Item 12.5 - Attachment 1

Childcare Fees Option Paper - March 2009

 

 

CHILD CARE FEES

(OPTIONS PAPER)

MARCH 2009

 

 

 

 

 

F2008/03695 – D01156779

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


1.     EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 3

2.     BACKGROUND.. 3

3.     CHILDCARE FEE LEVELS – IMPACT ON COUNCIL BUDGET 2009/2010. 4

4.     PROPOSED FEE INCREASE IMPACT ON FAMILIES.. 4

5.     LOOKING AHEAD.. 5

 


1.      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

This discussion paper provides some background information on the fees currently applying to Council’s child care services and proposed for the Management Plan and Budget 2009/10.   A modest fee increase has been included in the draft services budget which will result in a deficit result for Council, similar to 2009/10.   Other options are outlined in this report including details of the potential impact on families and Council.

 

2.      BACKGROUND

 

It has been the aim of Council to achieve cost neutrality with the childcare centres but due to increasing costs and reduced utilisation this has not occurred in recent years.  The utilisation issue started to arise largely as a result of incentives in the way the Federal Government applied a fee subsidy which encouraged more families to switch to part time care and so the centres were faced with numerous odd days to fill, particularly on Mondays and Fridays.

 

As a result of this, a significant review of the childcare centres was carried out prior to the fees being set last year.  Historically, the fees at the centres have increased by three dollars per day every Financial Year.  In 2008/2009, the fees were standardised across the centres and increased by $1.00 to $6.00 per day, depending on the centre.

 

Over this Financial Year the childcare centres have maintained an average utilisation of 90%.  The utilisation reached a high of 96% in September and a low of 86% in January.  As a result of these figures it is proposed to continue to set the childcare fees based on 90% utilisation across the board.

 

Note:  Utilisation rates at each centre vary which is why we aggregate the rate across all ages for all centres for budgetary purposes.  For example, all centres are achieving 100% utilisation rates for the 0 to 2 year old groups but a varied rate for the 3 to 5 year old age group, ranging from 86% to 90% utilisation

 

The standardised utilisation method is based on a more realistic break even fee that anticipates some fluctuation in childcare operations, takes account of lower utilisation rates and fixed staff and operating costs. 

 

To achieve full cost neutrality based on the current environment and utilisation rates the daily fee would need to increase markedly.  The fees within the 2009/2010 draft budget have been set at $65.00 per day which has been based on the suggested CPI in the Fees and Charges document and will result in a Council deficit of approximately $385,000.  The information below outlines the impact on families as well as options to reduce the Council subsidy.

 


3.      CHILDCARE FEE LEVELS – IMPACT ON COUNCIL BUDGET 2009/2010

 

The following table provides an overview of the possible increases per day for the Long Day Care Centres as a quick snapshot of the increase and difference in fee when compared to current rates as well as the resulting cost to Council.

 

 

Proposed Fee/Day

Daily Increase on

current fee

Total Cost To Council Across

5 LDC Centres

 

$65.00

$3.00

$384,994

$68.00

$6.00

$227,867

$70.00

$8.00

$162,089

$74.00

$12.00

$0

 

4.      PROPOSED FEE INCREASE IMPACT ON FAMILIES

 

Families accessing the childcare centres are entitled to two Federal Government subsidies.   Childcare Benefit (CCB) is a subsidy that is applied weekly at the centres to reduce the fee and is applied as a percentage through an income test.  The second is the Childcare Tax Rebate (CCTR) which is a 50% rebate for the out of pocket childcare expenses for families, capped at $7,500, and this can be claimed by the families quarterly through the Family Assistance Office.

 

The attached tables illustrate the impact of the proposed fee increase options on the families after the subsidies have been applied. 

 

(a)     Table one displays the fee impact after CCB has been calculated and has been calculated on the percentage rates effective for the 08/09 Financial Year.  These are usually CPI indexed each year, but the 09/10 percentages have not been released at this time.

 

(b)     Table two shows the impact on families after the CCTR has been applied.

 

(c)     Table three outlines examples of the total difference that families will have to pay for the varying proposed fee options.

 

The impact of fee increases on families will obviously vary depending on their income level and other personal circumstances.   A breakdown of the income categories for families currently using Council’s childcare centres is:

 

i.   25% Families earn $34,310 or less

ii.  13% Families earn between $34,310 - $60,000

iii. 31% Families earn between $60,000 - $130,000

iv. 31% Families earn above $130,000, are not eligible for CCB or choose to take the Lump Sum CCB option and claim as part of their annual income tax return.

 


5.      LOOKING AHEAD

 

Taking into account forward planning, it must be noted that there are also new Children’s Services Regulations that are due to be implemented in approximately July 2010, with a change to the staff to child ratio from 1:5 to 1:4 for children under two years of age.  These changes will have a direct impact on the childcare centres as an extra staff member will need to be recruited per centre.  This will need to be included in further fee structures.

 

The changes may also place significant pressure on Council to maintain or increase the number of under two year old children that we cater for in the future as there is anticipation that some of the private centres in the LGA may cease this service as a result. 

 

This information does not relate to the Occasional Care Centre as it is being dealt with as a separate issue.  A review of the service provision model is currently being undertaken and discussions with the State Government are in the process to look at approval for the possible improvement that will encourage viability as well as meet the needs of the Community.