Item 14.6
- Attachment 1 |
Draft
Minutes of Audit Committee 5 February 2009 |
MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HELD IN MEETING ROOMS 1 AND 2, GROUND
FLOOR, COUNCIL CHAMBER BUILDING ON THURSDAY, 5 FEBRUARY 2009 AT 6:50 PM
_________________________________________________________
PRESENT
Councillor Andrew
Wilson, Councillor Michael McDermott and Pamela Fynan – Community
representative.
IN
ATTENDANCE
Denis Banicevic –
External Auditor, Jenny Fett – Manager Finance, Dr Robert Lang, Chief Executive
Officer, Michael Quirk - Manager Service Audit & Review and Grant Davies –
Minute Clerk.
APOLOGIES
An apology was received and accepted for the absence of Councillor
Julia Finn.
CONFLICT
OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
There were no
conflict of interest declarations at this meeting.
1/09 Audit Committee Minutes –
RESOLVED (Wilson/McDermott)
That the minutes of
the Audit Committee Meeting held on
2/09 Appointment of Chairperson
Guidelines had
recently been received from the Department of Local Government recommending
that the Chair of the Audit Committee be a person who is independent of and
external to the Council.
The sole Community
Representative declined to take the Chair on this occasion and agreement was
reached to hold over appointment of the Chair at this stage.
Councillor Wilson
also questioned the length of time members had been appointed to the Committee.
Mr Quirk replied from the Audit Committee Charter that community members had
been appointed for 2 years with Councillors’ membership subject to the
direction of Council.
AGENDA
ITEMS
3/09 Department of Local Government
Guidelines for Internal Audit
Mr Quirk advised that Internal Audit
Guidelines had been issued by the Department of Local Government. The purpose
of the guidelines was to bring local government into line with the requirements
for internal audit and risk management in existence for State and Federal
Governments. A copy of the guidelines had been distributed with the Committee
Agenda.
He added that Parramatta City
Council was generally in compliance with the guidelines and that the guidelines
should be placed before Council for adoption.
Dr Lang added that the
guidelines clearly indicated that the GM of a Council should not be a voting
member of the Committee and he supported this requirement. He emphasised his
intention to continue being present at meetings unless otherwise requested by
the Committee.
Mr Banicevic stated that the
guidelines were not regulations or part of the Act and, subject to
justification, Council could choose not to comply with certain sections if it
so wished.
The Committee agreed that the
recommended guidelines should be adopted with decisions being made in the
future should it wish to not comply with certain recommendations.
4/09 Report of Internal Audit Activities
A memorandum had been
distributed to all members advising of the audit related activities for the
period
Mr Quirk indicated
that the following 4 audits had been completed and were awaiting management
response prior to finalisation and added that a number of smaller audits were
near completion:-
1. Council’s
Online Trim (awaiting approval of the Syndicate Steering Committee).
2. Councils
Online Privacy Management (awaiting approval of the Syndicate steering
Committee).
3. Section 94
Contributions.
4. Concrete and
Bitumen Laying Problems.
The results of the Councils
Online Syndicate Audits would be referred to the Syndicate Steering Committee
and following that, referred to the Audit Committee. Other completed audits
would also be referred to the next Audit Committee meeting.
Councillor Wilson
expressed his desire for the Audit Committee to give consideration to all the major
council contracts such as
Mr Quirk responded
that this forms part of the standard Internal Audit Planning process. Mr Quirk
would provide background information to the new Audit Committee members in
relation to this matter.
Dr Lang advised that
presently Council was carrying out a large number of audits and it may be
beneficial to carry out less, more focussed audits per year.
Councillor McDermott
advised that he saw huge benefits in monitoring operational performance.
Mr Banicevic
suggested that monitoring operational performance was where benchmarking could
be beneficial and could indicate whether the Council was under performing in
certain areas together with areas of possible savings.
Dr Lang added that
whilst not an easy task, benchmarking was currently being undertaken on certain
depot operations.
Councillor Wilson
advised that he would also like to see benchmarks and timeframes for audits. He
believed that such benchmarks would enable Council to build a culture of
compliance. Mr Quirk advised that revised audit benchmarks and improved Internal
Audit Reporting would be developed and provided to the Audit Committee for
consideration in the Internal Audit Charter.
Mr Quirk advised that
Audit had also completed work in the corruption prevention area and work had
commenced on a review of the Code of Conduct and the corruption prevention
strategy.
The Committee
discussed potential risks around planning controls including development and
changes to zonings. Dr Lang responded that ICAC had developed guidelines on
dealing with developers and Mr Banicevic suggested that such guidelines should
be built into the Code of Conduct. It was agreed that these guidelines would be
obtained and circulated to members.
A general discussion
was then held on fraud detection. It agreed that the audit role was not specifically
to detect fraud (managers should detect) but rather to aid in the prevention of
fraud.
5/09 Review of Audit Committee Operations
Councillor Wilson invited input
into the future operation of the Audit Committee.
Mr Banicevic advised
that the Committee should operate in accordance with its charter.
Ms Fynan added that
the role of the Committee had been set out clearly in the previously circulated
documents.
GENERAL
BUSINESS
6/09 Next Meeting
Mr Quirk suggested that it may
be beneficial to hold meetings of the Audit Committee in conjunction with the
presentation of the financial statements and the management plan.
Mr Banicevic noted that
consideration of the Management Plan would be more relevant to the Council than
an Audit Committee. Should there be a breakdown in the Management Plan process,
then the Committee should look at that breakdown.
It was then agreed that Mr
Quirk would circulate suggested meeting dates, generally on a quarterly basis,
for consideration of members.
The meeting terminated at