NOTICE OF Council MEETING

PUBLIC AGENDA

 

An Ordinary Meeting of City of Parramatta Council will be held in the Cloister Function Rooms, St Patrick's Cathedral, 1 Marist Place, Parramatta on Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 6.30pm.

 

 

 

 

Brett Newman

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Council                                                                             9 June 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


COUNCIL CHAMBERS

 

 

Governance Manager

 

Lord Mayor

Clr Bob Dwyer

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

Minute Clerk

 

Minute Clerk

 

 

 

Clr Phil Bradley

 

 

 

Clr Lorraine Wearne

 

 

 

 

 

Sound

 

Clr Sameer Pandey

 

 

 

Clr Andrew Wilson

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clr Bill Tyrrell

 

 

 

Clr Dr

Patricia Prociv

 

 

 

Clr Andrew Jefferies

 

 

 

 

IT

 

Clr Pierre Esber

 

 

 

Clr Benjamin Barrak

 

 

Clr Donna Davis

 

 

 

Clr Martin Zaiter

 

 

 

Clr Michelle Garrard, Deputy Lord Mayor

 

 

Clr Steven Issa

 

 

 

Executive Director City Engagement & Experience

 

Executive Director Community Services

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

Executive Director City Assets & Operations

Executive Director Corporate Services

Director Property Development Group

 

 

    

    Press                  Press

 

 

 

 

                                                                    Public Gallery

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ITEM                                                SUBJECT        PAGE NO

 

1      OPENING MEETING

2      ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS

3      WEBCASTING ANNOUNCEMENT

4      OTHER RECORDING OF MEETING ANOUNCEMENT

5      CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

Council - 11 May 2020....................................... 8

Extraordinary Council – 9 June 2020…………………………………….............36

6      APOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE

7      DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

8      MATTERS OF URGENCY (if any)

9      Minutes of the Lord Mayor

10    Public Forum

11    Petitions

12    Rescission Motions

13    Fair

13.1          FOR NOTATION: Investment Report for April 2020................................... 42

13.2          FOR APPROVAL: Quarterly Budget Review - March 2020....................... 77

13.3          FOR APPROVAL: Vacancy in Civic Office............................................. 130

14    Accessible

14.1          FOR NOTATION: Variations to Standards under Clause 4.6 of Parramatta LEP 2011, Auburn LEP 2010, Holroyd LEP 2013, The Hills LEP 2012, Hornsby LEP 2013 and SEPP 1                                                       136

15    Green

16    Welcoming

17    Thriving

17.1          FOR APPROVAL: Submission on Draft Liquor Amendment (24-hour Economy) Bill 2020......................................... 140

18    Innovative

18.1          FOR APPROVAL: Submission on the Infrastructure Contributions Review 154

18.2          FOR APPROVAL: Gateway Request: Planning Proposal at 8-14 Great Western Highway, Parramatta........ 185

18.3          FOR APPROVAL: Gateway Request: Planning Proposal for land at 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta............ 279

18.4          FOR APPROVAL: Amendment to the East Epping Planning Proposal and draft amendments to the Hornsby DCP 2013.............................................. 403

18.5          FOR APPROVAL: Post-exhibition: Planning Proposal, draft Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement at 23-27 Harold Street, Parramatta (Deferred Item)............. 428

18.6          FOR APPROVAL: Post-exhibition: Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement at 55 Aird Street, Parramatta..................................... 441

18.7          FOR APPROVAL: COVID-19 Update                                                       519 

19    Notices of Motion

19.1          NOTICE OF MOTION: Agreed NSW Parliament Legislative Council Motion of 13 May 2020 - Powerhouse Museum Production of Documents Order...... 530

19.2          NOTICE OF MOTION: Granville Town Square........................................... 532

19.3          NOTICE OF MOTION: Wisteria Gardens transfer from NSW Health to Parramatta Park Trust.................... 533

19.4          NOTICE OF MOTION: Traffic Study Granville........................................ 542  

20    QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

21    Closed Session

21.1          FOR NOTATION: Legal Status Report as at 20 May 2020

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (g) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

21.2          FOR APPROVAL: Tender 02/2019 Service Desk Managed Service for Procurement of ICT Hardware (Deferred Item)

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

21.3          FOR APPROVAL: Tender 15/2019 Receipt and Processing of Clean-up Material

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

21.4          FOR APPROVAL: Extension of Mixed Solid Waste Processing and Disposal Contract

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

21.5          FOR APPROVAL: Proposed New Lease for Carlingford Bowling Club

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

21.6          FOR APPROVAL: Proposed Purchase of 6 Valentine Avenue, Parramatta

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

21.7          FOR APPROVAL: City of Parramatta Festival Proposal

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret (To ensure that Council can capitalise on the media opportunity through the media announcement of  the new festival at a future date to be determined by Council.).

 

22    PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF RESOLUTIONS PASSED IN CLOSED SESSION

23    CONCLUSION OF MEETING


MINUTES OF THE Meeting of City of Parramatta Council HELD REMOTELY VIA AUDIO-VISUAL LINK ON Monday, 11 May 2020 AT 6.30pm

 

These are draft minutes and are subject to confirmation by Council at its next meeting. The confirmed minutes will replace this draft version on the website once confirmed.

 

PRESENT

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors Benjamin Barrak, Phil Bradley, Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Michelle Garrard (Deputy Lord Mayor), Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies, Sameer Pandey, Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill Tyrrell, Andrew Wilson, Lorraine Wearne and Martin Zaiter.

 

1.     OPENING MEETING

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, opened the meeting at 6.37pm.

 

2.     ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, acknowledged the Burramattagal people of The Darug Nation as the traditional custodians of this land, and paid respect to their ancient culture and their elders past and present.

 

3.     WEBCASTING ANNOUNCEMENT

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, advised that this public meeting is being recorded and streamed live on the internet. The recording will also be archived and made available on Council’s website.

 

4.     OTHER RECORDING OF MEETING ANOUNCEMENT

 

The Lord Mayor advised members of the public that the meeting was being held remotely and if persons watching the meeting live were to encounter technical difficulties to leave and re-enter the meeting via Council’s website.

 

5.     CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

 

 

SUBJECT:        Minutes of the Council Meeting held on 14 April 2020

 

2714

RESOLVED      (Esber/Tyrrell)

 

That the minutes be taken as read and be accepted as a true record of the Meeting.

 

6.     APOLOGIES/REQUESTS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE

 

There were no apologies or requests for leave of absence made at this meeting.

 

7.     DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

Councillor Barrak declared a non-pecuniary but significant interest in Item 18.8 being Post Exhibition - Draft Development Control Plan and Matters Pertaining to Planning Agreement - 14-20 Parkes Street, Harris Park as a company he is a Director of owns property on Wigram Street. He retired from the meeting prior to debate and voting on the matter.

 

8.     MATTERS OF URGENCY (if any)

 

There were no matters of urgency raised at this meeting.

 

9.     Minutes of the Lord Mayor

 

9.1

SUBJECT         Resignation of Councillor Paul Han

 

REFERENCE   F2019/03630 - D07409822

 

REPORT OF    Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer

 

2715

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Barrak)

 

That Council formally acknowledge the resignation of Councillor Paul Han, effective from 30 April 2020, and thank him for his service.

 

9.2

SUBJECT         National Sorry Day and National Reconciliation Week 2020

 

REFERENCE   F2019/03630 - D07409859

 

REPORT OF    Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer

 

2716

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Bradley)

 

(a)    That Council note that National Sorry Day is on 26 May, held each year to recognise and commemorate members of the Stolen Generations, and recognise its significance to the first nation and people of Australia.

 

(b)    Further, that Council recognise that National Reconciliation Week 2020 is from 27 May to 3 June 2020, with this year’s theme of ‘In this together’ signifying that the journey of Reconciliation is one for all Australians.

 

10.   Public Forum

 

10.1

SUBJECT         PUBLIC FORUM: Item 18.2 - Proposed Amendment to the Homebush Bay West DCP 2013 and Planning Agreement for Block H

 

REFERENCE   RZ/27/2016 – D07407434

 

 

FROM              Rick Graf

 

Dear Lord Mayor and Councillors, the Billbergia team wish to address you in relation to Item 18.2 - Proposed Amendment to the Homebush Bay West DCP 2013 and Planning Agreement for Block H, for public exhibition.

 

Our focus is on three things:

·            the Design Excellence process,

·            the public benefits to be delivered via the Voluntary Planning Agreement, and

·            the substantial transport improvements that support the final stage of Billbergia’s Award-winning Wentworth Point town centre development.

 

The detailed VPA for consideration tonight, has been scrutinized by Council’s Land Use Team, to ensure the full value and benefit of the offer is focussed on community needs in Wentworth Point. It includes:

-       Hill Road/Bennelong Parkway, major intersection upgrade and traffic lights. This work is vital, the intersection is dangerous, and the most talked about concern in the Wentworth Point community.

-       Open space. The winning Design Excellence competition scheme, increases the public park from 1.6Ha, TO OVER 2.5Ha of open space and will provide the key activities and embellishment for the community.

 

Other essential social infrastructure elements of the VPA include:

-       Library Funding

-       A Childcare Centre

-       Council Maintenance Fund

-       Baylink Shuttle Buses

-       Waterfront recreation facility.

 

In terms of traffic and transport, we note that Council’s resolution from two years ago restricted application for Scenario two, until commitments from the State Government to Metro West and Parramatta Light Rail (Stage 2), or other transport improvements.

 

The good news is that there have been six (6) major traffic and transport improvements over the past two years that include:

 

1.     Metro West Committed:

The State Government has confirmed the route for Metro West and on 8 April 2020 called tenders for the tunnelling, with the start of construction confirmed by the end of this year.

 

2.     State Transit Buses:

Both the Government’s 526 & 533 routes have been upgraded and provide a 7-day service, with additional high frequency weekday peak commuter service.

 

3.     Billbergia’s Free Shuttle Buses:

Passenger surveys from the early trial of the Baylink Shuttle, reported a 15% mode shift away from private car trips - transforming the peak hour commuter traffic patterns in the area.

 

The fleet has subsequently been upgraded to include 4 full size 12.5m buses and an additional express service added at peak times. Patronage now averages 25,000 trips per week, and has reached more than 2.7 million total passenger trips since the service was introduced.

 

4.     WestConnex Opened:

The opening of WestConnex from Haberfield on 12 July 2019, has revolutionised traffic access and substantially improved travel times to and from Wentworth Point, and includes the Hill Road on ramp.

 

5.     Increased Rail Services on T9 Northern Line at Rhodes

In 2019, Sydney Trains increased to 8 trains per hour at peak times and upgraded to all 8-car trains.  This has resulted in a 60% capacity increase in peak services through Rhodes for Wentworth Point customers using bus connections across Bennelong Bridge.

 

6.     Traffic Intersection Improvements

Billbergia’s long proposed reconfiguration of the Hill Road & Bennelong Parkway intersection with traffic lights, will greatly improve safety, access and traffic flows to Wentworth Point.

 

Priority Projects for NSW Covid Response

 

At a broader level the NSW Treasurer, has issued criteria to identify ‘shovel ready’ projects for prioritisation through the assessment process of the planning system:

·            jobs–do projects create jobs?

·            timing–can the assessment and determination of the project be completed quickly, and can the project commence (for Das) or proceed to DA (for planning proposals) within 6 months?

·            public benefits–can the project deliver, or be a stimulus for the delivery of, public benefit?

 

In summary, Billbergia has worked closely with the community for over 12 years at Wentworth Point and delivered vital community infrastructure. The $70m offer represents almost double the value of VPA share for the floor space in the proposal, and delivers great value for the Council and the Community alike. 

 

As public transport is now satisfactorily improved by the measures outlined above, we strongly recommend that Council move forward with public exhibition of Scenario 2 to secure the full $70M value of VPA, and remove the staging caveat in the DCP amendment to realise the FULL benefit for the entire Wentworth Point community.

 

STAFF RESPONSE

 

The submission is noted. The subject report is not seeking Council to choose a scenario in the draft DCP, but rather to place on public exhibition controls that requires certain transport infrastructure prior to achieving 85,000sqm of residential GFA (described as scenario 2). Should this transport infrastructure not be delivered only 54,356sqm of residential GFA (scenario 1) would progress. It is imperative that Council consult with Transport for New South Wales to confirm that the Parramatta Light Rail Stage 2 and Metro West are required and the nature of the trigger, and/or whatever alternative arrangements would need to be provided to accommodate the increase in density from scenario 1 to scenario 2.

 

11.   Petitions

 

There were no petitions tabled at this meeting.

 

12.   Rescission Motions

 

Nil

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

2717

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

That Items 13.1, 14.1, 14.2, 14.5, 18.1 and 19.1 be resolved en bloc and the recommendations be adopted.

 

13.   Fair

 

13.1

SUBJECT         FOR NOTATION: Investment Report for March 2020

 

REFERENCE   F2009/00971 - D07361823

 

REPORT OF    Tax and Treasury Accountant

 

2718

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

That Council note the Investment Report for March 2020.

 

13.2

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Response to Notice of Motion - Use of Sporting Fields in the Local Government Area

 

REFERENCE   F2004/07337 - D07322482

 

REPORT OF    Recreation Facilities & Programs Manager

 

 

MOTION          (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

(a)    That Council work with authorised, organised users of Doyle Ground and other similar sportsgrounds in the Local Government Area (LGA), through the seasonal hirers’ workshop and other regular communication channels to encourage the reporting of unauthorised, organised use of Council parks.

 

(b)    That Council undertake proactive patrols at Doyle Ground and other similar sportsgrounds which are subject to unauthorised, organised use for an extended period of time, until there is a significant increase in the levels of compliance and reduction in the unlawful use of Council’s parks.

 

(c)    Further, that Council undertake a review of signage in Council’s parks to ensure any regulatory action is enforceable under the Local Government Act 1993.

 

AMENDMENT (Esber/Wilson)

 

That this matter be deferred for one month for consideration at a Councillor Workshop.

 

The amendment moved by Councillor Esber and seconded by Councillor Wilson on being put was declared CARRIED.

 

The amendment then became the motion.

 

The motion moved by Councillor Esber and seconded by Councillor Wilson on being put was declared CARRIED.

 

2719

RESOLVED      (Esber/Wilson)

 

That this matter be deferred for one month for consideration at a Councillor Workshop.

 

13.3

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Response to Notice of Motion - Cost of Printing Council Business Papers

 

REFERENCE   F2019/04433 - D07354656

 

REPORT OF    Governance Manager

 

 

MOTION          (Prociv/Wearne)

 

That no further action be taken.

 

AMENDMENT  (Issa/Jeffries)

 

That there be no hard copy business papers.

 

The amendment moved by Councillor Issa and seconded by Councillor Jeffries on being put was declared LOST.

 

The motion moved by Councillor Prociv and seconded by Councillor Wearne was on being put was declared CARRIED.

 

2720

RESOLVED      (Prociv/Wearne)

 

That no further action be taken.

 

14.   Accessible

 

14.1

SUBJECT         FOR NOTATION: Variations to Standards under Clause 4.6 of Parramatta LEP 2011, Auburn LEP 2010, Holroyd LEP 2013, The Hills LEP 2012, Hornsby LEP 2013 and SEPP 1

 

REFERENCE   F2009/00431 - D07250465

 

REPORT OF    Group Manager - Development and Traffic Services

 

2721

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

That the report be received and noted.

 

14.2

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Minutes of the Parramatta Traffic Committee Meeting held on 26 March 2020

 

REFERENCE   F2020/00082 - D07249545

 

REPORT OF    Traffic and Transport Manager

 

2722

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

(a)    That Council note the minutes of the Parramatta Traffic Committee meeting held on 26 March 2020, as provided at Attachment 1.

 

(b)    Further, that Council approve the recommendations of the Parramatta Traffic Committee meeting held on 26 March 2020 provided at Attachment 1 and in this report, noting the following financial implications for each item.

 

i.      ITEM 2003 A1 – INTERSECTION OF BETTINGTON ROAD AND YORK STREET, OATLANDS – PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT

 

        The draft cost estimate for the proposed roundabout in Bettington Road at York Street, Oatlands is $323,000 to be funded 100% by Council as outlined in the report.

 

ii.      ITEM 2003 A2 – THREE BRIDGES RUN 2020 ALONG PARRAMATTA VALLEY CYCLEWAY

 

        There is no financial implication to Council as the proposed traffic management is to be implemented by the organiser of the Three Bridges Run 2020.

 

iii.     ITEM 2003 A3 – WIGRAM STREET, HARRIS PARK - SYDNEY CURRY FAIR STREET FESTIVAL ON SATURDAY 18 JULY 2020

 

      The proposed Event is to be delivered by Little India Harris Park Business Association. The Event Organiser has lodged an application to Council for a Community Event Grant of $10,000.  The outcome of the application is not yet determined.

 

 

14.3

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Minutes of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group Meeting held on 26 March 2020

 

REFERENCE   F2020/00077 - D07249552

 

REPORT OF    Traffic and Transport Manager

 

2723

RESOLVED      (Esber/Tyrrell)

 

(a)    That Council note the minutes of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group meeting held on 26 March 2020, provided at Attachment 1.

 

(b)    That Council approve the recommendations of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group meeting held on 26 March 2020 provided at Attachment 1 and in this report, noting the following financial implications for each item.

 

i.      ITEM 2003 B2 – REVIEW OF RESIDENT PARKING SCHEME AREA BOUNDARY PARRAMATTA (AREA 14)

 

        The proposal to remove 76-80 Pemberton Street or 127 Pennant Street, Parramatta from the Resident Parking Scheme for the purpose of issuing new permits would not involve any changes to parking restrictions.  Accordingly, this matter has no direct financial impact upon Council's budget.

 

ii.      ITEM 2003 B3 - PROJECT LISTS INCLUDING AN UPDATE ON PROJECTS FOR 2019/20

 

        There is no financial implication to Council as a result of this recommendation.

 

iii.     ITEM 2003 B4 – OUTSTANDING WORKS INSTRUCTIONS

 

        RMS Block Grant funds for 2019/20 have been used for these works.

 

(c)    Further, that Item 2003 B1 – Request for Nine Car Share Spaces in Harris Park, Westmead and Epping be deferred for a report back to Council to provide advice on the current commercial market value of car spaces in the Parramatta Local Government Area.

 

14.4

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Proposed changes to the Community Engagement Strategy for the notification of development applications

 

REFERENCE   F2016/03461 - D07342887

 

REPORT OF    Strategic Business Manager

 

2724

RESOLVED      (Pandey/Davis)

 

That this matter be deferred for consideration at a Councillor Workshop.

 

 

14.5

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Epping to Carlingford Cycleway (Deferred Item)

 

REFERENCE   F2017/01529 - D07375707

 

REPORT OF    Senior Project Officer Transport Planning

 

2725

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

(a)    That Council acknowledge the contribution made by the communities of Epping and Carlingford on the project, and note the community consultation documented at Attachment 1.

 

(b)    That Council note the Road Safety Audit and additional commentary by the Road Safety Audit team provided at Attachments 3, 4 and 5.

 

(c)    That Council note the significantly reduced scope of works for the Cycleway from the original proposal provided at Attachment 6.

 

(d)    That Council approve the scope of works as summarised below to be submitted to the Parramatta Traffic Committee for consideration:

a.  Widen the western kerb in Victoria Street south of Bridge Street, Epping, and install a refuge island in Rickard Street at Marsden Road, Carlingford.

b.  Upgrade the existing pedestrian refuge islands at High Street south of Epping Road, at the roundabout Bridge Street / Rawson Street (eastern/southern approach) Epping, and at the roundabout at Willoughby Street / Pennant Parade (southern approach) to allow use by cyclists.

c.  Widen the footpath to a shared use path on the southern side of Bridge Street between High Street and Wyralla Avenue, Epping, and between Pennant Parade and Barellan Avenue, Carlingford.  All efforts shall be undertaken at every stage of the project to ensure there are minimal impacts on existing street trees on, and adjacent to Bridge Street.

d.  Install regulatory signage on the eastern side of Marsden Road between Pennant Hills Road and Rickard Street, Carlingford to enable a shared path.

e.  Install a pedestrian/cyclist refuge island in Midson Road near Wyralla Avenue, Epping.

f.   Re-fresh the existing PS-2 logos on Willoughby Street and install PS-2 logos on Wyralla Avenue, Hermington Street and Barellan Avenue to indicate a cycling route.

g.  Review the existing Evans Road and Pennant Hills Road refuge island to identify potential short-term safety improvements, and advocate for the prioritisation of traffic lights at this intersection as a result of existing and future development in the area.

h.  Identify longer-term walking and cycling improvements to be incorporated into future planning and design of the Carlingford Precinct to improve the connections from the Parramatta Light Rail Active Transport Link to the Epping to Carlingford Cycleway.

i.   Any remaining grant funds for the cycleway to be focussed on improving the connections along Epping Road to Pembroke Street, to connect onwards to the Ryde regional cycleway.

 

(e)    Further, that Council note the project is wholly grant funded, with $2.5M of funding from Transport for NSW, and $1M of funding from the State Government’s Stronger Communities Fund.

 

15.   Green

 

Nil

 

16.   Welcoming

 

Nil

 

17.   Thriving

 

17.1

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Concept Design for Charles Street Square Parramatta

 

REFERENCE   F2019/02851 - D07353040

 

REPORT OF    Team Leader City Transformation

 

2726

RESOLVED      (Esber/Tyrrell)

 

(a)    That Council note the feedback and submissions made during the public exhibition of the draft concept design for Charles Street Square.

 

(b)    Further, that Council approve the concept design, including minor amendments in response to feedback and submissions as shown in Attachment 4 for progression to detailed design, planning and technical approvals, and documentation for tender.

 

18.   Innovative

 

18.1

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Minutes of the Smart City Advisory Committee Meeting held on 27 February 2020

 

REFERENCE   F2017/00685 - D07321680

 

REPORT OF    Senior Strategic PO Future City

 

2727

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

(a)    That Council note the minutes (provided at Attachment 1) of the Smart City Advisory Committee meeting held on 27 February 2020.

 

(b)    That Council officers initiate a Request for Quotation to evaluate online parking applications prior to implementation.

 

(c)    Further, that Council approve the Digital Services Transformation Strategy (provided at Attachment 2) and proceed with its implementation, as a priority, within the limitations of current resources.

 

18.2

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Proposed Amendment to the Homebush Bay West DCP 2013 and Planning Agreement for Block H, 16 Burroway Road and part 5 Footbridge Boulevard, Wentworth Point for public exhibition

 

REFERENCE   RZ/27/2016 - D07123388

 

REPORT OF    Senior Project Officer Land Use Planning

 

2728

RESOLVED      (Issa/Prociv)

 

(a)    That Council endorse draft amendments to the Homebush Bay West Development Control Plan (DCP) 2004 (provided at Attachment 2) that have been prepared in response to Council’s resolution on 28 May 2018 and the Phase 2 Design Excellence Competition for the purposes of public exhibition in order to accommodate a:

i)      Maximum of 54,356m2 of residential GFA and 40 storeys plus architectural articulation storeys under Scenario 1

ii)      Maximum of 85,000m2 of residential GFA and 50 storeys plus architectural articulation storeys under Scenario 2.

 

(b)    That Council endorse the drafting of a Planning Agreement to reflect the following items identified in Table 4 including associated drafting commentary provided in Attachment 1, with the exception of the proposed Water Recreation Facility:

 

i)      Bennelong Parkway/Hill Road intersection upgrade works,

ii)      Community Centre and Library Fit-Out reimbursement,

iii)     Childcare Centre (75 place) and public pavilion,

iv)     Embellishment of additional open space,

v)     Shuttle bus service,

vi)     Water Recreation Facility or Indoor Multi-purpose courts (refer to recommendation (c) below), and

vii)    Community Infrastructure Maintenance and Operational Fund

 

(c)    That during the public exhibition, Council seeks community feedback on the following alternative options for inclusion in the Planning Agreement in accordance with the parameters provided in Attachment 1:

i)      Indoor multi-purpose courts; or

ii)      A water recreation facility; or

iii)     Any other recreation facility.

 

(d)    That the draft DCP and Planning Agreement be placed on public exhibition concurrently for a period of 28 days and that a report be provided to Council on the outcomes of the public exhibition.

 

(e)    That Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and determine the specific terms around the delivery of the proposed Planning Agreement items in accordance with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy (2018) and as detailed in Attachment 1 including but not limited to staging, delivery, security and indexing prior to the Planning Agreement being placed on public exhibition.

 

(f)     Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to correct any anomalies of a minor or non-policy nature that may arise during the preparation of the Planning Agreement or the draft DCP.

 

DIVISION         A division was called, the result being:-

 

AYES:              Councillors Bradley, Davis, Dwyer, Esber, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell, Wearne, Wilson and Zaiter

 

NOES:              Councillor Barrak

 

18.3

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Matters relating to Planning Proposal and draft Planning Agreement - 295 Church Street, Parramatta

 

REFERENCE   RZ/14/2014 - D07251589

 

REPORT OF    Acting Team Leader Land Use Planning

 

2729

RESOLVED      (Esber/Tyrrell)

 

(a)    That Council note:

i.      the correspondence from the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) and the Applicant attached to this report;

ii.      that the Planning Proposal does not contain a boarding house proposal; and

iii.     that the forthcoming public exhibition of planning policies related to affordable rental housing indicated by the Minister will present an opportunity for Council to make a formal submission on this matter.

 

(b)    That Council endorse the Planning Proposal for finalisation, noting that the Proposal seeks to:

i.      Increase the height of buildings from 12 metres to part 12 metres for the front of the site and part 150 metres for the remainder of the site (plus design excellence bonus); and

ii.      Increase the maximum floor space ratio from 3:1 to 10:1 (plus design excellence bonus).

 

(c)    That Council approve the amendments to the draft Planning Agreement which require the payment of 75% of the payment before the issue of the first Construction Certificate and 25% of the payment before the issue of an Occupation Certificate (or registration of a strata plan, whichever is earlier) and note that these amendments are consistent with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy.

 

(d)    That Council:

i.      endorse the concurrent public exhibition of the amended draft Planning Agreement and draft Development Control Plan (DCP) (the latter of which was endorsed by Council on 12 December 2019); and

ii.      note that the outcomes of the exhibition of these two documents will be reported to Council.

 

(e)    That Council forward the Planning Proposal to the DPIE to prepare for finalisation, but request that the final notification on the relevant Government website only be undertaken once:

i.      Council confirms that the Planning Agreement has been signed and entered into; and

ii.      The site-specific DCP has been publicly exhibited and endorsed by Council.

 

(f)     Further, that Council officers prepare a submission on the forthcoming exhibition of planning policies relating to affordable housing foreshadowed by the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces. This submission should:

i.      be informed by an analysis of the potential infrastructure impacts of these provisions which is based on monitoring development proposals that respond to the provisions of the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal and the State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 bonus provisions for boarding houses, and

 

ii.      subject to the analysis confirming the infrastructure impacts, it should make a request that the bonus provisions for boarding house proposals in State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 not be applied in the Parramatta CBD.

 

DIVISION         A division was called, the result being:-

 

AYES:              Councillors Dwyer, Esber, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Tyrrell, Wearne and Zaiter

 

NOES:              Councillors Barrak, Bradley, Davis, Prociv and Wilson

 

18.4

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Draft Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement for land at 235 - 237 Marsden Road, Carlingford

 

REFERENCE   RZ/25/2016 - D07322428

 

REPORT OF    Project Officer Land Use

 

2730

RESOLVED      (Wearne/Davis)

 

That Council defer this matter for staff to investigate including provisions within the site specific DCP, relative to the nature and form of the height of the buildings and with a method of achieving the heights whilst building development that is compatible with the low density development of the surrounding area.

 

DIVISION         A division was called, the result being:-

 

AYES:              Councillors Bradley, Davis, Esber, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell, Wearne, Wilson and Zaiter

 

NOES:              Councillors Barrak and Dwyer

 

18.5

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Planning Proposal and draft Development Control Plan for land at 197 and 207 Church Street and 89 Marsden Street, Parramatta

 

REFERENCE   RZ/4/2015 - D07358670

 

REPORT OF    Project Officer Land Use

 

 

MOTION          (Esber/Zaiter)

 

(a)    That Council endorse the Planning Proposal for 197 and 207 Church Street and 89 Marsden Street, Parramatta for the purposes of public exhibition (included as Attachment 1), subject to the following amendments:

·            Apply an FSR of 10:1

·            Apply a height of part 105m part 12m;

·            Include provisions that require a minimum 1:1 commercial floor space be provided in any redevelopment and allow for unlimited commercial floor space to be provided;

·            apply the full range of car parking rates specified in the current draft Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal; and

·            ensure it reflects the amendments requested by the Gateway Determination conditions excluding those described in (b) below.

 

(b)    That Council request that amendments be made to the Gateway Determination to ensure that:

·            The requirement to consult with relevant aeronautical agencies prior to exhibition is no longer required;

·            It is clear that the clause implementing the solar access protections requested in the Gateway conditions has already been implemented via a separate Planning Proposal. No further amendments are proposed to be made to the solar access clause notwithstanding some changes may be required to the height of buildings map; and

·            The requirement for a satisfactory arrangements clause seeking contributions to fund state provided public infrastructure be removed.

 

(c)    That Council endorse the draft Development Control Plan (DCP) at Attachment 2 for public exhibition, subject to amendments contained in Attachment 5 of this report and inclusion of an additional DCP control requiring that any residential tower fronting Marsden Street on this site must be setback 6m from the Marsden Street boundary tower setback.

 

(d)    That delegated authority be given to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to negotiate and endorse for exhibition a draft Planning Agreement that takes into consideration the Applicant’s letter of offer (Attachment 6) and the following negotiating position:

·            consistent with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy and draft framework relating to Community Infrastructure in the Parramatta CBD;

·            require any contribution payable to be based on the Community Infrastructure policy in place at the time the contribution is paid rather than the current rate;

·            secure a 2m right of public access over the 2m ground floor setback along Marsden Street.

 

(e)    That Council grant delegated authority to the CEO to correct any minor anomalies to the Planning Proposal and draft DCP that may arise during the amendment process.

 

(f)     That Council no longer require an international design competition to be run for the subject site.

 

(g)    Further, that the Planning Proposal, draft DCP and draft Planning Agreement be publicly exhibited concurrently and the outcome of the public exhibition be reported back to Council.

 

AMENDMENT  (Bradley)

 

(a)    That Council endorse the Planning Proposal for 197 and 207 Church Street and 89 Marsden Street, Parramatta for the purposes of public exhibition (included as Attachment 1), subject to the following amendments:

·            Apply an FSR of 10:1

·            Apply a height of part 105m part 12m;

·            Include provisions that require a minimum 1:1 commercial floor space be provided in any redevelopment and allow for unlimited commercial floor space to be provided;

·            apply the full range of car parking rates specified in the current draft Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal; and

·            ensure it reflects the amendments requested by the Gateway Determination conditions excluding those described in (b) below.

 

(b)    That Council request that amendments be made to the Gateway Determination to ensure that:

·            The requirement to consult with relevant aeronautical agencies prior to exhibition is no longer required;

·            It is clear that the clause implementing the solar access protections requested in the Gateway conditions has already been implemented via a separate Planning Proposal. No further amendments are proposed to be made to the solar access clause notwithstanding some changes may be required to the height of buildings map.

 

(c)    That Council endorse the draft Development Control Plan (DCP) at Attachment 2 for public exhibition, subject to amendments contained in Attachment 5 of this report.

 

(d)    That delegated authority be given to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to negotiate and endorse for exhibition a draft Planning Agreement that takes into consideration the Applicant’s letter of offer (Attachment 6) and the following negotiating position:

·            consistent with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy and draft framework relating to Community Infrastructure in the Parramatta CBD;

·            require any contribution payable to be based on the Community Infrastructure policy in place at the time the contribution is paid rather than the current rate;

·            secure a 2m right of public access over the 2m ground floor setback along Marsden Street.

 

(e)    That Council grant delegated authority to the CEO to correct any minor anomalies to the Planning Proposal and draft DCP that may arise during the amendment process.

 

(f)     That Council no longer require an international design competition to be run for the subject site.

 

(g)    Further, that the Planning Proposal, draft DCP and draft Planning Agreement be publicly exhibited concurrently and the outcome of the public exhibition be reported back to Council.

 

The amendment moved by Councillor Bradley lapsed without a seconder.

 

The motion moved by Council Esber and seconded by Councillor Zaiter on being put was declared CARRIED.

 

2731

RESOLVED      (Esber/Zaiter)

 

(a)    That Council endorse the Planning Proposal for 197 and 207 Church Street and 89 Marsden Street, Parramatta for the purposes of public exhibition (included as Attachment 1), subject to the following amendments:

·            Apply an FSR of 10:1

·            Apply a height of part 105m part 12m;

·            Include provisions that require a minimum 1:1 commercial floor space be provided in any redevelopment and allow for unlimited commercial floor space to be provided;

·            apply the full range of car parking rates specified in the current draft Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal; and

·            ensure it reflects the amendments requested by the Gateway Determination conditions excluding those described in (b) below.

 

(b)    That Council request that amendments be made to the Gateway Determination to ensure that:

·            The requirement to consult with relevant aeronautical agencies prior to exhibition is no longer required;

·            It is clear that the clause implementing the solar access protections requested in the Gateway conditions has already been implemented via a separate Planning Proposal. No further amendments are proposed to be made to the solar access clause notwithstanding some changes may be required to the height of buildings map; and

·            The requirement for a satisfactory arrangements clause seeking contributions to fund state provided public infrastructure be removed.

 

(c)    That Council endorse the draft Development Control Plan (DCP) at Attachment 2 for public exhibition, subject to amendments contained in Attachment 5 of this report.

 

(d)    That delegated authority be given to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to negotiate and endorse for exhibition a draft Planning Agreement that takes into consideration the Applicant’s letter of offer (Attachment 6) and the following negotiating position:

·            consistent with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy and draft framework relating to Community Infrastructure in the Parramatta CBD;

·            require any contribution payable to be based on the Community Infrastructure policy in place at the time the contribution is paid rather than the current rate;

·            secure a 2m right of public access over the 2m ground floor setback along Marsden Street.

 

(e)    That Council grant delegated authority to the CEO to correct any minor anomalies to the Planning Proposal and draft DCP that may arise during the amendment process.

 

(f)     That Council no longer require an international design competition to be run for the subject site.

 

(g)    Further, that the Planning Proposal, draft DCP and draft Planning Agreement be publicly exhibited concurrently and the outcome of the public exhibition be reported back to Council.

 

DIVISION         A division was called, the result being:-

 

AYES:              Councillors Barrak, Davis, Dwyer, Esber, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell, Wearne, Wilson and Zaiter

 

NOES:              Councillor Bradley

 

18.6

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Pre-Gateway - Planning Proposal for 12-14 Phillip Street and 331A, 333 & 339 Church Street, Parramatta

 

REFERENCE   RZ/8/2019 - D07357764

 

REPORT OF    Project Officer, Land Use Planning

 

2732

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

(a)    That Council note the independent peer-review (provided at Attachment 2) completed in relation to the subject Planning Proposal and the assessment report (provided at Attachment 1).

 

(b)    That Council endorse the Planning Proposal at Attachment 3 for land at 12-14 Phillip Street and 331A, 333 & 339 Church Street, Parramatta, which seeks to amend Parramatta LEP 2011 by way of:

·            Re-zoning part of the site from B4 Mixed Use to RE1 Public Recreation;

·            Re-zoning part of the site from RE1 Public Recreation to RE2 Private Recreation;

·            Re-zoning part of the site from RE1 Public Recreation to B4 Mixed Use; and

·            Amending the floor-space ratio control for the parts of the site which are being rezoned.

 

(c)    That the Planning Proposal be forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment to request a Gateway Determination be issued.

 

(d)    That upon the issue of a Gateway Determination, the Planning Proposal be publicly exhibited for a minimum of 28 days.

 

(e)    That Council advise the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment that Council will not be exercising plan-making delegations for this Planning Proposal.

 

(f)     That Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to correct any minor anomalies of a non-policy and administrative nature that may arise during the plan-making process; and

 

(g)    Further, that Council note that the Parramatta Local Planning Panel’s advice to Council (Attachment 1) is consistent with the recommendations of this report.

 

DIVISION         A division was called, the result being:-

 

AYES:              Councillors Bradley, Davis, Dwyer, Esber, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell, Wearne, Wilson and Zaiter

 

NOES:              Councillor Barrak

 

18.7

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Post Exhibition - Planning Proposal, draft Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement - 2 O'Connell St, Parramatta

 

REFERENCE   RZ/2/2017 - D07357862

 

REPORT OF    Acting Team Leader Land Use Planning

 

2733

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Zaiter)

 

(a)    That Council receives and notes the submissions made during the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan (DCP) and draft Planning Agreement.

 

(b)    That Council endorse for finalisation the Planning Proposal for land at 2 O’Connell Street, Parramatta provided at Attachment 1 of Attachment 1, which seeks to amend the Parramatta LEP 2011 as follows:

i.      An increase in the maximum Height of Buildings from 36 metres to 217 metres (inclusive of design excellence bonus);

ii.      An increase in the maximum FSR from 4.2:1 to 16.2:1 (including all bonuses, opportunity site provisions and additional non-residential floor space);

iii.     Introduction of site-specific provisions that outline the requirements for achieving the maximum FSR, require an appropriate transition to heritage items or conservation areas, introduce maximum parking rates, and ensure that issues pertaining to airspace operations and satisfactory arrangements for State infrastructure are addressed.

 

(c)    That Council forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) to prepare for finalisation, but request the final notification on the relevant Government website only be undertaken once:

i.      Council confirms that the Planning Agreement has been signed and entered into; and

ii.      The site-specific DCP has been publicly exhibited and endorsed by Council for finalisation.

 

(d)    That an amended DCP is re-exhibited and the outcomes of this exhibition are reported to Council. The amendments to be made to the DCP prior to re-exhibition are as follows:

i.      Removal of the 3.5 metres setback to O’Connell Street (as Transport for NSW has indicated this is no longer required for road widening purposes) and resulting adjustments to relevant controls including but not limited to changes to the building and tower setbacks;

ii.      Addition of a section on heritage that refers to the LEP provision relating to heritage transition and impacts. The new DCP controls will ensure clear criteria for assessing the transition of any development on this site to the adjoining heritage item; and

iii.     Addition of a control outlining that materials selection is to minimise reflectivity and glare impacts.

 

(e)    That, with regards to the Planning Agreement:

i.      That an administrative amendment is undertaken to the draft Planning Agreement provided at Attachment 4 of Attachment 1 to accurately describe the instrument change sought under the Planning Proposal (noting that this does not change the contribution or any other terms of the Planning Agreement);

ii.      That Council enter into this amended Planning Agreement;

iii.     The Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority to sign the Planning Agreement on behalf of Council;

iv.     Council (in accordance with its statutory obligations) forward the Planning Agreement to DPIE once it comes into force.

 

(f)     That Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to make any minor amendments and corrections of a non-policy and administrative nature that may arise during the plan amendment process relating to the Planning Proposal, DCP and Planning Agreement.

 

(g)    Further, that Council note the advice of the Local Planning Panel of 21 April 2020 at Attachment 2 is consistent with the Council Officer’s Recommendation in this report. 

 

DIVISION         A division was called, the result being:-

 

AYES:              Councillors Davis, Dwyer, Esber, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell, Wearne, Wilson and Zaiter

 

NOES:              Councillors Barrak and Bradley

 

Note: Councillor Barrak declared a non-pecuniary but significant interest in Item 18.8, and left the meeting prior to consideration of the matter.

 

18.8

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Post Exhibition - Draft Development Control Plan and Matters Pertaining to Planning Agreement - 14-20 Parkes Street, Harris Park

 

REFERENCE   RZ/9/2015 - D07358402

 

REPORT OF    Project Officer Land Use

 

2734

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

(a)    That Council receives and notes the submissions made during the public exhibition period of the draft site-specific Development Control Plan (DCP) as detailed in this report.

 

(b)    That Council endorse for finalisation the site-specific DCP contained at Attachment 1 for insertion in Section 4.3.3 – Parramatta City Centre of the Parramatta DCP 2011.

 

(c)    That Council endorse further amendments to the Planning Agreement previously endorsed by Council on 16 December 2019 and confirm that the Planning Agreement can now be finalised by the CEO utilising the delegation granted by Council on 16 December 2019 subject to the following further amendments:

I.      The site area which forms the basis of the contribution calculations being amended to 2,829.7m2 and resulting increase in the monetary contribution; and

II.     Introduction of a clause that provides for the contribution payable to be based on the final floor space approved through a Development Application process or subsequent application to modify a development approval. This provision would apply regardless of whether the final amount of floor space approved is greater or less than the FSR permitted by the Planning Proposal.

 

(d)    Further, that Council grant delegated authority to the CEO to make any minor amendments and corrections of an administrative and non-policy nature to the draft DCP that may arise during the plan making and finalisation process.

 

DIVISION         A division was called, the result being:-

 

AYES:              Councillors Davis, Dwyer, Esber, Garrard, Han, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell, Wearne, Wilson and Zaiter

 

NOES:              Councillor Bradley

 

 

Note: Councillor Barrak returned to the meeting following consideration of Item 18.8.

 

19.   Notices of Motion

 

19.1

SUBJECT         NOTICE OF MOTION: Advocate for Extension of 401 Bus Route

 

REFERENCE   F2008/02993 - D07388728

 

FROM              Councillor Prociv

 

2735

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Garrard)

 

That, in light of the NSW State Government announcement that Transport for NSW could reprioritise investment into the City’s West, Council explore and advocate for the extension of the 401 bus route which currently operates from Carter Street to Lidcombe Station, to accommodate the public transport needs of the residents of Wentworth Point and Newington.

 

19.2

SUBJECT         NOTICE OF MOTION: NSW Government’s COVID-19 Act Amendments to the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979

 

REFERENCE   F2019/04433 - D07388798

 

FROM              Councillor Bradley

 

 

MOTION          (Bradley/Prociv)

 

That Council:

 

(a)    Write to the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, The Hon Rob Stokes MP and the NSW Premier, Gladys Berejiklian to advise them that we believe that local councils are best placed to make decisions about planning that is appropriate for their local area and constituents, and that planning decisions should be supported by community and be consistent with Ecologically Sustainable Development principles.

 

(b)    Accordingly, will express its concern in the correspondence about the loosely worded COVID-19 Act 2020 amendments to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act which grant the Minister unprecedented powers to override planning decisions made by local councils. The correspondence should also ask the Minister that these amendments (which allow the Minister “to authorise development to be carried out on land without the need for any approval under the Act or consent from any person”) not be applied to developments other than hospitals, ICUs, social housing, or other directly COVID-19 related works, using the ambiguity of the wording of clause 10.17(5)(b) allowing Ministerial discretion about which works are "necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of members of the public".

 

(c)    Therefore, ask the Minister to reconsider the permission granted under this COVID-19 Act to the construction industry to operate every day and potentially late at night, including on public holidays, in light of the growing level of complaints from residents living close to construction works (including those on compulsory work from home and home schooling arrangements) about the detrimental impact on their “health, safety and welfare” due to all week construction disturbances.

 

 

The motion moved by Councillor Bradley and seconded by Councillor Prociv on being put was declared LOST.

 

19.3

SUBJECT         NOTICE OF MOTION: NSW Government’s “Planning System Acceleration Program” and related changes No. 1

REFERENCE   F2019/04433 - D07388805

 

FROM              Councillor Bradley

 

 

MOTION          (Bradley/Prociv)

 

That Council:

 

(a)    Seek assurances from the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, Rob Stokes MP, that Council’s ability to conduct due diligence in line with community expectations and Ecologically Sustainable Development principles will not be impeded by the recently announced Planning System Acceleration Program to fast-track assessments of State Significant Developments, rezoning and development applications (DAs).

 

(b)    Advise the Planning Minister that in order to ensure community confidence in the Program, a plan to promote a high level of community engagement must be included in the additional support the Minister promised to provide to councils and planning panels to fast-track locally and regionally significant DAs.

 

(c)    Seek confirmation from the Planning Minister that Planning Proposals for amendments to Local Environment Plans (LEPs) currently in progress and/or already before the Department of Planning are to be finalised before the approvals of “any expanded list of works that may be carried out without the need for planning approval or under the fast-tracked complying development pathway.”

 

(d)    Alert the Planning Minister that many of the proposals included in Urban Taskforce Australia’s list of 76 so-called ‘shovel-ready’ projects that “are caught up in any area of the planning system” have already been refused by local councils and/or Local or Regional Planning Panels for valid planning, social or environmental reasons or because of insufficiency of community infrastructure funding needed to maintain liveability standards for the resulting population growth, particularly in targeted population growth areas like in the City of Parramatta LGA.

 

 

The motion moved by Councillor Bradley and seconded by Councillor Prociv on being put was declared LOST.

 

 

Note: Councillor Wilson was not present during the vote taken in this matter.

 

19.4

SUBJECT         NOTICE OF MOTION: NSW Government’s “Planning System Acceleration Program” and related changes No. 2

 

REFERENCE   F2019/04433 - D07388809

 

FROM              Councillor Bradley

 

 

MOTION          (Bradley/ Davis)

 

That Council:

 

(a)       Advise the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces that the NSW Government’s removal of the mandatory requirements for councils to publish development applications, DCPs and Contribution Plans in local newspapers will disadvantage the elderly and other residents who do not have access to the internet. The subsequent advertising loss of revenue will likely also undermine the viability of local newspapers, many of which are already struggling to survive.

 

(b)       Advise the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces that the Department of Planning’s advice to councils that certain documents related to development proposals/applications will no longer be required for physical inspection in their offices disadvantages residents who do not have access to computers and could lead to copyright issues with architects/developers regarding the electronic publication of certain plans.

 

 

The motion moved by Councillor Bradley and seconded by Councillor Davis on being put was declared LOST.

 

19.5

SUBJECT         NOTICE OF MOTION: Parramatta Light Rail

 

REFERENCE   F2019/04433 - D07389022

 

FROM              Councillor Davis

 

2736

RESOLVED      (Davis/Esber)

 

(a)    That detailed design drawings of the entire Parramatta Light Rail corridor, including the width of the corridor, be made publicly available on City of Parramatta Council’s website by 31 May 2020.

 

(b)    Further, that the Lord Mayor and Chief Executive Officer write to the State Minister for Planning, State Minister for Transport and Deputy Secretary, Greater Western Sydney, Transport for NSW and the State member for Parramatta requesting:

(i)     That City of Parramatta Council and the public be informed of what measures are being taken to preserve heritage components/materials of buildings, such as pressed metal ceilings, fireplaces, window and door frames (as appropriate), that have been identified for demolition as a result of the construction of Parramatta Light Rail;

(ii)    That an archival pictorial record of all these buildings be produced;

(iii)    That City of Parramatta Council and the public be provided with details of all trees identified for removal as a result of the construction of the Parramatta Light Rail; and

(iv)   Further, that City of Parramatta Council and the public be provided with details of all trees identified for relocation as a result of the construction of the Parramatta Light Rail along with details of the proposed relocation sites for these trees.

 

 

Note: Lord Mayor, Councillor Dwyer requested his name be recorded as having voted against the decision taken in this matter.

 

20.   QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

 

There were no questions on notice to consider at this meeting.

 

21.    CLOSED SESSION

 

Note: Prior to moving into Closed Session, the Lord Mayor invited members of the public gallery to make representations as to why any item had been included in Closed Session.  No member of the gallery wished to make representations.

 

2737

RESOLVED      (Garrard/Tyrrell)

 

That members of the press and public be excluded from the meeting of the Closed Session and access to the correspondence and reports relating to the items considered during the course of the Closed Session be withheld. This action is taken in accordance with Section 10A(s) of the Local Government Act, 1993 as the items listed come within the following provisions:-

1      FOR NOTATION: Legal Status Report as at 22 April 2020. (D07269840) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (g) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

2      FOR APPROVAL: Tender 01/2020 Alfred Street at Prospect Street, Rosehill – Construction of Two Pedestrian Refuge Islands and Associated Works. (D07283177) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

3      FOR APPROVAL: Tender 02/2020 Macarthur Street at Grose and Mason Streets North Parramatta – Construction of a Roundabout and Associated Works. (D07283214) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

4      FOR APPROVAL: Tender 03/2020 Sturt Street at Evans Road Telopea – Construction of a Roundabout and Pedestrian Refuge Island and Associated Works. (D07283226) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

5      FOR APPROVAL: Appointment of consultants for the Horwood Place Car Park Compulsory Acquisition by Metro. (D07368767) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

2738

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

That Items 21.2, 21.3, 21.4 and 21.5 be resolved en bloc and the recommendations be adopted.

 

21.1

SUBJECT         FOR NOTATION: Legal Status Report as at 22 April 2020

 

REFERENCE   F2019/04434 - D07269840

 

REPORT OF    Group Manager Legal Services

 

2739

RESOLVED      (Esber/Garrard)

 

That Council note the Legal Status Report as at 22 April 2020.

 

 

21.2

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Tender 01/2020 Alfred Street at Prospect Street, Rosehill – Construction of Two Pedestrian Refuge Islands and Associated Works

 

REFERENCE   F2020/00090 - D07283177

 

REPORT OF    Project Manager

 

2740

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

(a)    That Council accepts the tender of the preferred tenderer for the construction of two pedestrian refuge islands in Alfred Street at the intersection with Prospect Street, Rosehill for the contract sum as outlined in paragraph 17 of this report.

 

(b)    That all unsuccessful tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in this matter.

 

(c)    Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to finalise and execute all necessary documents.

 

21.3

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Tender 02/2020 Macarthur Street at Grose and Mason Streets North Parramatta – Construction of a Roundabout and Associated Works

 

REFERENCE   F2020/00091 - D07283214

 

REPORT OF    Project Manager

 

2741

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

(a)    That Council accepts the tender of the preferred tenderer for the construction of a roundabout and associated works at the intersection of Macarthur, Grose and Mason Streets, North Parramatta for the contract sum as outlined in paragraph 14 of this report.

 

(b)    That all unsuccessful tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in this matter.

 

(c)    Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to finalise and execute all necessary documents.

 

21.4

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Tender 03/2020 Sturt Street at Evans Road Telopea – Construction of a Roundabout and Pedestrian Refuge Island and Associated Works

 

REFERENCE   F2020/00092 - D07283226

 

REPORT OF    Project Manager

 

2742

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

(a)    That Council accepts the tender of the preferred tenderer for the construction of a roundabout, pedestrian refuge islands and associated works at the intersection of Sturt Street and Evans Road, Telopea for the contract sum as outlined in paragraph 14 of this report.

 

(b)    That all unsuccessful tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in this matter.

 

(c)    Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to finalise and execute all necessary documents.

 

21.5

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Appointment of consultants for the Horwood Place Car Park Compulsory Acquisition by Metro

 

REFERENCE   F2019/04434 - D07368767

 

REPORT OF    Development Manager Property Development

 

2743

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

(a)    That Council approve the appointment of the consultants as outlined in Item 8 (Consultants) to advise on the compulsory acquisition of Council land known as the Horwood Place Car Park, known as 45A George Street, Parramatta being Lot 2 in DP701456, 71 George Street, Parramatta, being Lot 100 in DP607789, Houison Place, being Lots 1, 3 & 4 in DP207864 and Lot 1 in DP442837 (Horwood Place Car Park).

 

(b)    That Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to sign all necessary documents and agreements with Consultants in connection with the compulsory acquisition of the Horwood Place Car Park.

 

(c)    Further, that a report be tabled at a future Council meeting once an agreement has been reached by Council with Sydney Metro as to the quantum of compensation to be paid to Council as a result of the compulsory acquisition process that has been initiated by Sydney Metro.

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

2744

RESOLVED      (Garrard/Tyrrell)

 

That the meeting resume into Open Session.

 

22.   REPORTS OF RESOLUTIONS PASSED IN CLOSED SESSION

 

The Chief Executive Officer read out the resolutions for Items 21.1 to 21.5.

 

The meeting terminated at 9.21pm.

 

THIS PAGE AND THE PRECEDING 26 PAGES ARE THE MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, 11 MAY 2020 AND CONFIRMED ON TUESDAY, 9 JUNE 2020.

 

 

 

 

 

Chairperson

 

 

   


 

MINUTES OF THE Extraordinary Council Meeting of City of Parramatta Council HELD REMOTELY VIA AUDIO-VISUAL LINK ON Wednesday, 27 May 2020 AT 6:30PM

 

These are draft minutes and are subject to confirmation by Council at its next meeting. The confirmed minutes will replace this draft version on the website once confirmed.

 

PRESENT

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors Benjamin Barrak, Phil Bradley, Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Michelle Garrard (Deputy Lord Mayor), Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies, Sameer Pandey, Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill Tyrrell, Andrew Wilson, Lorraine Wearne and Martin Zaiter.

 

24.   OPENING MEETING

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, opened the meeting at 6:31PM.

 

25.   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, acknowledged the Burramattagal people of The Darug Nation as the traditional custodians of this land, and paid respect to their ancient culture and their elders past and present.

 

26.   WEBCASTING ANNOUNCEMENT

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, advised that this public meeting is being recorded and streamed live on the internet. The recording will also be archived and made available on Council’s website.

 

4.     OTHER RECORDING OF MEETING ANOUNCEMENT

 

The Lord Mayor advised members of the public that the meeting was being held remotely and if persons watching the meeting live were to encounter technical difficulties to leave and re-enter the meeting via Council’s website.

 

5.     APOLOGIES/REQUESTS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE

 

There were no apologies or requests for leave of absence made at this meeting.

 

6.     DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

There were no Declarations of Interest made at this meeting.

 

7.     MATTERS OF URGENCY (if any)

 

There were no matters of urgency raised at this meeting.

 

8.     MINUTES OF THE LORD MAYOR

 

8.1

SUBJECT         Condolence Motion - Passing of former Cr Paul Han

 

REFERENCE   F2019/03630 - D07443746

 

REPORT OF    Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer

 

2745

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Esber)

 

(a)    That Council acknowledge the passing of former Councillor Paul Han, who passed away at the weekend, and extend its deepest sympathies to his family and friends.

 

(b)    That Council note arrangements are being made for former Councillor Paul Han’s family to be presented with a memento of his service.

 

(c)    Further, that the Chamber hold a minutes silence as a mark of mourning and gesture of respect on his passing and in recognition of his commitment to the Parramatta community.

 

9.     FAIR

 

9.1

SUBJECT         FOR APPROVAL: Public Exhibition - Delivery Program Year Three; Draft Operational Plan and Budget 2020/21

 

REFERENCE   F2019/04433 - D07428316

 

REPORT OF    Corporate Strategy Manager; Commercial Manager

 

 

MOTION          (Zaiter/Tyrrell)

 

(a)    That Council approve the Delivery Program 2018-2021 and Draft Operation Plan 2020/21 including Draft Budget 2020/21 and Draft Fees and Charges 2020/21 for public exhibition for a period of 28 days.

 

(b)    Further, that following public exhibition, Council will be presented with the Delivery Program 2018-2021 and Draft Operational Plan 2020/21 including Draft Budget 2020/21 and Draft Fees and Charges 2020/21 for adoption at a Council meeting in July 2020.

 

 

AMENDMENT  (Bradley/Prociv)

 

(a)    That Council approve the Delivery Program 2018-2021 and Draft Operation Plan 2020/21 including Draft Budget 2020/21 and Draft Fees and Charges 2020/21 for public exhibition for a period of 28 days, except that in the 2020/21 CAPEX Program items for:

1.     Installation of rooftop solar panels on city assets program be restored to the original $50,000;

2.     Energy and water upgrades to Council assets be restored to $185,000; and

3.     Council Plant, Fleet and other Equipment Replacement Program be enabled to include fleet vehicle replacement if warranted.

 

(b)    Further, that following public exhibition, Council will be presented with the Delivery Program 2018-2021 and Draft Operational Plan 2020/21 including Draft Budget 2020/21 and Draft Fees and Charges 2020/21 for adoption at a Council meeting in July 2020.

 

A foreshadowed amendment was moved by Clr. Davis.

 

The amendment moved by Councillor Bradley and seconded by Councillor Prociv on being put was declared LOST.

 

The foreshadowed amendment moved by Clr. Davis then became the amendment.

 

 

AMENDMENT  (Davis/Esber)

 

(a)    That Council approve the Delivery Program 2018-2021 and Draft Operation Plan 2020/21 including Draft Budget 2020/21 and Draft Fees and Charges 2020/21 for public exhibition for a period of 28 days, except that in the 2020/21 CAPEX Program items for:

1.     Installation of rooftop solar panels on city assets program be restored to the original $50,000; and

2.     Energy and water upgrades to Council assets be restored to $185,000

 

(b)    Further, that following public exhibition, Council will be presented with the Delivery Program 2018-2021 and Draft Operational Plan 2020/21 including Draft Budget 2020/21 and Draft Fees and Charges 2020/21 for adoption at a Council meeting in July 2020.

 

The amendment moved by Councillor Davis and seconded by Councillor Esber on being put was declared LOST.

 

The motion moved by Councillor Zaiter and seconded by Councillor Tyrrell on being put was declared CARRIED.

 

2746

RESOLVED      (Zaiter/Tyrrell)

 

(a)    That Council approve the Delivery Program 2018-2021 and Draft Operation Plan 2020/21 including Draft Budget 2020/21 and Draft Fees and Charges 2020/21 for public exhibition for a period of 28 days.

 

(b)    Further, that following public exhibition, Council will be presented with the Delivery Program 2018-2021 and Draft Operational Plan 2020/21 including Draft Budget 2020/21 and Draft Fees and Charges 2020/21 for adoption at a Council meeting in July 2020.

 

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

 

MOTION          (Esber/Garrard)

 

That a procedural motion be granted to allow consideration of a matter of urgency in relation to Council returning to fortnightly meetings.

 

The Lord Mayor ruled the matter not urgent.

 

10.   CONCLUSION OF THE MEETING

 

The meeting terminated at 7:26pm.

 

THIS PAGE AND THE PRECEDING 3 PAGES ARE THE MINUTES OF THE EXTRAORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, 27 MAY 2020 AND CONFIRMED ON TUESDAY, 9 JUNE 2020.

 

 

 

 

 

Chairperson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

09 June 2020

 

13.1          FOR NOTATION: Investment Report for April 2020............................................................ 42

 

13.2          FOR APPROVAL: Quarterly Budget Review - March 2020.................................................. 77

 

13.3          FOR APPROVAL: Vacancy in Civic Office.. 130


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 13.1

FAIR

ITEM NUMBER        13.1

SUBJECT                 FOR NOTATION: Investment Report for April 2020

REFERENCE           F2009/00971 - D07402320

REPORT OF            Tax and Treasury Accountant        

 

PURPOSE:

 

The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the investment portfolio performance for the month of April 2020.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council note the Investment Report for April 2020.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     In accordance with clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, a report setting out details of all money invested must be presented to Council on a monthly basis.

2.     The report must include a certificate as to whether or not the investments have been made in accordance with the Act, the Regulations and the Investment Policy of Council.

 

ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES

 

3.     The investment portfolio closing balance as at 30 April 2020 was $451.3m. The average portfolio holdings held throughout the month was $458.3m.

4.     Council holds a diversified range of investment products which as at 30 April 2020 included:

Investment Product

$000

% Held

Return %

Annualised

Term Deposits

$281,630

62.40%

0.18%

2.20%

Floating Rate Notes / Bonds

$123,378

27.34%

0.13%

1.61%

Cash at Call

$16,313

3.61%

0.08%

0.91%

Managed Funds

$13,349

2.96%

1.22%

15.90%

Long Term Growth

$16,663

3.69%

3.22%

47.17%

Total Investment Funds

$451,333

100.00%

0.31%

3.73%

 

5.     The Investment portfolio reported an annualised return of 3.73% in April, outperforming the AusBond Bank Bill Index benchmark 315 basis points. The monthly returns of TCorp Fund (+3.22%) and CFS Fund (+1.22%) were the primary contributors to performance this month, as all risk assets rebounded strongly.

 

6.     Council engages CPG Research and Advisory & Imperium Markets for assistance in all investment matters relating to advice, risk and portfolio weighting. CPG monitor the portfolio daily and conduct a monthly health check review. This confirms that Council’s portfolio is conducted within Ministerial and rated counterparty guidelines.

 

7.     COVID-19 –Impact on City of Parramatta Portfolio

 

        COVID-19 has adversely influenced financial markets, which in turn, has also affected Council’s investment portfolio.

 

        With regards to financial markets, of importance was the RBA cutting interest rates to a record low of 0.25%. Shares (equities) rebounded significantly in April due to record fiscal and monetary policy stimulus packages provided by federal governments and central banks.

 

        The following summarises the performance Covid-19 impact on Council’s various investments types:

 

        Council’s Floating Rate Notes make up approximately 27% of the portfolio at month end.  The market valuation of Council’s FRNs rose by around 0.72% (actual) during April as credit assets rebounded across financial markets.

 

 

Council’s FRNs are senior ranking assets and high in the bank capital structure. If held to maturity, the FRNs will pay back its original face value, along with its quarterly coupons throughout the life of the security. That is, advisors do not expect Council to lose any capital or interest payments from its current holdings. At month-end, Council’s FRNs are now marked at an unrealised capital gain of $287k

 

Term Deposits account for approximately 62% of the portfolio at month end, yielding 2.20%. Official cash rates have fallen to all-time lows, in conjunction with the covenants placed in the new investment policy, which largely limits Council to “A” or higher rated ADIs.

 

Council is likely to see some decline in interest income over future financial years. The difference in deposit rates between the “BBB” and unrated ADIs and the “A” or higher rated ADIs can ranging from 0.25%-0.50% p.a.

 

BBB Investments As per all other direct assets, advisors have no issues with Council’s investments in “BBB” rated senior FRNs given all counterparties continue to hold robust balance sheets with high levels of capital. On a mark-to-market basis, they were up nearly $98k or +0.20% (actual) for the month of April.

 

T-Corp Long Term Growth Fund accounts for around 3½% of council’s investment portfolio. The Fund returned +3.22% (actual) during April, largely driven by the fact it invests between 60-80% of its underlying assets in domestic and international shares (equities). Equities rebounded significantly during April due to the record stimulus packages provided by governments and central banks looking to soften the economic impact of COVID-19.

Advisors anticipate a sustained level of volatility in equity markets, particularly as downside risks to global growth remain, dictated by how long the effects of COVID-19 will remain.

 

Unemployment globally is expected to surge over coming months, with the collective economic impact likely to be more severe than the global financial crisis (GFC).

 

However, with the unprecedented and unilateral stimulus and aid packages provided by global central bank and federal governments across all nations, once there is some indication of stability surrounding the containment of the virus globally, equity markets may rebound quickly.

 

The Current allocation of the TCorp LTGF is as follows:

 

Council will continue to monitor financial markets and may consider increasing Council’s investment in the TCorp Fund over the coming 3-12 months, particularly given the fact that official interest rates are at record lows.

 

CFS Global Credit Managed Fund accounts for around 3% of Council’s total investment portfolio. The Fund rose 1.22% in April, as the market valuation of the fund’s assets in global credit securities (FRNs and bonds) rose as spreads tightened.

 

The Fund holds a diverse range of securities across the global credit market. It remains very well diversified by issuer in order to mitigate default risk. It invests in nearly 600 corporate bonds from issuers in various countries and industry sectors. Any spread contraction going forward allows credit and asset-backed holdings to enjoy significant capital gains. With a running yield of around 3% p.a., it is recommended that Council retains this “grandfathered” Fund given the alternative to invest in cash and deposits are yielding much lower.

 

8.     Council’s investment portfolio returns are benchmarked to the Ausbond Bank Bill Index to ensure investment returns are acceptable for the investment strategy Council has adopted. Current and Historical Performance is as follows:

 

Past and Present Performance

FYTD

1 Year

2 Year

3 Year

4 Year

5 Year

Total Portfolio

1.94%

2.14%

2.70%

2.85%

2.98%

3.08%

Ausbond Bank Bill Index Benchmark

1.00%

1.12%

1.56%

1.63%

1.69%

1.80%

Outperformance

0.94%

1.02%

1.14%

1.22%

1.29%

1.28%

 

9.     The portfolio now fully invested, with 4% of at-call and a further 15% of assets maturing in the next 3 months. Returns have gradually fallen after the RBA’s multiple cuts during FY20 and reducing the cash rate to 0.25%.

 

10.   Council has a substantial allocation to securities and bonds, as well as the CFS credit managed fund, for additional liquidity requirements. The portfolio is well- spread across maturities, opportunistically utilising capacity available in short – medium terms.

 


The maturity profile as at 30 April is as follows:

 

11.   Band limits, including group totals, comply except for legacy BBB-/NR ADIs:

BBB- and unrated ADIs will increasingly fall over time, accelerated if FRN sales or projected large inflows occur. Under the new Policy, a more complex and generally lower set of limits applies. This will result in a lengthy transition in which new purchases are tightly constrained, but existing positions grandfathered. The majority of lower rated entities are likely to be largely run off during CY20.

 

12.   The majority of Council’s portfolio is deposits, at 62% of the total assets. The portfolio also includes liquid FRN securities, cash, as well as TCorpIM Long Term Growth Fund.

 

Approximately 6.7% of the portfolio is less defensive, and is categorised as long-term. The investment portfolio is well diversified in complying assets across the entire credit spectrum; with no one credit dominating.

 

Council has invested $15M of Reserve funds (3.5% of the total portfolio) to back specified long-term liabilities with the TCorpIM Long Term Growth Fund.

 

13.   The Portfolio allocation as at 30 April 2020 is as follows:

 

14.   The following details are provided on the attachments for information:

·   Comparison of average funds invested with loans balance (Attachment 1)

·   Average interest rate comparison to Ausbond Bank Bill Index (Attachment 1)

·   Investments and loans interest compared to budget (Attachment 1)

·   List of all Council investments (Attachment 2)

·   CPG Comprehensive Investment report (Attachment 3).

 

15.   The Certificate of Investments for April 2020 is provided below:

 

Certificate of Investments

I hereby certify that the investments for the month of April 2020 have been made in accordance with the Act, the Regulations and Council’s Investment Policy – Alistair Cochrane, Acting Chief Financial Officer. 

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

16.   Council officers consulted with its financial advisors’ CPG & Imperium during the preparation of this report.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

17.   Council’s budgeted income for FY2019-2020 was $10.4m. On Council’s average total portfolio size of around $475m over the financial year, that equates to a budgeted return of around 2.2% p.a.

 

As at the end of April, the cumulative interest earned was approximately $1.2m below budget due to the significant selloff experienced in March 2020.

 

18.   Should the last two months of the financial year offer some “stability” in financial markets, Council is likely to return around ~1.9% p.a. for FY2019-2020, below its budgeted income of around 2.2% p.a. by around $1.4m.

 

Bruce MacFarlane

Tax and Treasury Accountant

 

Jason Peters

Finance Manager Governance, Planning & Analysis

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Michael Tzimoulas

Executive Director Corporate Services

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Investment and Loans Performance Graph - April 2020

1 Page

 

2

List of Council Investments by Maturity - April 2020

9 Pages

 

3

CPG Comprehensive Investment Report - April 2020

18 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL


Item 13.1 - Attachment 1

Investment and Loans Performance Graph - April 2020

 

PDF Creator


Item 13.1 - Attachment 2

List of Council Investments by Maturity - April 2020

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 13.1 - Attachment 3

CPG Comprehensive Investment Report - April 2020

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 13.2

FAIR

ITEM NUMBER        13.2

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Quarterly Budget Review - March 2020

REFERENCE           F2019/04433 - D07401606

REPORT OF            Commercial Manager       

 

PURPOSE:

 

To present the March 2020 Quarterly Budget Review Statement for adoption.

 

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

(a)    That Council adopt the March 2020 Quarterly Budget Review Statement and the Responsible Accounting Officer’s report on the financial position of the Council.

 

(b)    Further that Council approve the revised estimates as follows:

1.     Operating Budget deficit of ($0.4m) which is a reduction of ($5.2m) from December 2019 Forecast, including:

I.      a decrease in Operating Revenue by ($11.9m) (predominantly related to lower user charges & fees and interest as a result of COVID-19);

II.     an decrease in Operating Expenses by ($6.7m) (employee vacancies and re-phasing of operating projects);

 

2.     A decrease in Capital Revenue by $23.1m (predominantly driven by a reduction in state grants and section 7.11 revenue);

 

3.     A reduction in Capital Expenditure by $47.0m (as detailed in attached March 2020 QBRS).

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.           Clause 203 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires the Responsible Accounting Officer (Chief Financial Officer) to prepare and submit to the Council a Quarterly Budget Review Statement that shows, by reference to the estimates of income and expenditure set out in the Operational Plan, a revised estimate of the income and expenditure for the full financial year.

2.           The Responsible Accounting Officer is also required to report as to whether or not they believe the financial position of the Council is satisfactory, having regard to the original estimate of income and expenditure.

 

ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES

 

3.           The statutory Responsible Accounting Officer’s Report and Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) is incorporated into the attached March 2020 Quarterly Progress Report and includes an analysis of the year to date result and the reasons for the major variances from the previously adopted Budget. Explanations for major variances are in line with the parameters previously agreed by Council i.e. Budget variations greater than +/- 10% of the current budget or greater than +/- $100,000 of the current budget.

4.           Commentary on progress against the Budget and any proposed changes to the Budget are included in the attached QBRS.

5.           The operating year to date result as at the March 2020 QBRS was a favourable variance (surplus) to the forecast of $2.1m. Revenue was $5.5m below forecast, the decrease mainly due to interest having impacts from falls in local and international stock markets.

6.           Council’s year to date expenditure was below forecast by $7.6m as at the March 2020 QBRS. Employee costs are $3.0m below forecast due to staff vacancies across council and timing of expenditure relating to staff training. Materials and contracts are lower than forecast by $4.3m due to delays in project expenditure. Other Operating Expenses are under forecast by $0.3m due to street lighting savings generated from completed 2018-19 LED lighting works.

7.           Council has updated its full year financial forecast and is now forecasting a full year deficit of $0.4m, a decrease of $5.2m.

8.           While forecasted annual revenue is anticipated to decrease by $11.9m due to Covid-19 impacts to user charges and fees, other revenue and interest, expenditure is anticipated to decrease by $6.7m primarily through re-phasing operating projects to 2020/21 financial year as well as recognising savings in staff vacancies in the third quarter.

9.           The year to date March capital expenditure is $11.9m lower than the forecast of $76.5m.  A full review of capital projects has been undertaken during the March quarter.  As a result, the capital expenditure full year forecast has decreased by $47.0m due to the re‑phasing capital projects to the 2020/21 financial year for:

•       Parramatta Square developments,

•       Aquatic Centre Parramatta,

•       Southern Precinct Renewal Project,

•       Epping Community Hub

•       Phillip Smart Street and PRUAIP projects.

10.         Detailed explanations of the key variances for both the quarter and the full year forecast result are outlined in the Responsible Accounting Officer’s Report.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

11.         Consultation has taken place with all relevant staff in preparing the March 2020 Quarterly Budget Review Statement.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

12.         Details of the financial implications are contained within the March 2020 QBRS. 

 

 

 

Chris Sleiman

Commercial Manager

 

Jason Peters

Finance Manager Governance, Planning & Analysis

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Michael Tzimoulas

Executive Director Corporate Services

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

March Quarterly Review Budget Report

50 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL


Item 13.2 - Attachment 1

March Quarterly Review Budget Report

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 13.3

FAIR

ITEM NUMBER        13.3

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Vacancy in Civic Office

REFERENCE           F2019/04433 - D07397146

REPORT OF            Governance Manager        

 

PURPOSE:

 

The purpose of this report is to note the recent vacancy in civic office of the North Rocks Ward and seek Council’s approval to make an application to the Minister to dispense with a by-election in accordance with Chapter 10 Part 5 Section 294 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)    That Council note the resignation of Councillor Paul Han of the North Rocks Ward, effective 30 April 2020.

 

(b)    That Council apply to the Minister for Local Government seeking to dispense with a by-election to fill the casual vacancy in the civic office for the North Rocks Ward, in accordance with Chapter 10 Part 5 Section 294 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

(c)    Further, that the Councillor representative position held by Councillor Han on the following Advisory Committees remain vacant until September 2020, when a further report to Council will be tabled seeking representation on the various Advisory Committees for the remainder of the Council term:

        -       Floodplain Risk Management Committee;

        -       Metropolitan Public Libraries Association Inc.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     Council has received the resignation of Councillor Paul Han of the North Rocks Ward effective 30 April 2020, due to health reasons.

2.     In accordance with Chapter 10 Part 5 Section of the Local Government Act 1993 (LG Act), by‑elections are held when a casual vacancy in civic office occurs.

3.     This report seeks Council’s consideration of the matter, and recommends an application be made to the Minister for Local Government, seeking to dispense with a by-election to fill the casual vacancy in civic office, in accordance with Chapter 10 Part 5 Section 294 of the LG Act.

 

ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES

 

4.     The Minister for Local Government has announced the intention to postpone the 2020 Local Government Elections (LG Elections) to September 2021, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

5.     Chapter 19 Part 6A of the LG Act provides that the Minister may, by Order published in the Gazette, postpone the election requirements of the LG Act due to the COVID‑19 pandemic.  By definition, the provision of postponing elections also extends to by-elections, as noted at Section 318A of the LG Act.  It is noted that an Order to postpone the LG Elections has not yet been made.

6.     In the absence of an Order to postpone the LG Elections, Council must consider whether they wish to fill the casual vacancy in civic office by way of a by-election or make an application to the Minister to dispense with a by‑election, as the casual vacancy occurs within 18 months before the date specified for the next ordinary election (Section 294 of the LG Act).

By-Election Considerations

7.     Should Council wish to pursue a by-election, it must be held no later than three (3) months after the casual vacancy occurs.  Additionally, Council is to resolve to enter into an arrangement with the NSW Electoral Commissioner (NSW EC) for the administration of the by-election.

8.     Consideration is to be given on the conduct of a by-election in the current COVID-19 environment, noting the Minister’s public announcement to postpone elections.  If Council resolved to proceed with a by-election, and enter into arrangements with the NSW EC to conduct the by-election, any time after the commencement of these arrangements, they may cease due to an Order being made.

9.     The NSW EC has confirmed that a minimum of two (2) months would be required to make arrangements for the administration of a by-election.  This allows provision of an appropriate date to hold a by-election as well as the required statutory timing leading up to the by-election.

10.   The NSW EC has also indicated that the costs to conduct a by-election would generally be in the order of $272,000.  Additional unknown expenses due to safe distancing requirements would also be incurred, such as:

a.  50% increase in the required number of polling places to address social distancing requirements;

b.  50% increase in the required number of staff for polling places (as noted above);

c.  Sanitization costs associated with the “bump in” and “bump out” of all polling places;

d.  Costs for the provision of disposable stationery, face masks, sanitizer and other miscellaneous items.

11.   Apart from the increased costs for the conduct of the elections during the COVID-19 environment, there is a risk that many venues will not be comfortable in allowing an election to take place, noting the sanitization required after the event is held.  In addition, there may be difficulty in attracting staff who wish to work at a by-election during this time.

 

Casual Vacancy Considerations

12.   Should Council consider making an application to the Minister to dispense with a by-election, the casual vacancy in civic office will remain until September 2021.

13.   Additionally, the casual vacancy will extend to Councillor Han’s appointments to the Floodplain Risk Management Committee and Metropolitan Public Libraries Association Inc., which will remain vacant until September 2020.  At this time, Council will receive a report on the appointment of Councillors to all advisory committees post September 2020 for the remainder of the Council term.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

14.   Consultation has been undertaken with the Office of Local Government, which confirmed that due to timing of the casual vacancy and the absence of any order to postpone the elections, Council by resolution should determine whether it wishes to make an application to the Minister to dispense with a by-election, or resolve to enter into arrangements with the NSW Electoral Commission to conduct a by-election prior to the next ordinary elections.

15.   Consultation has also been undertaken with the NSW Electoral Commission which has confirmed the range of considerations outlined above, and the risk of commencing work towards a by-election, should arrangements be halted due to the subsequent order made by the Minister to postpone the elections.

16.   Additionally, consultation was undertaken with the office of the Minister for Local Government which confirmed its intention to postpone the elections by way of an order to be published in the Gazette.

17.   It is noted that the timing of the casual vacancy is within 18 months of the next ordinary election, and Council may make an application to dispense with the by-election.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

18.   Should Council wish to pursue a by-election to fill the casual vacancy of civic office, the NSW EC has also indicated that the costs to conduct a by-election would generally be in the order of $272,000.  Additional unknown expenses due to safe distancing requirements would also be incurred.

19.   Any funds spent on proceeding with a by-election may not be recoverable as a result of the Minister making an Order to postpone the Local Government Elections.

 

 

Patricia Krzeminski

Governance Manager

 

Lisa Oldridge

Group Manager Corporate Strategy and Governance

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Ian Woodward

Group Manager Legal Services

 

Michael Tzimoulas

Executive Director Corporate Services

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

There are no attachments for this report.

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

  


 

Accessible

 

09 June 2020

 

14.1          FOR NOTATION: Variations to Standards under Clause 4.6 of Parramatta LEP 2011, Auburn LEP 2010, Holroyd LEP 2013, The Hills LEP 2012, Hornsby LEP 2013 and SEPP 1 136


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 14.1

ACCESSIBLE

ITEM NUMBER        14.1

SUBJECT                 FOR NOTATION: Variations to Standards under Clause 4.6 of Parramatta LEP 2011, Auburn LEP 2010, Holroyd LEP 2013, The Hills LEP 2012, Hornsby LEP 2013 and SEPP 1

REFERENCE           F2009/00431 - D07250471

REPORT OF            Group Manager - Development and Traffic Services       

 

PURPOSE:

 

To provide Council with information each month on development applications determined where there has been a variation in development standards under Clause 4.6 of the Local Environment Plans or State Environmental Planning Policy No.1.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the report be received and noted.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     During the reporting period, 15 April 2020 to 11 May 2020, there was one (1) Development Application determined under Council delegation where there was a variation to a development standard under Clause 4.6:

 

Refer to Attachment 1 for further details.

 

2.     Under Clause 4.6 of the relevant Local Environmental Plan (LEP) applying to the local government area of the City of Parramatta, development consent may be granted for development even though the development would contravene a development standard such as a height and/or floor space ratio standard contained within an LEP.

 

3.     State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 (SEPP 1) contains similar provisions to Clause 4.6 and allows development to be approved even though it may not comply with a development standard in a state planning instrument, such as another SEPP.

 

4.     A report is presented to Council each month on any development consent issued where the development does not comply with a development standard.  This report follows the reporting requirements prescribed in Planning Circular PS08-014 issued by the (then) NSW Department of Planning.

 

5.     Controls within Development Control Plans (DCP) are not development standards as a DCP is not an “environmental planning instrument”.

 

ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCE

 

6.     There are no issues/options/consequence for Council associated with this report.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

7.     There are no consultation and timing considerations for Council associated with this report.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL

 

8.       There are no financial implications for Council associated with this report.

 

Mark Leotta

Group Manager - Development and Traffic Services

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Jennifer Concato

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Development Applications with a variation to development standards - 15 April 2020 to 11 May 2020

1 Page

 

 

 

 


Item 14.1 - Attachment 1

Development Applications with a variation to development standards - 15 April 2020 to 11 May 2020

 

PDF Creator  


 

Thriving

 

09 June 2020

 

17.1          FOR APPROVAL: Submission on Draft Liquor Amendment (24-hour Economy) Bill 2020... 140


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 17.1

THRIVING

ITEM NUMBER        17.1

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Submission on Draft Liquor Amendment (24-hour Economy) Bill 2020

REFERENCE           F2018/02117 - D07404753

REPORT OF            Project Officer        

 

PURPOSE:

 

The purpose of this report is for Council to consider a submission on the Draft Liquor Amendment (24-hour Economy) Bill 2020, currently on public exhibition by Liquor & Gaming NSW. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)    That Council approve a submission on the Draft Liquor Amendment (24-hour Economy) Bill 2020 provided at Attachment 1, noting Council’s support for the draft bill including:

i)       The streamlined enforcement (demerit and reward) system for venues;

ii)      The proposed removal of overlapping regulations relating to live music and liquor licences from future Development Applications;

iii)     The classification of small bars as low risk (similar to restaurants);

iv)     The improvement suggestions for the Cumulative Impact Assessment Framework (for licensed venues saturation), including increased guidance for local government on the assessment of small bar applications;

v)      Suggestions for communication and collaboration strategies for local councils and local liquor accords to understand and implement the changes effectively.

(b)    Further, that Council forward the submission to Liquor & Gaming NSW for their consideration.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     On 29 May 2019, the NSW Government established the Joint Select Committee on Sydney’s Night Time Economy to investigate mechanisms to enhance Sydney’s night time economy, improve regulatory processes for businesses and promote positive community safety and health outcomes.

2.     Council resolved to make a submission to the Joint Select Committee on 22 July 2019 which provided a series of regulatory enhancements to support the night time economy, including small bar regulation reforms, licensing reforms, abolition of live music conditions and other state environmental planning reforms.

3.     The Joint Select Committee tabled its recommendations on 30 September 2019, which was accepted in full by the NSW Government for implementation.

4.     In accordance with the Committee’s recommendations, Liquor & Gaming NSW has prepared a series of amendments to the Liquor Act 2007 and Liquor Regulation 2018 to support the enhancement of the night time economy, particularly the management of licensed venues. These amendments form the Draft Liquor Amendment (24-hour Economy) Bill 2020, which has been released for public comment by Liquor & Gaming NSW in May 2020. 

 

KEY CONSIDERATIONS

 

5.     While local councils do not issue or regulate liquor licenses, state liquor regulation plays an important role in development assessment, regulatory compliance, social planning and public safety considerations for local government.

6.     On 10 February 2020, Council endorsed the 5-year Parramatta Night City Framework 2020-2024. Action 6.4 of the Framework provides that Council will “support the implementation of recommendations from the NSW Parliamentary Inquiry into Sydney’s Night Time Economy” and Action 6.2 commits Council to active participation in discussions of matters of importance to night time economy policy and strategy in New South Wales, including liquor regulation.

7.     The key changes proposed in the draft Liquor Amendment (24-hour Economy) Bill 2020 include:

a)  Creation of a new incentive and demerit point system that consolidates three existing sanctions schemes into one integrated approach to incentivise well-run venues, minimise violence and reduce serious liquor law breaches;

b)  Support live music and entertainment by removing outdated entertainment conditions on liquor licences and waiving application fees to change or remove other existing live music conditions;

c)  Further align liquor licence and planning processes for small bar licences and refinding Liquor & Gaming NSW’s regulatory role in noise compliant compliance;

d)  Diversify the allowable product offering of small bar licences to encourage their uptake;

e)  Refine the approach to assess cumulative impact of licensed venues;

f)   Remove miscellaneous instances of red tape and responsibility overlap.

 

8.     In summary, the submission at Attachment 1 provides:

a)  Support for the proposed new streamlined demerit sanction and incentive system;

b)  Support for the refined and integrated approach to cumulative impacts of concentrated licensed venues;

c)  Support for enhancements to same-day delivery (business to home) of alcohol to protect minors and vulnerable people;

d)  Support for the incentivisation of the uptake of the small-bar licence;

e)  Support for the removal of live music conditions on liquor licences and waiving fees for licensees to remove these conditions;

f)   Support for removal of Liquor and Gaming NSW’s involvement in noise regulation inside of licensed venues;

g)  Support for minor amendments to remove unnecessary red-tape and duplication in the Liquor Regulation 2018.

 

9.     In addition, the submission makes additional suggestions for consideration as part of the draft Bill:

a)  Suggestions to enhance the Cumulative Impact Assessment Framework for licensed venues;

b)  Guidance on assessment of small bar applications for cumulative impact and security risk; 

c)  Suggestions for communication and collaboration strategies with local liquor accords and Councils to understand and implement the changes effectively;

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

10.   Early government and industry feedback on proposed amendments within the draft Bill was sought throughout early 2020. Council officers provided initial feedback through its membership of the NSW Night Time Economy Councils’ Committee.

11.   Consultation on the proposed changes commenced on 4 May 2020 and will close on 14 June 2020.

12.   Relevant staff from Council’s City Strategy and Regulatory Services Units were consulted to provide input into Council’s submission.

13.   Further, all Liquor Accords active within the City of Parramatta LGA were forwarded information regarding the proposed changes, and provided the opportunity to provide comments to inform Council’s submission.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

14.   There are no financial implications for Council in endorsing this submission, beyond staff time to prepare the submission.

 

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS

 

15.   Should Council resolve to endorse the submission, it will be forwarded to Liquor & Gaming NSW for its consideration.

16.   The final Draft Liquor Amendment (24-hour Economy) Bill is anticipated to be tabled for parliamentary consideration later this year.

Beau Reid

Project Officer

 

Nicole Carnegie

Economic Development Manager

 

Geoff King

Group Manager City Strategy

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Jennifer Concato

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Attachments:

1

Submission on the Draft Liquor Amendment (24-Hour Economy) Bill 2020

9 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL


Item 17.1 - Attachment 1

Submission on the Draft Liquor Amendment (24-Hour Economy) Bill 2020

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator

 


 

Innovative

 

09 June 2020

 

18.1          FOR APPROVAL: Submission on the Infrastructure Contributions Review............ 154

 

18.2          FOR APPROVAL: Gateway Request: Planning Proposal at 8-14 Great Western Highway, Parramatta................................................. 185

 

18.3          FOR APPROVAL: Gateway Request: Planning Proposal for land at 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta................................................. 279

 

18.4          FOR APPROVAL: Amendment to the East Epping Planning Proposal and draft amendments to the Hornsby DCP 2013...... 403

 

18.5          FOR APPROVAL: Post-exhibition: Planning Proposal, draft Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement at 23-27 Harold Street, Parramatta (Deferred Item).............. 428

 

18.6          FOR APPROVAL: Post-exhibition: Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement at 55 Aird Street, Parramatta.......................... 441

 

18.7          FOR APPROVAL: COVID-19 Update.......... 519


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 18.1

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER        18.1

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Submission on the Infrastructure Contributions Review

REFERENCE           F2020/01399 - D07386428

REPORT OF            Project Officer Land Use       

 

PURPOSE:

 

To seek Council’s approval of a submission on the State Government’s Infrastructure Contributions Review to be forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)    That Council approve the submission at Attachment 1 on the State Government’s Infrastructure Contributions Review, noting that the main recommendations of the submission are summarised as follows:

i)      The current review only proposes amendments to existing contributions mechanisms, while a more fundamental and holistic review of the NSW infrastructure planning and contributions framework needs to be undertaken.

ii)     The proposals on value sharing are strongly opposed as they threaten to undermine Council’s current policy framework for Planning Agreements, which adopts value sharing as an equitable, transparent and evidence-based policy approach.

iii)     Strengthened guidance is needed on negotiation practice and administration of Planning Agreements, such as independent third parties, cost recovery, dispute resolution, probity and other matters.

iv)    If the Practice Note is finalised with minor changes, the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) should urgently provide clarity about the implications for the current Planning Proposal and Planning Agreement processes underway, and appropriate transitional arrangements need to be put in place.

v)     The section 7.11 threshold should be increased in accordance with Option 3 to $45,000 to increase Council’s capacity to apply a higher contribution rate without having to undergo an IPART review.

vi)    Section 7.11 threshold indexation is supported, however, the chosen mechanism for indexation should accurately reflect infrastructure delivery and land costs, and should be reviewed periodically to remain relevant.

vii)    IPART’s ‘essential works list’ should be expanded to include capital costs to reflect the realities of providing necessary infrastructure in urban infill areas.

viii)   There should be assessment criteria and a clear process set out for Council to seek a higher section 7.12 levy above the 3% maximum in order to deliver the necessary infrastructure to support growth.

ix)    The proposed maximum 0.2% of a contributions plan for administration costs should be increased to 1.5%.

x)     Council’s Local Strategic Planning Statement should be included as a strategic document to be considered as part of the criteria for an increased section 7.12 percentage.

xi)    The Special Infrastructure Contribution (SIC) guidelines should require consultation with councils during the SIC preparation process.

xii)    The Regulation should be amended to require the State Government to report on SIC accounting in a similar capacity required by councils in the interest of transparency and accountability.

xiii)   The SIC proposed for the City of Parramatta area to fund major infrastructure to support growth should be progressed in consultation with Council.

xiv)   Additional requirements for reporting on contributions accounting should be streamlined into existing council accounting and reporting activities. Clarity is needed on the intended timeframe for introducing the additional reporting requirements to enable councils time to put in place the necessary processes.

xv)   Further guidelines are needed to provide clarity to support the recovery of the costs associated with the negotiation, preparation, administration, and monitoring of planning agreements by councils.

 

(b)    Further, that Council forward the submission to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment in response to the Infrastructure Contributions Review.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND 

 

1.     On 15 April 2020, the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, Rob Stokes MP, requested the NSW Productivity Commissioner conduct a comprehensive review (the review) of the infrastructure contributions system. The Department of Planning, Infrastructure and Environment (DPIE) have provided an opportunity for submissions to be made as part of this process.  Submissions are required by 12 June 2020.  

 

2.     The review seeks to improve the existing infrastructure contributions system, and has three main objectives: 

 

·    Review the infrastructure contributions system to determine whether it meets the objectives of certainty and efficiency while delivering public infrastructure required to support development; 

·    Make recommendations for reform aimed at delivering a principle-based system that delivers the infrastructure required to accompany growth; and 

·    Identify legislative and regulatory changes necessary to implement the proposed reforms.  

 

3.     The review is proposed in a suite of five documents, each providing details of guidelines or changes to the existing infrastructure contributions system as detailed in Table 1 below. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1: Exhibited materials 

Policy Area 

Description  

(from DPIE’s website “Improving the contributions system”)  

Draft planning agreements policy framework 

Proposed guidance material to provide more transparency around the planning agreement process. 

Improving the review of local infrastructure contributions plans discussion paper 

Proposed efficiency reforms to review the process for section 7.11 contributions plans. 

Criteria to request a higher section 7.12 percentage discussion paper 

Proposed criteria to provide clarity and guidance on when higher percentage rates for section 7.12 contributions may be appropriate. 

Draft Special Infrastructure Contributions (SIC) guidelines 

Proposed guidelines to improve transparency around the purpose and function of SICs. 

Proposed amendments to the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 

Proposed changes to improve transparency in the infrastructure contributions system. 

 

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS

 

4.     Council officers have reviewed the exhibited materials and prepared a draft submission for Council’s consideration.  The key recommendations in the Council submission follow below and are expanded on the submission which forms Attachment 1.

 

5.     Overall, Council officers consider that the current review only proposes amendments to existing contributions mechanisms, while a more fundamental and holistic review of the NSW infrastructure planning and contributions framework needs to be undertaken. The review should bring together the various disparate and un-coordinated ways in which infrastructure is funded into an integrated system that better ensures infrastructure is delivered in a timely manner and does not lag behind development.

 

SUBMISSION PART A: DRAFT PLANNING AGREEMENTS POLICY FRAMEWORK

 

6.     The draft Practice Note covers several areas relating to the negotiation, operation and administration of Planning Agreements.  

 

7.     Overall, the elements of the draft Practice Note relating to administrative procedures and decision-making are largely straightforward and would be of assistance to councils in drafting their own planning agreement policies. However, Council staff have major concerns that the practice note states the following:

 

[planning agreements] should not be used to capture land value uplift resulting from rezoning or variations to planning controls. Such agreements often express value capture as a monetary contribution per square metre of increased floor area or as a percentage of the increased value of the land. Usually the planning agreement would only commence operation as a result of the rezoning proposal or increased development potential being applied”.  

 

 

 

 

8.     Council officers consider that the practice of sharing land value uplift arising from rezoning land is appropriate when founded on an equitable, transparent and evidence-based policy approach. It is Council’s experience that this is generally accepted by industry and provides certainty for all stakeholders involved providing a clear and consistent basis for planning for growth.

 

9.     The position on value sharing outlined in the Practice Note threatens to undermine Council’s current policy framework for planning agreements, which applies value sharing based on a percentage of a pre-determined rate of value uplift per square metre (in the CBD), or on 50% of value uplift on a site-specific basis (outside the CBD). This has significant risks for Council and the community, including:

 

a)  Significant impacts for Council’s financial position: With the loss of its value sharing policy as a basis for voluntary planning agreements (VPAs), Council would be at a severe disadvantage in current and immediate future VPA negotiations. This would give rise to an immediate need to identify funds to provide infrastructure for the community from other sources. Council staff estimate that the proposed draft Community Infrastructure provisions in the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal could potentially facilitate approximately $300 million worth of community infrastructure in the CBD. This would make a significant contribution to Council’s approximate $1.5 billion works program for new community infrastructure in the Parramatta CBD and would be at risk if the proposed system is brought into effect. 

 

b)  Urgent policy review required: There would be an urgent need to prioritise a review of Council’s entire development contributions / planning agreements policy framework to account for the loss of value sharing as a policy approach. This would require immediate re-prioritisation of other strategic planning matters, as well as giving rise to significant delay to the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal.  

 

c)  Less community infrastructure being delivered: During the time that would elapse while Council undertakes a policy review and associated fund-sourcing investigations, planning for the continuing growth of the LGA would need to be addressed. The likely outcome would be that development would outstrip the delivery of supporting infrastructure - particularly in high growth precincts – leading to poorly planned outcomes to the detriment of the local community. 

 

10.   On this basis, Council officers recommend that Council strongly objects to the proposals on the basis that they would undermine Council’s current approach to planning agreements. Council officers are currently holding discussions with DPIE with the aim of ensuring Council’s proposed measures in the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal, that were developed in collaboration with DPIE, can continue to be used to ensure delivery of the infrastructure needed as the City continues to rapidly grow.

 

11.   The above is further discussed in Part A of the submission at Attachment 1. The submission also raises the following key points:

 

a)  Strengthened guidance is needed about negotiation practice and administration of Planning Agreements, such as independent third parties, cost recovery, dispute resolution, probity and other matters.

b)  If the Practice Note is finalised with minor changes, DPIE should urgently provide clarity about the implications for current Planning Proposal processes underway, and appropriate transitional arrangements need to be put in place. Most urgently, there is a need to reconcile the Gateway determination for the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal framework with the draft Practice Note.

 

SUBMISSION PART B: IMPROVING THE REVIEW OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRIBUTIONS PLANS DISCUSSION PAPER 

 

12.   The discussion paper identifies the following reforms:

 

a)  Increasing the existing local development contributions threshold (currently $20,000 in infill areas) before plans are required to undergo an IPART review. The three options as they apply to urban infill areas are proposed as follows: 

i.   Option 1: Indexing the current threshold to the current quarter using the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which would be $24,247 for infill areas; 

ii.   Option 2: $35,000 for infill areas; 

iii.  Option 3: $45,000 for infill areas; 

b)  Apply an annual indexation adjustment to the contribution IPART review thresholds; and

c)  Updates to the IPART terms of reference for contributions plan reviews, aimed at improving the efficiency and speed of the review process.  

 

13.   Council officers generally support the reforms proposed in the discussion paper. In relation to the new thresholds, Council officers support Option 3, being the $45,000 threshold, as it provides the greatest flexibility to Council to meet the costs of delivering infrastructure.

 

14.   This is further discussed in Part B of the submission at Attachment 1. The submission also contains the following key points:

 

a)  Section 7.11 threshold indexation is supported, however, the chosen mechanism for indexation should accurately reflect infrastructure delivery and land costs, and should be reviewed periodically to remain relevant.

b)  IPART’s ‘essential works list’ should be expanded to include capital costs to reflect the realities of providing necessary infrastructure in urban infill areas.

 

SUBMISSION PART C: CRITERIA TO REQUEST A HIGHER SECTION 7.12 PERCENTAGE DISCUSSION PAPER 

 

15.   The discussion paper proposes criteria for considering an increase to the existing section 7.12 levy from the current maximum of 1% to 2% and up to a maximum of 3%. The criteria for seeking a higher maximum levy is centred around three principles:

 

a)  The area needs to be identified in a strategic plan; 

b)  Needs to demonstrate significant employment growth; and 

c)  The proposed planning controls in these areas need to support such growth.  

 

16.   Council officers support, in principle, the development and preparation of criteria to assist in preparing requests to increase section 7.12 levies under the Act and the Regulation. This is assured by the criteria for areas to be identified within strategic documents, including regional and district plans, to be considered for increased levies. Therefore, it is recommended that Council’s recently adopted Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS) be considered a valid strategic document to warrant consideration of higher section 7.12 levies.

 

17.   The Parramatta CBD area is already subject to the maximum 3% section 7.12 percentage. The discussion paper includes a framework to allow any Council with plans that apply a 1% Contribution rate to increase it to 2% or 3%. It remains silent on what councils should do to increase the rate beyond 3%. Previously if a Council wanted to increase it’s section 7.12 rate there was no clearly defined process. An application would be made to the Minister and the application was previously referred to Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal for assessment. It is unclear what the process will be for Council’s that already a rate at 3% (such as exists in the Parramatta CBD) or above.

 

18.   Council officers recommend that a process, including assessment criteria that Councils would need to meet in order to exceed 3% be included in the framework. There is a process and separate specific criteria proposed for increases to 2% or 3% but no process or criteria to guide a Council seeking an increase beyond 3%.

 

19.   This is further discussed in Part C of the submission at Attachment 1. The submission also makes the point that the proposed maximum 0.2% of a contributions plan for administration costs should be increased to 1.5% to reflect the genuine cost to maintain and administer the plan.

 

SUBMISSION PART D: DRAFT SPECIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRIBUTIONS GUIDELINES 

 

20.   The draft SIC guidelines seek to provide guidance and clarity on the following: 

 

a)  The purpose and objectives of the SIC framework applying to current SICs and the development and implementation of prospective SICs; 

b)  The key principles guiding the State Government in implementing the SIC framework; 

c)  The method for determining a new SIC; and 

d)  The process for allocating SIC revenue to infrastructure once a SIC has been determined.  

 

21.   Council officers support, in principle, the proposed guideline for SICs as it would enable a relevant and transparent process for their implementation and ongoing administration.

 

22.   Council officers support public consultation on any draft SIC prior to its implementation for feedback and collaboration with State government. However, Council officers recommend that further guidance for the active collaboration between councils and the DPIE at the SIC planning stage be established to enable council’s involvement throughout the entire process of a SIC preparation.

 

23.   Furthermore, Council officers recommend that Council requests that the SIC previously proposed by the State Government for the Greater Parramatta to Olympic Peninsula (GPOP) area be progressed. It is important that the SIC is finalised in close consultation with Council to ensure that it contributes appropriately to the orderly programming and funding of infrastructure delivery to support growth in the GPOP area.

 

24.   This is further discussed in Part D of the submission at Attachment 1. The submission also considers that the Regulation should be amended to require the State Government to report on SIC accounting in a similar capacity required by councils, in the interest of transparency and accountability.

 

SUBMISSION PART E: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT REGULATION 

 

25.   The proposed amendments to the Regulation seek to improve the following: 

 

a)  Reporting and accounting on contributions received through contributions plans and planning agreements; 

b)  Online publication of reports and information related to infrastructure contributions received by councils and planning authorities via development contributions plans and planning agreements; and

c)  The making of contributions plans requiring an IPART review. 

 

26.   Councils are already required to maintain some accounting records in a specified format for contributions and inclusion of information in annual financial reports and statements. However, further guidance to councils on the detailed reporting requirements will be necessary to ensure there is enough clarity around the nature and format of the information to the reported.

 

27.   Council officers support, in principle, the proposed streamlining of the IPART review process to expedite the implementation of contributions plans where a contribution that exceed the Section 7.11 Cap is proposed.

 

28.   This is further discussed in Part E of the submission at Attachment 1. The submission also makes the following key points:

a)  Additional requirements for reporting on contributions accounting should be streamlined into existing accounting and reporting activities of councils. Clarity is needed on the intended timeframe for introducing the additional reporting requirements to enable councils time to put in place the necessary processes.

b)  Further guidelines are needed to provide clarity to support the recovery of the costs associated with the negotiation, preparation, administration, and monitoring of planning agreements by councils.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING 

 

29.   The proposed infrastructure contributions review is currently on public exhibition until 12 June 2020. 

 

30.   Should Council resolve to adopt the submission at Attachment 1, it will be forwarded to the DPIE.  

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL 

 

31.   The infrastructure contributions review has a number of significant financial implications which would impact on Council’s future ability to fund infrastructure to meet the needs to the City of Parramatta community. These are summarised as follows: 

 

a)   Planning Agreement Framework Changes:

Parramatta CBD: Council estimates that the currently proposed draft Community Infrastructure provisions in the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal could potentially facilitate approximately $300 million worth of community infrastructure for the Parramatta CBD. This funding would be placed at risk and Council would need to identify alternative funding sources.

Outside Parramatta CBD: Council’s ability to secure funding outside the CBD would be significantly impacted. Whilst Council would continue to negotiate VPAs for Planning Proposals this could not be founded on the current policy position of 50% value sharing. The scale of this impact would depend on the new policy position that Council develops to support Council’s ability to raise funds and forms a new basis for undertaking VPA negotiations.

b)   Increasing the 7.11 Contributions Plan threshold beyond the current $20,000 cap to $45,000 would provide Council the flexibility to increase funding available for infrastructure as part of future reviews of Council’s Contributions Policy framework.

c)   Introducing a system for Council to seek to apply for an increase in the current 1% section 7.12 Contributions Plans that apply outside of the CBD to 3% would provide Council with the flexibility to increase funding available for infrastructure under the ongoing review of Council’s Contributions Policy framework.

 

32.   If the proposed changes under the Infrastructure Contributions Review are introduced as exhibited, they will require a complete review of Council’s Planning Agreements Policy. This would disrupt the flowthrough of contributions as the LGA continues to rapidly develop. It is vitally important that transitional arrangements are introduced to avoid such negative effects which would potentially result in either the failure to deliver supporting infrastructure and/or burdens being placed on Council finances to meet associated funding gaps.

 

33.   The potential opportunity under the reforms to increase the section 7.11 thresholds and the section 7.12 percentages would aid Council in enabling the levying of higher development contributions. While this has the potential to improve the level of funding able to be collected, the caps in place would still mean that Council will be unable to fund future infrastructure solely from contributions, and it will still be reliant on general revenue and other funding sources such as Government Grants to fund Council’s future infrastructure program.

 

 

 

Darren Caballero

Project Officer Land Use Planning

 

Sarah Baker

Acting Team Leader Land Use Planning

 

Robert Cologna

Acting Land Use Planning Manager

 

David Birds

Group Manager City Planning

 

Jennifer Concato

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

 

Alistair Cochrane

Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Submission on the Infrastructure Contributions Review

22 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

The exhibited materials discussed in this report will be available at the following webpage until the end of their exhibition:

https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/draftplans/on-exhibition

 

Following the end of this exhibition, it is expected that the materials will be available at the following webpage:

https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/draftplans/under-consideration

 

Once finalised, it is expected that the materials will be available at the following webpage:

https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/draftplans/made-and-finalised

 

 


Item 18.1 - Attachment 1

Submission on the Infrastructure Contributions Review

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 18.2

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER        18.2

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Gateway Request: Planning Proposal at 8-14 Great Western Highway, Parramatta

REFERENCE           RZ/6/2019 - D07392259

REPORT OF            Student Project Officer       

 

LANDOWNER          JM Malouf Investments Pty Ltd and The Owners Strata Plan                           8700

APPLICANT             GLN Planning Pty Ltd

 

Development applications considered by sydney central city planning panel - Nil

 

PURPOSE:

To seek Council’s endorsement of a Planning Proposal which amends Parramatta Local Environment Plan 2011 by way of:

·    Increasing the height of building and floor space ratio controls; and

·    Inserting site-specific provisions relating to design excellence, high performing buildings, minimum commercial floor space, maximum additional commercial floor space and maximum car parking rates;

for the purposes of requesting a Gateway Determination from the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)    That Council endorse the Planning Proposal at Attachment 2 for the purpose of requesting a Gateway Determination for land at 8-14 Great Western Highway, Parramatta, which seeks to amend Parramatta Local Environment Plan 2011 (PLEP 2011) by way of:

i.      Increasing the height of building control from 28 metres to 211 metres;

ii.      Amending the controls so that the FSR which is to apply to the site is composed of mapped components and bonuses as follows:

a.  Mapped FSR increased from 3.5:1 to 10:1 of which a minimum of 1:1 FSR must be commercial uses;

b.  Design Excellence bonus (15% - 1.5:1);

c.  High Performing Buildings bonus (5% - 0.5:1);

d.  Opportunity Sites bonus (3:1);

e.  Unlimited commercial FSR above the 1:1 requirement; and

        iii.     Insert a site-specific provision applying maximum car parking rates per the Parramatta CBD Strategic Transport Study.

 

(b)    That the Planning Proposal be forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment to request a Gateway Determination be issued. 

 

(c)    That should a Gateway Determination be issued that structures the floor space ratio (FSR) and site specific clauses in an alternative way, that the Chief Executive Officer is authorised to make the necessary amendments to the Planning Proposal for the purposes of public exhibition, only where the total proposed FSR is unchanged.

 

(d)    That should a Gateway Determination be issued, a site-specific Development Control Plan be prepared in accordance with the design principles contained within this report.

 

(e)    That should a Gateway Determination be issued, the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to negotiate a Planning Agreement in accordance with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy.

 

(f)     That the draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement be reported to Council for endorsement prior to being publicly exhibited concurrently with the Planning Proposal.

 

(g)    That Council request the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment to issue Council’s Chief Executive Officer plan-making delegations for this Planning Proposal.

 

(h)    That Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to correct any minor anomalies of a non-policy and administrative nature that may arise during the plan-making process.

 

(i)     Further, that Council note that the Parramatta Local Planning Panel’s advice to Council (Attachment 1) is consistent with the recommendations of this report.

 

 

PLANNING PROPOSAL TIMELINE

 

SITE DESCRIPTION

 

1.     The subject site is comprises 8 Great Western Highway (Lot 10 DP1097949) and 10-14 Great Western Highway, Parramatta (SP8700) and is approximately 2,386 square metres. The site has a single frontage on the Great Western Highway at its southern boundary. The site is bound by three to eight storey residential flat buildings along its western and northern boundaries and a single-storey commercial building on its eastern boundary (refer Figure 1).

 

2.     The subject site is located immediately adjacent to the site of 87 Church Street and 6 Great Western Highway (refer Figure 1) for which a Planning Proposal has been endorsed and is currently with the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for finalisation.

 

3.     There are also two State listed Heritage Items near the subject site shown in green in Figure 1 below. Item 00751 relates to ‘Lennox House’ and Item 648 relates to ‘Masonic Centre’.

 

Figure 1: An aerial image of the site and surrounds (subject site outlined in red, adjacent planning proposal at 87 Church Street & 6 Great Western Highway outlined in orange, state heritage items in green).

 

CURRENT CONTROLS

 

4.     Under the Parramatta Local Environment Plan 2011, the site is subject to the following controls:

 

a.  Land Use Zoning is B4 Mixed Use;

b.  The maximum Height of Buildings is 28 metres;

c.  The maximum Floor Space Ratio is 3.5:1;

d.  The site is located within proximity of identified State Heritage Items (refer Figure 1 above); and

e.  The site is not flood prone.

 

5.     Pages 5 to 6 of Attachment 1 contain further detail on the existing controls.

 

 

 

 

PLANNING PROPOSAL SUMMARY

 

6.     The Planning Proposal (refer to Attachment 2) seeks to amend the Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 by:

·    Increasing the height of building control from 28 metres to 211 metres;

·    Amending the controls so that the FSR which is to apply to the site is composed of mapped components and bonuses as follows:

 

a.  Mapped FSR increased from 3.5:1 to 10:1 of which a minimum of 1:1 FSR must be commercial uses;

b.  Design Excellence bonus (15% - 1.5:1);

c.  High Performing Buildings bonus (5% - 0.5:1);

d.  Opportunity Sites bonus (3:1); and

e.  Unlimited additional commercial FSR (applicant’s Urban Design Report indicates that at least 1.42:1 will be provided).

 

·    Insert a site-specific provision applying maximum car parking rates per the Parramatta CBD Strategic Transport Study.

 

7.     A detailed explanation of the proposed amendments is provided in the Planning Proposal at Attachment 2.

 

8.     The reference design submitted by the applicant (refer Attachment 3 Urban Design report) indicates the proposed controls would facilitate the construction of a mixed use development comprising of approximately 399 dwellings and 5,766 square metres of commercial gross floor area (GFA).

 

KEY ASSESSMENT ISSUES

 

9.     The Planning Proposal is consistent with the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal as outlined in Table 1 below.

 

Table 1: Comparison of planning controls sought for the subject site compared to existing controls and the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal

Site Area

2,386sqm

Existing (Parramatta LEP 2011)

Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal

Site-specific Planning Proposal

Zoning

B4 Mixed Use

B4 Mixed Use

B4 Mixed Use

Height of Buildings

28m (8 storeys)

211m (65 storeys)

211m (exclusive of Design Excellence bonus – 65 storeys) - see further comments below

Floor Space Ratio

3.5:1

15:1 FSR (including the following).

·    10:1 Mapped Incentive FSR (inclusive of 1:1 commercial FSR)

·    1.5:1 Design Excellence FSR

·    0.5:1 High Performing Building FSR

·    3:1 Opportunity Site FSR

·    With the potential for unlimited additional commercial FSR*

 

15:1 FSR (including the following):

·    10:1 Mapped Maximum FSR (inclusive of 1:1 commercial FSR)

·    1.5:1 Design Excellence FSR

·    0.5:1 High Performing Building FSR

·    3:1 Opportunity Site FSR

·    Unlimited additional commercial floor space1.

 

Total FSR of at least: 16.42:1

Parking

Car Parking rates per Parramatta LEP 2011

Car parking rates as per Parramatta CBD Strategic Transport Study

Car parking rates as per Parramatta CBD Strategic Transport Study

Development2

104 residential units3. with some commercial GFA at ground level

417 residential units3 and minimum of 2,386m2 plus unlimited additional commercial GFA permitted within height control

399 residential units4 and minimum of 2,386m2 plus unlimited additional commercial GFA permitted within height control

 

1.    Above the required 1:1 minimum commercial provision but within the Height of Building control requirement

2.    Assumed Mixed Use redevelopment of site not completely commercial building

3.    Based on average unit size of 80m2

4.    Based on Reference Design submitted by applicant

 

10.   A more detailed assessment of the Planning Proposal is provided at pages 8 to 16 at Attachment 1. Key aspects of the assessment are:

·     Whilst the application sought a height of 170 metres and additional commercial floor space of 1.42:1, Council Officers are recommending that the controls be aligned with the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal and so a height of 211m (65 storeys), (243 metres (75 storeys) with design excellence) and unlimited commercial floor space above the minimum 1:1 requirement.

·     The reference design provided allows for a 6m setback which will protect existing trees already located on the site. Preliminary consultation with Transport for NSW and Council Traffic Engineers suggests that potential road widening and/or a vehicle deceleration lane may be required given the sites location on the Great Western Highway. It is proposed that these issues will be investigated in more detail as part of the preparation of a site-specific Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement.

·     The Council’s Heritage Advisor raised no objection to the Planning Proposal, subject to more details regarding structural stability and design being submitted with the subsequent design competition and development application.

 

ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURE OF FSR BONUSES

 

11.   The subject Planning Proposal, like two site-specific Planning Proposals within the Parramatta CBD at 2 O’Connell Street and 12 Hassall Street, is utilising the site specific FSR bonuses (including ‘opportunity site’ bonus) proposed under the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal.

 

12.   The two site-specific Planning Proposals (2 O’Connell and 12 Hassall Streets) were drafted so that the design excellence and opportunity sites bonuses were included in the mapped FSR, rather than separate site-specific clauses. The reason for this is because the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) advised that Planning Proposals must be formatted so as not to pre-empt the outcomes of the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal Gateway Determination, and to be structured more like the Parramatta LEP 2011.

 

13.   Now that the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal is substantially more progressed and has received Gateway Determination (on 13 December 2018), Council Officers consider that the site-specific bonuses relating to FSR should be structured like the proposed FSR controls in the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal. This will be achieved by inserting site specific clauses that apply to the subject site which apply the policy framework proposed for the CBD. This will ensure the bonuses are being applied more transparently and ensures that they can be better assessed on merit at Development Application stage.

 

14.   However, in the event that the DPIE requests that the floorspace be structured in an alternative way, Council may consider that the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any required amendments to the Planning Proposal for the purposes of public exhibition, as long as the total FSR amount (of at least 16.42:1) remains unchanged. Granting this delegation will ensure that if the Department requires a different structure for the Planning Proposal that this can be dealt with efficiently and without the need for a further report to Council.

 

DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN

 

15.   Should a Gateway Determination be issued, a site-specific Development Control Plan (DCP) will be prepared for the site and reported to Council prior to public exhibition. Principles to be addressed in the site-specific DCP are to include, but are not limited to, built form, building separation and setbacks, heritage interface, vehicle access points and deceleration lane requirements and landscaping.

 

PARRAMATTA LOCAL PLANNING PANEL

 

16.   As per the Ministerial direction issued on 27 September 2018, Council is required to refer all Planning Proposals prepared after 1 June 2018 to the Local Planning Panel for advice before Council considers whether or not to forward it to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for a Gateway Determination.

 

17.   At its meeting on 19 May 2020, the Parramatta Local Planning Panel, in issuing its advice to Council, supported the Council Officer’s recommendations and advised Council to forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for the purposes of requesting a Gateway Determination (refer Attachment 1).

 

PLAN-MAKING DELEGATIONS

 

18.   New delegations were announced by the then-Minister for Planning and Infrastructure in October 2012, allowing councils to make LEP amendments of local significance. On 26 November 2012, Council resolved to accept the delegation for plan-making functions and that these functions be delegated to the Chief Executive Officer.

 

19.   Should Council resolve to proceed with the subject Planning Proposal, it is recommended that Council issue a request to the Department that it be able to exercise its plan-making delegations for the Planning Proposal. If the Department agrees to this request, this means that once the Planning Proposal has been to Gateway, undergone public exhibition and been adopted by Council, Council Officers will liaise directly with the Parliamentary Counsel Office on the legal drafting and mapping of the LEP amendment. The LEP amendment would then be signed by Council’s Chief Executive Officer before being notified on the NSW Legislation website. 

 

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS

 

20.   The Planning Proposal is consistent with the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal and has planning merit to be endorsed for the purposes of seeking a Gateway Determination, consistent with the Local Planning Panel’s advice as of 19 May 2020 (refer Attachment 1). If Council resolves to proceed with the Planning Proposal, it will be forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment requesting a Gateway Determination.

 

21.   Should a Gateway Determination be issued, the Chief Executive Officer will commence negotiations of a Planning Agreement in accordance with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy.

 

22.   Should a Gateway Determination be issued, a site-specific Development Control Plan (DCP) will be prepared for the site, addressing the principles of built form, building separation and setbacks, heritage interface, vehicle access points and landscaping, and reported to Council prior to public exhibition.

 

23.   Should a Gateway Determination be issued, the Planning Proposal will be placed on public exhibition concurrently with the site-specific Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement for a minimum for 28 days.  A report on the outcomes of the public exhibition will be provided to the Local Planning Panel addressing any objections received. If no objections are received, the matter will be reported directly to Council seeking approval to finalise the Planning Proposal and the accompanying site-specific Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

24.   The applicant has indicated their willingness to enter into a Planning Agreement in accordance with Council policy and the endorsed Council rates as of April 2017. A draft Planning Agreement will be negotiated should a Gateway Determination be issued. Based on the maximum development potential currently proposed under this Planning Proposal and Council’s endorsed community infrastructure rates the amount payable would be $5,010,600. However, when negotiating the Planning Agreement a clause will be sought that requires the applicant to pay the community infrastructure contribution rate at the time of payment. If this is agreed and the contribution rate is increased Council would be paid the higher amount applicable at that time.

 

Grace Haydon

Student Project Officer

 

Marko Rubcic

Project Officer, Land Use Planning

 

Bianca Lewis

Team Leader Land Use Planning

 

Robert Cologna

Land Use Planning Manager

 

David Birds

Group Manager, City Planning

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Jennifer Concato

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Local Planning Panel Report and Minute

19 Pages

 

2

Planning Proposal - 8-14 Great Western Highway Parramatta

34 Pages

 

3

Urban Design Report - 8-14 Great Western Highway Parramatta

33 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

 


Item 18.2 - Attachment 1

Local Planning Panel Report and Minute

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 18.2 - Attachment 2

Planning Proposal - 8-14 Great Western Highway Parramatta

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 18.2 - Attachment 3

Urban Design Report - 8-14 Great Western Highway Parramatta

 


































Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 18.3

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER        18.3

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Gateway Request: Planning Proposal for land at 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta

REFERENCE           RZ/11/2016 - D07423319

REPORT OF            Project Officer Land Use        

 

LANDOWNER          Century 888 Pty Ltd

 

APPLICANT             Think Planners

Development applications considered by sydney central city planning panel - Nil


PURPOSE:

 

To seek Council’s endorsement of a Planning Proposal for land at 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta to be forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry & Environment for a Gateway Determination.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)    That Council endorse the Planning Proposal (at Attachment 1) for the purposes of seeking a Gateway Determination, for land at 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta which seeks to amend the Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 in relation to the subject site by:

1.  Maintaining the R4 – High Density Residential zone for the developable part of the site (3,825sqm) and extending the RE1 – Public Recreation zone for the undevelopable land affected by the Natural Resources - Biodiversity control,

2.  Increasing the maximum Building Height (HOB) control from 11 metres to 22 metres across the R4 zoned part of the site, and removing the HOB control from the undevelopable land,

3.  Increasing the Floor Space Ratio (FSR) control from 0.8:1 to 1.3:1 across the R4 zoned part of the site, and removing the FSR control from the undevelopable land,

4.  Removing No.85 Thomas Street from the Land Reserved for Acquisition Map, subject to agreement being reached regarding the Planning Agreement referred to in (d) below.

 

(b)    That the Planning Proposal be forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry & Environment for a Gateway Determination.

 

(c)    That a site-specific Development Control Plan (DCP) be prepared and reported to Council prior to exhibition.

 

(d)    That the CEO be authorised to negotiate a Planning Agreement on behalf of Council in addition to any development contributions payable, and that the outcome of negotiations be reported back to Council prior to its concurrent exhibition with the draft site specific DCP and Planning Proposal.

 

(e)    That Council advises the Department of Planning, Industry & Environment that the CEO will be exercising the plan-making delegations for this Planning Proposal as authorised by Council.

 

(f)     That Council authorise the CEO to correct any minor anomalies of a non-policy and administrative nature that may arise during the plan-making process.

 

(g)    Further, that Council note the advice of the Local Planning Panel (provided at Attachment 1) is consistent with Council officer’s recommendation.

 

 

THE SITE

 

1.     The site at 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta is subject to Parramatta Local Environmental Plan (PLEP) 2011. It includes four (4) properties on the southern side of Thomas Street (see Figure 1) with a total site area of 6,321sqm. The 4 lots that form the subject site each contain a single dwelling house, all of which are owned by Century 888 Pty Ltd (the landowner). The legal descriptions of the properties are listed below:

i.   Lot 13 DP 1239 known as No. 85 Thomas Street

ii.   Lot 142 DP 537053 known as No. 87 Thomas Street

iii.  Lot 15 DP 1239 known as No. 89 Thomas Street

iv.  Lot 16 DP 1239 known as No. 91 Thomas Street

Figure 1 - Subject site at 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta

2.     The subject site was able to achieve approximately 5,057sqm of high-density residential GFA under the planning controls when the Planning Proposal was lodged in June 2016. However, on 28 July 2017 a Council led LEP Amendment known as Parramatta LEP 2011 – Amendment No.20 - Review of Land Reserved for Acquisition was gazetted, which reduced the developability of the land in the following manner:

·    1,296sqm of land at No.85 Thomas Street being zoned RE1 Public Recreation and placed on Land Reserved for Acquisition map for local open space, reducing the R4 – High Density Residential zoned area from 6,321sqm to 5,025sqm,

·    1,200sqm of land at No.89 and 91 Thomas Street being identified for Natural Resources Biodiversity provisions, further reducing the developable site area to 3,825sqm.

Figure 2 –Land subject to Acquisition and Natural Resources Biodiversity Provisions

3.     In effect, the amendment reduced the residential GFA potential on the site from 5,057sqm to 4,020sqm. Figure 2 shows the land subject to the acquisition provision as well as the land subject to the Natural Resources Biodiversity provisions.

PLANNING PROPOSAL

 

4.     On 6 June 2016, Think Planners (the Applicant) lodged a Planning Proposal with the City of Parramatta Council on behalf of the landowners, Century 888 Pty Ltd, to amend the planning controls applicable to 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta (subject site). The Proposal has been subject to multiple refinements based upon detailed input from Council officers leading to an amended Proposal being submitted to Council on 4 February 2020.

5.     The Planning Proposal and changes to planning provisions for 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta are summarised in Table 1 below. This includes proposed minor changes from the applicant’s revised Planning Proposal submitted on 4 February 2020.

Table 1: Summary of Planning Proposal for 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta

Parramatta LEP 2011

Applicant’s initial Planning Proposal

6 June 2016

Planning Controls before 28 July 2017

Current Controls

Applicant’s revised Planning Proposal 

4 February 2020

Current Planning Proposal

9 June 2020

Zoning

R4 – High Density Residential (6,321sqm)

R4 – High Density Residential (6,321sqm)

Part R4 High Density Residential (5,025sqm),

Part RE1 Public Recreation (1,296sqm)

As current controls

Part R4 High Density (Developable Portion approx. 3,825sqm),

Part RE1 Public Recreation (Undevelopable portion approx. 2,496sqm)

Maximum HOB

 

34 metres

(11 storeys)
(R4 land only)

11 metres

(3 storeys)

11 metres

(3 storeys)

(R4 land only)

25 metres
(7 storeys)

(R4 land only)

22 metres

(6 storeys)

(R4 land only)

Maximum FSR

 

2.2:1

(entire site area)

0.8:1 (entire site area)

0.8:1

(R4 land only)

0.8:1

(entire site area)

1.3:1 on R4 land (with land dedication)

Maximum GFA

13,906sqm

(based on the total site area)

5,057sqm (based on the total site area)

4,020sqm (based on R4 High Density Residential only)

4,994sqm (based on the submitted concept design)

Approx. 4,973sqm (based on developable site area)

FSR on Developable Portion

3,825sqm

3.64:1

1.32:1

1.05:1

1.3:1

1.3:1

Other Planning Controls

Foreshore Building Line,

Acid Sulfate Soils,

Heritage

Foreshore Building Line,

Acid Sulfate Soils,

Heritage,

Land Reserved for Acquisition,

Natural Resources – Biodiversity,

Natural Resources – Riparian Lands and Waterways

Approximate Dwelling yield

(based on 85sqm per dwelling)

164 dwellings

59 dwellings

47 dwellings

59 dwellings

59 dwellings

 

6.     The intent of the Planning Proposal is to enable a 6-storey residential flat building development comprising of approximately 59 dwellings within 2 buildings, which include additional setbacks for the 5th & 6th storeys and basement car-parking access within the building envelope. This is shown in detail at Attachment 1 and below in Figure 3.

Figure 3 – Scale of Planning Proposal along Thomas St with adjacent development

7.     The Planning Proposal concept design is considered to be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood context and is assessed in detail in Attachment 1. A key element of the concept design is how the built form relates to adjoining properties. In this regard, the proposed side setbacks will exceed the minimum requirements of the Apartment Design Guide (ADG) and will allow substantial deep soil planting to mitigate the impact of the proposal on adjoining properties.

 

8.     The detailed analysis contained in Attachment 1 also addresses the relevant State and Council policies, urban design issues including building heights, streetscape and privacy impacts and landscaping as well as traffic and parking, heritage and ecology.

 

9.     Many of these matters will additionally be covered in the draft site-specific DCP, which will be exhibited concurrently with the Planning Proposal and Planning Agreement should Council resolve to proceed with the Proposal.

 

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN

10.   The site-specific DCP can be prepared once the Planning Proposal has been submitted for Gateway Determination and the extent of the development on the site is established. The site-specific DCP would guide the redevelopment of the site, having regard to the local context and detailed design requirement for the site, including, but not limited to the following:

·    Built Form and Massing

·    Solar Access and Overshadowing

·    Traffic, Transport and Parking

·    Landscaping and Open Space

11.   The draft DCP document will be reported separately to Council prior to any public exhibition and will facilitate a design in keeping with the submitted concept should Council endorse the Proposal in its current form.

 

PLANNING AGREEMENT OFFER

12.   In order to support the Planning Proposal, the applicant indicated they intend to enter into a Planning Agreement with Council and have submitted a Letter of Offer substantiating the proposed terms of the agreement. The Letter of Offer dated 17 March 2020 proposes to dedicate to Council the part of the site that is not able to be developed for high density residential purposes. This includes the existing RE1 Public Recreation zoned land (1,296sqm) affected by a land acquisition for local open space at No.85 Thomas Street, and the undevelopable portion of R4 High Density Residential land affected by the Natural Resources control (1,200sqm) at No.89 and No.91 Thomas Street (see Figure 2). The applicant’s Letter of Offer is included in Attachment 1 on pages labelled p.276-277.

13.   The dedication of land offer provides the opportunity for Council to attain the acquisition asset on No. 85 Thomas Street at no cost. Council would otherwise be required to purchase the Land Reserved for Acquisition from the owner at a market rate at some point in the future. The Planning Agreement also seeks to facilitate the dedication of the undevelopable portion of the R4 High Density Residential zoned land to Council free of cost. This land is intended to provide a contiguous vegetation buffer along the rear of the site with the adjacent RE1 Public Recreation land. It is recommended that this portion of the R4 High Density Residential zone be rezoned to RE1 Public Recreation to match the adjoining land and to properly reflect its intended use.

14.   Under Council’s Planning Agreements Policy, planning proposals outside the Parramatta CBD seeking uplift in density need to be supported by a planning agreement that is valued at 50% of the resulting land value uplift. However in this instance, it is acknowledged that the gazettal of PLEP 2011 Amendment No.20 reduced the development potential on the site and the planning proposal is only seeking to recoup the density potential it may have been able to achieve under the planning controls in place prior to this amendment. The dedication offer of 2,496sqm of land at the rear of the subject site provides the opportunity for Council to attain the acquisition asset on No. 85 Thomas Street at no cost and will allow this parcel of land to be removed from the Land Reserved for Acquisition Map in Parramatta LEP 2011. The proposed Planning Agreement also ensures the public protection of environmentally sensitive land on No. 89 and 91 Thomas Street upon Council ownership. It is therefore recommended that Council proceed with the negotiations for a Planning Agreement with the applicant on this basis.

LOCAL PLANNING PANEL ADVICE

15.   As per the Ministerial direction issued on 27 September 2018, Council is required to refer all Planning Proposals prepared after 1 June 2018 to the Local Planning Panel for advice before Council considers whether or not to forward it to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for a Gateway Determination.

16.   On 19 May 2020 the Parramatta Local Planning Panel, in issuing its advice to Council, supported the Council Officer’s recommendations and advised Council to forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for the purposes of requesting a Gateway Determination (refer to Attachment 1).

PLAN-MAKING DELEGATIONS

 

17.   Revised delegations were announced by the then Minister for Planning and Infrastructure in October 2012, allowing councils to make LEPs of local significance. On 26 November 2012, Council resolved to accept the delegation for plan-making functions. Council has resolved that these functions be delegated to the CEO.

18.   Should Council resolve to endorse the Planning Proposal to proceed, it is recommended that Council request that it exercise its plan-making delegations. This means that once the Planning Proposal has been to Gateway, undergone public exhibition and been adopted by Council, Council officers will deal directly with the Parliamentary Counsel Office on the legal drafting and mapping of the amendment. The LEP amendment is then signed by the CEO before being notified on the NSW Legislation website.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

19.   Should Council resolve to proceed with the Planning Proposal for the site, it will be forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry & Environment requesting a Gateway Determination.

20.   If a Gateway Determination is issued, the Planning Proposal will be placed on public exhibition in conjunction with any associated site specific DCP and Planning Agreement.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

21.   Should Council resolve to proceed with the Planning Proposal, the costs incurred in conducting the community consultation are covered by the fees associated with the submission of the Planning Proposal request.

22.   Preliminary financial implications of the Planning Agreement Offer are provided in Attachment 1. The ongoing maintenance cost for the 0.25ha land dedication is approximately $5,000 per year. The maintenance cost would be added to the existing maintenance contract for the adjoining reserve. All of Council’s costs associated with the Planning Agreement are to be paid by the developer in accordance Council’s Planning Agreements Policy 2018.

 

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS

 

23.   The Planning Proposal seeks to rezone the land, increase the maximum height of building control and include a maximum FSR control for the site at 85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta. It is recommended that Council endorse the Planning Proposal provided at Attachment 1 and for it to be forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry & Environment for a Gateway Determination.

 

24.   Should a Gateway Determination be issued, the Planning Proposal will be placed on public exhibition and the outcomes will be reported to the Local Planning Panel if any objections are received. If no objections are received, the matter will be reported directly to Council post-exhibition.

 

Kieren Lawson

Project Officer Land Use Planning

 

Kevin Kuo

Team Leader Land Use Planning

 

Michael Rogers

Land Use Planning Manager

 

David Birds

Group Manager, City Planning

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Jennifer Concato

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

LPP Minutes & Item - 19 May 2020

116 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL


Item 18.3 - Attachment 1

LPP Minutes & Item - 19 May 2020

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 18.4

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER        18.4

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Amendment to the East Epping Planning Proposal and draft amendments to the Hornsby DCP 2013

REFERENCE           F2019/01712 - D07221356

REPORT OF            Team Leader Land Use Planning

PREVIOUS ITEMS           18.5 - FOR APPROVAL:  Gateway Request: Planning Proposal - 2-8 & 1-7 Rosebank Avenue, Epping - Council - 08 Oct 2019 6:30pm

                                18.6 - FOR APPROVAL:  Gateway Request: Planning Proposal - Various properties in Rockleigh Way, Pembroke and Essex Streets, Epping - Council - 08 Oct 2019 6:30pm

                                18.5 - FOR APPROVAL: Gateway Request: Planning Proposal - Properties on the western side of Essex Street, Epping (between Maida and Epping Roads) - Council - 10 Feb 2020 6.30pm       

 

PURPOSE:

 

To seek Council’s endorsement for the following:

·        Amendments to the East Epping Planning Proposal in order to be consistent with the Harmonisation Planning Proposal for the purposes of seeking a revised Gateway Determination from the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.

·        Draft amendments to the Hornsby Draft Development Control Plan 2013 for the purposes of placing on public exhibition with the Planning Proposals for East Epping and Rosebank Avenue, Epping.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)    That Council note:

i.   That the East Epping Planning Proposal was endorsed by Council at its meeting on 8 October 2019 for the purposes of addressing transition issues of high density areas adjacent to heritage conservation areas in Epping; and

ii.   Subsequently the Planning Proposal received a Gateway Determination from the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) on 10 January 2020.

(b)    That Council endorse the following amendments to the East Epping Planning Proposal (at Attachment 1 provided under separate cover) for the purposes of forwarding to the DPIE to request the issuing of a revised Gateway Determination:

i.              Inclusion of an additional 15 properties (1 to 31 Rockleigh Way) in the Planning Proposal to be consistent with Condition 1 of the Gateway Determination; and

ii.              Amending the proposed height limit applying to the R3 Medium Density Residential zoned land in the Rockleigh Park Precinct (1-31 and 2-24 Rockleigh Way, 3-7 and 4-8 Brenda Way and 5A Essex St) from 9 metres to 11 metres, in order to be consistent with Council’s endorsed Harmonisation Planning Proposal.

(c)    That Council request the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment to issue Council’s Chief Executive Officer plan-making delegations for this Planning Proposal.

(d)    That Council endorse the following amendments to the Hornsby Development Control Plan 2013 (DCP) for the purposes of public exhibition:

i.       The future widening of the pedestrian link between Essex Street and Forest Grove from 1.8 metres to 3 metres at Attachment 2

ii.      Setback, heritage and landscaping controls supporting the Planning Proposal for land at 1 – 7 and 2 – 8 Rosebank Avenue, Epping at Attachment 3.

iii.      Correction of minor errors to the car parking clauses relating to Epping Town Centre at Attachment 4.

(e)    That the Draft DCP Amendments be placed on public exhibition concurrently with the Planning Proposals for 1-7 and 2-8 Rosebank Avenue and various properties at East Epping for a minimum of 28 days and the outcome of the public exhibition be reported back to Council.

(f)     Further, that Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to correct any minor inconsistencies or anomalies of an administrative nature relating to the Planning Proposal, draft Development Control Plan that may arise during the drafting and exhibition processes.

 

 

PLANNING PROPOSAL TIMELINE

 

 

BACKGROUND

1.     The Epping Planning Review was commenced by the City of Parramatta Council in late 2016 to address the unintended consequences of the planning control amendments brought into effect by the NSW Government in March 2014. One of the key issues examined by the Epping Planning Review was the impact of the interface between high density development with heritage conservation areas (HCAs).

2.     On 9 July 2018, a report was presented to Council on the findings of Stage 1 of the Epping Planning Review. At this meeting the Council resolved to prepare planning proposals for the following properties in order to address the adverse impacts of high density development on adjoining Heritage Conservation Areas (HCAs):

a.  Various properties in East Epping - 21-29 Essex Street, 23 and 23A Pembroke Street and the Rockleigh Park precinct (the East Epping Planning Proposal);

b.  2-8 and 1-7 Rosebank Ave, Epping; and

c.  Western Side of Essex Street (between Maida and Epping Roads)

 

Figure 1: Subject sites of the Planning Proposals (outlined in blue) and adjoining Heritage Conservation Areas (shown as red hatched)

3.     Subsequently three Planning Proposals were prepared and reported to the Local Planning Panel for advice and then to Council. The current status of each planning proposal and associated draft Development Control Plan (DCP) amendments are summarised in Table 1 below.

 

Table 1: Status of Council initiated Planning Proposals in Epping seeking to address issues of high density residential development adjacent to heritage conservation areas.

Planning Proposal

Status

Next Steps

East Epping Planning Proposal

 

Council endorsed the Planning Proposal on 8 October 2019. Gateway Determination was received from the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment on 10 January 2020.

 

·     Amendments to the Planning Proposal are sought, relating to inclusion of all properties in Rockleigh Way and change of maximum building heights as part of this Council report.

·     As per Condition 2 of the Gateway Determination the Planning Proposal must be placed on public exhibition concurrently with the Rosebank Avenue Planning Proposal.

2-8 & 1-7 Rosebank Avenue

Council endorsed the Planning Proposal on 8 October 2019. Gateway Determination was received from the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment on 10 January 2020 (with an Alteration received 30 March 2020).

 

·     Draft DCP Amendments relating to Rosebank Ave are proposed as part of this Council report.

·     As per Condition 2 of the Gateway Determination the Planning Proposal will be placed on public exhibition with the East Epping Planning Proposal.

Western side of Essex St (between Epping & Maida Roads)

Council on 10 February 2020 resolved not to progress the Planning Proposal, however it resolved to progress the Draft DCP amendment relating to widening of the Forest Grove / Essex St pedestrian link.

·     Draft DCP Amendments to widen the pedestrian link are proposed as part of this Council report.

 

 

4.     The Planning Proposal relating to properties on the western side of Essex Street (between Maida and Epping Roads) proposed amendments to the planning controls to allow detached dual occupancy dwellings. Council resolved at its meeting of the 10 February 2020 not to proceed with the Essex Street Planning Proposal. This decision was based on further assessment presented in the Council report detailing the potential impacts of a new dwelling at the rear of the property on existing mature trees and the heritage conservation area.

EAST EPPING PLANNING PROPOSAL – AMENDMENTS

5.     The purpose of the East Epping Planning Proposal is to amend the land use zoning, floor space ratio and height controls to provide an improved transition in built form to the adjoining East Epping Heritage Conservation Area (refer Attachment 1 for the Planning Proposal which is provide under separate cover). Table 2 provides a summary of existing and proposed amendments of the East Epping Planning Proposal (as endorsed by Council on 8 October 2019).

Table 2: East Epping Planning Proposal - Summary of current planning controls and proposed amendments to the Hornsby LEP 2013 controls relating to the subject properties.

Subject sites

Hornsby LEP 2013 – current controls

Planning Proposal - proposed controls (as per Gateway Determination of 10 January 2020)

Proposed amendments (subject to this Council report)

Rockleigh Park precinct

·     Zoned R4 High Density Residential;

·     maximum building height of 17.5 metres; and

·     No maximum floor space ratio (FSR).

·     R3 Medium Density Residential;

·     Maximum building height of 9 metres; and

·     Maximum floor space ratio of 0.6:1.

·     Inclusion of 1-31 Rockleigh Way (as per Condition 1 of the Gateway Determination)

·     Amending the proposed height from 9 metres to 11 metres (consistent with Harmonisation Planning Proposal)

21-29 Essex Street

·     Zoned R4 High Density Residential;

·     Maximum height of buildings of 17.5 metres; and

·     No maximum floor space ratio (FSR).

·     R4 High Density Residential;

·     Maximum building height of 11 metres; and

·     Maximum floor space ratio of 0.8:1.

None

23-23A Pembroke Street

·     Zoned R3 Medium Density Residential

·     Maximum building height of 12 metres; and

·     No maximum floor space ratio (FSR).

·     R4 High Density Residential

·     Maximum building height of 11 metres; and

·     Maximum floor space ratio of 0.8:1.

None

 

6.     The Harmonisation Planning Proposal seeks to consolidate into one Planning Instrument a set of controls that will replace the controls in the five different Local Environmental Plans that currently apply in different parts of the City of Parramatta. This Planning Proposal was considered by Council at its meeting of 11 November 2019. Council resolved to endorse the Planning Proposal for submission to the DPIE, subject to a number of amendments being incorporated, including:

(i)  “Retain the existing height controls applying to R3 Medium Density Residential zoned land currently subject to Parramatta LEP 2011, and amend the Height of Building Map to apply a height limit of 11 metres to R3 zoned land across the remainder of the City of Parramatta LGA

 

7.     It is noted that the East Epping Planning Proposal was reported to Council on 8 October 2019 prior to the Harmonisation Planning Proposal.  As indicated in table 2 above the East Epping Planning Proposal endorsed by Council proposed a 9 metre height for the R3 Medium Density zoned land across the LGA. Consequently, it is inconsistent with the 11 November 2019 Council resolution to apply a 11 metre height limit to R3 zoned land to R3 Medium Density zoned land across the LGA. Amendments are proposed to the East Epping Planning Proposal to ensure it is consistent with the Harmonisation Planning Proposal. Therefore, this report seeks Council endorsement to request an amended Gateway Determination from the DPIE in order to make the proposed height for the Rockleigh Park precinct 11 metres, which is consistent with the Harmonisation Planning Proposal.

 

8.     Furthermore, Condition 1 of the Gateway requires that additional 15 properties at 1 - 31 Rockleigh Way be included in the Planning Proposal, as follows:

“1. Prior to public exhibition, the Planning Proposal is to be amended to reduce the maximum height of buildings for the area surrounding Rockleigh Precinct currently labelled as 12 metres to 9 metres.”

9.     The properties at 1-31 Rockleigh Way are outlined in yellow on Figure 2. Currently this area is zoned R3 Medium Density Residential and has a maximum height of buildings 12 metres under the Hornsby LEP 2013.  The sites that are not hatched are those originally included in Council’s Planning Proposal. Those hatched red are those the Gateway condition requires be added to the Planning Proposal. The DPIE’s Gateway Assessment Report indicated that the additional sites should be included as they abut the HCA and the planning controls should be applied consistently for the Rockleigh Park Precinct. This will provide a transition from the R2 Low Density Residential of the East Epping Heritage Conservation Area and the R4 High Density Residential area of Essex and Pembroke Streets.

Figure 2: New area to be included in the Planning Proposal (1-31 Rockleigh Way, Epping) shown in hatched red.

10.   Condition 1 of the Gateway Determination would also need to be amended to reflect the new proposed height within R3 zones of 11 metres, as endorsed by Council in the Harmonisation Planning Proposal, instead of the 9 metres stated in the Gateway Condition.

11.   Council Officers consider the inclusion of the remainder of the Rockleigh Park Precinct and the proposed reduction in height for 1-31 Rockleigh Way from the current 12 metres to the proposed 11 metres to be the most appropriate response at this time. There is a transitional issue that impacts on this recommendation. This precinct based planning proposal seeks to rezone the precinct from R4 High Density Residential to R3 Medium Density Residential under Hornsby LEP 2013, however, apartment buildings are currently permissible in both of these zones. Under the Harmonisation Planning Proposal, endorsed by Council, this precinct will remain zoned R3 Medium Density Residential however apartment buildings will not be permitted, instead, townhouses will be the highest density residential form permitted. Technically the height controls will need to be applied differently as these permitted uses change, and the controls in the DCP will need to change when the Harmonisation Planning Proposal comes into force.

12.   The increase in height 9m to 11m to ensure consistency with the Harmonisation Planning Proposal will not have any significant impacts for the following reasons:

a.  The precinct is unlikely to be redeveloped in the short to medium term. As can be viewed from the subdivision pattern this precinct was subdivided into relatively small lots ranging from 250sqm to 350sqm and the houses were built in the mid-1990s. Amalgamation of enough small lots to make an apartment building development is unlikely.

b.  The Harmonisation Planning Proposal process will ensure only townhouses will be permitted. This will make amalgamation of these lots for redevelopment even less viable. In the opinion of Council Officers it is unlikely there will be any change on these sites in the short to medium term.

c.  The Harmonisation Process can apply controls via the consolidated DCP being prepared. These future DCP controls can apply appropriate controls to manage the impacts associated with the 11m height. As an example, controls that limit any third storey in a townhouse to rooms within the roof space, in attic form, could be imposed as has been proposed in other precincts in other parts of the Parramatta LGA.

 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE HORNSBY DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN

 

13.   The following draft amendments are proposed to the Hornsby Development Control Plan (2013):

a.  Insert a provision to facilitate widening of the Forest Grove/Essex Street pedestrian link in the event of redevelopment;

b.  Design controls to support the Rosebank Avenue Planning Proposal; and

c.  Minor corrections to the Epping Town Centre car parking provisions (no policy implications).

14.   Each of the draft DCP amendments are described in turn below and are found at Attachments 2 – 4 of this Report. If endorsed by Council, the amendments will be placed on public exhibition concurrently with the Rosebank Avenue and East Epping Planning Proposals.

 

Forest Grove/ Essex Street Pedestrian Link

 

15.   A pedestrian link is located between 58-60 and 60A Essex Street and 19-21 and 15-17 Forest Grove, Epping as indicated at Figure 3. The pedestrian link is classified as public road, it is approximately 115 metres long and 1.58 – 1.8 metres wide. Its potential for widening was considered as part of the outcomes of the Epping Planning Review, when Council (part) resolved on 9 July 2018 that:

“(j)(ii)   Draft DCP planning controls that require provision to be made for the widening and improvement of the pedestrian link currently located between 58-60 Essex Street linking through to Forest Grove.”

 

16.   Further, an assessment of the potential to widen the pedestrian link, including through future dedication of private land, was presented to Council at its meeting on 10 February 2020, and as such Council resolved (part):

“That amendments to Section 3 of the Hornsby DCP 2013 relating to widening of the pedestrian link between Essex Street to Forest Grove be prepared and reported to Council...”

 

Figure 3: Pedestrian link (shown in red) between properties 60 and 60A and 58 Essex Street and 19 and 15-17 Forest Grove

 

17.   An assessment of the potential for the laneway was presented to Council at its meeting on 10 February 2020, and is summarised at Table 3 below. The assessment concluded that there is limited opportunity for widening the pedestrian link due to strata development along Forest Grove and reduced redevelopment potential along Essex Street (which sits within a heritage conservation area). Therefore the public benefit of widening the laneway may only be achieved in the long-term future (20-50 years), and will only occur if the planning controls are in place.

 

Table 3: Assessment of surrounding properties and potential to widen pedestrian link

Property

Potential for widening

15-17 Forest Grove

Residential flat building (strata title) approved under Hornsby (DA/346/2015), constructed at the end of 2017. As strata subdivided unlikely to be redeveloped in the long term and therefore limited opportunity to widen laneway.

19-21 Forest Grove

Development application (DA/55/2019) was approved (by the Parramatta Local Planning Panel on 19 November 2019) which conditions the development to widen the existing laneway 0.3 metres and it be dedicated to Council and therefore limited opportunity to widen laneway further at this time.

60A Essex Street

Single dwelling (dual occupancy). Unlikely to occur as a result of the existing planning controls (R2 Low Density Residential and within the Essex St HCA).

60 Essex Street

Single dwelling. Unlikely to occur as a result of the existing planning controls (R2 Low Density Residential and within the Essex St HCA).

58 Essex Street

Single dwelling. Unlikely to occur as a result of the existing planning controls (R2 Low Density Residential and within the Essex St HCA).

 

18.   It is proposed that the current 1.58 – 1.8 metres could be increased to 3 metres in the long term. This width is consistent with Council’s Public Domain Guidelines for pedestrian links. A 3 metres wide laneway would realise improved safety and amenity benefits, and would encourage pedestrian usage for shortened access (particularly those residents east of Essex St) to surrounding parks (e.g. Forest Park) and the Epping Town Centre.

 

19.   If redevelopment potential was realised in the long term, the widening would occur through land dedication from redevelopment of either side of the link, and would require between 0.75 metres and 0.6 metres of dedication per property. This is not considered onerous for future high density development, as it could be included within the setback area.

 

20.   The amendments to the Section 3 of the Hornsby DCP 2013 are presented in Attachment 2 and include amendment to the Figures containing the Forrest Grove/ Essex Street Precinct to reflect the location of the existing pedestrian link and inserting supporting text “future widening of the pedestrian link to 3 metres, to allow for public domain improvements including seating and planting.”

 

Rosebank Avenue – Draft DCP controls

 

21.   The purpose of the Rosebank Avenue Planning Proposal is to address heritage interface issues resulting from a poor transition between recent five to six storey apartment development in Hazelwood Place and Cliff Road to the low density Rosebank Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. Council endorsed the Planning Proposal for properties at 2-8 and 1-7 Rosebank Avenue to amend the Hornsby LEP 2013 as follows:

a)   Remove the Heritage Conservation Area notation from these sites;

b)   Rezone the sites from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential;

c)     Amend the maximum height of buildings control for these sites from 8.5 metres to 11 metres – to enable future apartment building development no greater than three storeys on the sites; and

d)   Apply a maximum floor space ratio (FSR) control of 0.8:1, noting there is no existing maximum FSR control for the sites.

 

22.   A Gateway Determination was received from the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment on 10 January 2020. However, Condition 1 of the Gateway Determination reduced the proposed height of 11 metres (three storeys) to the existing height of 8.5 metres (two storeys) for 5, 7 and 6-8 Rosebank Ave. Council Officers assessed the impact of Condition 1 and considered that it would potentially undermine the objectives of the planning proposal of delivering residential flat buildings. Subsequently, Council Officers wrote to the DPIE to ask that they consider amending Condition 1 and that alternative design controls (i.e. DCP controls) could be put in place to respect the interface with existing streetscape and heritage item.

23.   An alteration to the Gateway Determination was issued by DPIE on 30 March 2020, revising Condition 1 to maintain the proposed 11 metres height (three storeys), however supporting DCP controls to respond to the adjoining heritage conservation area, as follows:

“Prior to public exhibition, amend the planning proposal to outline a suitable planning mechanism to ensure transition of height and scale to the adjoining land to the north and retain streetscape values. This may include the requirement to prepare a Development Control Plan that comes into force once the planning proposal is finalised.”

 

24.   In accordance with Condition 1 of the Gateway Determination and Council resolution of 8 October 2019, draft amendments to Sections 3 and 9 of the Hornsby DCP are proposed for Rosebank Avenue are found at Attachment 3, and described as follows:

a)   Provision of minimum setbacks at ground level and first and second levels which are designed to ensure a sympathetic transition to the adjoining heritage item and heritage conservation area as shown at Figure 4 below.

b)   That the side setback will be designed to allow for trees to be retained and planted to maintain the landscape amenity and setting of adjoining heritage items and heritage conservation areas.

 

Figure 4: Proposed minimum setbacks for ground level and upper storeys for residential flat buildings adjacent to Rosebank Avenue HCA and heritage items

Section EE

 

Car parking rates Epping Town Centre – minor Draft DCP Amendments

 

25.   Council Officers have raised issues in relation to minor errors in Section 1C.2.1 Transport and Parking relating to car parking rates for Epping Town Centre. These minor errors are leading to some confusion as the application of car parking rates for Epping Town Centre (in Table 1C2.1(e) versus car parking rates for the rest of Hornsby LGA (outlined in 1C.2.1(d)). Therefore, the proposed draft amendments to the DCP are administrative in order to clarify the application of car parking rates, will not amend any car parking rates and aim to be consistent with the approach taken in Section 4.1 of the Parramatta DCP 2011 which relates to the part of the of Epping Town Centre west of the rail line.

 

26.   Table 3 below summarises the proposed draft amendments (a copy of the draft DCP is at Attachment 4).

Table 3: Proposed draft amendments to Section 1C.2.1 Transport and Parking in the Hornsby DCP 2013

Proposed Draft DCP Amendment

Reasons

 

Amend paragraph (o) text in the body of “Section 1C.2.1 Transport and Parking” to:

·    replace reference ““Town Centre Core” as defined by Figure 4.6(a) to “within 800m of Epping railway station.”

·    Define what car parking rates in Tables 1C2.1(d) and (e) apply to what development in what areas.

·    Remove reference to Table 1C2.1(c).

·    Delete reference to ‘minimums’ and include sentence clarifying that rates are minimums unless otherwise specified as maximums.

 

·    Figure 4.6(a) does not include 800m catchment of Epping Railway Station. The amendment is to capture high density development within Epping Town centre, and to be consistent with the Epping Town Centre car parking provisions of the Parramatta DCP 2011 (which apply to developments within 800m of the railway station).

·    To clarify that Table 1C2.1(e) applies to developments within 800m of Epping Railway Station, and if the development is not listed in this Table, Table (d) applies which refers to ‘general’ car parking rates in Hornsby.

·    A correction, as Table 1C.2.1 (c) relates to Motor Cycle Parking rates, not car parking rates.

·    Clarification that most of the rates are minimums, however some rates are maximums in both Tables 1C.2.1(d) and (e).

 

Delete paragraph (p) text in the body of “Section 1C.2.1 Transport and Parking”.

·    Matters raised in (p) are addressed in both paragraphs (o) and (q).

·    Paragraph (q) amended to include that development that falls partly within 800m of the Epping Railway Station, that the parking rate in Table 1C.2.1(e) is to apply to the whole development.

 

Amend paragraph (q) and (r) text in the body of “Section 1C.2.1 Transport and Parking” to include Tables 1C.2.1 (d) and (e) and delete reference to Table 1C.2.1(c).

 

·    A correction, as Table 1C.2.1 (c) relates to Motor Cycle Parking rates, not car parking rates. Table 1C.2.1 (e) relates to car parking rates for development within Epping Railway Station.

 

 

Amend Paragraph (u) text in the body of “Section 1C.2.1 Transport and Parking” to include the sentence “The maximum number of car parking spaces is to be rounded down to the nearest whole number if it is not a whole number.”

·    Clarification to assist in the calculation of car parking rates.

Amend Table 1C.2.1(d) within Section 1C.2.1 Transport and Parking:

·    Heading change to exclude development applying to 1C.2.1(e) within 800m of Epping Railway Station.

·    Remove reference to “Seniors Housing”.

 

·    Table 1C.2.1(e) applies to certain development within 800m of Epping Railway Station.

·    The car parking rates contained in State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 applies to Senior Housing developments. It is unnecessary to include a rate in the DCP table.

 

Amend Table “1C.2.1(e)” under “Residential Accommodation”:

·    From car parking rates applying to ‘Epping Town Centre Core to “land within 800 metres of Epping Railway Station”.

·    Include “shop top housing”.

·    Delete reference to ‘Residential accommodation’ and ‘commercial premises/health care’.

·    The amendment is to capture high density development within Epping Town centre, and to be consistent with the Epping Town Centre car parking provisions of the Parramatta DCP 2011 (which apply to developments within 800m of the railway station).

·    Land use zoning in the 800m Epping station catchment includes R4 and B2 land use zoning which permits residential flat buildings and shop top housing developments.

·    The headings in the Table labelled ‘Residential Accommodation’ and ‘commercial premises/health care’ are confusing and not necessary to include. Alternative approach to list developments that Table 1C.2.1(e) applies.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

27.   Financial implications for Council include the mailout of letters to impacted landowners and surrounding residents notifying of public exhibition to be funded from the City Planning budget.

 

CONSULTATION AND NEXT STEPS

 

28.   Epping Ward Councillors have been briefed on the proposals the subject of this report.

 

29.   If endorsed by Council, the amendments to the East Epping Planning Proposal will be sent to DPIE seeking an amended Gateway Determination.

 

30.   If a revised Gateway Determination is received, the East Epping Planning Proposal will be placed on public exhibition concurrently with the Rosebank Avenue Planning Proposal and Draft DCP amendments in accordance with the provisions under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000 (Regulations).

 

31.   Impacted landowners and surrounding residents will be notified through letters of the public exhibition and the documentation relating to the Planning Proposals for East Epping and Rosebank Avenue and draft DCP amendments will be placed on Council’s website for viewing.  

 

32.   As a Condition of Gateway Determination for both Rosebank Avenue and East Epping Planning Proposals, Council must consult with Hornsby Shire Council, Transport for NSW and NSW Heritage Office.

 

33.   Further, in order to address the requirements of the Local Government (City of Parramatta and Cumberland) Proclamation 2016, Council must formally consult with Hornsby Council as part of the public exhibition of the proposed draft DCP amendments.

 

34.   Following public exhibition, the Planning Proposal and final DCP amendments will be reported to Council to consider any submissions. The final DCP amendments in relation to Rosebank Avenue will be finalised upon gazettal of the Rosebank Avenue Planning Proposal.

 

Charlotte Brogan

Project Officer Land Use Planning

 

Bianca Lewis

Team Leader Land Use Planning

 

Robert Cologna

Land Use Planning Manager

 

David Birds

Group Manager City Planning

 

Alistair Cochrane

Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

Jennifer Concato

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Planning Proposal (separately enclosed)

597 Pages

 

2

Draft DCP Pedestrian Link

2 Pages

 

3

Draft DCP Amendment Rosebank Ave

3 Pages

 

4

Draft DCP Amendment Car Parking

6 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

 


Item 18.4 - Attachment 2

Draft DCP Pedestrian Link

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 18.4 - Attachment 3

Draft DCP Amendment Rosebank Ave

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 18.4 - Attachment 4

Draft DCP Amendment Car Parking

 


PDF Creator






Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 18.5

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER        18.5

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Post-exhibition: Planning Proposal, draft Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement at 23-27 Harold Street, Parramatta (Deferred Item)

REFERENCE           RZ/27/2015 - D07390570

REPORT OF            Project Officer, Land Use Planning

PREVIOUS ITEMS           18.10 - FOR APPROVAL:  Post Exhibition Outcomes - 23-27 Harold Street, Parramatta - Council - 08 Oct 2019 6:30pm

                                18.2 - FOR APPROVAL: Post Exhibition Outcomes - Planning Proposal for land at 470 Church Street Parramatta (Deferred Item) - Council - 09 Dec 2019 6.30pm

                                18.3 - FOR APPROVAL: Post Exhibition Outcomes - 23-27 Harold Street, Parramatta (Deferred Item) - Council - 09 Dec 2019 6.30pm       

 

Council at its meeting on 9 December 2019 (Item 18.3) resolved that the matter be deferred until the outcome of the Planning Proposal for 470 Church Street, Parramatta is known, or before the end of June 2020, whichever is earlier.

 

The outcome of the Planning Proposal at 470 Church Street, Parramatta has not yet been finalised by the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment so this report has been prepared to ensure compliance with the timeframe in the Council resolution.

 

Landowner          Trebel 88 Pty Ltd     

applicant             Think Planners Pty Ltd

 

development applications considered by sydney central city planning panel – Nil.

 

PURPOSE:

 

The purpose of this report is:

·        To allow Council to reconsider the feedback received during the public exhibition for the Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement for land at 23-27 Harold Street, Parramatta following the deferral of this matter at the Council meeting on 9 December 2019;

·        To advise Council that work on the planning investigation area between Church Street and the Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation Area is being prioritised and will be targeted for a report to Council in October 2020;

·        To allow Council to consider deferring this Planning Proposal until it has adopted a planning strategy for the planning investigation area between Church Street and the Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation Area.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

a)      That as a result of Council’s resolution of 25 November 2019 to excise areas currently zoned R4 High Density Residential from the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal, Council defer progressing the Planning Proposal that is the subject of this report until Council has adopted a planning strategy for the planning investigation area containing the subject site.

 

b)      That Council note that work on the planning investigation area between Church Street and the Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation Area will be the subject of a Councillor workshop before a draft planning strategy is reported to Council for its consideration in October 2020, for the purposes of public exhibition.

 

c)      Further, that the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment be advised of Council’s resolution on this matter.

 

 

 

PLANNING PROPOSAL TIMELINE

 

 

THE SITE

 

1.     The subject site is located in the northern part of the Parramatta CBD and includes sites at 23, 25 and 27 Harold Street, Parramatta, as shown in Figure 1 below. The site currently contains three separate single-storey buildings. The site area is 1,638 square metres.

 

Figure 1: The subject site at 23-27 Harold Street outlined in pink. The site of the Planning Proposal at 470 Church Street is outlined in blue.

 

PLANNING PROPOSAL SUMMARY

 

Table 1: Summary of proposed controls

 

Parramatta LEP 2011

Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal endorsed by Council on 25 November 2019

Subject Planning Proposal

Site Area

1,638m2

Land Use Zoning

R4 High Density Residential

This site is no longer within the boundaries of the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal.

R4 High Density Residential

Height of Buildings

11m

(3 storeys)

70m

(22 storeys)

Floor-space ratio

0.8:1

6:1*

 

Parking

Parramatta DCP 2011 rates

Strategic Transport Study rates

Number of dwellings ^

15 dwellings

116 dwellings

* This Planning Proposal received a Gateway Determination prior to the FSR sliding-scale threshold being increased from 1,600sqm to 1,800sqm

^ The number of dwellings has been estimated based on the maximum achievable residential gross-floor area (excluding bonuses) divided by an average apartment size of 85m2

 

BACKGROUND

 

2.     At its meeting on 8 October 2019, Council considered a report on the post—exhibition outcomes of a Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement for land at 23-27 Harold Street, Parramatta (See Reference Material 1. Item 18.10 – 8 October 2019). A total of 19 submissions were received during public exhibition. This includes three submissions from public agencies identified in the Gateway Determination, 15 submissions from community members and one submission from the National Trust. The issues raised during the exhibition process which Council was asked to consider are summarised as follows:

 

·        Heritage: the proposal is immediately adjacent to a heritage item and the Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation Area and will have negative heritage impacts.

·        Traffic and parking: increased density will exacerbate traffic in the already congested area and insufficient car parking spaces have been provided which will put a strain on on-street car parking in the area.

·        Neighbourhood character and change: the proposal is out of character with the existing surrounding low to medium density residential area and the proposed changes to neighbourhood character are not supported.

·        Overshadowing: the proposed building height will lead to overshadowing of the nearby adjoining heritage conservation area and low-density residential areas.

·        Amenity: the development will undermine the quality of life of residents already in the area.

·        Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal: the community has still not had an opportunity to comment on the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal.

 

3.     At the same Council Meeting, a separate report detailing the post-exhibition outcomes of the Planning Proposal, draft site-specific DCP and draft Planning Agreement for 470 Church Street, Parramatta, was considered by Council.

 

4.     Council resolved to defer the Planning Proposals for 470 Church Street and the subject site until Council was able to consider a report on the content of the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal which was expected to be reported at the following Council meeting.

 

5.     On 25 November 2019, Council considered a report on the response to the Gateway Determination conditions for the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal. As part of its resolution on the matter, Council amended the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal to excise three areas proposed to be zoned R4 High Density Residential from the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal. One of these areas includes the subject site as shown in Figure 2 overleaf. The excised areas will form part of the identified future work on the ‘planning investigation areas’ as per the Parramatta CBD Planning Strategy.

 

6.     At its meeting on 9 December 2019, the site-specific Planning Proposals for 470 Church Street and the subject site were reported back to Council (See Reference Material 2. Item 18.2 and Reference Material 3. 18.3 – 9 December 2019). Council resolved:

 

·        470 Church Street: Forward the Planning Proposal for the Department for finalisation, pending the Planning Agreement for the site being executed; and

·        23-27 Harold Street: Defer the Planning Proposal until the outcome of the Planning Proposal at the adjacent site at 470 Church Street, Parramatta, is known, or in June 2020, whichever is earlier.

 

 

Figure 2: Areas excised in the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal

 

UPDATE SINCE COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF 9 DECEMBER 2019

 

7.     Following Council’s resolution of 9 December 2019, the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment notified Council Officers that the applicant had requested that an alternate Planning Proposal Authority be appointed for the site-specific Planning Proposal. This would mean that Council would not be able to make a final decision on the Planning Proposal and it would make it difficult to implement a site-specific Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement following a decision being made by the new Planning Proposal Authority. 

 

 

 

 

8.     Council Officers advised the Department that the appointment of an alternate Planning Proposal Authority could result in a decision which pre-empts the outcome of the work to be completed for the ‘planning investigation areas’, and that is potentially inconsistent with the future strategic framework that could apply to this site. Council Officer’s letter to the Department is provided in Attachment 1.

 

9.     It is noted that the Department has still not determined whether it will elect an alternate Planning Proposal Authority. However, the applicant has advised Council Officers that they look forward to having the matter reported back to Council in accordance with the resolution of 9 December 2019.

 

10.   The Planning Proposal at 470 Church Street, Parramatta, has been forwarded to the Department to allow them to commence the finalisation process. Council has also requested that the Planning Proposal not be finalised until the Planning Agreement endorsed by Council has been executed. The applicant is yet to provide a signed copy of the Planning Agreement to allow it to be executed. Finalisation of the Planning Proposal will only occur once the Planning Agreement has been signed and entered into.

 

OPTIONS FOR COUNCIL’S CONSIDERATION

 

11.   Council Officer’s recommend that the Planning Proposal be deferred until a decision has been made on the planning strategy for the part of the planning investigation area that the subject site is located within. This strategy will allow Council to implement a consistent planning strategy for the area between Church Street and the Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation Area. Council Officers are seeking to progress work on this planning investigation area with a target to report to Council in October 2020 on a draft strategy for the purposes of public exhibition.

 

12.   Council Officers also consider that this approach carries the lowest risk of having an alternate Planning Proposal Authority appointed by the Department as it demonstrates that Council is expressly seeking to implement a holistic planning strategy for this area.

 

13.   Council has completed two heritage studies (Urbis, 2015 and Hector Abrahams Architects, 2017) in support of the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal, with each study recommending a different heritage interface for the area between Church Street and the Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation Area. The Urbis Study was prepared prior to the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal being reported to Council on 14 December 2015.  The Hector Abrahams Study was undertaken following a resolution of Council to apply an FSR of 6:1 to the precinct containing the subject site in December 2015

 

14.   More detail on the two heritage studies and their impact on this site-specific Planning Proposal can be found in the extract from Local Planning Panel provided as Attachment 2. In summary, the Urbis Report recommended 3:1 for the subject site to deliver appropriate transition to the adjoining Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation area. The Hector Abrahams Report prepared in 2017 recommended that a suitable transition could still be achieved with a taller building and the FSR of 6:1, supporting Council’s April 2016 endorsed position. 

 

15.   Given this background Council Officers have identified the following options for the next steps in relation to this Planning Proposal for Council to consider:

a)     Defer consideration of the Planning Proposal until Council has adopted a planning strategy for the planning investigation area between Church Street and the Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation Area;

b)     Progress the Planning Proposal in accordance with the Hector Abrahams Heritage Study with an FSR of 6:1 (applicant preferred option);

c)     Progress the Planning Proposal in accordance with the Urbis Heritage Study with an FSR of 3:1; or

d)     Refuse the Planning Proposal.

A summary of the advantages and disadvantages of each option is provided at Attachment 3.

 

16.   Council Officers consider that refusing the Planning Proposal would present the highest risk of having an alternate Planning Proposal Authority being appointed by the Department. Although Council is already satisfying its housing targets, the Department may consider that the Planning Proposal is too far progressed to be refused outright, given that it was deemed to have some planning merit when a Gateway Determination was issued.

 

17.   In this respect it is noted that the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces has announced the Planning System Acceleration Program to encourage development that can proceed as quickly as possible to assist in strengthening the local economy impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Department’s website contains detailed criteria for assessing developments for inclusion in the acceleration program and identifies three key criteria. The criteria and the ability of this proposal to meet them is set out in Table 2 below.

 

Table 2: Assessment of the Planning Proposal against the Planning System Acceleration Program criteria

Jobs – does the project create jobs during construction and ongoing?

The proposal if it were to proceed would provide construction jobs.

Timing - can a decision on the project be made quickly?
- for DAs, can the project commence within six months?
- for planning proposals, can the project proceed to DA within six months?

The applicant lodged a Development Application in 11 July 2019 hoping to have the application approved when the Planning Proposal was finalised but then withdrew the Development Application in January 2020 following Council’s deferral of the Planning Proposal. It seems that the applicant would be able to re-lodge an application within 6 months if this Planning Proposal was to proceed to finalisation.

Public benefit – can the project deliver or support public benefits?

 

The proposal would meet housing objectives. However, it is noted that Council is already meeting its housing targets without the inclusion of the Planning Investigation Areas in the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal.

 

 

 

 

18.   If the site-specific Planning Proposal is finalised by an alternate Planning Proposal Authority, the redevelopment of this site would meet the Planning System Acceleration Program criteria. If this occurs it will introduce planning controls which could prejudice the development of Council’s future strategy for the planning investigation area.

 

19.   Council Officers consider that progressing this Planning Proposal with the controls recommended in either the Urbis or Hector Abrahams Studies would also undermine the work to be completed on the planning investigation areas, and pre-empt Council’s decision on a holistic strategic framework for this precinct.

 

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

 

20.   Council Officers consider it to be premature to progress this site-specific Planning Proposal ahead of work being completed for the future investigation areas.  It is recommended that Council finalises its decision on a planning strategy for the precinct as soon as possible, to provide a framework under which the proposal can progress.  This will also help mitigate the risk of an alternative Planning Proposal Authority being appointed.

 

21.   It is therefore recommended that Council defer this site-specific Planning Proposal and that it be reported back to Council once a decision (being final adoption of the planning strategy following public exhibition of that strategy and consideration of community submissions) has been made on the future planning investigation areas. A Councillor workshop will be held on the matter, with a report to be prepared for Council (targeting October 2020) detailing a proposed planning strategy for sites between Church Street and the Sorrell Street Heritage Conservation Area for the purposes of public exhibition.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

22.   A draft Planning Agreement had previously been negotiated which would have required a monetary contribution of $1,279,980, consistent with Council’s CBD Planning Proposal Community Infrastructure Framework. The agreement will not proceed until a decision is made on the Planning Proposal.

Marko Rubcic

Project Officer, Land Use Planning

 

Robert Cologna

Land Use Planning Manager

 

David Birds

Group Manager, City Planning

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Jennifer Concato

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Letter to DPIE

1 Page

 

2

Bacground extracted from Local Planning Panel report

2 Pages

 

3

Analysis of options

1 Page

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

 

1.     Item 18.10 – 8 October 2019:

https://businesspapers.parracity.nsw.gov.au/Open/2019/OC_08102019_AGN_548_AT.PDF

 

2.     Item 18.2 – 9 December 2019:

https://businesspapers.parracity.nsw.gov.au/Open/2019/OC_09122019_AGN_546_AT.PDF

 

3.     Item 18.3 – 9 December 2019:

https://businesspapers.parracity.nsw.gov.au/Open/2019/OC_09122019_AGN_546_AT.PDF

 


Item 18.5 - Attachment 1

Letter to DPIE

 

PDF Creator


Item 18.5 - Attachment 2

Bacground extracted from Local Planning Panel report

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 18.5 - Attachment 3

Analysis of options

 


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 18.6

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER        18.6

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: Post-exhibition: Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement at 55 Aird Street, Parramatta

REFERENCE           RZ/18/2015 - D07351036

REPORT OF            Project Officer, Land Use Planning        

 

Landowner          55 Aird Pty Ltd

 

applicant             Think Planners Pty Ltd

 

Development applications considered by sydney central city planning panel - Nil

 

PURPOSE:

 

To report to Council the outcome of the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement for land at 55 Aird Street, Parramatta, and to seek Council’s endorsement:

·    to forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for finalisation;

·    to adopt the draft site-specific Development Control Plan; and

·    to enter into the Planning Agreement.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)    That Council notes that one (1) submission was made during the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement at 55 Aird Street, Parramatta.

 

(b)    That Council endorse the Planning Proposal (provided at Attachment 2) for land at 55 Aird Street which seeks to amend Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 (PLEP 2011) by way of:

i.    Increasing the height of buildings control from 36 metres to 80 metres;

ii.    Increasing the floor-space ratio (FSR) control from 4.2:1 to 10:1, noting that the application of the FSR sliding-scale would result in an effective FSR of 6:1 (6.9:1 with design excellence if the site is developed in isolation);

iii.   Applying maximum car parking rates in accordance with the Parramatta CBD Strategic Transport Study; and

iv.   Applying a minimum 1:1 commercial floor-space provision on the site.  

 

(c)    That the Planning Proposal be amended to clarify the purpose of the minimum commercial floor-space provision is to encourage employment-generating uses in the case of a mixed-use development.

(d)    That Council forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for finalisation and request that the final notification in the Government Gazette only be undertaken once Council confirms that the Planning Agreement has been executed.

 

 

(e)    That Council endorse for finalisation the site-specific Development Control Plan contained at Attachment 3 for insertion in Section 4.3.3 – Parramatta City Centre of Parramatta Development Control Plan 2011.

 

(f)     That Council enter into the Planning Agreement as exhibited at Attachment 4 and authorise the Chief Executive Officer to sign the Planning Agreement.

 

(g)    That Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to make any minor amendments and corrections of a non-policy and administrative nature that may arise during the plan amendment process, relating to the Planning Proposal, Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement.

 

(h)    Further, that Council note that the Parramatta Local Planning Panel’s advice to Council (Attachment 1) is consistent with the recommendations of this report.

 

PLANNING PROPOSAL TIMELINE

 

 

 

THE SITE

 

1.     The site is located at 55 Aird Street Parramatta (refer Figure 1) and has an area of 658 square metres. It adjoins Westfield Shopping Centre to the west and south, and two-storey commercial buildings immediately to the east. Demolition of the building on the site was granted development consent (DA/1045/2017) and demolition has occurred. The site currently contains a concrete pad as the only remaining portion of the previous building.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1: The subject site is outlined in yellow

 

SUMMARY - PLANNING PROPOSAL, DRAFT DCP & PLANNING AGREEMENT

 

2.     The Planning Proposal (refer to Attachment 2) seeks to amend the Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 by:

·        Increasing the maximum floor space ratio control from 4.2:1 to 6:1;

·        Increasing the maximum building height control from 36 metres to 80 metres;

·        Applying a minimum commercial provision of 1:1 should the site be developed for mixed-use purposes; and

·        Applying maximum car parking rates in line with the Parramatta CBD Strategic Transport Study.

 

3.     The Planning Proposal is consistent with the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal as outlined in Table 1 below.

 

Table 1: Summary of proposed controls

 

Existing Parramatta LEP 2011

Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal

Subject Planning Proposal

Site Area

658m2

Land Use Zoning

B4 Mixed Use

B4 Mixed Use

B4 Mixed Use

Height of Buildings

36m (11 storeys)

RL 211m (65 storeys)

80m (25 storeys)

Floor-space ratio

4.2:1

10:1 (6:1 if the FSR sliding-scale is applied)

10:1 (6:1 following application of the FSR sliding-scale)

Parking

In accordance with Clause 7.3

Strategic Transport Study rates

Strategic Transport Study rates

Number of dwellings ^

32 dwellings

46 dwellings

46 dwellings or

155 hotel rooms *

^ The number of dwellings has been estimated based on the maximum achievable residential gross-floor area (excluding bonuses) divided by an average apartment size of 85m2

* The draft DCP and amended reference design provided by the applicant reflects the proposal by the applicant to develop the site for a hotel

 

4.     As the site is located in a B4 Mixed Use zone, the proposed amendments to PLEP 2011 facilitate the construction of a mixed use development or a commercial development.  The applicant has already commenced the design competition process with Council and has indicated that the proposed development will comprise of an 18 storey hotel.

 

5.     As such, the site-specific Development Control Plan (DCP) (at Attachment 3) provides development parameters for the two different development scenarios, being a wholly non-residential or a mixed-use development. The draft DCP outlines design controls for both development scenarios in relation to:

·        Built form and building setbacks;

·        Podium heights;

·        Treatment of blank walls;

·        Internal amenity; and

·        Ground floor interfaces with Aird Street.

 

6.     A draft Planning Agreement has been prepared in accordance with the terms set in Council’s resolution of 20 February 2020. The draft Planning Agreement (Attachment 4) provides for a monetary contribution of $177,660 only in the case that the redevelopment contains residential uses.  Further, acknowledging that Council is undertaking a review of the community infrastructure rates, the Planning Agreement has been drafted in a manner so that the monetary contribution amount can be amended, should Council adopt different community infrastructure rates as part of the Parramatta CBD Community Infrastructure Framework so the contribution made is consistent with Council’s Policy at the time the payment is made.

 

PUBLIC EXHIBITION

 

7.     The Planning Proposal, draft DCP and draft Planning Agreement relating to 55 Aird Street, Parramatta, was publicly exhibited from 4 March 2020 to 3 April 2020 in accordance with relevant provisions of the Gateway Determination and Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000.

 

8.     During public exhibition, one (1) submission was received from Transport for NSW which recommended that provisions be made for a funding mechanism for state infrastructure, and that the labels within the draft DCP be made clearer prior to finalisation. A summary of the submission and the Council Officers response is provided in the post-exhibition assessment report to the Parramatta Local Planning Panel at Attachment 1.

 

9.     Council Officers have reviewed and addressed the submission relating to this Planning Proposal, site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement and consider that the concerns have been addressed. This Planning Proposal is consistent with Council’s endorsed vision for the Parramatta CBD and will allow development in a manner that is consistent with the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal.

 

MINIMUM COMMERCIAL FLOOR SPACE PROVISION CLARIFICATION

 

10.   An issue relating to minimum provision of commercial floorspace has arisen following a scheme submitted by the applicant at design competition stage for a 18 storey hotel development for this site.

 

11.   The Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal includes a policy that requires minimum commercial floor space of 1:1 to be provided on B4 Mixed Use sites. The objective of this policy position is to encourage further employment-generating uses surrounding the commercial core and to ensure that mixed-use developments still make a contribution towards job targets even when they are primarily being developed for residential purposes.

 

12.   However at the time the Planning Proposal was first lodged (August 2015), the proposal was for a mixed-use development (a commercial and residential development). A clause was included in the Planning Proposal to require a minimum commercial floor space of 1:1 be provided consistent with the Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal.

 

13.   The planning system has a separate legal definition for a hotel use (defined under ‘tourist and visitor accommodation’) as from ‘commercial premises’. If the Planning Proposal is finalised with a requirement to provide a minimum commercial floor space of 1:1, the hotel would not be recognised as commercial floor space and technically the 1:1 commercial floor space requirement would not be met. It would force the applicant to provide commercial floor space separate to the hotel use. Effectively it would decrease the size of the hotel and force the applicant to provide alternate commercial floor space.

 

14.   The outcome discussed above in which a new hotel proposal must also provide 1:1 commercial floor space was not the intention of the policy framework proposed for the CBD. The hotel itself is generally recognised as an employment generating use. To ensure this does not become a problem during the assessment of any future Development Application, the Planning Proposal should include clarification that the 1:1 commercial floor space requirement will only be applied where a mixed-use development is proposed.

 

PARRAMATTA LOCAL PLANNING PANEL

 

15.   Council resolved on 14 May 2018 to refer Planning Proposals that have been exhibited to the Local Planning Panel where a submission has been received during the exhibition process requesting the Planning Proposal be amended.  The Panel provides advice to Council on whether the Planning Proposal should be amended and whether or not to forward it to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for finalisation.

 

16.   At its meeting on 19 May 2020, the Parramatta Local Planning Panel, in issuing its advice to Council, supported the Council Officer’s recommendations and advised Council to forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and so that the Planning Proposal can be finalised (refer Attachment 1).

 

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS

 

17.   It is recommended Council endorse the Planning Proposal, draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement, subject to the Planning Proposal being amended to clarify the purpose of the minimum commercial floor-space provision is to encourage employment-generating uses in the case of a mixed-use development.

 

18.   Following the outcome of this resolution, Council will forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment for finalisation but request that the final notification in the Government Gazette only be undertaken once Council confirms that the Planning Agreement has been executed. The Development Control Plan will come into effect when the Local Environmental Plan amendment comes into effect.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

19.   A monetary contribution of $177,660 will be provided to Council only in the case that the redevelopment contains residential uses via a Planning Agreement. The contribution would not be paid if a hotel or commercial development progressed. However, the Planning Agreement has been drafted in a manner so that if the site is developed for residential use and Council adopt different community infrastructure rates as part of the Parramatta CBD Community Infrastructure framework the applicant would be required to pay the higher rates in place at the time the development proceeds.

 

Marko Rubcic

Project Officer, Land Use Planning

 

Bianca Lewis

Team Leader Land Use Planning

 

Robert Cologna

Land Use Planning Manager

 

David Birds

Group Manager, City Planning

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Jennifer Concato

Executive Director City Strategy & Development

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Local Planning Panel Report and Minute

11 Pages

 

2

Planning Proposal

29 Pages

 

3

Draft DCP

7 Pages

 

4

Draft Planning Agreement

24 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

 


Item 18.6 - Attachment 1

Local Planning Panel Report and Minute

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 18.6 - Attachment 2

Planning Proposal

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 18.6 - Attachment 3

Draft DCP

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 18.6 - Attachment 4

Draft Planning Agreement

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 18.7

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER        18.7

SUBJECT                 FOR APPROVAL: COVID-19 Update

REFERENCE           F2020/01447 - D07423509

REPORT OF            Group Manager City Strategy        

 

PURPOSE:

 

To provide an update on the progress of actions in Council’s COVID-19 Community Resilience and Economic Relief Package (COVID-19 Relief Package) as adopted 7 April 2020, and to propose additional relief and recovery actions for Council’s consideration.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)    That Council note the progress of actions in Council’s COVID-19 Community Resilience and Economic Relief Package (Attachment A) adopted 7 April 2020.

 

(a)    That Council approve an additional expenditure of $75,000 from the Economic Development Special Rate for a local business gift card support program and expansion of the successful Small Business Support Grants Program approved April 2020.

 

(b)    That Council endorse the initial recovery package expenditure of $785,000 from its Cultural Fund Reserve to deliver the following Creative Economy Support Program for Council’s creative services and industry to adapt to current restrictions:

 

1.1   HOME AT Parramatta – Online Platform

1.2   HOME AT Parramatta – Digital Content – Culture

1.3   Riverside Theatres Digital – Studio Riverside and Your Riverside Online

1.4   Sound West Conference and Festival

1.5   Creative Economy Business Resilience Grants.

(c)    Further, that Council write to the Minister for the Arts to consult on Council’s intentions relating to proposals for the expenditure of the Cultural Fund Reserve for creative economy and services support during the 2020/21 Financial Year.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic (COVID-19 or pandemic) has been felt across Australia since March 2020. As Australia’s fifth largest economy, Parramatta will bear a substantial portion of these impacts.

2.     Council announced its first COVID-19 Community Resilience and Economic Relief Package in April 2020, to respond and provide support for the local economy and community.

 

ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES

 

COVID-19 Community Resilience and Economic Relief Package – Progress Report

 

3.     Council endorsed its COVID-19 Relief Package on 7 April 2020. This included 23 actions that focus on financial relief, jobs and investment, health and wellbeing, and support for vulnerable people, totalling $3 million in support. Of these actions, 4 have been completed,19 are ‘progressing – on track’, and no actions are behind schedule. 

4.     A summary is provided in the COVID-19 Community Resilience and Economic Relief Package - Progress Report May 2020 (Attachment A).

 

Further proposed actions- June 2020

 

5.     In the period since Council adopted the first version of the Package on 7 April 2020, additional actions have been developed for Council consideration.

6.       One of the proposed relief actions seeks additional funding for the Small Business Grants Program.  Council endorsed a Small Business Grants Program totaling $100,000 in value as part of the first COVID-19 relief package. Within 1 week of the grants program launch, Council received 185 applications. Many quality applications have been received and assessed and an additional $50,000 of funding would enable these to be further supported. The grant funding can be fully covered from Council’s Economic Development Special Rate. 

 

7.       Another Economic Development action identifies $25,000 for a proposed Business Gift Card Program enabling the development of a gift card system specifically to support Parramatta LGA businessesThis can also be funded from Council’s Economic Development Special Rate.

 

8.     A further proposed new relief action is a Creative Economy Support Program. It includes 5 projects and a total budget of $785,000, proposed to come from Council’s Cultural Plan Reserve (which must be used for cultural activities). This proposal will be followed by a plan for additional funding for Council’s creative services for the 20/21 financial year (to a total of $4M, if approved).

9.     Parramatta’s creative economy includes businesses across a broad range of industries including Architecture, Screen and Sound production, Publishing, Advertising, Performing and Visual Arts, Events and Festivals, Publishing and Broadcasting. Council also has roles as a facilitator, advocate and service provider in this industry.

10.   The creative economy in Parramatta delivers significant economic value. A conservative estimate puts the creative economy value to the City (prior to COVID-19) at $1.131b (based on 2018 ABS data). In Parramatta, the creative economy is larger than the Food and Beverage Services sector ($869m) and comparable to the Retail ($1.174b) sector.

11.   There has been a material negative impact on Parramatta’s this sector of the economy because of COVID-19. This also impacts on related industries driven by the arts and creative industries, such as tourism and hospitality.

12.   The 5 proposed projects that make up the Creative Economy Support Program include the adaption of Council’s marketing program to support creative industry and other initiatives to transform the digital content and delivery of both Council and local creative business.  The proposed projects include:

a.  HOME AT Parramatta – Online Platform ($120,000),

b.  HOME AT Parramatta – Digital Content – Culture ($165,000),

c.  Riverside Theatres Digital – Studio Riverside and Your Riverside Online ($100,000),

d.  Sound West Conference and Festival ($250,000), and

e.  Creative Economy Resilience Grants ($150,000) to local creative businesses (similar in nature to the Economic Development business support program).

13.   Council has the opportunity to use restricted reserve funds to protect and strengthen the local economy by providing focused support to creative industries. The current reserve can fully fund (if approved) the proposed Creative Economy Support Program cost of $785,000.  This expenditure is suggested in addition to Council’s proposal to use $4M from Council’s reserves to fund Council’s operations in the creative economy for the 20/21 FY.

14.   Consultation with the Minister for the Arts is required in advance of any expenditure, and an effective support package may support additional applications for broader use of these funds.

15.   Other Councils are providing similar support to their local creative industries: City of Sydney is providing a $3.25m arts and culture relief package and the City of Melbourne is providing $2 million in grants.

Recovery Actions

16.   Council staff have already commenced work on a wide range of recovery proposals. These include identifying “Shovel Ready Projects” - Infrastructure opportunities to boost jobs and investment in our CBDs and neighbourhoods.

17.   Council is also reviewing development applications and planning proposals to identify how these may best support employment, investment and rapid economic recovery.

18.     These and other recovery-focused actions will be further developed and reported to Council at its July 2020 meeting, with a further summary of implementation progress.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

19.   In April 2020, Council staff consulted with a range of arts, screen and media/tech companies, regarding impacts of COVID-19 on the creative economy sector.

 

20.   Council staff have been engaged in the preparation of the consolidated proposal for creative industry support.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

21.   If approved, the updated COVID-19 Community Resilience and Economic Relief Package June 2020 will take the value of Council’s relief support from $3 million to $4.23 million. These additional costs to Council are made up of:

a.  $380,000 in lost revenue (car parking and affordable housing rent relief)

b.  $860,000 that can be fully covered using Council reserves ($785,000 from the Cultural Plan Reserve and $75,000 from the Economic Development Special Rate)    

1.    

 

Geoff King

Group Manager City Strategy

 

Alistair Cochrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Update on COVID-19 Actions

5 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

 


Item 18.7 - Attachment 1

Update on COVID-19 Actions

 

City of Parramatta Council:

 COVID 19 Community Resilience and Economic Relief Package – Progress Tracker Report (19 May 2020)

 

Code

Theme Alignment

Initiative

Description

Division

Status

F1

Financial Relief

Rates Hardship Policy – Interest Waiver* 

The Council will waive interest on late payments for Council Rates, where ratepayers satisfy the hardship criteria (as set out in the Rates Hardship Policy)

Corporate Services

Progressing- On Track

F2

Financial Relief 

Rates Hardship Policy – Payment Plans for financial difficulties*

The Council will put in place payment plans for late payments for Council Rates, where ratepayers are suffering financial hardship and satisfy the hardship criteria (as set out in the Rates Hardship Policy)

Corporate Services

Progressing- On Track

F3

Financial Relief 

7 Day Payment of Goods

The Council will seek to pay all local small and medium suppliers of goods within 7 days

Finance

Completed

F4

Financial Relief

Support restaurants/takeaway businesses

Non-enforcement of takeaway conditions to allow restaurants to undertake a take away service

City Assets & Operations

Progressing- On Track

F5

Financial Relief 

Waiver of Licence and Hire Fees

The Council will waive pre-paid and ongoing licence fees and hire fees for outdoor dining licenses, food stalls, temporary, premises, advertising, community halls, parks and community venues for the period of the shutdown

City Assets & Operations

Progressing- On Track

F6

Financial Relief 

On Street Parking

The Council will put in place a range of measures to provide grace periods and cautions for time-limited on street parking spaces; however, Council will continue to enforce illegal parking to ensure public safety and turnover for short stay parking to support local businesses. Council will also reduce and change time limits in a number of local on street parking locations to facilitate takeaway services and support local business

City Assets & Operations

Progressing- On Track

F7

Financial Relief

Waiver of rents

The Council will waive all rents for Council owned assets which are occupied by community groups, essential services and not for profit organisations

City Assets & Operations

Progressing- On Track

F8

Financial Relief

Community Grants

The Council will suspend the annual round of the Community Grants program and redirect all unallocated funds to support local services and community groups impacted by the COVID-19 crisis

Community Services

Progressing- On Track

F9B

Financial Relief

Community Grants

Establish a category of funding, enabling grants of up to $50,000 to be made to standard eligible organisations for the purpose of addressing digital inclusion, social inclusion, cultural production and service accessibility in the light of COVID-19.

Community Services

Progressing- On Track

J1

Jobs & Investment

Council staff

Council will continue to pay casual staff for up to 4 weeks after the relevant services or facilities have been shut down. Seek to reallocate casual staff to other services to continue to provide employment and put in place systms and procedures to allow remote working capability

Corporate Services

Completed

J2

Jobs & Investment

e-Planning acceleration

The Council will accelerate transition to e-planning (the online system for electronic lodgement and assessment of planning applications)

City Strategy & Development

Completed

J3

Jobs & Investment

Promote local businesses

The Council will use its existing websites and its new Parramatta Brand to support measures for local businesses including promotion opportunities

City Engagement & Experience City Strategy & Development

Progressing- On Track

J4

Jobs & Investment

Buy Local

The Council will amend its tender policy to support the purchase of local goods and services, where possible

Finance City Assets & Operations City Engagement & Experience

Progressing- On Track

J5

Jobs & Investment

Cleaning

The Council will increase its cleaning services in high traffic public spaces including more regular cleaning and disinfectant of public water stations, bins and amenities

City Assets & Operations

Progressing - on track

J6

Jobs & Investment

Business Grants

The Council will provide grants of up to $2,000, with a total value of up to $10,000, to support local businesses who have been adversely impacted by COVID-19 (using existing Economic Development Special Rate)

City Strategy & Development

Progressing- On Track

J7

Jobs & Investment

Online Services

Accelerate the Council transition to online services to improve remote community access

Digital Transformation

Progressing- On Track

J8

Jobs & Investment

Investment in Technology

Council will invest in hardware, software and audio visual technology to enable remote Council Meetings, remote Councillor, staff and stakeholder meetings and remote working capability

Information Technology

Progressing- On Track

J9

Jobs & Investment

Planning Approvals Acceleration

Council will identify and prioritise Development Assessments and Planning Proposals to support employment, investment and recovery

City Strategy & Development

Progressing- On Track

J10

Jobs & Investment

Change on street parking in other centres

Change parking limits at centres with restaurants that can offer take-away e.g. Carmen Drive Paring will be changed to 1/2hr

City Strategy & Development City Assets & Operations City Engagement & Experience

Progressing - on track

J11

Jobs & Investment

Promote 15 minute parking

Promote 15 minute parking and localised information on critical services (e.g. Chemists)

City Strategy & Development

Progressing- On Track

S1

Support for our vulnerable community members

Financial Fitness Campaign Social Media

Social media campaign to connect residents to a self-assessment tool on financial stress

Community Services

Completed

H1

Health & Wellbeing

Digital Storybox

Council will accelerate the launch of its digital storytelling public art project designed for the Parramatta Square public domain through a digital platform sharing the rich stories of Parramatta past and present

City Strategy & Development

Progressing- On Track

H2

Health & Wellbeing

Community Services

Council will continue to adjust its services to maintain support to the most vulnerable in our community and connect residents with the social and financial services

Community Services

Progressing- On Track

* Initiatives previously announced in City of Parramatta's media release dated 24 March 2020

 

  


 

Notices of Motion

 

09 June 2020

 

19.1          NOTICE OF MOTION: Agreed NSW Parliament Legislative Council Motion of 13 May 2020 - Powerhouse Museum Production of Documents Order................................... 530

 

19.2          NOTICE OF MOTION: Granville Town Square                                                                   532

 

19.3          NOTICE OF MOTION: Wisteria Gardens transfer from NSW Health to Parramatta Park Trust.......................................................... 533

 

19.4          NOTICE OF MOTION: Traffic Study Granville                                                                   542


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 19.1

ITEM NUMBER        19.1

SUBJECT                 NOTICE OF MOTION: Agreed NSW Parliament Legislative Council Motion of 13 May 2020 - Powerhouse Museum Production of Documents Order

REFERENCE           F2019/04433 - D07422777

FROM                      Councillor Prociv       

 

 

MOTION

(a)    That Council express support for the Agreed NSW Parliament Legislative Council Motion of 13 May 2020, ‘Powerhouse Museum Production of Documents: Order’.

 

(b)    That Council officers examine and review all publically available documents, as they are released.

 

(c)    Further, that a report of this examination and review be brought back to the Chamber at the Council Meeting on Monday, 13 July 2020.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     THE AGREED MOTION - supported by all members of the committee:

 

The Hon. ROBERT BORSAK moved

 

That, under Standing Order 52, there be laid upon the table of the House within 28 days of the date of passing of this resolution the following documents, created since 12 April 2018, in the possession, custody or control of the Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs, and the Arts, the Premier, the Department of Premier and Cabinet, Create NSW, the Trustees of the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences Staff Agency, Infrastructure NSW or the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment:

 

(a)    any 2019 revised business case or cost benefit analysis relating to the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences [MAAS] project;

 

(b)    all documents relating to the MAAS project capital and recurrent costs, exhibition concepts, and commercial and income-generating opportunities;

 

(c)    all documents relating to any visitor studies, planning costs, and architectural, museological, geotechnical, engineering, heritage and flood risk studies conducted for the MAAS project;

 

(d)    all documents relating to the Powerhouse Precinct at Parramatta International Design Competition;

 

(e)    all documents relating to the Ultimo Creative Industries Precinct;

 

(f)     all documents relating to the transfer and storage of large and very large objects for the MAAS project;

 

(g)    all documents relating to the proposed heritage listing of the Powerhouse museum; and

 

(h)    any legal or other advice regarding the scope or validity of this order of the House created as a result of this order of the House.

 

Full Hansard transcript

 

https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/Hansard/Pages/HansardResult.aspx#/docid/HANSARD-1820781676-81738

 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CITY STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT RESPONSE

 

2.     This Notice of Motion is not supported.

 

3.     This is on the basis that:

i)      the contentions raised under the Standing Order No. 52, relate primarily to the business case considering the relocation of the Powerhouse to Parramatta is a matter for the NSW State Government;

ii)     the exhibition of the State Significant Development Application (SSDA) is imminent. Council resources should be allocated to respond to the public exhibition of the Powerhouse SSDA exhibition material when it is formally exhibited in the coming month/s. It would be more effective to provide comments and advice in a submission on the SSDA as Council’s submission would need to be considered and addressed by the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment and the proponent prior to its determination.

 

4.     Council officers will be examining and reviewing the plans and supporting publicly available material once it is placed on public exhibition as part of the SSDA process, and reporting to Council a submission for its consideration.

 

FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

 

5.     It is considered that the most efficient and effective use of Council resources is to respond to the SSDA public exhibition.

 

6.     It is not possible to determine the cost of this Notice of Motion nor the preparation of the report as the volume and complexity of documents that will be required to be reviewed is unknown.  However, it is anticipated that there will be a large number of such documents and the time and resources likely to be required would be significant. There is no current budget for such a report.

 

 

 

Councillor Patricia Prociv

Councillor

 

 

 

Attachments:

There are no attachments for this report.

 


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 19.2

ITEM NUMBER        19.2

SUBJECT                 NOTICE OF MOTION: Granville Town Square

REFERENCE           F2019/04433 - D07438383

FROM                      Councillor Prociv        

 

 

MOTION

(a)    That in the 2020/21 financial year, Council commence master planning the future Granville Town Square site bordered by Good, Cowper, Rowell and Bridge Streets, Granville.

 

(b)    That $2.57M be allocated from the ‘Outside CBD’ S7.11 contributions plan and used for future embellishment and/or property acquisition at the future Granville Town Square site.

 

(c)    That $800,000 of the East Street sale proceeds dedicated by Council in 2015 for the improvement of assets within the Granville area be allocated towards the future Granville Town Square site.

 

(d)    Further, that $300,000 from these funds be directed to funding the master planning of the future Granville Town Square site.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     No background has been provided.

 

STAFF RESPONSE

 

2.     A staff response will be provided to Councillors at the Council Meeting.

 

FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

 

3.     A staff response will be provided to Councillors at the Council Meeting.

 

 

Councillor Patricia Prociv

Councillor

 

 

 

Attachments:

There are no attachments for this report.

 


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 19.3

ITEM NUMBER        19.3

SUBJECT                 NOTICE OF MOTION: Wisteria Gardens transfer from NSW Health to Parramatta Park Trust

REFERENCE           F2019/04433 - D07443704

FROM                      Councillor Davis       

 

 

MOTION

That by 30 June 2020, the Chief Executive Officer write to the NSW Minister for Health, NSW Minister for the Environment, State Member for Parramatta and Mr Graeme Loy, WSLHD requesting:

(i)     an update on actions taken thus far by NSW Health, Parramatta Park Trust and other relevant State Government departments and agencies to transfer the management of Wisteria Gardens (including Graythwaite house) to Parramatta Park Trust,

(ii)    a date for the transfer of the Wisteria Gardens (including Graythwaite house) to the Parramatta Park Trust,

(iii)    details about any proposed increase in funding to the Parramatta Park Trust for the initial repair and ongoing maintenance of Wisteria Gardens and Graythwaite house.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     On 12 October 2017 in the NSW Parliament the Hon Gabrielle Upton, then Minister for Environment, confirmed “the Government’s decision to transfer the ownership of the Wisteria Gardens at the northern end of the parklands from NSW Health to the Parramatta Park Trust, which will increase by two hectares the open green space that will be controlled by the Parramatta Park Trust. This is a heritage-listed and nationally significant site. The transfer of property will secure an important part of our history as well as more green space for the general public and the local community. Planning is underway to facilitate the transfer of Wisteria Gardens that will occur by the end of this year”. https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/Hansard/Pages/HansardResult.aspx#/docid/HANSARD-1323879322-99204

 

2.     In the Parramatta Park Trust Annual Report 2017/18 page 7 it reads under “Key Achievements…Commencement on work for the transfer of Wisteria Gardens to Parramatta Park Trust from NSW Health”.

 

3.     As the population of our city grows the need for public open space is increasing. Open space takes many forms from grassy parklands, to native bushland, riverside pathways to pocket parks. The importance of these places is clearly highlighted in the actions of our city’s residents during the COVID-19 outbreak. The one place they could rely on to exercise and escape from the confines of home was public open space. The importance of large expanses of open space was exacerbated by the need to socially distance.

 

4.     Parramatta Park is an oasis in our city. Established in 1857, Parramatta Park truly deserves its UNESCO World Heritage Listing as one of 11 sites that form the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Property - such a remarkable place. Expanding the park to include land that was also originally included in Macquarie’s park is such a great opportunity.

 

5.     A return to full public access to Wisteria Gardens will provide our city with an additional area of open space. It will also deliver a further attraction as each spring the Wisteria Gardens are simply beautiful. While the gardens have been neglected in recent years the opportunity exists for the gardens to be restored and enjoyed by the public particularly for special events such as the Wisteria Gardens Fete.

 

6.     It is more than 2 years since the announcement to transfer Wisteria Gardens to Parramatta Park Trust. Our city needs this additional open space and that is why I am moving the following motion.

 

STAFF RESPONSE

 

7.     A staff response will be provided to Councillors at the Council Meeting.

 

FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

 

8.     A staff response will be provided to Councillors at the Council Meeting.

 

 

Councillor Donna Davis

Councillor

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Parramatta Park Trust Amendment (Western Sydney Stadium) Bill 2017

6 Pages

 

2

Map of Wisteria Gardens

1 Page

 

 

 


Item 19.3 - Attachment 1

Parramatta Park Trust Amendment (Western Sydney Stadium) Bill 2017

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Item 19.3 - Attachment 2

Map of Wisteria Gardens

 

PDF Creator


Council 9 June 2020                                                                     Item 19.4

ITEM NUMBER        19.4

SUBJECT                 NOTICE OF MOTION: Traffic Study Granville

REFERENCE           F2019/04433 - D07443781

FROM                      Councillor Prociv        

 

 

MOTION

That Council write to the Roads and Maritime Services requesting that they provide any results of ongoing or completed traffic studies undertaken at the corner of Alfred St and Parramatta Rd Granville as part of the Parramatta Road Urban Amenity Improvement Program (PRUAIP).

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.     No background has been provided.

 

STAFF RESPONSE

 

2.     A staff response will be provided to Councillors at the Council Meeting.

 

FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

 

3.     A staff response will be provided to Councillors at the Council Meeting.

 

 

Councillor Patricia Prociv

Councillor

 

 

 

Attachments:

There are no attachments for this report.