MINUTES OF THE Local Planning Panel HELD BY WAY OF ELECTRONIC DETERMINATION ON Monday, 29 May 2023.

PRESENT

Julie Walsh (Chairperson), David Johnson, Tony Reed and Warrick McLean.

1.      DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

There were no declarations of interest made to this Local Planning Panel.

2.      Confidential Matter

ELECTRONIC DETERMINATION: 71-73 Thomas Street Parramatta - Land and Environment Court Appeal against Parramatta Local Planning Panels refusal of DA/1036/2021. (D08986913) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (e) (g) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, prejudice the maintenance of law; AND the report contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

2.1

SUBJECT          ELECTRONIC DETERMINATION: 71-73 Thomas Street Parramatta - Land and Environment Court Appeal against Parramatta Local Planning Panels refusal of DA/1036/2021 DESCRIPTION Demolition of existing dwellings and construction of new boarding house development with basement parking and associated landscaping. REFERENCE   F2022/01755 - D08986913 APPLICANT/S  Ausino Investments No.2 Pty Ltd OWNERS          Ausino Investments No.2 Pty Ltd REPORT OF     Group Manager Development and Traffic Services

DETERMINATION (a)     That it is recommended that the Council resolve the Class 1 appeal by way of a section 34 conciliated agreement. (b)     Further that delegation be granted to the Group Manager of Legal Services of the City of Parramatta Council who in turn may sub-delegate to Council Officers nominated by the Manager, to: (i) negotiate and enter into an Agreement, with the Applicant pursuant to section 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act, on the basis of the set of without prejudice amended plans and attached proposed conditions of consent, which do not authorise any intensification of the use of the proposed development and which may be approved by the court; and (ii) negotiate any minor changes required to the proposed conditions of consent. The Panel decision was UNANIMOUS.

Chairperson