Item 7.3 - Attachment 3 |
Attachment C - Draft
Better Neighbourhood Program Guidelines |
ATTACHMENT C:
Report to Council 28 March 2011
Centres Review
Better
Neighbourhood Program Guidelines
Adopted by Council:
Implemented by: Place Services Team
Date of Review:
In response to a resolution of Council the City Strategy Unit at
Parramatta City Council led a ‘Centres Review’ project to develop a new
methodology to provide Councillors with a sound information base on which to
allocate Better Neighbourhood Program (BNP) funding (approximately $1.4M
annually).
CONTENTS:
1. |
Why do we need guidelines for investing in
streetscape projects? |
Page 2 |
2. |
What makes a good centre? |
Page 2 |
3. |
What is in scope for this methodology |
Page 2 |
4. |
Research & Consultation |
Page 2 |
5. |
Analysing The Data and Scoring Centres |
Page 4 |
6. |
Implementation |
Page 6 |
|
APPENDIX A - The Regional Context Of
Centres In |
Page 7 |
|
APPENDIX B Applying the
Public Domain Guidelines |
Page 9 |
|
APPENDIX C Centres Hierarchy Diagram |
Page 10 |
|
APPENDIX D |
Page 11 |
1. Why
do we need guidelines for investing in streetscape projects?
Understanding what we are trying to achieve in a centre makes is easier
to decide where funding will be allocated. The Better Neighbourhood Program
seeks to enhance neighbourhood centres as the focus for local communities….to
deliver high quality, attractive, distinctive and viable neighbourhood centres,
each with a sense of local identity. Residents of
Streetscape improvement projects are not always the most effective
treatment for a centre in poor health. New paving and street furniture won’t
necessarily improve viability of a centre. When applying this methodology
consideration will be given to alternative strategies such as activation,
changes to zoning and economic stimulus.
2. What makes a good
centre?
A good centre has inviting public spaces and an appealing mix of
businesses and community facilities. It is well maintained and popular, accessible
to people on foot, driving and on public
transport. A good centre is perceived to
be safe and is active and animated community meeting place.
3. What is in scope for
this methodology?
This methodology is a tool for assessing the health of the twenty-six
Town Centres, Village Centres and Neighbourhood Centres. Streetscape improvement projects for the Parramatta CBD are funded separately and and
are not included in this methodology. Enterprise corridors and the sixteen
centres identified as ‘Local Shops’ (less than 5 shops in one location see APPENDIX D – LOCAL CENTRES) are also
death with separately.
4. Research &
Consultation
The Research and
consultation phase will be September – November each year, culminating with a
workshop for Councillors in November, and a report to Council the following March
with recommendations for streetscape improvement projects and allocation of
funding accordingly.
The “Parramatta Centres Diagram” prepared by Council’s Urban Design Unit
is the key reference tool for the Better
Neighbourhood Program Guidelines. Descriptions for centres as outlined in
the NSW Government ‘Metropolitan
Plan for
Let by the Place
Services team, a cross functional team will undertake the following research
and consultation:
1. Data Collection:
o Update Better Neighbourhood Program expenditure since for current year
o Collect and map Graffiti incident reports (GRIP)
o Map Illegal rubbish dumping data
o Record retail vacancy rates for each centre (annual survey)
o Collect small centres cleansing surveys
o Review CRMs and Community Feedback (data mining and reporting)
o Review LEP and future growth scenarios
o Apply Walkscore to each centre (free web based software or more sophisticated alternative).
2. Desktop Review
o Review
of the descriptions of centres in the ‘Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036’, or a
subsequent plan and changes of the status on centres in Parramatta
o Review of best practice other Councils
o Current and proposed zoning
o DA activity in each centre
o Analysis of local and regional statistics including
ABS and i.d.forecast
o Crime statistics
o Community / suburb profiles
o Retail and Planning Studies
3. Site Inspections
o Annual Asset survey: site inspections of the 26 centres to gather data and report on the condition of the public assets in each centre (September - Sept – November each year), conducted by the Operational Liaison Officers 2010
o Inspection and evaluation of completed Streetscape improvement works
4. Consultation
o Surveys - Residents Panel and where appropriate
place specific surveys
o Internal: Place Services, City Strategy, Capital Projects, Community Capacity Building & City Culture Tourism and Recreation Units, and the Executive Team.
o Councillors (workshop held annually as part of the Centres Review)
5. Analysing the data and scoring
centres
FILTERS
1. Last Upgrade / expenditure last 5 years
Determined by:
· Historical BNP expenditure
· Streetscape improvements funded / co-funded through external sources
2. High Use
· Pedestrian counts (do not have the technology for this)
· Anecdotal evidence
· Car park usage
· Bicycle rack usage
· Vacancy rate (annual survey by place managers)
3. State of Public Assets
Determined by:
· OLO annual asset survey
· Complaints and resident / business owner requests for action
4. Future Growth
Determined by;
· comparison with existing and proposed LEP
· transport infrastructure
5. Community Feedback
Determined by;
· Community Surveys
· Place based consultation
· Residents Panel
· CRM data mining
· Complaints and resident / business owner requests for action
· Crime
statistics and perceptions of public safety
Table One
Core Filters key
Core Filters |
Comment |
||||
a. |
What was the centre last upgraded? |
< 3 years |
3-5 years |
6+ years |
Data collected since 2001. |
Score |
1 |
3 |
6 |
||
b. |
How busy is the
Centre? |
<1000 people per day LOW |
2500 people per day MEDUIM |
>5,000 people per day HIGH |
This measure will be useful over time in measuring trends. For accurate numbers investment in automated people counting technology required. These criteria can be used in conjunction with vacancy rates and other economic data. |
Score |
1 |
3 |
6 |
||
c. |
What is the
condition of the public assets? |
Poor |
Moderate |
Good |
Data gathered through annual asset survey and information available through Civil infrastructure section. |
Score |
1 |
3 |
6 |
||
d. |
Future Growth |
None projected |
Moderate |
Significant increase |
Projections from Sydney Metropolitan Plan 2036 and the |
Score |
1 |
3 |
6 |
||
e. |
Community Feedback |
Few |
Moderate |
Significant |
· * Community Feedback weighted higher than other criteria. · Analysis of CRMs · Analysis of Residents Panel Surveys · Councillor feedback |
Score |
1 |
4 |
8 * |
Moderating filters
These relate specifically to timing and annual review. The availability of a significant grant, VPAs, public partnerships, significant development may trigger or delay PCC investment in centres or other opportunities to leverage external funding.
a. External sources of funding or external investment (private or DoH, RTA, DoP for example) Unexpected and significant investment in social or environmental assets by external organisations, raid increase in Development proposals / approvals for new businesses in the centre.
b. Internal sources of funding (Roads, new or upgraded community assets such as libraries, community centres and parks)
c. Equity: an equitable approach to the allocation of streetscape improvement projects across the LGA.
d. Review annually as part of the budget process for Councillors, checking current status of priorities
Scoring
The scores provide a mechanism to take the pulse of a centre – a high score indicates that further investigation is required to determine the appropriate ‘treatment’ to bring a centre to good health. Moderating filters (listed above a - d) are also considered as these may override either low or high scores.
Table Two – Scoring
00 – 06 |
|
Low scores. Centre
is in good ‘health’ and increases residential density not expected. |
07 – 11 |
|
Moderate score in 2
or more filters. Maintenance and minor works required. |
12 – 16 |
|
High scores in 2 or
more filters. Consider for streetscape improvement project. |
17 – 20+ |
|
High scores in 3 or
more filters – Centre requires intervention which may include streetscape
improvement projects. |
6. Implementation
Writing of the annual project plan and set-up of the cross
functional team is the responsibility of the Place Services Team. Key partners
are the Capital Projects Team and the Urban Design Unit. At the completion of
the data collection and analysis phase, Councillors will be invited to a
workshop to discuss the findings and make recommendations for funding
streetscape improvement projects.
APPENDIX A -
THE REGIONAL CONTEXT OF CENTRES IN
Land Use Planning
Following extensive consultation Parramatta City Council submitted the new LEP to the Department of Planning for consideration. It is expected that the LEP will be gazetted in the first half of 2010.
The LEP has significant impact on some of or centres, particularly those where the plan is to increase densification.
Regional Centres
Regional cities are a core consideration of the Metropolitan Plan in creating a series of connected cities. Three Regional cities are identified in the Metropolitan Plan:
- Parramatta, Sydney’s second CBD which serves Western Sydney
- Liverpool which serves south western Sydney and
- Penrith, which serves outer Western Sydney and the Blue Mountains.
Regional Cities contain a full
range of business, government, health, retail, cultural, entertainment and
recreational activities and have a walking catchment of 2km radius.
Town Centres
A Town Centre is a large group of shops and services, with a
mix of uses and good links with the surrounding neighbourhood. It provides the
focus for a large residential population. At PCC we map the catchment for a
Town Centre at 800m radius. Town Centres in
Village Centres
A village is a group of shops and services for daily shopping, with a mix of uses and good links with the surrounding neighbourhood.
Villages comprise retail premises and services such as
supermarkets, butchers, banks, hairdressers, cafes, restaurants, and take away
food shops, as well as child care centres and schools. Villages have a walking
catchment radius of approximately 400-600 metres. Villages in the City of
Neighbourhood Centres
A Neighbourhood Centre is the smallest of the recognised type in the Metropolitan Plan hierarchy. Neighbourhood Centres have a walking catchment radius of 400 metres.
Neighbourhood Centres usually comprise 10 or more shops and
services, such as a corner shop, chemist, bottle shop, convenience store, café
and a newsagent. Neighbourhood Centres in Parramatta are: Constitution Hill
(N1), Carlingford Shopping Centre (N2), Telopea Station Centre (N3), Kleins
Road Northmead (N4), The Chisholm Centre Winston Hills (N5), Toongabbie shops (N6),
Collett Park (N7), Bungaree Road Toongabbie (N8) Mobbs lane Carlingford (N9),
Excelsior & Constance Streets Granville (N10), Victoria & park roads
Rydalmere (N11) and Iron Street North Parramatta (N12). At
Local Shops
This category is applied at
Parade shops Winston Hills (L10), Station Road shops Toongabbie (L11), Tintern Avenue shops Telopea (L12), Wentworthville shops (L13), Wentworthville Station shops (L14), Windsor Road shops Northmead (L15) and Yates Avenue shops Dundas (L16)
Source: NSW Government Metropolitan Plan for
Centres across the
border
APPENDIX
B
Applying
the Public Domain Guidelines
In Australian cities over 70% of the public
domain is streets. Footpaths and small urban squares create vital areas for
social contact as well as providing access to services.
A high quality public domain creates a
memorable image of a place and a strong identity for centres. Public Domain
Guidelines are guidelines that specify the materials and layout for streetscape
elements including footpaths, pavement, lighting, street trees, street
furniture, kerb ramps, lanes, bollards.
The review is being undertaken because it is
over 10 years since the first standard set of guidelines were developed for
The aim is:
· For a consistent approach throughout
Parramatta.
· There will be significant financial benefits
from a standardised approach from points of view of, purchasing, maintenance
and managing the asset base.
· To well define the places and to provide good
amenity as seating, shade, shelter, lighting, signage and accessible kerb
ramps.
· To ensure that the pedestrian space is
sufficient to accommodate the pedestrian volumes and that parking and bicycles
are well integrated with the street.
· Overall this will enable the funds to go
further and an improved appearance and quality for the Parramatta’s centres.
APPENDIX C
Centres Hierarchy
diagram (to be inserted)
APPENDIX D
Parramatta LGA Local Shops (Centres with 5 or less shops).
Not assessed under the Better Neighbourhood Program Guidelines
L1 |
|
L2 |
Bells Road Shops, Oatlands |
L3 |
|
L4 |
Excelsior & |
L5 |
Gibbons Road shops, Oatlands |
L6 |
|
L7 |
Midson Road shops, Epping |
L8 |
Pendle Hill shops |
L9 |
Picasso shops, Toongabbie |
L10 |
Rebecca parade shops, |
L11 |
Station Road shops Toongabbie |
L12 |
|
L13 |
Wentworthville shops |
L14 |
Wentworthville Station shops |
L15 |
|
L16 |
|
|
|