Item 9.4 - Attachment 3

Attachment 3 - Summary of submissions

Submission Number	Property Address	Contents of submission
1	114 Thomas Street, Parramatta	§ Foreshore is sacred and should be protected. § The foreshore has a heritage value. § Concerned that the development will encroach the river and effect important wetlands. § There is a lack of public transport in the area. § This proposal is penalising existing residents.
2	14 Gould Place, Parramatta	§ Development is out of character with the area. § Concerned by the development and the likely flooding impacts. § The area is already affected by traffic congestion. Traffic from James Ruse Drive will be backed up creating serious problems. This is also an issue in Thomas and Macarthur Street. § The size and height of the proposed development is excessive. § Opening Harvey Street or New Zealand Street will create further traffic problems.
3	43 Morton Street, Parramatta	§ Lack of public consultation and the available information supplied by Council is inadequate. A proposal of this scale should incorporate a public display. § The proposal in its current form is out of character with the adjoining area and will greatly impact on existing residents. There is currently no high density development in this location. § Height of buildings proposed is excessive causing significant visual impacts. Submitter provides details of the reduced levels (RL’s) for the area and holds the view that the buildings will dwarf everything in its surrounds. § Council should look to protect some parts of the river from buildings. § This area is not a gateway to Parramatta. The gateway begins further downstream. Beautifying this area is of more importance. § Area contains a floodplain and should not be filled as a consequence of the proposed development. § The staging of this development will effect parking provisions. This has not been addressed. § Proposed road extension to New Zealand and Harvey Street does not clarify issues of acquisition. Submitter assumes these are long-term ideas that may never eventuate. § The traffic study has errors and therefore its reliability should be questioned. § Proposal may affect Council’s depot activities. § The location of the footbridge with Noller Parade is impractical. The clearance and excessive ramp required means it will never be built. Council should reconsider the cost of this footbridge. § Concerned by the impacts on an area already congested with traffic in peak periods.
4	n/a	The residents of the community have signed a petition (containing 117 signatures) opposing the proposed development of 2 Morton Street , Parramatta on the following grounds: § Scale of the proposed development will impact negatively on the local community § The increased traffic and pedestrian movement through local streets. § The current low-density skyline will be dominated by the proposed height of the unit development. Two towers of 10-12 storeys will be part of this development with the other units consisting of 6-8 storeys. § The development is out of context and out of character with the existing neighbourhood § The proposal to open up Harvey Street and New Zealand Street to allow access to the site is inappropriate.
5	5 Harvey Street, Parramatta	§ Why is there a necessity to amend the current Parramatta LEP 2001 when Council has prepared and is working on draft Parramatta LEP 2010. The community should be provided with reason why the Council has departed from the protocols of complying with the standard LEP. Submitter recommends that a decision on this matter be deferred until after the making of draft Parramatta LEP 2010. § If the Planning Proposal sets a maximum FSR then the developer should adhere to this ratio. § The Planning Proposal is underpinned by the intent to construct the West Metro. Now this link is cancelled, Council should place more emphasis on transport solutions. § The predominance of 1-bedroom dwellings is not the most efficient manner for Council achieving its planning targets. The area needs to provide more housing for families and provide an adequate social mix. The submitter recommends that Council impose controls requiring a greater mix of 2 and 3 bedroom units § Development should be built to the highest environmental standards § The impact of car usage is a concern. Council should look to introduce through its DCP a car share scheme as part of the development. § The traffic analysis does not take into account any realistic traffic increase surrounding the study area. The draft LEP foreshadows significant growth as described by the Elizabeth Street structure plan. It is almost certain that this growth will be greater than the 1.5% increase in traffic movements modelled in the traffic study § That because Thomas Street only has marginal connection to James Ruse Drive then it should not be considered a Collector Road but a local road. As a result, the traffic projections proposed will result in this road being over used. § The traffic study should provide more detail on the impacts on intersections such as at Macarthur and Thomas Street.
6	7 Melville Street, Parramatta	§ The rezoning is contrary to its immediate surrounding which are mostly family homes. § High density living encourages more transient (non-permanent residents).This has impacts on the neighbourhood. § The development will not result in improvements to the urban environment. § Such development on the edge of the river is unattractive for visitors coming to Parramatta by ferry. § Mixed-use development is unnecessary due to the proximity of the Parramatta CBD. § The general area is already choked with parked vehicles. Further traffic introduced by the new development will create further problems.
7	1 Pemberton Street, Parramatta	§ The rezoning is contrary to its immediate surrounding which are mostly family homes. § High density living encourages more transient (non-permanent residents).This has impacts on the neighbourhood. § The development will not result in improvements to the urban environment. § Such development on the edge of the river is unattractive for visitors coming to Parramatta by ferry. § Mixed-use development is unnecessary due to the proximity of the Parramatta CBD. § The general area is already choked with parked vehicles. Further traffic introduced by the new development will create further problems.
8	14 Noller Parade, Parramatta	§ Wants more assurances that the redevelopment will result in the protection of the riverfront which has been neglected over a long period of time. § Interested in high quality development. Although the height of the development may be of concern, preference is for good design. § Unsure how the extension of other local roads will be achieved. § Would like the Council depot site cleaned up and possibly returned as foreshore. § The development and details of a footbridge should be approved before this development proceeds. Such a footbridge should be funded by the developer. § More clarification is needed in terms of how resident concerns will be alleviated.
9	3 Noller Parade, Parramatta	§ The height of the proposed towers is excessive. § Will be an intrusion of privacy. § Decreased sunlight to surrounding houses. § The footbridge is not wanted.
10	16 Grandview Street, Parramatta	§ The extent of residential development (possibly 600 units) on this site is unreasonable given the increase in vehicles it will generate. § The exiting of residents from this development onto major roads, i.e. - Victoria Road is unsafe. § If this development is to proceed, the developer should be required to fund a major improvement to vehicle access between Thomas Street and James Ruse Drive. § The proposed 12-storey height limit in relative terms is higher than all other buildings.
11	200 George Street, Parramatta	§ The proposal would create overshadowing of the public foreshore therefore damaging the natural wetland environment. § The height of the proposed buildings will overshadow houses to the south who will lose access to solar energy. § There is insufficient traffic or public transport infrastructure to cater for this increase in development. It will create traffic problems on already inadequate roads. § The proposal will detract from heritage sites in the immediate vicinity. The attractions to both tourists and locals will be destroyed by an overpowering skyline.
12	14 Gore Street, Parramatta	§ The probable height (10-12 storeys) is totally out of character for this urban area. If they were to be there at all, a reduction to six storeys would be a little more reasonable. § The increase in traffic and already heavy flows may force traffic onto Gore Street and will affect the intersection of Macarthur and Thomas Streets. § The traffic impacts could make living in this area uncomfortable.
13	1 Noller Parade, Parramatta	§ The proposal is an overdevelopment of the site. § It will impact on the whole of Parramatta City and its surrounds, particularly on its infrastructure, transport and environment. § In comparison to the development proposed, the existing industrial development could be considered low impact. § Will affect permanently all residents on either side of the river. § The building height will affect people’s privacy and impact on views and vistas. § The location of this development is insensitive to heritage aspects of Queens Wharf and Noller Parade. § That a public hearing be held on the issues raised in this submission.
14	16 Wandsworth Street, Parramatta	§ Such a large development is totally out of keeping with the area, which is mostly one and two level detached houses, with some slightly taller townhouses. § The development will generate increase in noise, traffic and parking. § This proposed development is the equivalent of several streets worth of occupants. § The proposed development does not consider the heritage value of the area. § This area is not the Parramatta CBD. It is a suburban area.
15	12 Harvey Street, Parramatta	§ The proposed development will affect what little area of historic foreshore is left along the Parramatta River. This foreshore is integral to both Indigenous and European heritage. § The proposed development site must be preserved as riverbank and left intact for thew future. § Such density should not be built on a natural and sensitive site. § High-rise buildings are completely out of character with the local suburban neighbourhood. § The site is a flood area with a history of flooding. Buildings and hard surfaces will decrease the ability for land to absorb rainfall and greatly increase runoff. § The proposed development and increased population will place a great strain on the local road system. § The idea to extend Harvey Street is impractical, particularly as the street is so narrow and would require the demolition of the Aged Care Facility. Opening this road and New Zealand Street will add further congestion to main arterial roads such as Macarthur Street. § The building footprints and heights will have a negative visual impact on the natural appearance of the foreshore. § Locating taller buildings near or along the riverbank will interfere with river breezes from the east.
16	1/28-30 Broughton Street, Parramatta 5/6 Broughton Street	This submission represents the views of 5 people who reside in these two properties. § The site is not within walking distance to Parramatta Railways Station. Train travel is not a valid option. § The frequency of trains is too low. Major infrastructure projects are long term and are unlikely to be funded. § The distance to bus stops is more than 10 minutes with bus travelling speeds to low to make it an attractive option. § Car travel is the most preferred and convenient way to get to work. The proposed development is located within a “pocket” with limited access point to major roads. These major roads are already over their capacity. § New development does not integrate with existing landscape character. This development conflicts with Council’s design principles that new development must fit within the existing landscape character and be sensitive to site attributes. § The development will impair the rights of local residents. Views from Broughton Street will be destroyed. § If the site is to be redeveloped, it should be houses, townhouses and 3-4 storey unit blocks. § The building setback in the draft DCP for Morton Street of 3 metres conflicts with Council’s current DCP 2005 which requires houses to be setback 5-9 metres. The DCP also limits development to six storeys for which this proposal contravenes. § Unemployment will rise significantly after the development. There are not enough jobs in the area to accommodate the new population. § The University of Western Sydney will be affected by immigration policies, which will see a drop in overseas students. Therefore, the need for rental accommodation to take advantage of the close proximity to the University is overstated. § This area is flood affected. We would like to see more details on the possible affects on flooding as a result of this proposal.
17	22 Gore Street, Parramatta	§ Homes in surrounding streets with views will be deprived of such views in the future. § Will create traffic problems in Thomas Street and at the intersection of James Ruse Drive. § It is wrong that anyone can take over or decide to widen local streets to allow access for noisy trucks going to and from this building site. § The site could be made into a wonderful park for local residents. § This project is much out of character with the area.
18	7 Gore Street, Parramatta	§ Scale of the proposed development will impact negatively on the local community. § The proposal will increase the amount of traffic and pedestrian movement in local streets. § The current low-density skyline will be dominated by the proposed height of the unit development. Two towers of 10-12 storeys will be part of this development with the other units consisting of 6-8 storeys. § The development is out of context and out of character with the existing neighbourhood. § Does not support the proposal to open up Harvey Street and New Zealand Street to allow access to the site.
19	5 Gould Place, Parramatta	§ The rezoning proposal is not consistent with the zoning in the immediate and surrounding area. The predominant zoning for this area is low-rise housing consisting of single and two storey dwellings. § The proposal for development up to 34 metres is completely foreign to the area. This is an intrusion. This height level contradicts the draft LEP and DCP because the proposed development should enhance and reinforce the character of the locality. § The area is predominately a natural environment. This natural area will change if the proposed development proceeds. It will have a visual impact and change the aesthetics of the area. § The proposed development will change the noise and pollution levels in the area. § Morton Street and other local streets are classified local roads. These streets should carry only low volumes of traffic (less than 2000 vehicles per day). The proposed development will cause traffic congestion decreasing the safety and property value of home owners. § There is not enough space or infrastructure to cope with the influx of people and traffic. § The extension of the bike path and over pass to the river should be issues that Parramatta Council deal with regardless of this development. § This proposal will affect local businesses in the area. § The proposed development will remove industrial land which is needed for employment purposes.
20	6 Gould Place, Parramatta	§ The rezoning proposal is not consistent with the zoning in its immediate and surrounding area. The predominant zoning for this area is low-rise housing consisting of single and two storey dwellings. § The proposal for development up to 34 metres is foreign to the area. This is an intrusion. This height level contradicts the draft LEP and DCP because the proposed development should enhance and reinforce the character of the locality. § The area is predominately a natural environment. This natural area will change if the proposed development proceeds. It will have a visual impact and change the aesthetics of the area. § The proposed development will change the noise and pollution levels in the area. § Morton Street and other local streets are classified local roads. These streets should carry only low volumes of traffic (less than 2000 vehicles per day). The proposed development will cause traffic congestion decreasing the safety and property value of home owners. § There is not enough space or infrastructure to cope with the influx of people and traffic. § The extension of the bike path and over pass to the river should be issues that Parramatta Council deal with regardless of this development. § This proposal will affect local businesses in the area. § The proposed development will remove industrial land which is needed for employment purposes.
21	7/81-83 Thomas Street, Parramatta	§ Significant development at 2 Morton Street, Parramatta would result in unacceptable levels of vehicular traffic on local narrow roads, given the area is poorly serviced by public transport. § Completion of the cycleway/walkway along the Parramatta River should be a high priority in addition to reducing traffic hazards. § The area surrounding 2 Morton Street is flood prone. No development should take place below the 1 in 100-year flood level due to the risks to people and property. Further, the area designated as prone to high risk flooding related to the site is significantly reduced. § The proposal for 2 Morton Street is a massive overdevelopment. Past surveys reveal residents' interest in preserving the look and feel of the neighbourhood. Residents would like to maintain the amenity of the area by restricting zoning to medium density. This restriction in zone should also apply to the industrial area, including Council's depot. § The DCP's depiction of traffic pathways to and from 2 Morton Street, Parramatta are misleading. There is no requirement for the developer or Council to provide these means of access. All this does is provide evidence that the current roads and access are inadequate.
22	12 Broughton Street, Parramatta	This submission represents the views of 2 people who reside in these two properties. § Was not notified about the proposed development. § When purchasing their house the submitter was told this area was low density. § Does not want high density across the street, because it would create noisy crowds. § This development will tower over their property. This makes the submitter uncomfortable. § It will create more traffic in the area which is hazardous and dangerous.
23	5/28-30 Broughton Street, Parramatta	§ The area only consists of low-density housing. It was only meant to have this type of housing. § Not pleased that they were not notified earlier about this proposal. § The submitter likes living in this area because of the peace and quiet. The submitter will lose their views of the river and foreshore. § This proposed development will make this area very busy, loud and increase traffic. § This proposed development is not right for any community living here and will not be supported by the community.
24	Grandview Street, Parramatta	§ The proposed development will increase traffic and pedestrian movements through local streets. With more than 600 units proposed, the traffic turning onto Macarthur Street from Thomas Street already takes a few minutes. The proposed development, especially in peak times will make this worse. § The current low density skyline will be dominated by the proposed buildings. § The development is out of context and character with the existing neighbourhood.
25	8 Broughton Street, Parramatta	§ The proposed development will adversely impact on the local community, which the proposal fails to consider. § Our local community is a low/medium density area with dwellings no more than 2 storeys. High-rise development is totally out of character with the existing neighbourhood. § The proposed development will result in a large increase in the number of people and vehicles. This will make it more dangerous for pedestrians, especially young children and elderly people. § The submitters house, which is across the road from the proposed development will be overshadowed and overlooked on. It will affect their access to sunlight and their privacy will be violated. It will change the lifestyle they currently enjoy. § It is unfair to the community who did not choose to live in a high-density area. § This location provides the community with a nice and quiet living environment with easy access to the CBD. § This proposal may put at risk the environment and waterways especially from the affects of pollution and rubbish.
26	39 Gore Street, Parramatta	§ High-density residential development is totally out of character with the surrounding suburban precinct. § Surrounding streets are already suffering adversely from increased traffic flows and demand for parking. § Oppose the 10-12 storey height limits. Land to the west and south west of the Parramatta CBD already allow for this style of development. Believe that east Parramatta should be preserved as a more traditional suburban precinct.
27	12 Gore Street, Parramatta	§ The 40-metre building height limit will have a negative visual impact over the surrounding residential area which are a maximum of two storeys. These proposed buildings will be visible from Victoria Road and are considered out of character with the location. § It is not possible to extend Harvey Street through to Morton Street. There is no consideration given to property acquisition to deal with this issue and nor should Council compulsorily acquire any land. § The surrounding streets are not capable of carrying more traffic. While the traffic study relies on RTA standards, they have not applied those standards consistently. The traffic study does not consider the congestion in Thomas Street caused by parents and students of the local high school. It also doesn’t consider the 40km speed limit in peak periods. § Other local roads are not designed for higher levels of traffic. The study also relies on the sites proximity to the West Metro Station which is no longer a priority. § The only public transport is the Parramatta Railway hub. For this to be within easy walking distance will require the proposed pedestrian bridge to be built. § A more realistic limit needs to be placed on the development than what is proposed. The proposed 640 units will place an onerous strain on all residents of the surrounding areas and unfairly burden them with visual affects.
28	39 Morton Street, Parramatta	§ Concerned by the lack of notification given to residents about this development proposal. There is a lack of information and each resident should have been notified in writing. § The submitter bought in this area because it contained low-density housing. Does not support any changes to it, especially the extent of change proposed with this development. § This site will be 4 times taller than any other building in the vicinity. It would dominate the skyline and detract from the quality of the foreshore. § The independent study makes an error by stating that Morton Street is open from Victoria Road. This is not the case. It was closed because it was dangerous for vehicles to enter Victoria Road on a blind corner. § How are existing residents going to benefit from high density living, increased traffic and pressures on already stretched infrastructure.
29	33 Gore Street, Parramatta	§ The area is made up of single dwellings and some townhouses. The proposed development with between 580- 673 dwellings would have a major impact on this community. § The proposal will cause major problems during construction with the amount of equipment and transportation needed. § The local streets are not wide enough to cope with the increased traffic generated. § Parking will be difficult for local residents because of CBD workers parking in the area. It is unlikely that each of the proposed dwellings will have provision for one or more parking space within a car park. § The possible opening up of Harvey Street and New Zealand Street through to Morton Street could be a hazard. These streets are narrow and will increase the risk of accidents. § Traffic cutting through to and from Victoria Road will affect traffic flow along Gore, Pemberton and Wandsworth Street. § Daily noise levels will increase due to the proposed development. § Parramatta’s heritage and historical significance would not benefit from 10-12 storey towers. § There could be social impacts and problems caused by 1000 new people being introduced to this small area. § There is no community services and public transport to serve the area. § Local residents buy and rent in this area in good faith that the character will not change dramatically. The proposed development will adversely affect the value of homes.
30	n/a	§ Surprised by the scale of the buildings proposed. § There is abundant housing currently available in the area (Harris Park, Granville, Westmead, inner City Parramatta). § The proposed development will devalue the current neighbourhood. § It would be only reasonable to have a maximum of four storey buildings across this area. This will help reduce the negative impacts from increased traffic and noise.
31	14 Harvey Street, Parramatta	§ Does not support Harvey Street being opened because most people in this street are seniors. There is light traffic and we feel safe because of this. § Opposite Harvey Street is Macarthur Girls High School. Heavy traffic will have negative effects on students at the school. § Gasworks bridge is a heritage item, No reason to increase traffic over this bridge. It may be better to build a new bridge to cope with this traffic.
32	3 Harvey Street, Parramatta	§ The proposal to open Harvey Street to allow access to the site is a problem. Harvey Street is only 7 metres wide; two cars cannot pass each other without one pulling over to stop. Garbage trucks cannot turn in this street. § During construction the traffic from cranes, cars, work trucks will be dangerous to residents and school children. § If Harvey Street is opened, then it will be used as a thoroughfare on a permanent basis. § The proposed development is out of context and character with the surrounding neighbourhood. It will have a negative impact on the history of this City.
33	7 Harvey Street, Parramatta	§ The proposal to open Harvey Street to allow access to the site is a problem. Harvey Street is only 7 metres wide; two cars cannot pass each other without one pulling over to stop. Garbage trucks cannot turn in this street. § During construction the traffic from cranes, cars, work trucks will be dangerous to residents and school children. § If Harvey Street is opened, then it will be used as a thoroughfare on a permanent basis. The proposed development is out of context and character with the surrounding neighbourhood. It will have a negative impact on the history of this City.
34	80 Thomas Street, Parramatta	§ Requests that this proposal not be approved. § The parking of cars in front of houses and driveways during weekdays is a problem. This proposed development will affect our community life.
35	1/12 Grandview Street, Parramatta	§ There has been very little advertising of this development and a limited timeframe in wish residents can voice their opinions. § While it is understood the need to increase housing in Parramatta, we do not understand why the proposed development has to include so many apartments and be so high. § Were advised 10 years ago that this area of Parramatta was restricted to low-density housing. § Will result in increased traffic in the surrounding streets, particularly those with access to Victoria Road. It will also increase the amount of cars parked in residential streets. § Would be interested in participating in a meeting where we can voice our concerns.
36	2/14 Pemberton Street, Parramatta	§ This proposed development of 600 units is a lot for a small area. The roads cannot match the increased needs to cope with this additional traffic. § Proposal will impact on the riverfront environment. § The proposal does not match the appearance of the current buildings. § The proposed development will result in more noise.
37	15 New Zealand Street, Parramatta	§ Proposal is totally out of character with the existing neighbourhood. § The proposal will negatively affect property values. § When townhouses in the area were built, residents were assured that most parking for that development will be available on site. This is not the case. The increase number of cars is a direct result of these townhouses which are two storeys. The proposed 10 storeys will be far worse. § Extending New Zealand and Harvey Street will affect this quiet neighbourhood. It will increase traffic to a level for which it cannot cope with. As it is cars cannot travel along these streets as they are narrow. § Surrounding dwellings will have their privacy taken away. § The size and concentration as proposed is out of character. Two storeys would be more appropriate.
38	Not provided	§ Concerned with the proposed size and height of the proposed development § The proposal will increase traffic and noise and affect people’s safety. It will also cause pollution. § This development will place strain on existing infrastructure such as local health, community and education services. § There are no buses servicing this street. § Any proposal above two/three storeys is out of character with the neighbourhood.
39	Not provided	§ Concerned with the proposed size and height of the potential development. § The proposal will increase traffic and noise and affect people’s safety. It will also cause pollution. § This development will place strain on existing infrastructure such as local health, community and education services. § A redevelopment like this should be accompanied by submissions from all appropriate government departments, outlining how they will provide services for the increased number of residents.
40	10 Rangihou Crescent, Parramatta	§ Proposal will have a detrimental impact on the community living in surrounding areas. § This type of development is not required in those areas where only small dwellings exist. § Infrastructure is not capable of handling this development.
41	11 Rangihou Crescent, Parramatta	§ Buildings of high-density accommodation being built as opposed to low or medium density accommodation will change the character of the area. § This proposed development will lead to increased traffic. It will disrupt the peace and quiet of the area and make the streets less safe for children and the elderly.
42	3 Gore Street, Parramatta	§ The Department of Planning’s assessment is not correct in saying that this proposal is low impact. The proposal is for high-density development which is out of character with existing development and presents significant issues with regard to public transport and public transport. § The traffic assessment does not accurately describe the current situation. Morton Street does not have access to Victoria Road, Bus Route 547 is a limited service and route 524 provides only one service after 5:30pm, § The traffic study fails to take traffic counts for two streets (Wandsworth and Gore) and therefore underestimates existing peak volumes. § Photographic evidence in the traffic study was taken outside of peak periods. § The traffic study only provides traffic counts over one day. § Peak times start before 7am and restart at 3pm and not 4pm. § The recommendation that Harvey and New Zealand Street be opened to accommodate additional vehicles is misconceived. These streets are narrow with only enough room for one lane. § It is requested that a public hearing be held on the above issues.
43	8 Noller Parade, Parramatta	§ The proposal at 2 Morton Street is considered to be completely outside existing development in the area. It will result in high-rise development dominating the area and adding to the deterioration of the area in general. § High-rise development often leads to a loss of community spirit and general pride in ones surroundings. § The proposal contains errors of fact or omission that questions the resources that have and will be devoted to any implementation. § There are a number of major road changes (extension of Harvey and New Zealand Streets). What has not been clarified is the issue of who is responsible to fund acquisition of properties required to implement this. § Morton Street does not have vehicular access to Victoria Road as described by the traffic study. § Thomas Street is a not a Collector road. It is restricted to a 50km speed limit. It appears to change in classification which reverses previous experience. § The statement in the traffic study about the direction and alignment of Pemberton and Broughton Street is incorrect. § The site is on or close to the Parramatta floodplain. It ought to include a reference to the adopted PMF in this location. The effects on the flood level could have impacts for properties upstream and opposite the right bank. § There is no mention in the document of the proposed height of the various structures proposed. Some indication would give an idea as to the visual impact on the environment. § The proposal will have a major visual impact on the landscape and as such will be of concern to present residents over a wide area. § The developer will be required to undertake some road work on the left bank between the proposed development and the river. The description of this road is vague and does not specify the affect on the existing river and the mangrove stand that protects the bank. § The proposed location of a footbridge across the river cannot be implemented. It would require an extensive access ramp to enable erection of the footbridge with sufficient clearance to conform with existing structures. § Reference to the proposal for the provision of a road, bike and walking path located between the development site and the river makes no reference to their possible effect on flooding. These structures will have to extend above the natural surface thereby decreasing the available channel. § Ignoring flood level data would be a dereliction of responsibility of all parties. Building structures in a flood plain must consider the effect that such structures will have by way of afflux on existing structures pre-existing on the flood plain.
44	236 George Street, Parramatta	§ High-rise development together with mixed use will be an attractive addition to this area. We believe this whole part of the City would benefit greatly by increasing the density. The foreshore open space will be a welcome addition to the riverbank and enhance the amenity of the area.
45	14 Gould Place, Parramatta	§ This area is subject to flooding. Submitter recalls flooding that has occurred in the past that had major impacts. § The size of the proposed development will create an adverse situation. § The increase in traffic will cause problems in Thomas Street and Macarthur Street which already has traffic jams. § Opening Harvey Street and New Zealand Street will impact on the flow of traffic again onto Macarthur Street. § The increase in the number of people will affect the peace and quiet feel of this neighbourhood. § The residential towers to be built are too high for this area. The skyline will be dominated by high-rise. This is out of keeping with the neighbourhood. The existing character of the area has not been considered. § Traffic will be congested to James Ruse Drive creating significant problems. Traffic along Grandview Street will also be affected. § This proposal should be given a lot more thought especially regarding flooding, increased traffic, suitability to surrounding area and appearance.
46	86 Thomas Street, Parramatta	§ The area around Morton Street contains mostly homes. High-density living will change this quiet area that families have lived in for over 30 years. § The adjacent streets are busying during the working week. § Shops, commercial businesses would further congest the area. § The surrounding houses would be subjected to increased noise with shops bringing unnecessary weekend and late night noise and traffic. § Thomas Street is a popular cycle route. High-density housing and more traffic will make cycling on Thomas Street less safe. § During the working week, streets are clogged with cars. These cars block access to driveways and make it difficult to enter and leave properties. More development will make this problem worse.
47	Broughton Street, Parramatta	§ There are currently only two roads leading to Pemberton Street and Morton Street. These streets are very small and will not be able to hold the extra hundreds of cars belonging to new residence. § The influx of new residence means congestion is inevitable. There is also a school close by. These small streets are used to pick up young children. More vehicles around will increase the chance of more accidents. § High-rise will affect people’s privacy. Concerned that residence in the high rise buildings will be able to look straight down onto houses, backyards and through any open windows. § The high rise will cast a shadow on houses for half the day. § The Parramatta River is beautiful, but if the high-rise plan goes ahead, it will not only result in damage to the natural fauna and flora in the area. It will also affect any views to the river. § When the home in Broughton Street was purchased, there have were no plans of development on that land. § It would be a good idea for some development but it would be more suitable for houses, duplex’s or townhouses.
48	2 Morton Street, Parramatta	§ For information on the content of the proponent’s submission refer to Attachment 1.
59	NSW Roads and Traffic Authority	§ No objection is raised to the Planning Proposal subject to the following requirements: a) The RTA be consulted during the preparation of the VPA. b) Any future development applications (DA’s) provide a masterplan, which identifies the development impacts on the surrounding network. c) The masterplan will require the submission of a full traffic impact assessment.
50	Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water	§ The site contains salt marsh vegetation. This is an endangered ecological community. The salt marsh are appears to be located where the tower elements are proposed. § The environment protection layer is supported, as it will require the consent authority to demonstrate how environmental impacts have been considered and ameliorated.
51	NSW Transport and Infrastructure	§ The proposal is generally consistent with the intentions of the draft West Central Subregional strategy. § The site is close to both the Parramatta CBD and Strategic Bus Corridor 10 (Parramatta to City, via Ryde) on Victoria Road. § Given the sites significant development potential, a holistic transport assessment be undertaken. § Appropriate development controls including minimal car parking rates to maximise walking and cycling should be considered. § Specific opportunities to provide and improve pedestrian and cycling links to the Parramatta CBD and to bus services on both sides of Victoria Road be explored. § The proposal should achieve consistency with the objectives and targets of the NSW State Plan 2010.