Item 9.3
- Attachment 1 |
Outcomes
of Ward Councillor Working Group Discussions |
Attachment 1
OUTCOMES OF WARD COUNCILLOR WORKING
GROUP DISCUSSIONS
Item |
Amendment Proposed |
|
Woodville Ward Councillors |
1 |
The neighbourhood block bounded by Blaxcell St, The
Avenue, |
2 |
The west side of Blaxcell Street, between Adam
Street and Markey Street, which is shown as B4 Mixed Use be replaced by R3
Medium Density Residential, further, that the proposed B4 Mixed Use section
of Blaxcell Street, adjacent to Markey Street (grey on the map) be altered to
conform with the surrounding residential zoning. |
3 |
The
proposed R4 High Density Residential in |
4 |
That
the east side of Clyde Street between Boronia and Chiswick Road become R2 Low
Density Residential, with Council officers to investigate the ability to give
bonuses to development sites on the basis that they dedicate land for future
road proposals. |
5 |
The
frontage to the east side of Woodville Road between William and Clarke
Streets be altered to B4 Mixed Use due to its closeness to the TAFE and the
existing development on the corner of William Street and recognising the run
down nature of existing housing stock. |
6 |
Change
the area in |
7 |
Land
south of Guildford Rd between Railway Terrace, Cross St and Swift St to be
amended from a height of L (11m) to a height of P
17 metres (5 storeys). |
|
Elizabeth Macarthur Ward
Councillors
|
8 |
That where dead end
streets and cul de sacs occur, such as Teale Place, North Parramatta, Wyuna
Place Oatlands - no town house or duplex development occur. |
9 |
|
10 |
Rydalmere
industrial area we need to ensure that our zoning does not permit brothels
and the area that we as Ward Councillors, if we need to permit brothels,
would prefer them to be in the Camellia area, as it is not a residential
area, with no schools, places of worship or recreational facilities |
11 |
Parramatta
East, area between |
12 |
Council
depot, |
13 |
Area
proposed as R4 along |
14 |
Block
bounded by Pemberton Street, Thomas Street, Morton Street and Victoria Road to
be zoned R2 with the exception of lots fronting Victoria Road which may
remain R3. This area to have a height
limit of J (12m). |
15 |
All
corner properties at intersection of |
16 |
Rydalmere
Industrial area to the south of Height
along the southern side of Victoria Road within this zone and along Brodie
Street to be amended from M (12m) and J (12m) to P1 (18m). The remaining area west of the waterway to
have a height of O (15m). |
17 |
Corner
of |
18 |
The
proposed draft height limit identified as J1 (9.2m) to be amended to a
height limit of N (13m) in the block bounded by Prospect Street, Alfred
Street, Virginia Street and the laneway in Rosehill, |
19 |
The
height limit identified as J1 (9.2m) to be amended to a height limit M
(12m) in the block bounded by Weston, Arthur, Prospect and The Rydges
hotel, Rosehill. |
20 |
Shops
near |
21 |
That
all of |
22 |
Due
to the importance of the |
23 |
That
Council undertake a Master Plan process for the land bounded by Tramway,
Alfred, River Road, James Ruse Drive, Parramatta, for the purpose of creating
a more effective land use pattern. |
24 |
Recommend
RE2 private recreation zone along river foreshores. |
|
Carolyn Chisolm Ward Councillors |
25 |
Zoning
of |
26 |
That
staff commence work on preparation of amended planning controls as a future
amendment to the LEP for the |
|
|
27 |
Include
previously adopted draft planning controls, for the Epping town centre
precinct including the draft heritage conservation area additions as well as
draft heritage items. |
|
Arthur Phillip Ward Councillors (not clear on the
level of agreement amongst ward Councillors) |
28 |
(Map 4) Department
of Housing estate, R4 zone site near the intersection of |
29 |
(Map 10) - R2 zone site
west of the City Centre LEP for the area bounded by Lansdowne, Inkerman and
Dixon Streets, amend the zoning to R4, FSR limit of 0.8:1, and a height limit
of 11 metres. (Note by staff: the
Landsdowne frontage of this block forms part of a heritage conservation
area). Make the balance of that
proposed R2 zone west of the City Centre LEP to R3, FSR limit of 0.8:1, and a
height limit of 11 metres. (That is, townhouse format with a higher density
yield). (Note by staff: this is a
heritage conservation area). Also, would like to
discuss how to have these proposed zoning changes, but with the incentives
for block consolidation such that we have the opportunity to widen streets in
order to cope with the increase in population density in terms of traffic. |
30 |
(Map 4) - the B4 zone
sites on the north and south side of |
31 |
In the definitions of
land use in the LEP document, please delete "Dual Occupancies" from
the R2 zone under the "Permitted with consent" section. |
32 |
In the definitions of
land use in the LEP document, please delete "Child care centres"
from the R1 and R2 zones under the "Permitted with consent"
section. (This would render section 6.3 obsolete). |
33 |
In the definitions of
land use in the LEP document, please delete "Places of public
worship" from the R1 and R2 zones under the "Permitted with
consent" section. (This means section 6.16 will need to be consequently
revised.) |
34 |
In clause 6.12(1) in the
LEP document, please change the text to "... maximum period of 28
consecutive calendar days, in any one calendar year." |
35 |
Under Schedule 2 of
Exempt Development, in the "Advertisements" section, please delete
clause "(8) Must not be an "A" frame sign". (Note by staff: Council will need to
include the provisions of the Exempt and Complying SEPP as directed by the
DoP). |
36 |
Under Schedule 1 of
Additional Permitted Uses, in page 56, under "Flagpoles", why would
we want to restrict the size of an Australian flag and the height of the pole
itself? There may be good reasons in commercial/retail/office zones where
much bigger flags and taller flagpoles are warranted, if not more desired?
Could we therefore delete clauses (1), (2) and (6)? |