |
· Youth
4 Youth Fiesta · Convenor
· Membership
Holroyd and · Membership
Youth Health Forum Working Party |
· Issues
Forum · Increase young people’s membership on Residents
Panel · Civics
Education Program · Pilot
electronic media engagement strategy |
General Issues Forums |
|
· 2 per
year · Proactively scan and scope new
and emerging issues that Council should be aware of · Ensure a
means by which the community can raise issues that they do not feel are being
addressed |
Electronic forums |
|
· Internet, online surveys · Chat rooms on key issues with
young people |
Arts |
· Cultural
Trust establishment · Artsmart Artist professional development
program · Art
professional projects fund · Regular
forums and Workshops with artist at the Parramatta Artists Studios |
· Issues based
and general forums (two per year) · Web based
consultation · Use of
Residents Panel |
10. The proposed strategies seek
to target Council’s approach and resources to ensure we are in the best position to
obtain expert input and key information on critical matters of importance to
Maggie
Kyle Donna
Mosford
1View |
Advisory Committee Audits 2004 - 2008 |
11 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
City Leadership and
Management
14.1 Presentation of 2007/08 Financial report to
the Public
14.2 Investments Report for September 2008
14.3 2008/09 Management Plan - September Quarterly
Review
14.4 Status Report of Implementation of ICAC
Recommendations
14.5 Tender No 29/2008 Westpool/UIP Service
Providers Broking and Claims Management
14.6 Affirmation and Review of Civic Office
Expenses and Facilities Policy
Item 14.1 |
CITY LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM NUMBER 14.1
SUBJECT Presentation
of 2007/08 Financial report to the Public
REFERENCE F2004/05862 - D01051071
REPORT OF Manager - Finance
PURPOSE: To present the 2007/08 Financial Report and
Auditors Report to the public. |
That
the 2007/08 Financial Report and the Auditors Report be received and
presented to the public. |
BACKGROUND
1. The Council is required to present the
2007/08 Financial Report and Auditors Report to the General Public in
accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993.
2. The Council at its meeting held on the
3. The 2007/08 Financial Report and Auditors
Report was placed on public exhibition at the
4. A copy of the Auditors Report and the
previous report to Council is attached for Councillors information.
5. The Council must ensure that copies of all
submissions received by it are referred to the auditor, and may take such
action as it considers appropriate with respect to any such submission,
including the giving of notice to the Director-General of any matter that
appears to require amendment of the Council’s financial reports.
6. The Auditors in their 2007/08 report state
that all indicators are better than accepted industry benchmarks and reflect a
sound and stable financial position.
CONCLUSION
7. The
presentation of the Council’s 2007/08 Financial Report and the Auditors Report
to the public at the Council meeting of the
Jenny Fett
Manager Finance
1View |
Auditor's Report - Section 417(2) - |
1 Page |
|
2View |
Report on the Conduct of the Audit |
3 Pages |
|
3View |
Independant Auditor's Report |
1 Page |
|
4View |
Previous Report to Council on |
5 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 14.2 |
CITY LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM NUMBER 14.2
SUBJECT Investments
Report for September 2008
REFERENCE F2008/01474 - D01062797
REPORT OF Manager - Finance
PURPOSE: To inform
Council of the investment portfolio performance for the month of September
2008. |
That Council receives and notes the
investments report for September 2008. |
BACKGROUND
1. In accordance with
clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, a report setting
out details of all money invested must be presented to Council on a monthly
basis.
2. The report must include
a certificate as to whether or not the investments have been made in accordance
with the Act, the Regulations and the investment policy of Council.
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
3. The Council’s investment
portfolio stood at $89.2 Million as at
4. Council invests directly
with Local Government Financial Services (LGFS), various term deposit providers
and with funds managers
utilising the services of Grove Financial Services. There are also investments
with the Commonwealth Bank for loan offset funds.
5. The average interest rate
on Council’s investments for the month compared to the Bank Bill Index is as
follows:
Monthly
Annualised
Total
Portfolio -0.16% -0.75%
Funds
Managers -0.54% -4.65%
Bank
Bill Index 0.59% 7.37%
NB: Annualised rates
are calculated on a compounding basis assuming that the interest returns are
added to the initial investment amount and reinvested.
6. After allowing for
Council’s loan offsets and at call funds, Council recorded a negative
annualised return of -0.75% in the month for its total investment portfolio.
The negative return recorded by Council was below the Bank Bill Index of 7.37%.
Fund managers also recorded a negative annualised rate of
-4.65%
for the month of September.
7. The amount of funds
invested at the end of September increased from the previous
month by 7.6 Million. This increase was due to a late inflow of rates receipts
from the 1st instalment which were due by
8. September
was a month dominated by financial market distress as US and Japanese equity
markets plummeted to levels last seen during the 2000-2002. As the global
financial sector collapsed, central banks worldwide rushed to inject hundreds
of billions of dollars into money markets to ensure the supply of funds does
not deteriorate an already illiquid marketplace.
9. The continued Global credit crisis
and continuing speculation of a possible
recession resulted in Council’s overall
portfolio falling well below the bank bill index by approximately 8.12%. This
negative return can be attributed to the poor performance of council’s
remaining pool of Funds Managers and Equity Linked Notes which are negatively
affected by the volatile global credit market being experienced worldwide. Volatility will continue for some time,
meaning October returns will be even more adversely affected. We will continue to reduce our exposure to
Managed Funds as the opportunity arises to do so without locking in
losses. We have a couple of long term
funds that are still expected to return our capital at maturity.
10. The Blackrock Diversified Credit Fund recorded a mark to market loss of
approximately $235K for the month of September, however this fund is currently
being liquidated and all funds as they are drawn down will be placed in term
deposits and cash at call. This will help stabilise council’s return in future
months. The decision made by the Finance team to lock $16.2M of Civic place
investments into a 6 month term deposit at 8% has proven to be advantageous
with rates now starting to drop significantly.
11. The following details are
provided on the attachments for information:
Graph –
Comparison of average funds invested with loans balance
Graph – Average
interest rate comparison to Bank Bill Index
Graphs –
Investments and loans interest compared to budget
Summary of
investment portfolio
12. The Certificate of
Investments for September 2008 is provided below:
Certificate of Investments
I hereby certify that the investments for the month of
September 2008 have been made in accordance with the Act, the Regulations and
Council’s Investment Policy.
13. There is no standard report attachment -
detailed submission - attached to this report.
Jenny Fett
Finance Manager
1View |
Investments & Loans - Performance |
1 Page |
|
2View |
Summary of Investments Portfolio |
2 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 14.3 |
CITY LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM NUMBER 14.3
SUBJECT 2008/09
Management Plan - September Quarterly Review
REFERENCE F2008/03450 - D01065734
REPORT OF Manager - Finance
PURPOSE: 1. Section 407 of the Local Government Act 1993 requires the
General Manager (Chief Executive Officer) to report to the Council within 2
months after the end of each quarter as to the extent to which the
performance targets set by the Council’s Management Plan have been achieved
during that quarter. 2. Clause 203 of the Local Government
(General Regulation) 2005 requires that the Responsible Accounting Officer
(Manager Finance) prepare and submit to the Council, not later than 2 months
after the end of each quarter, a budget review statement that shows, by
reference to the estimate of income and expenditure set out in the Management
Plan, a revised estimate of the income and expenditure for that year. The
Responsible Accounting Officer is also required to include with the budget
review statement, a report as to whether or not the Responsible Accounting
Officer believes that the statement indicates that the financial position of
the Council is satisfactory, having regard to the original estimate of income
and expenditure, and if that position is unsatisfactory, recommendations for
remedial action. |
(a) That Council adopt the Chief Executive Officer’s
September 2008 Quarterly Review of the 2008/09 Management Plan and Budget. (Attachment
1). (b) That Council note and approve the actual results and
variations to the previously adopted budget estimates for the 2008/09
financial year as detailed in Attachment 1. (c) Further, that Council adopt the Responsible
Accounting Officer’s report on the financial position of the Council. |
BACKGROUND
1. The attached Quarterly
Review September 2008 contains
the Chief Executive Officer’s report, detailing the extent to which the
performance targets set by the Council’s 2008/09 Management Plan have been achieved
on a Program basis.
2. The Review also details at pages 14 to15 and 75 the actual
income, expenditure and proposed budget adjustments for 2008/09 with
comparisons to the original budget and the approved budget incorporating
re-votes previously adopted by Council.
3. The Quarterly Review
September 2008 was submitted to
Council’s Program Panels’ meeting on
4. In addition to reporting Councils Operating Result and
capital expenditure Councils reports on its Financial Performance Summary. For internal reporting purposes Council
separates its activities into Services and Projects. Services are reported in the Financial
Performance summary and consist of the regular functions that Council provides
to the community to meet its statutory requirements. Some restricted revenue
and depreciation expenses are excluded. Any surplus of Services Revenue over
Services Expenditure is available to fund Projects.
5. Projects are either –
Capital expenditure works which create new or replacement
assets that enhance the capacity of Council to deliver services
or
Operating Projects which consist of expenditure that
provides new or enhanced services or is for an ongoing service funded from
restricted revenue which Council wants to monitor. This expenditure does not
create an asset.
6. In putting together the 2008/09 Budget, Council undertook a
prioritisation process to determine which Projects should be undertaken given
the limited funds available. Projects
are funded from any Services surplus plus a combination of loans, special
rates, reserves, specific purpose Government grants and contributions such as Section
94 funds which must be used for specific purposes.
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
Report of
the Responsible Accounting Officer
7. As
noted earlier in this report the Responsible Accounting Officer is required, as
part of the Quarterly Management Plan Review, to report on the financial
position of the Council.
Operating
Statement result
8. Council is required to produce a financial statement in accordance with
statutory accounting standards and generally accepted accounting principles.
This Operating Statement does not include funds transferred to and from
reserves and includes depreciation and the profit/loss on disposals of assets.
9. Council’s
original budget, adopted in June 2008 as part of the 2008/09 Management Plan,
was to deliver a balanced operating result.
10. At
its meeting on
11. Of
the total revotes, $1.6M related to operating expenditure and this expenditure
in 2008/09 had a direct negative impact on the forecast operating result for
2008/09. Council was advised at that time that the deficit resulting from the
re-votes could be partly offset by new unbudgeted capital grants which were
then subject to confirmation.
Operating surplus/(deficit)
Original Budget adopted with Management Plan Nil
Revised Budget following 30 June re-votes ($1.6M)
The September Review forecast Surplus $0.26M.
12. The September Review
forecast includes an increase in revenue of $3.382M and an increase in forecast
expenses of $1.545M. The major areas that have caused the variation to the
operating result are as follows:
User
Charges & Fees increased $0.522M
Aquatic Centres income up $553k
Parking Meters Revenue up $250k
Community Centres – Rec Halls income up $95k
Hoarding Fees down $140k
Construction Certificates down $260k
Investment
Income decreased $1.6M
Down
$1.585M- This is an estimated likely impact on Councils investments in Managed
Funds resulting from the global financial crisis. This will be reviewed again in December.
Grants
and Contributions increased $2.38M
Financial Assistance Grant up by $483k
Wharf Road Boat Ramp $300k - Capital
Sportsground upgrade $150k - Capital
Parramatta Cycleway project $1.1M – Capital
Fish Ladders $280K -Capital
Gain on sale of assets increased by $2.98M
This gain on sale relates to the sale of land at the site of the
Macquarie Street Carpark to Integral energy.
This had previously been valued at market value but on advice from
Council’s auditor it was recorded at cost.
The proceeds from this sale have been transferred to the Property
Reserve.
Other Revenues decreased $0.9M
Property rentals down $1.1M
Increased Aquatic Centre Catering Sales
$0.12M
Employee
Costs increase $1.9M
Salaries increased by $1.2M. To achieve a balanced operating result in
the original budget each area was given an employee savings target. As part of the CEO’s 2% target savings
challenge, offsetting savings were identified elsewhere in the budget plus additional
savings of $507K. The year to date actuals expenditure was in
excess of the year to date budget because the impact of this savings
target. Casual wages increased in
Borrowing
Costs $0.2M
The net reduction of $0.244M in interest on loans primarily relates to
Materials
and Contracts $0.7M
The total increase was $0.726M, which primarily relates to an increase
in Fuel Costs of $0.63M, partially offset by some savings in materials. Fuel costs remained high during the first
quarter, presenting significant challenges to last year’s targets in this
area. The revised budget reflects a
slight increase on last year’s actuals.
Other
Operating expenses $0.6M
Reduction of
$0.6M relates to general savings target
Projects Summary
Original Budget adopted with Management Plan $30.465M
Revised Budget following re-votes
$40.7M
The September Review forecast $43.0M
Projects
bids, new and increases to existing
Project |
Approved Budget |
Annual Forecast |
Increase |
Funding Source |
13093. CAP - 07/08.Parramatta War
Memorial Swimming Centre |
$4,896,094 |
$5,196,094 |
$300,000 |
S94 |
13529. 08/09 CAP Civic Pl Proj Mgmt |
$608,000 |
$908,000 |
$300,000 |
Civic Place Reserve |
13549. 08/09 CAP Drainage Const Big 7 |
$600,000 |
$620,000 |
$20,000 |
S94 and Contributions |
11800. |
$312,360 |
$592,360 |
$280,000 |
Grants |
13550. 08/09 CAP Floodplain Prop
Acquis |
$400,000 |
$550,000 |
$150,000 |
Property Acquisition Reserve |
13728. Printer Device Replacement |
$ - |
$314,653 |
$314,653 |
Street Furniture Reserve |
12858. OP - TBL - Model for |
$113,000 |
$303,000 |
$190,000 |
Grants |
13586. 0708 CAP Wharf Road Boat Ramp |
$ - |
$300,000 |
$300,000 |
Grants |
13727. Cap 08/09 Lotus to MS |
$ - |
$297,000 |
$297,000 |
Street Furniture Reserve |
13536. 08/09 |
$250,000 |
$278,965 |
$28,965 |
Open Space, S94 and loans t/f from Road Repair
Project |
13307. |
$ - |
$229,833 |
$229,833 |
Open Space, S94 and loans t/f from Road Repair
Project |
12477. CAP - 2006/07 Epping TMAP |
$ - |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
Epping T Map Reserve |
13719. 08/09 - |
$ - |
$120,000 |
$120,000 |
Grants |
12865. OP - 2006/07 Estuary Mngt Plan |
$10,000 |
$120,000 |
$110,000 |
Grants/Sub Infrast Special Rate |
13733. |
$ - |
$90,000 |
$90,000 |
Grants |
11996. OP - SMART Transport to |
$30,178 |
$85,123 |
$54,945 |
Grants |
12577. CAP - 2006/07 City Ctre Transp
Plan |
$11,000 |
$60,000 |
$49,000 |
S94 |
13360. CAP |
$ - |
$16,827 |
$16,827 |
Grants |
12567. CAP - 2006/07 Lord Mayor Art |
$ - |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
Revenue |
13834 –OP –Councillor Support Project |
$ - |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
Revenue |
Total |
|
|
$3,091,223 |
|
Financial Performance Summary - Services and
Projects forecast result against Management Plan Budget 2008/09
13. As part of the 2008/09 Management Plan, Council adopted a
Services Budget, which excludes depreciation, which resulted in a surplus of
$9.46M. This amount was allocated to funding Projects in a total Projects
budget of $30.47M.
14. As noted earlier in this report, Council re-voted an additional
$10.275M of 2007/08 Projects into 2008/09. These Projects were incomplete in
2007/08 and the revenue which was to fund the works was set aside in reserves.
The re-votes took the total Projects budget to $40.7M made up of operating
projects $4.3M and capital projects $36.4M.
Following the September Review total forecast Project expenditure is
$43.0M.
15. The
Services and Projects Financial Summary is shown at pages 14 to 15 of the Quarterly Review September 2008. Unlike
the Operating Statement, this Summary is more focused on funding sources.
Revenue received that is restricted to a specific purpose, (such as Special
Rates and capital grants and contributions) and which is not matched by
expenditure, is transferred to reserves until expended. (For information
purposes the total of restricted revenues is appended to the Financial
Summary.)
16. Following
this quarterly review the forecast year end revenue funds available for
projects has moved from the adopted
Budget of $9.47M to $7.6M a reduction of $1.87M. New Project proposals
requiring revenue funding of $0.09M have been put forward.
17. This movement is due to the same factors that influence the
operating result and are described earlier in this report. As a result of the
reduction in revenue funds available for projects it became necessary to review
funding of existing and proposed projects.
18. Changes to Section 94 enabled the Parramatta Pool project to
increase the funding from Section 94, releasing Street Furniture Reserve
funding of $3.462M. The released funds are proposed to be used to replace
revenue funding of 1.344M on the Road Repair and Maintenance project and to
fund IT projects totalling $0.631M which relates to high
priority IT projects. The Councils-On-Line upgrade has been delayed while we
assess
19. The remaining balance of
the Street Furniture Reserve (which came from a lump sum payment from the
Adshel contract) is proposed to be transferred to the IT reserve to
cover anticipated expenditure on computer replacements over this financial
year. Full details on this item will be
presented in the December quarter for councils’ consideration.
20. Council has complete discretion over the
expenditure of this Reserve. The use of the Street Furniture Reserve for this
purpose amends a council resolution made on
- seeding the development of an aquatic/leisure centre;
- undertaking substantial refurbishment and upgrading of the
- property acquisition associated with the redevelopment of
Responsible
Accounting Officer’s Statement
21. Following
a review of the attached Quarterly Review
September 2009, it is considered that the financial position of the Council
is satisfactory, though challenging.
Jenny Fett
Manager Finance
– Responsible Accounting Officer
September 2008 Quarterly Review of the Management Plan and Budget
(Copies distributed to Councillors and Senior Staff Only) |
|
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 14.4 |
CITY LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM NUMBER 14.4
SUBJECT Status
Report of Implementation of ICAC Recommendations
REFERENCE F2007/01985 - D01070624
REPORT OF Manager Service Audit and Review
PURPOSE: To provide Council
with an updated response to the recommendations of the Independent Commission
Against Corruption (ICAC) report into corrupt conduct associated with the
regulation of brothels in |
(a) That Council receive and note
this report. (b) Further, that Council refer this
report together with the schedule at Attachment
1 to the ICAC for information. |
BACKGROUND
1. The ICAC commenced an investigation
into the activities of the Compliance Section of the Development Services Unit
in November 2006. In August 2007 the ICAC published a report of their
investigation finding that the former Team Leader Compliance Services acted
corruptly in accepting cash and sexual favours in exchange for failing to
undertake inspections and for providing prior warning of inspections.
2. In August 2007 Council provided
the ICAC with a status report relating to the thirteen recommendations
contained in the ICAC report. A detailed report of improvements arising out of
the ICAC report was provided to Council on
3. In May 2008 two reports were
provided to Council covering the ICAC Investigation into the Compliance Section
(Attachment 2) and the Regulation
and Enforcement of Brothels and Massage Parlours (Attachment 3). At its meeting of
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
4. In a report to Council of
5. The re-structure of the Outcomes
and Development Group approved by Council in July 2008 has resulted in the
Compliance Services Team moving from the Development Services Unit to the
Regulatory Services Unit. A number of changes to procedures have been
implemented, and further development is required as vacant positions are
substantially filled. The updated report to the ICAC reflects a number of these
changes.
6. Council’s implementation plan
relating to the ICAC recommendations was provided to the ICAC in December 2007.
The implementation plan is posted on the ICAC website. Council is required to
provide the ICAC with updates on progress of the implementation plan on an
annual basis in 2008 and 2009.
7. Following a meeting with ICAC
officers in August 2008, the Manager Service Audit & Review secured an
extension to the reporting deadline to enable this report to be provided to the
newly elected Council. In a letter from
the ICAC dated September 2008, the Commission requested a 12 month
implementation progress report be provided by
8. The current status of
implementation of the ICAC recommendations is provided in the pro-forma schedule
at Attachment 1.
Michael Quirk
Manager – Service, Audit
and Review
1View |
12 Month Implementation Progress Report |
8 Pages |
|
2View |
Status Report of Implementation of ICAC Recommendations (D00917795) |
3 Pages |
|
3View |
Regulation & Enforcement of Brothels and massage Parlours
(D00935148) |
5 Pages |
|
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 14.5 |
CITY LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM NUMBER 14.5
SUBJECT Tender
No 29/2008 Westpool/UIP Service Providers Broking and Claims Management
REFERENCE F2004/06882 - D01072369
REPORT OF Service Manager Commercial and Risk
PURPOSE: It is intended that Westpool
and Metro Pool will undertake a tender on member Councils behalf for the
provision of Broking and Claims Management Services. In accordance with the
Local Government Act 1993 and Local Government (General) Regulations 2005.
Council must resolve to permit this to be done on their behalf. Westpool and
Metro Pool will then submit the results and a recommendation back to the
member Council for approval. |
(a) That the Council resolve that
Westpool be delegated authority to undertake a review of our insurance broker
and claims management team on council’s behalf. (b) That the results and recommended
tenderers be submitted back to Council for approval. |
BACKGROUND
1. Westpool and Metro Pool
undertook a review of the brokers and claims management team in 2004. Previously, AON provided all services,
however after analysis of the tender, Willis was appointed as the brokers and
Claims Management Australasia was appointed as the claim management team.
2. The broker is responsible
for assisting the Pool in its negotiation of all insurance with exception of
Workers’ Compensation. The current
broker operates on a fee structure with no commissions to be paid.
3. Our claims management team
are responsible for assisting risk managers in the management of medium to
large claims. They work with the lawyers
and, if required, provide independent advice.
They also liaise with our insurance claims team located in
4. Both contracts were for an
initial term of three years with a two-year extension. In April 2007 the Joint Pools decided to
extend the contract due to good performance until April 2009 and as that date
is fast approaching, the Pools are seeking members’ delegated authority to
undertake the tender process on their behalf.
5. The tender is required in
accordance with the Local Government Act as the fees for both services exceed
the limit of $150,000. We have discussed
the issue of tendering with the Department of Local Government and they advise
that until such time as the Act is amended, Local Government mutuals are required
to submit results of tenders back to the council for approval.
6. It is intended that
Westpool and Metro Pool will undertake the tender on members’ behalf and then
submit results and a recommendation back to the members for approval.
7. Before we commence this
process we require delegated authority to undertake the tender process on
council’s behalf.
ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES
8. Westpool must obtain each
member Councils approval prior to commencing a formal tender process on behalf
of all member Councils. As the current contracts are approaching expiry it is
necessary to receive approval from each Council to commence this process.
CONSULTATION & TIMING
9. All
member Councils are consulted via their respective representatives that attend
Westpool Risk Management Committee and Westpool Board meetings.
Michael Maclean
Service Manager Commercial and Risk
There are no
attachments for this report.
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Item 14.6 |
CITY LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM NUMBER 14.6
SUBJECT Affirmation
and Review of Civic Office Expenses and Facilities Policy
REFERENCE F2005/02435 - D01070627
REPORT OF Policy Review Officer
LATE REPORT
Please Note: This report will
be distributed to Councillors and Senior Staff next week
Ordinary
Council |
|
|
|
Notices of Motion
15.1 Congratulations to Councillor Prabir Maitra
PLEASE NOTE: This
matter was considered at the Council Meeting on
15.2 Traffic Congestion in Epping
15.3 Annual Christmas Lights Decorations
Competition beginning 2009
15.4 Protecting the Privacy of Individuals
Submitting Objections to Development Applications
15.5 Internal Council Ombudsman
15.6 Delegations from Council
15.7 Whistleblower Protection Policy
Item 15.1 |
NOTICE OF MOTION
ITEM NUMBER 15.1
SUBJECT Congratulations
to Councillor Prabir Maitra
REFERENCE F2008/04117 - D01052041
FROM Councillor G J Elmore
To be Moved by Councillor G J Elmore:- “That
Council congratulate Councillor Prabir Maitra as the first |
Item 15.2 |
NOTICE OF MOTION
ITEM NUMBER 15.2
SUBJECT Traffic
Congestion in Epping
REFERENCE F2004/07422 - D01070246
FROM Councillor A A Wilson
To be Moved by Councillor A A Wilson:- “That Parramatta City Council
form a Lobbying Committee with Hornsby Shire Council together with the State
and Federal Members to resolve the traffic congestion along |
Item 15.3 |
NOTICE OF MOTION
ITEM NUMBER 15.3
SUBJECT Annual
Christmas Lights Decorations Competition beginning 2009
REFERENCE F2004/09855 - D01073007
FROM Councillor C X Lim
To be Moved by Councillor C X Lim:- |
Item 15.4 |
NOTICE OF MOTION
ITEM NUMBER 15.4
SUBJECT Protecting
the Privacy of Individuals Submitting Objections to Development Applications
REFERENCE F2005/02497 - D01073010
FROM Councillor C X Lim
To be Moved by Councillor C X Lim:- |
.
Item 15.5 |
NOTICE OF MOTION
ITEM NUMBER 15.5
SUBJECT Internal
Council Ombudsman
REFERENCE F2004/07397 - D01073559
FROM Councillor A Bide
To be Moved by Councillor A Bide:- |
.
Item 15.6 |
NOTICE OF MOTION
ITEM NUMBER 15.6
SUBJECT Delegations
from Council
REFERENCE F2004/07400 - D01073593
FROM Councillor A Bide
To be Moved by Councillor A Bide:- |
Item 15.7 |
NOTICE OF MOTION
ITEM NUMBER 15.7
SUBJECT Whistleblower
Protection Policy
REFERENCE F2004/07397 - D01073623
FROM Councillor A Bide
To be Moved by Councillor A Bide:- |