DETERMINATION
(a) That, the Parramatta
Local Planning Panel, exercising the functions of Council, pursuant to Section 4.17 of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, grant deferred commencement consent to
DA/61/2022 for a period of five (5) years within which physical commencement
is to occur from the date on the Notice of Determination, subject to
conditions of consent in Attachment 1.
(b) Further, that objectors
be advised of the Panel’s decision.
Reasons
for Approval
It
has been recommended for approval for the following reasons:
1.
The Panel is satisfied with the
applicant’s clause 4.6 written request to vary the building height
standard in clause 4.3 (Height of Buildings) of Parramatta LEP 2011 as:
a.
The written request adequately addresses the
matters required to be addressed under clause 4.6(3) of the LEP; and
b.
The development is in the public interest
because it is consistent with the objectives of clause 4.3 (Height of
Buildings) of the LEP and the objectives for development in the R4 High
Density Residential zone.
2.
The building will present as a 4 storey
residential flat building that is consistent with the other residential flat
buildings in the locality and the emerging character of the area;
3.
The building is appropriately articulated
and modulated. Façade treatment , material variation and private open
spaces have been provided in order to minimize the external bulk and scale;
4.
The development is permissible in the R4
zone pursuant to the LEP and generally satisfies the requirements of the
applicable planning framework;
5.
The proposed density is reasonable for the
site , having regard to the context and zoning;
6.
Amenity impacts on neighbouring
properties and the public domain are reasonable;
7.
The design of the development is considered
satisfactory having regard to the comments from Council’s Design
Excellence Advisory Panel;
8.
The matters raised in the decision of the
Panel on 15 November 2022 to defer the application have been adequately
addressed; and
9.
Approval is in the public interest.
The Panel decision was UNANIMOUS.
|