DETERMINATION
(a) That the
Parramatta Local Planning Panel not support the variation to Clause 4.3
Height of Buildings, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the Parramatta Local
Environmental Plan 2011.
(b) Further, that the Parramatta Local Planning Panel, exercising the
functions of Council, pursuant to Section 4.16(1) of the Environmental
Planning and Assessment Act 1979, refuse development
consent to DA/880/2021 for the demolition of existing structures and
construction for a 5-storey residential flat building containing 4 units and
basement parking on land at No.51 Railway Street, Granville.
REASONS FOR REFUSAL
1.
State
Environmental Planning Policy 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat
Development
a) The proposed development is inconsistent with the
following provision of SEPP 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat
Buildings:
1. Part 3 Siting the development
·
Communal Open Space
2. Part 4 Designing the building
·
Apartment size and
layout
·
Private open space
and balconies
·
Storage
Section
4.15 (1)(a)(i) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
2.
Holroyd
Local Environmental Plan 2013
a) The proposed development is inconsistent with the
following provisions of Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 2013:
1. Clause 4.3 – Height of buildings
2. Clause 4.6 – Exceptions to development standard
3. Clause 5.6 – Architectural Roof Features
4. Clause 5.21 – Flood Planning
5. Clause 6.2 – Earthworks
Section
4.15 (1)(a)(i) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
3.
Holroyd
Development Control Plan 2013
a) The proposed development is inconsistent with the
following provisions of Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 2013:
Part A – General
Controls
1. 2 – Roads and Access
2. 3 – Car Parking
3. 6 – Soil Management
4. 7 – Stormwater Management
5. 8 – Flood Prone Land
6. 10 – Safety and Security
7. 12 – Services
Part B – Residential
Controls – 6. Residential Flat Buildings
1. 6.1 – Lot Size and Frontage
a. Frontage
b. Site Coverage
2. 6.3 – Setback and Separation
a. Front setback
3. 6.4 – Height
4. 6.6 – Open Space
a. Communal Open Space
5. 6.7 – Building Appearance
a. Facades
b. Roof Design
6. 6.12 – Facilities and Amenities
7. Cut and Fill
Section
4.15 (1)(a)(iii) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
4.
Likely
impacts
a) The proposed development does not adequately address
residential amenity, would be impacted by environmental site constraints and
act as a precedent undesirable for the surrounding locality.
Section
4.15 (1)(b) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
5.
Suitability
of the site
a) Due to flood affection the proposed development would not
be suitable for the subject site. It is further noted that the Clause 4.3
variation is not supported as it would be inconsistent relative to existing
and approved residential flat buildings surrounding the subject site.
Section
4.15 (1)(c) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
6.
Public
Interest
a) The proposed development represents a design that would
result in an undesirable precedent and as such would not be in the public
interest.
Section
4.15 (1)(e) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
The Panel decision was UNANIMOUS.
|