Item 10.1 - Attachment 1 |
Development
Application Variations under SEPP 1 - December 2011 & January 2012 |
Variations under SEPP 1 or clause 4.6
of standard instrument (or similar provision) approved in December 2011 &
January 2012
DA No: |
Address: |
Category of development: |
Environmental Planning Instrument |
Development standard to be varied |
Justification of variation |
Extent of Variation |
Date DA determined |
DA/571/2011 |
|
Residential flat building |
PCCLEP 2007 Zone – B4
Mixed Use |
Cl22D - building separation (6
metre setback to rear and side boundaries) |
The objectives of the building
separation clause are not compromised by the minor balcony encroachment.
There are no adverse privacy or amenity impacts arising from the variation to
the standard and the encroachment (being balconies) provides design variation
to the building. |
Side setback 6 metres
(min) required 5.4 metres
proposed to side boundaries (600mm or 10%
variation) |
7 December
2011 Sydney West Joint Regional Planning Panel |
DA/633/2011 |
EASTWOOD |
Dwelling house |
PLEP 2001 Zone – 2A
Residential (at time of DA lodgement) |
cl. 38 – minimum allotment size (550m2) cl.39 – maximum height (2 storeys) cl. 40 - maximum FSR (0.5:1) |
The site is subject to a Masterplan
and Council previously granted consent to subdivide the site into the subject
allotment sizes. The proposed dwellings are consistent with the Masterplan
and the overall site FSR of 0.6:1. The dwellings maintain suitable
residential amenity for surrounding properties. |
Allotment size 550m2 required 445.5 provided (13%
variation). Height 2 storey (max)
required 3 storey
provided on lots 18, 19 and 20 (50%
variation) FSR 0.5:1 (max) 0.54:1 to 0.77:1 proposed (approx 10-25% variation) |
12 December
2011 Council Meeting |
DA/726/2011 |
33 GRANVILLE |
Dwelling house |
PLEP 2011 Zone – R2 Low
Density Residential |
cl. 4.4(2) – maximum FSR
(0.5:1) |
The site is an undersized allotment
and the variation to the development standard is minimal (8.2m2) or less than
a 2% variation. No adverse amenity or bulk/scale impacts. |
FSR 0.5:1 (max) required 0.51:1 proposed (8.2m2 or less than 2% variation) |
30 November
2011 Group Manager Outcomes & Development
- delegated authority |
DA No: |
Address: |
Category of development: |
Environmental Planning Instrument |
Development standard to be varied |
Justification of variation |
Extent of Variation |
Date DA determined |
DA/560/2011 |
|
Dual occupancy |
PLEP 2001 Zone – 2B
Residential (at time of DA lodgement) |
cl.38 – minimum allotment size (600m2) |
The DP for the site shows the site
area to be 607m2 however the survey plan shows the dimensions of the site to
be 556m2. The extent of variation is minor and all other development
standards comply. |
Site area 600m2 (min)
required 556m2
proposed (44m2 or 8% variation) |
22 December
2011 Group Manager
Outcomes & Development – delegated authority |
DA/824/2011 |
2B ROSEHILL (Rosehill Racecourse) |
Signage |
PLEP 2011 Zone – RE2
Private Recreation |
cl.4.3 – maximum height (12metres) |
The screen can not be viewed from
public lands/roads as it is located within the racecourse and will not have
any adverse visual or amenity impacts.
|
Height 12 metres
(max) required 13.15m
proposed (1.15m or 9.6% variation) |
6 January
2012 Group Manager
Outcomes & Development – delegated authority |