Item 8.12 - Attachment 4

Heritage Items That Property Owners Are Seeking to Be Delisted

Attachment 2

Heritage Items That Property Owners Are Seeking to Be Delisted

Item/Map No (maps at end of this attachment)	Location	Description	Comments	Recommendation
1	54 Sorrell Street, North Parramatta	Inventory statement of significance – Professional, trade and manufacturing practice - example of the work of notable architect and builder, James Houison. Evidence of the major regional role of institutions in history of Parramatta. It is the finest example of the many Victorian surburban villas which once surrounded the town of Parramatta.	Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 DP of the property are listed on the State Heritage Register. An additional lot, Lot 5 is also heritage listed in Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011. A heritage assessment has been undertaken which concludes that although Lot 5 is part of the original garden and landscape setting of ‘Endrim’ it is outside of the immediate curtilage of the historic villa. The existing controls of the Parramatta LEP are considered adequate to ensure appropriate development of this site. It is also noted that a heritage impact statement will be required in support of any future development as it is located adjacent to a State Heritage listed item and in addition is subject to the controls of the Sorrell Street Conservation Area.	Remove Lot 5 from the schedule of listed items
2	Former stationmasters house, 213 Victoria Road, Rydalmere	Inventory statement of significance – Evidence of development of railway transport networks in area.	The land owner seeks delisting because significant alterations have been carried out to the house over time. The house is also in need of repair and an easement for the expansion of the railway covers the eastern portion of the property. The Heritage Advisory Committee recommended that further historical research be undertaken before a final determination. The historical research undertaken concludes that there is no firm evidence that this building was in position before 1900 when the government bought the private railway line, though the configuration of the land suggests there was a building there before that time. If the building was built and used as a gatehouse for the gates on Victoria Road then the purpose of the building will need to be re-assessed. The heritage consultant recommends that consideration should be given to removing the property from the schedule of listed items. The consultant comments that the place meets both some inclusion and some exclusion criteria. Notably, the former owners (NSW RailCorp) do not have it listed in their heritage register. The cottage was considerably modified and its associated railway station was demolished. Heritage incentives are not likely to be applied due to location near the railway line. Importantly a detailed research on the history item has not confirmed its age or design details.	Remove property from schedule of listed items
3	59/61 Wigram Street, Harris Park	Inventory statement of significance –Part of a house group which makes a notable contribution to the townscape.	The land owner seeks delisting because the building is considered to be in poor condition, the veranda is unsympathetic to the rest of the house and because of changes in the surroundings. From an inspection by Council’s Senior Building Surveyor the building is structurally sound, although only in fair condition. The Heritage Advisory Committee does not support delisting. The heritage consultant recommends retention of the item advising that the item meets NSW Heritage Office criteria; the context is very strong, the integrity level is relatively high and structural issues are deemed mendable.	Retain as an item of heritage significance.
4	104, 104A Harris Street, Harris Park	Inventory statement of significance – Example of an intact set of timber houses of an unusual configuration. Part of a house group which makes a notable contribution to the townscape.	The land owner seeks delisting because the building is in a deteriorated condition. The Heritage Advisory Committee does not support delisting. The heritage consultant recommends retention of the item commenting that the item meets NSW Heritage Office criteria; the context is very strong, the integrity level is relatively high and the structural condition is good.	Retain as an item of heritage significance.
5	31 Bridge Street (Epping Church of Christ), Epping	Inventory statement of significance – A distinctive church building of the style apparently favoured by the denomination, and very likely of considerable social significance to the congregation which supports it.	The land owner seeks delisting because the building is not distinctive, or a favoured style or representative and does not qualify for inclusion. The Heritage Advisory Committee does not support delisting. The heritage consultant comments that the place meets inclusion criteria on a local level. The context is neutral and the significant use is ongoing. The integrity level is high and the structural condition is good. Retention of the heritage listing is recommended.	Retain as an item of heritage significance.
6	45 Chiswick Road, South Granville	Inventory statement of significance – 27, 29, 33 – 47 Chiswick Road. This group of cottages was the first group development constructed by the newly formed Housing Commission in 1944.	The land owner seeks delisting because the building has significant building problems, it is impractical and uneconomic to upgrade and extend the building, the building has little heritage value and there are an excessive number of Housing Commission dwellings in the area. From an inspection by Council’s Senior Building Surveyor the building is structurally sound. However, because the site yards have been concreted over, surface stormwater is lying on the site and flowing underneath the house causing cracking of the brickwork and other building problems. As suggested, a drainage system should be provided to collect and drain water to the street. The Heritage Advisory Committee does not support delisting. The heritage consultant comments that the context of the house at 45 Chiswick Road is very strong and includes a nearby house groups and conservation area, all relating to the same historical theme of public housing. The current owner is vehemently opposed to heritage listing. However, the integrity level is high and Council's engineer confirmed that structural issues are mendable. On balance, the argument to retain listing prevails over reasons for removal from the schedule of listed items.	Retain as an item of heritage significance.
7	59 Harris Street, Harris Park	Inventory statement of significance – House which makes a contribution to townscape due to similarities in age, design, use and materials.	The land owner seeks delisting because the building is in poor condition, its heritage values are no higher than neighbouring unlisted properties and are suited to higher density development. The Heritage Advisory Committee does not support delisting. The heritage consultant comments that this cottage clearly meets inclusion criteria. It is located in a very strong context of the nearby listed houses, groups and conservation area, all relating to similar or same historical themes. The current owner is supposed to heritage listing. However, the integrity level is high and their perceived structural issues are readily identifiable as minor and mendable. Retention of the heritage listing is recommended.	Retain as an item of heritage significance.
8	123 -- 157 Bungaree Road (Fibro Cottage), Pendle Hill	Inventory Statement of Significance – Evidence of history before suburban lot subdivision. Evidence of major role of institutions in the history of Parramatta. The small cottages are in intact condition.	The land owner seeks delisting because the building is in poor condition with little visual appeal and obstructs future development plans. The Heritage Advisory Committee seeks further historical research before a final decision. The heritage consultant comments that the place meets some inclusion criteria on a local level, albeit it also meets a number of exclusion criteria. However, its original physical context is irreversibly lost, and it is likely that any application for demolition will prove successful due to this total loss of context. While the structure appears sound, it is likely that the majority of fabric will be replaced in forthcoming years. It is not deemed that significant new information will be retrieved through additional research. In this situation, it is deemed suitable to consider removing the house and site from the schedules of heritage items, subject to an archival record of the cottage being prepared.	Remove property from schedule of listed items subject to an archival record of the cottage being prepared.
9	2 Union Street, Eastwood	Inventory Statement of Significance – Houses and other buildings before subdivision.	The land owner seeks delisting because the building is in a dilapidated condition. The Council's Senior Building Surveyor has concluded from an inspection that the building is in a poor structural condition, through extreme lack of maintenance, and would be costly to restore. Water damage has threatened the building integrity and in particular that of the north external wall and an internal structural wall. External weatherboards, and especially the window sills, are badly in need of repair and repainting. The Heritage Advisory Committee sought further historical research before a final decision. The historical research undertaken concludes that this cottage was erected on a large parcel of land that passed down through the Spurway family, who were noted orchardists in the Eastwood area. Members of the Spurway family were noted local citizens in nineteenth century Dundas/Eastwood. The house appears to have been erected shortly before the land was subdivided and remained in the hands of the family for some years. The cottage has a strong association with the Spurway family and its descendants. The heritage consultant comments that the item meets the relevant listing criteria, albeit its condition is such that much of it may have to be rebuilt if it is to be saved. The current owners support delisting and the context is neutral. The integrity level is relatively high (in that much original fabric survives) but the structural condition is relatively poor which will likely impact on integrity in forthcoming years. Additional research was undertaken and did not provide new information of prevailing importance. Consideration to removal from the schedule of listed items is recommended.	Remove property from schedule of listed items subject to an archival record of the cottage being prepared.
10	Parramatta wetlands – Camellia, Clyde, Rydalmere and Ermington	Inventory statement of significance – Remnant areas of mangroves and salt marshes which once extensively lined the foreshores and tidal water flats of the region.	As part of the comprehensive heritage review, consideration has been given to the justification for listing when mangroves and wetlands are protected by other statutory provisions. The heritage consultant concludes: – The item meets NSW Heritage Office criteria for both listing and delisting; – The integrity level is relatively low; – The original context is varied (species may have changed); – Mangroves and wetlands under other legislation; – Condition is relatively good; – Some owners dispute “heritage” nature; – Heritage incentives unlikely to be applied The heritage consultant recommends removal of the wetlands from the schedule of listed items.	Remove from schedule of listed items
11	St Andrew's Church Hall, 7 St Andrews Place, Dundas	Inventory statement of significance – Evidence of social and cultural life.	The owners of the property have requested delisting. In the heritage review undertaken by the heritage consultant, Graham Hall in 2006, a recommendation was made for the removal of this item from the heritage list. The church was not considered significant. It was commented that relocation and alterations had diminished the significance of the building to a point where it does not satisfy the standard NSW Government listing criteria. The Council at its meeting on 25 September 2006 did not support the recommendation for delisting. The heritage consultant concludes: – The item meets NSW Heritage Office criteria for both listing and delisting; – The integrity level is relatively low; – The original context is lost (the building was relocated); – The structural condition is relatively good; – Owners request delisting; – Heritage incentives unlikely to be applied. The heritage consultant recommends removal of the property from the schedule of listed items.	Remove from Schedule of listed items
12	8 Valley Road, Eastwood	Inventory statement of significance – Part of a house group which makes a notable contribution to townscape due to similarities in age, design and materials.	The property owners seek delisting for the reasons that the listing: restricts the scope of planned alterations; it would be more economic to correct a new dwelling, listing adversely impacts on the property value and marketability and requires costly maintenance and repairs. The heritage consultant concludes: – – The item meets NSW Heritage Office criteria for listing; – The context is strong; – The integrity level is relatively high; – The structural condition of the building is good; – Owners request delisting; – Heritage incentives are unlikely to be applied. The heritage consultant recommends the retention of the property as an item of heritage significance.	Retain as an item of heritage significance
13	92 Calder Road, Rydalmere	Inventory statement of significance – Evidence of history before suburban small lot subdivision.	The property owners seek delisting for the reason that the dwelling is in poor condition, uneconomic to maintain and has been substantially modified over time. The heritage consultant concludes: – The item meets NSW Heritage Office criteria for listing; – The context is neutral; – The integrity level is relatively high; – Structural condition of the building is good; – Owners request delisting; – Heritage incentives unlikely to be applied. The heritage consultant recommends the retention of the property as an item of heritage significance.	Retain as an item of heritage significance
14	319/321 Church Street, Parramatta	Inventory statement of significance – Two storey Federation free style shop. Facade is part of the heterogeneous streetscape that demonstrates the history of the church Street as a shopping street since colonial times.	The property owners seek delisting for the reasons that the building has no heritage values and they have had no indication that it was heritage listed. In the heritage review undertaken by the heritage consultant, Graham Hall in 2006, a recommendation was made for the heritage listing of this property, along with other buildings in Church Street, Parramatta. The Council at its meeting on 25 September 2006 supported the recommendation for listing. A letter was forwarded on 11 December 2006 to the owners of proposed listings in the Parramatta City Centre as part of the exhibition of the draft Parramatta City Centre LEP 2007. The heritage consultant concludes: – The item meets NSW Heritage Office criteria for listing; – The context is very strong; – The integrity level is good; – The structural condition is good; – Owners request delisting; – Heritage incentives unlikely to be applied. The heritage consultant recommends the retention of the property as an item of heritage significance.	Retain as an item of heritage significance
15	333 Church Street, Parramatta	Inventory statement of significance – Two storey shop with Art Deco facade, behind which is a 19th-century structure. Facade is part of the heterogeneous streetscape that demonstrates the history of Church Street as a shopping street since colonial times.	Council’s Property Development Group is seeking delisting to enable improved access to Council land at 12 – 14 Philip Street which is to be redeveloped for mixed use purposes. A heritage assessment commissioned by Council concludes that 333 Church Street does not appear to be of such heritage significance that its loss and replacement with public open space, other uses or structures in sympathy with the form, height, bulk and appearance of other nearby retail and commercial heritage items, would irreparably diminished the heritage value of Church Street and the Parramatta City Centre. The heritage consultant concludes: – The item meets NSW Heritage Office listing criteria; – The context is very strong; – Integrity level is good; – The structural condition is good; – Owners request delisting; – Heritage incentives unlikely to be applied The heritage consultant recommends the retention of the property as an item of heritage significance.	Retain as an item of heritage significance
16	25 Prospect Street, Rosehill	Inventory statement of significance – Professional, trade and manufacturing practice - example of an intact house.	A submission has been received by a planning consultant seeking that the heritage listing be removed from the property. The request is supported by a heritage assessment that concludes that although the dwelling demonstrates some of the characteristics of the Federation style it is not however unique in this respect and is not an important benchmark or reference site. The heritage consultant concludes: – The item meets NSW Heritage Office listing criteria; – The context is strong and positive; – The integrity level is relatively high; – The structural condition of the building is good; – Owners request delisting; – Heritage incentives unlikely to be applied. The heritage consultant recommends the retention of the property as an item of heritage significance.	Retain as an item of heritage significance
17	8 Bijiji Street, Pendle Hill	Inventory statement of significance – Evidence of history before suburban small lot subdivision. Larger house than those in locality possibly associated with a notable person	The property owner seeks the listing for the reason that the building is in a poor structural condition. The heritage consultant concludes: – The item meets NSW Heritage Office listing criteria; – The context is neutral; – The structural condition of the building is poor; – Major replacement of structural fabric is likely in the foreseeble future; – Owners request delisting; – Heritage incentives unlikely to be applied. The heritage consultant recommends removal of the property from the schedule of listed items, subject to a structural assessment.	Remove from listed items subject to a structural assessment commissioned by the landowner, confirming that major structural improvements are required to the dwelling on the property
18	62 Railway Parade, Granville	Inventory statement of significance –Professional, trade and manufacturing practice - example of an intact house built and occupied by a local builder.	The property owner seeks delisting for the reasons that the building has little heritage value, is not rare or unique and has lost its significance due to the surrounding commercial development. Listing of the property has prevented redevelopment and negated the reason for its purchase as a pension fund. The property is leased by Council and occupied by the Granville Historical Society. The heritage consultant comments that the house presents as having a high degree of integrity. It is readily identifiable as a historic house in the area, it is aesthetically noteworthy and has features of Federation Arts and Crafts architectural style, it makes an important contribution to the streetscape character and, overall, it would easily meet the criteria for heritage listing on a local level.	Retain as an item of heritage significance

Map 1. 54 Sorrell Street, North Parramatta

Map 2. 213 Victoria Road, Rydalmere

Map 3. 59/61 Wigram Street, Harris Park

Map 4. 104 and 104A Harris Street, Harris Park

Map 5. 31 Bridge Street, Epping

Map 6. 45 Chiswick Road, South Granville

Map 7. 59 Harris Street, Harris Park

Map 8. 123-157 Bungaree Road, Pendle Hill

Map 9. 2 Union Street, Eastwood

Map 10. Parramatta Wetlands – Camellia, Clyde, Rydalmere and Ermington (Sample Only)

Map 11. St Andrews Church Hall, 7 St Andrews Place, Dundas

Map 12. 8 Valley Road, Eastwood

Map 13. 92 Calder Road, Rydalmere

Map 14. 319/321 Church Street, Parramatta

Map 15. 333 Church Street, Parramatta

Map 16. 25 Prospect Street, Rosehill

Map 17. 8 Bijiji Street, Pendle Hill

Map 18. 62 Railway Parade, Granville