NOTICE OF Council MEETING

PUBLIC AGENDA

 

An Ordinary Meeting of City of Parramatta Council will be held in the Dundas Community Centre, 21 Sturt Street, Telopea on Monday, 10 May 2021 at 6.30pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brett Newman

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


 

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

 

 

Governance

Manager

 

Lord Mayor
Clr Bob Dwyer

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

Minute Clerk

 

 

 

 

Clr Phil Bradley

 

 

Clr Lorraine Wearne

 

 

 

 

 

Sound

Clr Sameer Pandey

 

Clr Andrew Wilson

 

 

 

 

 

Clr Andrew Jefferies

 

 

 

Clr Dr

Patricia Prociv

 

Clr Bill Tyrrell

 

 

 

IT

Clr Pierre Esber

 

Clr Benjamin Barrak

 

 

 

Clr Donna Davis

 

Clr Martin Zaiter

 

 

 

Clr Michelle Garrard, Deputy Lord Mayor

 

Clr Steven Issa

 

 

 

 

Executive Director City Engagement & Experience

Executive Director Community Services

Executive Director City Planning & Design

Group Manager City Strategy

Executive Director City Assets & Operations

Executive Director Corporate Services

Executive Director Property and Place

 

 

 

Press

Press

 

 

 

 

Public Gallery

 


 


Council                                                                                                                   10 May 2021

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ITEM                                                         SUBJECT                                               PAGE NO

 

1       OPENING MEETING

2       ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS

3       WEBCASTING ANNOUNCEMENT

4       OTHER RECORDING OF MEETING ANOUNCEMENT

5       CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

Council - 26 April 2021................................................................................................ 7

6       APOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE

7       DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

8       Minutes of the Lord Mayor

9       Public Forum

10     Petitions

11     Rescission Motions

12     Fair

Nil

13     Accessible

13.1           FOR NOTATION: Variations to Standards under Clause 4.6 of Parramatta LEP 2011, Auburn LEP 2010, Holroyd LEP 2013, The Hills LEP 2012, Hornsby LEP 2013................................................................................. 42

14     Green

Nil

15     Welcoming

Nil

16     Thriving

16.1           FOR APPROVAL: Draft CBD Parking Strategy................................. 50

17     Innovative

17.1           FOR APPROVAL: Draft Development Control Plan and Draft Planning Agreement for 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead........................... 102

17.2           FOR APPROVAL: Draft Development Control Plan for the Telopea Precinct for Public Exhibition.............................................................................. 207

18     Notices of Motion

18.1           NOTICE OF MOTION: Re-establishment of the Wentworth Point Working Group...................................................................................................... 278

19     Questions with Notice

19.1           QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE: Questions Taken on Notice from Council Meeting - 26 April 2021....................................................................... 282

20     Closed Session

20.1           FOR APPROVAL: Tender 07/2020 Provision of Security Services – Panel 3 - VSS Operation & Monitoring

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

20.2           FOR APPROVAL: Tender 27/2020 Alfred Street Granville Cycleway, Stage 1 – Civil Works

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

20.3           FOR APPROVAL: Tender 09/2021 Epping to Carlingford Active Transport Link - Bridge Street, Epping

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

 

21     PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF RESOLUTIONS PASSED IN CLOSED SESSION

22     CONCLUSION OF MEETING

 

 

 

After the conclusion of the Council Meeting, and if time permits, Councillors will be provided an opportunity to ask questions of staff.


MINUTES OF THE Meeting of City of Parramatta Council HELD IN THE CLOISTER FUNCTION ROOMS, ST PATRICK’S CATHEDRAL 1 MARIST PLACE, PARRAMATTA ON Monday, 26 April 2021 AT 6.30pm

 

These are draft minutes and are subject to confirmation by Council at its next

meeting. The confirmed minutes will replace this draft version on the website once

confirmed.

 

PRESENT

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors Benjamin Barrak, Phil Bradley (6:37pm), Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Michelle Garrard (Deputy Lord Mayor), Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies (6:37pm), Sameer Pandey, Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill Tyrrell, Andrew Wilson (6:37pm), Lorraine Wearne (6:31pm) and Martin Zaiter.

 

1.      OPENING MEETING

 

The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, opened the meeting at 6.30pm.

 

2.      ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS

 

The Lord Mayor, acknowledged the Burramattagal people of The Darug Nation as the traditional custodians of this land, and paid respect to their ancient culture and their elders past and present.

 

3.      WEBCASTING ANNOUNCEMENT

 

The Lord Mayor, advised that this public meeting is being recorded and streamed live on the internet. The recording will also be archived and made available on Council’s website.

 

The Lord Mayor further advised that all care will be taken to maintain privacy, however as a visitor in the public gallery, the public should be aware that their presence may be recorded.

 

4.      OTHER RECORDING OF MEETING ANOUNCEMENT

 

As per Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, the recording of the Council Meeting by the public using any device, audio or video, is only permitted with Council permission. Recording a Council Meeting without permission may result in the individual being expelled from the Meeting.

 

5.      CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

 

 

SUBJECT:         Minutes of the Council Meeting held on 12 April 2021

 

3179

RESOLVED      (Esber/Tyrrell)

 

That the minutes be taken as read and be accepted as a true record of the Meeting.

 

6.      APOLOGIES / REQUESTS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE / REMOTE ATTENDANCE

 

3180

RESOLVED      (Wearne/Tyrrell)

 

That the request to attend the Council Meeting dated 26 April 2021 via remote means submitted by Clr. Wilson due to personal reasons, be accepted.

 

Note: Councillor Wearne arrived at 6:31pm during consideration of apologies.

 

7.      DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

Councillor Issa declared a non-pecuniary and less than significant interest in Item 20.4 Acquisition of Properties in Prince and Alberts Streets, Granville being that 13 years ago he was an employee of a supplier that provided financial services to the applicant and / or associates. He remained in the Chamber during debate and voting on the matter.

 

8.      Minutes of the Lord Mayor

 

8.1

SUBJECT          Parramatta River Masterplan wins National Stormwater Award

 

REFERENCE   F2019/03630 - D08019053

 

REPORT OF     Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer

 

3181

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Barrak)

 

(a)     That Council note the Parramatta River Masterplan has been awarded the 2021 Stormwater National Award for Excellence in Strategic or Master Planning.

 

(b)     Further, that Council congratulate the Parramatta River Catchment Group (PRCG), its members and partners, on this win and for their continued efforts to make the Parramatta River swimmable again.

 

8.2

SUBJECT          Wentworth Point Community Centre and Library recognised in Australian Library Design Awards

 

REFERENCE   F2019/03630 - D08020068

 

REPORT OF     Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer

 

3182

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Issa)

 

(a)     That Council note the Wentworth Point Community Centre and Library received a Commendation in the Public Libraries category at the 2021 Australian Library Design Awards.

 

(b)     Further, that Council congratulate our Wentworth Point Community Centre and Library project partners, contractors and staff, on this Commendation and for their commitment to delivering a dynamic community facility.

 

9.      Public Forum

 

There were no public forums for this meeting.

 

10.    Petitions

 

There were no petitions tabled at this meeting.

 

11.    Rescission Motions

 

There were no rescission motions for this meeting.

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

3183

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

That Items 12.1, 12.2, 13.2, 13.3 and 14.1 be resolved en bloc.

 

12.    Fair

 

12.1

SUBJECT          FOR NOTATION: Delivery Program & Operational Plan Progress Report - Quarter 2 - 2020/21

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07786208

 

REPORT OF     Corporate Planner

 

3184

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

That Council note the December 2020 Quarterly Progress Report of the Delivery Program 2018-2021, inclusive of the Operational Plan for 2020/21.

 

12.2

SUBJECT          FOR NOTATION: Investment Report for March 2021

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07991747

 

REPORT OF     Tax and Treasury Accountant

 

3185

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

That Council receive the Investment Report for March 2021.

 

12.3

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Public Exhibition - Delivery Program Year Four; Draft Operational Plan and Budget 2021/22

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07809567

 

REPORT OF     Commercial Manager; Acting Group Manager City Strategy

 

3186

RESOLVED      (Davis/Zaiter)

 

(a)     That Council endorse the Delivery Program 2018-2022 and the draft Year Four Operational Plan and Budget 2021/22 (DPOP) for the purpose of placing on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 27 April to 24 May 2021.

(b)     That Council note the feedback from the DPOP exhibition period will be presented at a Councillor Workshop prior to returning to Council for adoption on 28 June 2021.

(c)     That Council endorse the commencement of the preparation of the new Community Strategic Plan (CSP), and Delivery Program (DP) for the three years from FY 2022/23 to FY 2024/25 including:

i.        a review of the Key Focus Areas, Services and Key Service Measures in the current DPOP;

ii.       a strategic financial goal of seeking to achieve a net unrestricted cash surplus over the medium term (i.e. 2 – 3 years).

 

(d)     That Council note the new CSP and DP are scheduled to be approved by the Council in Q4 of 2021/22.

 

(e)     Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to make minor administrative amendments to the documents prior to public exhibition, as required.

 

 

Note:

1.      Councillor Bradley arrived at 6:37pm during consideration of Item 12.3.

2.      Councillor Jefferies arrived at 6:37pm during consideration of Item 12.3.

3.      Councillor Wilson joined remotely at 6:37pm during consideration of Item 12.3.

 

13.    Accessible

 

13.1

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Minutes of the Parramatta Traffic Committee Meeting held on 24 March 2021

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00082 - D07842517

 

REPORT OF     Traffic and Transport Manager

 

3187

RESOLVED      (Esber/Prociv)

 

(a)     That Council note the minutes of the Parramatta Traffic Committee meeting held on 24 March 2021, as provided at Attachment 1.

 

(b)     That Council approve the following recommendations of the Parramatta Traffic Committee meeting held on 24 March 2021 provided at Attachment 1 and in this report, noting the following financial implications for each item.

 

          i.       ITEM 2103 A1     ALFRED STREET AT ALICE STREET, HARRIS PARK – INSTALL A RAISED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

 

The estimated cost of the installation of the proposed raised pedestrian crossing is $440,000. This work will be 100% funded by Council from the 2020/21 and 2021/22 Active Transport Program Funds.

 

ii.       ITEM 2103 A3     CLUB LANE, ERMINGTON – REVIEW OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CONDITIONS

 

There is no financial implication to Council as a result of this recommendation.

 

(c)     Further, that Council defer consideration of Item 2103 A2 - Newington Retail Precinct – Proposed Speed Cushions as part of the installation of a ‘40km/H High Pedestrian Activity Area (HPAA)’ Restriction for further consultation.

 

13.2

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Minutes of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group Meeting held on 24 March 2021

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00077 - D07842528

 

REPORT OF     Traffic and Transport Manager

 

3188

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

(a)     That Council note the minutes of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group meeting held on 24 March 2021, provided at Attachment 1.

 

(b)     Further, that Council approve the recommendations of the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group meeting held on 24 March 2021 provided at Attachment 1 and in this report, noting the following financial implications for each item.

 

          i.       ITEM 2103 B1     REMBRANDT STREET SOUTH OF MELTON STREET, CARLINGFORD – REVIEW OF PEDESTRIAN CONDITIONS

 

This report identifies that a raised pedestrian crossing in Rembrandt Street south of Milton Street, Carlingford as the preferred pedestrian treatment to improve pedestrian safety at this location.

 

It is to be noted this location has been included in the “Draft City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021” (Draft Plan) for consideration of funding within 5 years.

 

         ii.       ITEM 2103 B2     REQUEST FOR Nine CAR SHARE SPACES IN PARRAMATTA, NORTH PARRAMATTA, EPPING AND WESTMEAD

 

According to 2020/21 Fees and Charges schedule, an initial application fee of $397 and annual renewal application fee of $159 will apply for the installation of each dedicated car share parking spaces in the Parramatta LGA. These fees include the costs of installing and removing car share spaces.

 

It is to be noted that a report was considered by Council on 24 August 2020 regarding car share fees and charges and it was resolved to make no changes to the existing car share fees as detailed in Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule.

 

          iii.      ITEM 2103 B3     PARRAMATTA CBD - REVIEW OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING

 

This report recommends further investigations to increase height clearance and accessible car parking spaces at Eat Street Car Park. This report also recommends working with Parramatta Westfield to create an information pack for people with disabilities. These recommendations will only involve staff time to implement with an approximate value of $1500 from within existing employee budgets.

 

          iv.      ITEM 2103 B4     PROJECTS RECENTLY COMPLETED, PROJECTS CURRENTLY FUNDED, AND PROJECTS LISTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE FUNDING

 

There is no financial implication to Council as a result of this recommendation

 

          v.       ITEM 2103 B5     OUTSTANDING WORKS INSTRUCTIONS

 

Transport for NSW Block Grant funds for 2020/21 have been used for these works. 

 

         vi.      ITEM 2103 B6     Intersection oF kissing point road and quarry road, dundas valley – REQUEST FOR UPDATE ON PROPOSED TRANSPORT FOR NSW INVESTIGATION 

 

There is no financial implication to Council as a result of this recommendation.

 

13.3

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Endorsement of a Draft CBD Integrated Transport Plan for Exhibition

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07844996

 

REPORT OF     Senior Project Officer Transport Planning

 

3189

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

(a)     That Council approve the attached draft CBD Integrated Transport Plan (“ITP”) at Attachment 1 for the purposes of exhibition.

 

(b)     That the draft ITP be placed on exhibition for a minimum period of 28 days.

 

(c)     That the outcomes of public exhibition of the ITP and the consideration of submissions are reported back to Council.

 

(d)     Further, that the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any necessary minor amendments of a non-policy nature that are consistent with the intent of the draft ITP.

 

13.4

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Response to NOM - Safety of Pedestrians and Food Delivery Bike Riders

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00077 - D07982548

 

REPORT OF     Road Safety Officer

 

3190

RESOLVED      (Pandey/Barrak)

 

That Council:

1.      Note that the preliminary draft guidelines for the ‘Food Delivery Rider Safety’ report have been released from the NSW Taskforce led by SafeWork NSW and Transport for NSW.

2.      Note that staff will review the NSW Taskforce ‘Food Delivery Rider Safety’ final report due in April 2021 and Centre for Work Health and Safety’s ‘Work Health and Safety of Food Delivery Workers in the Gig Economy’ final report due in October 2021 and report back to Council on potential actions that Council could take to respond to the reports via the Traffic Engineering Advisory Group.

3.      Note the Council programs outlined within this report that have been implemented and trialled by Council to date.

4.      Promote any future programs focussing on the safety for adult cyclists to Food Delivery Riders too.

5.      Invite a Food Delivery Riders representative on to the Cycleways Advisory Committee.

6.      Liaise with the Parramatta Light Rail contractor to install further ‘Walk Your Bike’ signs in Church Street.

7.      Install ‘Walk Your Bike – fines apply’ signs in Centenary Square to encourage cyclists to disembark and improve pedestrian safety.

8.      Trial an engagement program with Parramatta Police Area Command which will provide Police with reflective arm/leg bands (or other items) for Police to distribute to cyclists during Police bike patrols.

9.      Note that staff will continue to identify and address issues raised related to cyclist and pedestrian safety through public consultation to be undertaken in the first quarter in the 2022 calendar year.

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

3191

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Garrard)

 

That the meeting be adjourned for fifteen (15) minutes.

 

 

Note: The meeting was adjourned at 7:04pm for a short recess.

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

3192

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Tyrrell)

 

That the meeting resume.

 

 

The meeting resumed at 7:23pm with the following Councillors in attendance: The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors Benjamin Barrak, Phil Bradley, Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Michelle Garrard (Deputy Lord Mayor), Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies, Sameer Pandey, Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill Tyrrell, Lorraine Wearne and Martin Zaiter.

 

14.    Green

 

14.1

SUBJECT          FOR NOTATION: Floodplain Risk Management Committee Minutes 3 March 2019 and 17 November 2020

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07968448

 

REPORT OF     Senior Project Officer Waterways

 

3193

RESOLVED      (Tyrrell/Esber)

 

That Council receive and note the confirmed Minutes of the 5 March 2019, and the draft Minutes of the 17 November 2020 Parramatta Floodplain Risk Management Committee meetings.

 

14.2

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Naming of Lake Parramatta Sorry Day Garden as the Marcia Donovan Memorial Garden

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07938173

 

REPORT OF     Manager Open Space and Natural Resources; Community Capacity Building Manager; Supervisor Open Space and Natural Resources

 

3194

RESOLVED      (Pandey/Davis)

 

(a)     That Council approve the renaming of the ‘Sorry Day Garden’ in Lake Parramatta to the ‘Marcia Donovan Sorry Day Garden’, subject to the endorsement from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Committee (Committee).

 

(b)     Further, that in the event that the Committee does not endorse the name, that the matter be brought back to Council for further consideration.

 

15.    Welcoming

 

Nil

 

16.    Thriving

 

Nil

 

17.    Innovative

 

17.1

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Post Exhibition - Planning Proposal, Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement - 197 and 207 Church Street and 89 Marsden Street, Parramatta

 

REFERENCE   RZ/4/2015 - D07996359

 

APPLICANT/S  Think Planners Pty Ltd

 

OWNERS          Holdmark Properties Pty Ltd

 

REPORT OF     Project Officer Land Use

 

3195

RESOLVED      (Esber/Tyrrell)

 

(a)     That Council receives and notes the submissions made during the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal, draft Development Control Plan (DCP) and draft Planning Agreement at 197 and 207 Church Street and 89 Marsden Street, Parramatta (a summary of submissions is provided at Attachment 1).

 

(b)     That (subject to the clarification outlined in this report relating to removing any references to existing PLEP 2011 Clause 7.14) Council endorse for finalisation the Planning Proposal for land at 197 and 207 Church Street and 89 Marsden Street, Parramatta (provided at Attachment 2) which seeks to amend Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 as follows:

·        Apply an FSR of 10:1;

·        Apply a height of part 105m part 12m;

·        Include provisions that require a minimum 1:1 commercial floor space be provided in any redevelopment and allow for unlimited commercial floor space to be provided;

·        Apply the full range of car parking rates specified in the current draft Parramatta CBD Planning Proposal.

 

(c)     That Council submit the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) for finalisation once the Planning Agreement has been executed by the Applicant and Council.

 

(d1)   That Council finalise the DCP (Attachment 3) with the following amendments:

(i)      removal of controls relating to vehicular access (refer to part (e) of this resolution below for further detail);(ii) ensuring servicing, loading and set down/pick up activities take place on site;

(ii)     strengthening archaeology controls;

(iii)    resolving inconsistencies in the exhibited DCP relating to basement retail use and parking due to flood considerations by removing any references to habitable floor space below the flood planning level not being permitted

(iv)    protection of awning on Murray Bros building.

 

(d2)   That prior to Council considering the Draft CBD DCP for approval that Council seek advice from the following stakeholders on whether a prohibition of habitable floor space in basements is appropriate in the Parramatta CBD context:

•        Office of Environment and Heritage

•        State Emergency Service (SES)

•        Council Flood Plain Management Committee

•        Consultants who prepared Council Flood Study that supports the CBD LEP.

 

(e)     That, with regards to d1(i) above, Council’s current policy position on this matter is to support vehicle access arrangements whereby vehicles enter from Macquarie St and exit onto Marsden St, noting the following:

(i)      This position should form the basis of assessment of this matter for any Design Competition or Development Application at this site.

(ii)     The matter of vehicle access at this site will be re-exhibited as part of the draft Parramatta CBD DCP, or a Development Application at this site, whichever comes first.

 

(f)      That Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to finalise the draft Planning Agreement at Attachment 4, and to sign the Planning Agreement on Council’s behalf.

 

(g)     That Council officers write to DPIE to advise them of Council’s resolution on this matter and to request that DPIE considers commencing finalisation processes (such as legal drafting and map-making) prior to the formal submission of the Planning Proposal referred to in (c) above. (Note: The reason for making this request is to expedite plan-making processes.)

 

(h)     That Council note the Local Planning Panel’s advice (refer to Attachment 5) is consistent with the Council Officer’s recommendation in the report.

 

(i)      Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to make any minor amendments and corrections of a non-policy and administrative nature that may arise during the plan finalisation process, relating to the Planning Proposal, site-specific Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement.

 

DIVISION           The result being:-

 

AYES:                Councillors Barrak, Dwyer, Esber, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Tyrrell and Zaiter

 

NOES:                Councillors Bradley, Davis, Prociv, Wearne and Wilson

 

 

Note: Councillor Wilson rejoined the meeting at 7:39pm during consideration of Item 17.1.

 

18.    Notices of Motion

 

18.1

SUBJECT          NOTICE OF MOTION: World Falun Dafa Day

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07997138

 

FROM                 Councillor Wilson

 

3196

RESOLVED      (Wilson/Pandey)

 

That Council extend its best wishes to the local Falun Dafa community for World Falun Dafa Day on 13 May 2021.

 

 

Note: Lord Mayor, Councillor Dwyer requested his name to be recorded as having voted against the decision taken in this matter.

 

18.2

SUBJECT          NOTICE OF MOTION: Constitutional Referendum: Popularly Elected Lord Mayor

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07999834

 

FROM                 Councillor Dwyer

 

3197

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Esber)

 

(a)     That Council defer the decision to hold a constitutional referendum at the 4 September 2021 Local Government Elections to canvass voters on introducing a popularly elected Lord Mayor from September 2024.

 

(b)     That a Councillor Workshop to be convened and models brought to the Workshop about what could be implemented for the City of Parramatta.

 

(c)     That consideration be given to the appropriate ward structure and appropriate number of Councillors.

 

(d)     That Councillors be furnished with all models of popularly elected Mayors in the Sydney Metro, Newcastle and Wollongong areas.

 

(e)     Further, that the Workshop be convened and a report be brought to Council to consider this matter on Monday, 10 May 2021 and if resolved, Council’s decision to be submitted to the NSW Electoral Commission on Monday, 14 May 2021.

 

 

Note:

1.         Councillor Issa left the Chamber at 8:04pm and returned at 8:06pm during consideration of Item 18.2.

2.      Councillor Esber left the Chamber at 8:05pm and returned at 8:06pm during consideration of Item 18.2.

 

18.3

SUBJECT          NOTICE OF MOTION: Methods of Financing the Infrastructure Capital Works Program

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D08002336

 

FROM                 Councillor Davis

 

 

MOTION             (Davis/Esber)

 

That a funding report be prepared and provided to the Finance Committee as part of the Long Term Financial Plan and a final report be returned to Council within six (6) months on:

(1)     alternative medium and long term methods of financing the Council’s infrastructure capital works program (and not limited to external debt, “borrowing” section 7.11 contributions funds (in accordance with the Ministerial Direction));

(2)     risks and benefits of each proposed option.

 

3198

RESOLVED      (Esber/Barrak)

 

That the motion be put.

 

3199

RESOLVED      (Davis/Esber)

 

That a funding report be prepared and provided to the Finance Committee as part of the Long Term Financial Plan and a final report be returned to Council within six (6) months on:

(1)     alternative medium and long term methods of financing the Council’s infrastructure capital works program (and not limited to external debt, “borrowing” section 7.11 contributions funds (in accordance with the Ministerial Direction));

(2)     risks and benefits of each proposed option.

 

 

Note: Councillor Wilson requested his name to be recorded as having voted against the decision taken in this matter.

 

 

 

Note:

1.      Councillor Tyrrell left the Chamber at 8:10pm and returned at 8:12pm during consideration of Item 18.3.

2.      Councillor Wilson retired from the meeting at 8:10pm during consideration of Item 18.3.

3.      Councillor Garrard retired from the meeting at 8:20pm during consideration of Item 18.3.

4.      Councillor Barrak left the Chamber at 8:24pm and returned at 8:24pm during consideration of Item 18.3.

 

19.    Questions with Notice

 

Nil

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

 

MOTION             (Wearne/Zaiter)

 

That Item 20.2 - FOR APPROVAL: Enacting the DPIE Ministerial Direction dated 18 May 2020 to enable Delivery of Infrastructure be moved out of Closed Session.

 

The motion moved by Councillor Wearne and seconded by Clr Zaiter on being put was declared LOST.

 

DIVISION           The result being:-

 

AYES:                Councillors Davis, Issa and Wearne

 

NOES:                Councillors Barrak, Bradley, Dwyer, Esber, Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell and Zaiter

 

Note: Prior to moving into Closed Session, the Lord Mayor invited members of the public gallery to make representations as to why any item had been included in Closed Session.  No member of the gallery wished to make representations.

 

20.    CLOSED SESSION

 

3200

RESOLVED      (Esber/Tyrrell)

 

That members of the press and public be excluded from the meeting of

the Closed Session and access to the correspondence and reports

relating to the items considered during the course of the Closed

Session be withheld. This action is taken in accordance with

Section10A(s) of the Local Government Act, 1993 as the items listed

come within the following provisions:-

1       FOR APPROVAL: Tender 07/2020 Provision of Security Services - Panels 3 & 5. (D07996985) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

2       FOR APPROVAL: Enacting the DPIE Ministerial Direction dated 18 May 2020 to enable Delivery of Infrastructure. (D07957764) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret (The financial estimates and funding allocation provided in this report could impact upcoming competitive tender processes for these projects).

3       FOR APPROVAL: 31-35 Pitt Street, Parramatta - Holroyd City Brass Band Occupation of Premises & Shop 6/4-14 Hunter Street - City of Parramatta Arts Society Occupation of Premises. (D07678895) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

4       FOR APPROVAL: Acquisition of Properties in Prince and Alberts Streets, Granville. (D07996939) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

 

 

20.1

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Tender 07/2020 Provision of Security Services - Panels 3 & 5

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07996985

 

REPORT OF     Community Crime Prevention Officer

 

 

This item was WITHDRAWN.

 

20.2

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Enacting the DPIE Ministerial Direction dated 18 May 2020 to enable Delivery of Infrastructure

 

REFERENCE   F2021/00521 - D07957764

 

REPORT OF     Place Manager; Place Manager; Place Manager

 

 

MOTION             (Issa/Esber)

 

(a)     That Council approve the use of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Local Infrastructure Contributions - Pooling of Contributions) Ministerial Direction May 2020 (the Ministerial Direction) to supplement existing project funding and facilitate the provision of public amenity in high growth areas.

 

(b)     That Council approve the following principles when enacting the Ministerial Direction:

i.        The Ministerial Direction is applicable to Capital works projects identified within Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan (DPOP) with existing funding:

a.      where that existing funding is insufficient to deliver the project scope, and/or

b.      there are significant economies of scale or public benefits in enhancing project scope, and/or

c.       there is significant public benefit in delivering the projects ahead of the current DPOP schedule.

ii.       The Ministerial Direction is applicable to capital works projects in High Growth Areas only, as defined by Council’s Community Infrastructure Strategy. High Growth Areas will collect section 7.11 funds at a faster rate and will ensure funds borrowed from identified reserves are replenished in a timely manner.  

iii.      Reserves identified in sections 7.11/7.12 to facilitate public amenity provision are not required in the anticipated payback period.

iv.      That funds ‘borrowed’ using section 7.11/7.12 reserves be repaid in full.

v.       Clear documentation and reporting is provided, including collection and repayment of section 7.11/7.12 development contributions and their repayment into identified reserves through Council’s quarterly review process so that correct amounts are repaid and the information is made public.

 

(c)     That by enacting the Ministerial Direction, Council endorses the re-allocation of funds from identified section 7.11/7.12 reserves to supplement existing capital works projects identified in the table below.

 

Table 1: Summary of project funding requirements and risks associated with enacting the Ministerial Direction.

 

Project

Funding Summary

Risks to Council if additional funding is declined

Risks to Council if additional funding is approved

DPOP2018-21 Epping Pool project

 

 

Additional funding required: $2.852m

 

Additional funding will be used for the provision of water play equipment and a shallow splash pool

 

Reserve identified:

Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby Section 7.11 Plan)

 

Current reserve balance:

$3m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Epping Pool contribution plan will collect $0.6M per year, replenishing the Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby section 7.11 Plan) fund within 5 years.

 

 

The Epping shallow splash pool will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $2.852m from unrestricted funds to deliver the Epping Community Hub project.

 

DPOP2018-21 Rydalmere Field 1 &2 (Rydalmere Park Masterplan)

 

 

Additional funding required: $3.66m

 

Additional funding will be used to implement Stage 2 Rydalmere Park Masterplan

 

 

Reserve identified:

Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West $3.00m (open space)

 

Carlingford Precinct section 7.11 Plan $0.66m (open space)

 

Current reserve balance:

Section 7.11 Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West open space - $10.20m

 

Carlingford Precinct Section 7.11 Plan open space - $4.60m

 

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Rydalmere Park section 7.11 contribution plan will collect $0.72M per year, replenishing Carlingford Precinct Contribution Plan and Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West in 5 years.

 

Sports fields 1 and 2 will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e.within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $3.66m from unrestricted funds to deliver open space embellishments in Carlingford.

 

However, the only park the Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West can be applied to upgrade is Newington Reserve. The Newington Reserve upgrade is already a fully funded ($7.2m) DPOP project utilising the same funds. There is no further anticipated use of the remaining $3.00m in this reserve.

 

 

 

DPOP2018-21  PRUAIP F.S. Garside Park and Alfred Street (North Granville Community Facilities Masterplan)

 

Additional funding required: $8.44m

 

Additional funding will be used to supplement existing PRUAIP funding and implement Stage 1 of the North Granville Masterplan including construction and remediation of F.S. Garside Park and construction of the Alfred Street cycle way (part 2) in Granville

 

Reserve identified:

Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) section 7.12

 

Current reserve balance:

$8.7m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the F.S. Garside Park line item will collect $1.7m per year, replenishing the section 7.12 Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) in 5 years.

 

F.S. Garside Park was closed in August 2019 due to significant soil contamination.

 

The Park will remain closed, except for the small playground to the north, until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $8.44m from unrestricted funds to deliver the extension to Jubilee Daycare Centre and future CBD community facilities.

 

(d)     Further, that any ‘borrowed’ funds be redirected back to their original plan described in (b) above or the new relevant plan put in place if the current plan is replaced with a new section 7.11/7.12 plan currently being pursued by Council.

 

 

AMENDMENT  (Prociv/Pandey)

 

That Council defer consideration of this matter to the next Council Meeting to enable the report to be presented as two separate reports for the Epping Ward and Rosehill Ward projects.

 

 

FORESHADOWED MOTION     (Zaiter/)

 

(a)     That Council approve the use of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Local Infrastructure Contributions - Pooling of Contributions) Ministerial Direction May 2020 (the Ministerial Direction) to supplement existing project funding and facilitate the provision of public amenity in high growth areas.

 

(b)     That Council approve the following principles when enacting the Ministerial Direction:

i.        The Ministerial Direction is applicable to Capital works projects identified within Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan (DPOP) with existing funding:

a.      where that existing funding is insufficient to deliver the project scope, and/or

b.      there are significant economies of scale or public benefits in enhancing project scope, and/or

c.       there is significant public benefit in delivering the projects ahead of the current DPOP schedule.

ii.       The Ministerial Direction is applicable to capital works projects in High Growth Areas only, as defined by Council’s Community Infrastructure Strategy. High Growth Areas will collect section 7.11 funds at a faster rate and will ensure funds borrowed from identified reserves are replenished in a timely manner.  

iii.      Reserves identified in sections 7.11/7.12 to facilitate public amenity provision are not required in the anticipated payback period.

iv.      That funds ‘borrowed’ using section 7.11/7.12 reserves be repaid in full.

v.       Clear documentation and reporting is provided, including collection and repayment of section 7.11/7.12 development contributions and their repayment into identified reserves through Council’s quarterly review process so that correct amounts are repaid and the information is made public.

 

(c)     That by enacting the Ministerial Direction, Council endorses the re-allocation of funds from identified section 7.11/7.12 reserves to supplement existing capital works projects identified in the table below.

 

Table 1: Summary of project funding requirements and risks associated with enacting the Ministerial Direction.

 

Project

Funding Summary

Risks to Council if additional funding is declined

Risks to Council if additional funding is approved

DPOP2018-21 Epping Pool project

 

 

Additional funding required: $2.852m

 

Additional funding will be used for the provision of water play equipment and a shallow splash pool

 

Reserve identified:

Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby Section 7.11 Plan)

 

Current reserve balance:

$3m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Epping Pool contribution plan will collect $0.6M per year, replenishing the Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby section 7.11 Plan) fund within 5 years.

 

 

The Epping shallow splash pool will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $2.852m from unrestricted funds to deliver the Epping Community Hub project.

 

DPOP2018-21 Rydalmere Field 1 &2 (Rydalmere Park Masterplan)

 

 

Additional funding required: $3.66m

 

Additional funding will be used to implement Stage 2 Rydalmere Park Masterplan

 

 

Reserve identified:

Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West $3.00m (open space)

 

Carlingford Precinct section 7.11 Plan $0.66m (open space)

 

Current reserve balance:

Section 7.11 Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West open space - $10.20m

 

Carlingford Precinct Section 7.11 Plan open space - $4.60m

 

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Rydalmere Park section 7.11 contribution plan will collect $0.72M per year, replenishing Carlingford Precinct Contribution Plan and Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West in 5 years.

 

Sports fields 1 and 2 will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e.within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $3.66m from unrestricted funds to deliver open space embellishments in Carlingford.

 

However, the only park the Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West can be applied to upgrade is Newington Reserve. The Newington Reserve upgrade is already a fully funded ($7.2m) DPOP project utilising the same funds. There is no further anticipated use of the remaining $3.00m in this reserve.

 

 

 

DPOP2018-21  PRUAIP F.S. Garside Park and Alfred Street (North Granville Community Facilities Masterplan)

 

Additional funding required: $8.44m

 

Additional funding will be used to supplement existing PRUAIP funding and implement Stage 1 of the North Granville Masterplan including construction and remediation of F.S. Garside Park and construction of the Alfred Street cycle way (part 2) in Granville

 

Reserve identified:

Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) section 7.12

 

Current reserve balance:

$8.7m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the F.S. Garside Park line item will collect $1.7m per year, replenishing the section 7.12 Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) in 5 years.

 

F.S. Garside Park was closed in August 2019 due to significant soil contamination.

 

The Park will remain closed, except for the small playground to the north, until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $8.44m from unrestricted funds to deliver the extension to Jubilee Daycare Centre and future CBD community facilities.

 

(d)     That any ‘borrowed’ funds be redirected back to their original plan described in (b) above or the new relevant plan put in place if the current plan is replaced with a new section 7.11/7.12 plan currently being pursued by Council.

 

(e)     Further that, following a review of the current quarterly DPOP, that further projects that satisfy the Ministerial Direction be brought back to the Chamber for consideration.

 

The amendment moved by Councillor Prociv and seconded by Councillor Pandey was WITHDRAWN.

 

The foreshadowed motion moved by Councillor Zaiter was accepted by the Councillor Issa.  Councillor Esber withdrew his second to the motion and Councillor Zaiter then seconded the motion.

 

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

3201

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Tyrrell)

 

That the meeting be adjourned for ten (10) minutes.

 

 

Note:  The meeting was adjourned at 9:51pm for a short recess.

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

3202

RESOLVED      (Dwyer/Tyrrell)

 

That the meeting resume.

 

The meeting resumed at 9:26pm with the following Councillors in attendance: The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors Benjamin Barrak, Phil Bradley, Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies, Sameer Pandey, Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill Tyrrell, Lorraine Wearne and Martin Zaiter.

 

 

MOTION             (Issa/Zaiter)

 

(a)     That Council approve the use of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Local Infrastructure Contributions - Pooling of Contributions) Ministerial Direction May 2020 (the Ministerial Direction) to supplement existing project funding and facilitate the provision of public amenity in high growth areas.

 

(b)     That Council approve the following principles when enacting the Ministerial Direction:

i.        The Ministerial Direction is applicable to Capital works projects identified within Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan (DPOP) with existing funding:

a.      where that existing funding is insufficient to deliver the project scope, and/or

b.      there are significant economies of scale or public benefits in enhancing project scope, and/or

c.       there is significant public benefit in delivering the projects ahead of the current DPOP schedule.

ii.       The Ministerial Direction is applicable to capital works projects in High Growth Areas only, as defined by Council’s Community Infrastructure Strategy. High Growth Areas will collect section 7.11 funds at a faster rate and will ensure funds borrowed from identified reserves are replenished in a timely manner.  

iii.      Reserves identified in sections 7.11/7.12 to facilitate public amenity provision are not required in the anticipated payback period.

iv.      That funds ‘borrowed’ using section 7.11/7.12 reserves be repaid in full.

v.       Clear documentation and reporting is provided, including collection and repayment of section 7.11/7.12 development contributions and their repayment into identified reserves through Council’s quarterly review process so that correct amounts are repaid and the information is made public.

 

(c)     That by enacting the Ministerial Direction, Council endorses the re-allocation of funds from identified section 7.11/7.12 reserves to supplement existing capital works projects identified in the table below.

 

Table 1: Summary of project funding requirements and risks associated with enacting the Ministerial Direction.

 

Project

Funding Summary

Risks to Council if additional funding is declined

Risks to Council if additional funding is approved

DPOP2018-21 Epping Pool project

 

 

Additional funding required: $2.852m

 

Additional funding will be used for the provision of water play equipment and a shallow splash pool

 

Reserve identified:

Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby Section 7.11 Plan)

 

Current reserve balance:

$3m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Epping Pool contribution plan will collect $0.6M per year, replenishing the Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby section 7.11 Plan) fund within 5 years.

 

 

The Epping shallow splash pool will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $2.852m from unrestricted funds to deliver the Epping Community Hub project.

 

DPOP2018-21 Rydalmere Field 1 &2 (Rydalmere Park Masterplan)

 

 

Additional funding required: $3.66m

 

Additional funding will be used to implement Stage 2 Rydalmere Park Masterplan

 

 

Reserve identified:

Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West $3.00m (open space)

 

Carlingford Precinct section 7.11 Plan $0.66m (open space)

 

Current reserve balance:

Section 7.11 Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West open space - $10.20m

 

Carlingford Precinct Section 7.11 Plan open space - $4.60m

 

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Rydalmere Park section 7.11 contribution plan will collect $0.72M per year, replenishing Carlingford Precinct Contribution Plan and Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West in 5 years.

 

Sports fields 1 and 2 will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e.within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $3.66m from unrestricted funds to deliver open space embellishments in Carlingford.

 

However, the only park the Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West can be applied to upgrade is Newington Reserve. The Newington Reserve upgrade is already a fully funded ($7.2m) DPOP project utilising the same funds. There is no further anticipated use of the remaining $3.00m in this reserve.

 

 

 

DPOP2018-21  PRUAIP F.S. Garside Park and Alfred Street (North Granville Community Facilities Masterplan)

 

Additional funding required: $8.44m

 

Additional funding will be used to supplement existing PRUAIP funding and implement Stage 1 of the North Granville Masterplan including construction and remediation of F.S. Garside Park and construction of the Alfred Street cycle way (part 2) in Granville

 

Reserve identified:

Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) section 7.12

 

Current reserve balance:

$8.7m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the F.S. Garside Park line item will collect $1.7m per year, replenishing the section 7.12 Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) in 5 years.

 

F.S. Garside Park was closed in August 2019 due to significant soil contamination.

 

The Park will remain closed, except for the small playground to the north, until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $8.44m from unrestricted funds to deliver the extension to Jubilee Daycare Centre and future CBD community facilities.

 

(d)     That any ‘borrowed’ funds be redirected back to their original plan described in (b) above or the new relevant plan put in place if the current plan is replaced with a new section 7.11/7.12 plan currently being pursued by Council.

 

(e)     Further that, following a review of the current quarterly DPOP, that further projects that satisfy the Ministerial Direction be brought back to the Chamber for consideration.

 

 

AMENDMENT  (Davis/Esber)

 

(a)     That Council approve the use of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Local Infrastructure Contributions - Pooling of Contributions) Ministerial Direction May 2020 (the Ministerial Direction) to supplement existing project funding and facilitate the provision of public amenity in high growth areas.

 

(b)     That Council approve the following principles when enacting the Ministerial Direction:

i.        The Ministerial Direction is applicable to Capital works projects identified within Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan (DPOP) with existing funding:

a.      where that existing funding is insufficient to deliver the project scope, and/or

b.      there are significant economies of scale or public benefits in enhancing project scope, and/or

c.       there is significant public benefit in delivering the projects ahead of the current DPOP schedule.

ii.       The Ministerial Direction is applicable to capital works projects in High Growth Areas only, as defined by Council’s Community Infrastructure Strategy. High Growth Areas will collect section 7.11 funds at a faster rate and will ensure funds borrowed from identified reserves are replenished in a timely manner.  

iii.      Reserves identified in sections 7.11/7.12 to facilitate public amenity provision are not required in the anticipated payback period.

iv.      That funds ‘borrowed’ using section 7.11/7.12 reserves be repaid in full.

v.       Clear documentation and reporting is provided, including collection and repayment of section 7.11/7.12 development contributions and their repayment into identified reserves through Council’s quarterly review process so that correct amounts are repaid and the information is made public.

 

(c)     That by enacting the Ministerial Direction, Council endorses the re-allocation of funds from identified section 7.11/7.12 reserves to supplement existing capital works projects identified in the table below.

 

Table 1: Summary of project funding requirements and risks associated with enacting the Ministerial Direction.

 

Project

Funding Summary

Risks to Council if additional funding is declined

Risks to Council if additional funding is approved

DPOP2018-21 Epping Pool project

 

 

Additional funding required: $2.852m

 

Additional funding will be used for the provision of water play equipment and a shallow splash pool

 

Reserve identified:

Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby Section 7.11 Plan)

 

Current reserve balance:

$3m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Epping Pool contribution plan will collect $0.6M per year, replenishing the Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby section 7.11 Plan) fund within 5 years.

 

 

The Epping shallow splash pool will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $2.852m from unrestricted funds to deliver the Epping Community Hub project.

 

DPOP2018-21 Rydalmere Field 1 &2 (Rydalmere Park Masterplan)

 

 

Additional funding required: $3.66m

 

Additional funding will be used to implement Stage 2 Rydalmere Park Masterplan

 

 

Reserve identified:

Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West $3.00m (open space)

 

Carlingford Precinct section 7.11 Plan $0.66m (open space)

 

Current reserve balance:

Section 7.11 Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West open space - $10.20m

 

Carlingford Precinct Section 7.11 Plan open space - $4.60m

 

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Rydalmere Park section 7.11 contribution plan will collect $0.72M per year, replenishing Carlingford Precinct Contribution Plan and Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West in 5 years.

 

Sports fields 1 and 2 will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e.within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $3.66m from unrestricted funds to deliver open space embellishments in Carlingford.

 

However, the only park the Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West can be applied to upgrade is Newington Reserve. The Newington Reserve upgrade is already a fully funded ($7.2m) DPOP project utilising the same funds. There is no further anticipated use of the remaining $3.00m in this reserve.

 

 

 

DPOP2018-21  PRUAIP F.S. Garside Park and Alfred Street (North Granville Community Facilities Masterplan)

 

Additional funding required: $8.44m

 

Additional funding will be used to supplement existing PRUAIP funding and implement Stage 1 of the North Granville Masterplan including construction and remediation of F.S. Garside Park and construction of the Alfred Street cycle way (part 2) in Granville

 

Reserve identified:

Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) section 7.12

 

Current reserve balance:

$8.7m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the F.S. Garside Park line item will collect $1.7m per year, replenishing the section 7.12 Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) in 5 years.

 

F.S. Garside Park was closed in August 2019 due to significant soil contamination.

 

The Park will remain closed, except for the small playground to the north, until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $8.44m from unrestricted funds to deliver the extension to Jubilee Daycare Centre and future CBD community facilities.

 

(d)     That any ‘borrowed’ funds be redirected back to their original plan described in (b) above or the new relevant plan put in place if the current plan is replaced with a new section 7.11/7.12 plan currently being pursued by Council.

 

(e)     That following a review of the current quarterly DPOP, that further projects that satisfy the Ministerial Direction be brought back to the Chamber for consideration.

 

(f)      Further that, Council defer consideration of the Rydalmere Field 1 & 2 (Rydalmere Park Masterplan) matter to a Councillor Workshop and be brought back to Council for consideration.

 

The amendment moved by Councillor Davis and seconded by Councillor Esber on being put was declared LOST on the Lord Mayor’s casting vote.

 

The motion moved by Councillor Issa and seconded by Councillor Zaiter on being put was declared CARRIED.

 

3205

RESOLVED      (Issa/Zaiter)

 

(a)     That Council approve the use of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Local Infrastructure Contributions - Pooling of Contributions) Ministerial Direction May 2020 (the Ministerial Direction) to supplement existing project funding and facilitate the provision of public amenity in high growth areas.

 

(b)     That Council approve the following principles when enacting the Ministerial Direction:

i.        The Ministerial Direction is applicable to Capital works projects identified within Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan (DPOP) with existing funding:

a.      where that existing funding is insufficient to deliver the project scope, and/or

b.      there are significant economies of scale or public benefits in enhancing project scope, and/or

c.       there is significant public benefit in delivering the projects ahead of the current DPOP schedule.

ii.       The Ministerial Direction is applicable to capital works projects in High Growth Areas only, as defined by Council’s Community Infrastructure Strategy. High Growth Areas will collect section 7.11 funds at a faster rate and will ensure funds borrowed from identified reserves are replenished in a timely manner.  

iii.      Reserves identified in sections 7.11/7.12 to facilitate public amenity provision are not required in the anticipated payback period.

iv.      That funds ‘borrowed’ using section 7.11/7.12 reserves be repaid in full.

v.       Clear documentation and reporting is provided, including collection and repayment of section 7.11/7.12 development contributions and their repayment into identified reserves through Council’s quarterly review process so that correct amounts are repaid and the information is made public.

 

(c)     That by enacting the Ministerial Direction, Council endorses the re-allocation of funds from identified section 7.11/7.12 reserves to supplement existing capital works projects identified in the table below.

 

Table 1: Summary of project funding requirements and risks associated with enacting the Ministerial Direction.

 

Project

Funding Summary

Risks to Council if additional funding is declined

Risks to Council if additional funding is approved

DPOP2018-21 Epping Pool project

 

 

Additional funding required: $2.852m

 

Additional funding will be used for the provision of water play equipment and a shallow splash pool

 

Reserve identified:

Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby Section 7.11 Plan)

 

Current reserve balance:

$3m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Epping Pool contribution plan will collect $0.6M per year, replenishing the Community Facilities Reserve (Hornsby section 7.11 Plan) fund within 5 years.

 

 

The Epping shallow splash pool will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $2.852m from unrestricted funds to deliver the Epping Community Hub project.

 

DPOP2018-21 Rydalmere Field 1 &2 (Rydalmere Park Masterplan)

 

 

Additional funding required: $3.66m

 

Additional funding will be used to implement Stage 2 Rydalmere Park Masterplan

 

 

Reserve identified:

Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West $3.00m (open space)

 

Carlingford Precinct section 7.11 Plan $0.66m (open space)

 

Current reserve balance:

Section 7.11 Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West open space - $10.20m

 

Carlingford Precinct Section 7.11 Plan open space - $4.60m

 

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the Rydalmere Park section 7.11 contribution plan will collect $0.72M per year, replenishing Carlingford Precinct Contribution Plan and Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West in 5 years.

 

Sports fields 1 and 2 will not commence construction until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e.within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $3.66m from unrestricted funds to deliver open space embellishments in Carlingford.

 

However, the only park the Auburn Development Contributions Plan 2007 - Part C Homebush Bay West can be applied to upgrade is Newington Reserve. The Newington Reserve upgrade is already a fully funded ($7.2m) DPOP project utilising the same funds. There is no further anticipated use of the remaining $3.00m in this reserve.

 

 

 

DPOP2018-21  PRUAIP F.S. Garside Park and Alfred Street (North Granville Community Facilities Masterplan)

 

Additional funding required: $8.44m

 

Additional funding will be used to supplement existing PRUAIP funding and implement Stage 1 of the North Granville Masterplan including construction and remediation of F.S. Garside Park and construction of the Alfred Street cycle way (part 2) in Granville

 

Reserve identified:

Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) section 7.12

 

Current reserve balance:

$8.7m

 

Based on current estimates in the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021, the F.S. Garside Park line item will collect $1.7m per year, replenishing the section 7.12 Civic Improvement Plan (Community Facilities) in 5 years.

 

F.S. Garside Park was closed in August 2019 due to significant soil contamination.

 

The Park will remain closed, except for the small playground to the north, until 2026/27 when the City of Parramatta (Outside CBD) Development Contributions Plan 2021 funding becomes available.

 

 

If the repayment is not completed in the timeframe (i.e. within 5 years), or no other section 7.11/7.12 funds are available to borrow from in the future, Council may either delay delivery or fund up to $8.44m from unrestricted funds to deliver the extension to Jubilee Daycare Centre and future CBD community facilities.

 

(d)     That any ‘borrowed’ funds be redirected back to their original plan described in (b) above or the new relevant plan put in place if the current plan is replaced with a new section 7.11/7.12 plan currently being pursued by Council.

 

(e)     Further that, following a review of the current quarterly DPOP, that further projects that satisfy the Ministerial Direction be brought back to the Chamber for consideration.

 

20.3

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: 31-35 Pitt Street, Parramatta - Holroyd City Brass Band Occupation of Premises & Shop 6/4-14 Hunter Street - City of Parramatta Arts Society Occupation of Premises

 

REFERENCE   F2017/02366 - D07678895

 

REPORT OF     Space Management Officer

 

 

MOTION             (Esber/Davis)

 

(a)     That Council approve a licence to occupy the Jones Park Band Hall located at 31-35 Pitt Street Parramatta (also known as 151 Burnett Street, Mays Hill), for the City of Holroyd Brass Band subject to the terms and conditions outlined in this report.

 

(b)     That Council lease Shop 6, 4-14 Hunter Street, Parramatta and approve either Option 2 as outlined in paragraph 24 of this report.

 

(c)     Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and sign all documents in connection with these matters.

 

 

AMENDMENT            (Bradley/Zaiter)

 

(a)     That Council approve a licence to occupy the Jones Park Band Hall located at 31-35 Pitt Street Parramatta (also known as 151 Burnett Street, Mays Hill), for the City of Holroyd Brass Band subject to the terms and conditions outlined in this report.

 

(b)     That Council lease Shop 6, 4-14 Hunter Street, Parramatta and approve either Option 3 as outlined in paragraph 24 of this report.

 

(c)     Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and sign all documents in connection with these matters.

 

The amendment moved by Councillor Bradley and seconded by Councillor Zaiter was WITHDRAWN.

 

3206

RESOLVED      (Esber/Davis)

 

(a)     That Council approve a licence to occupy the Jones Park Band Hall located at 31-35 Pitt Street Parramatta (also known as 151 Burnett Street, Mays Hill), for the City of Holroyd Brass Band subject to the terms and conditions outlined in this report.

 

(b)     That Council lease Shop 6, 4-14 Hunter Street, Parramatta and approve either Option 2 as outlined in paragraph 24 of this report.

 

(c)     Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive     Officer to negotiate and sign all documents in connection with these matters.

 

20.4

SUBJECT          FOR APPROVAL: Acquisition of Properties in Prince and Alberts Streets, Granville

 

REFERENCE   F2020/03849 - D07996939

 

REPORT OF     Manager Property Plan & Program

 

3207

RESOLVED      (Esber/Tyrrell)

 

(a)     That Council rescind the resolution of Council from the meeting of 27 May 2019 for the acquisition of 20 Prince Street, Granville (a copy of the resolution is at Attachment 1).

 

(b)     That Council acquires 14 Albert Street, Granville being Lot 1 Deposited Plan 997315 on the terms and conditions as set out in paragraphs 14, 15 and 16.

 

(c)     That Council acquires 16 Albert Street, Granville being Lot 1 Deposited Plan 76437 on the terms and conditions as set out in paragraphs 14, 15 and 16.

 

(d)     That Council acquires 18 Albert Street, Granville being Lot 1 Deposited Plan 76113 on the terms and conditions as set out in paragraphs 14, 15 and 16.

 

(e)     That Council acquires 18 Prince Street, Granville being Lot Y Deposited Plan 412709 on the terms and conditions as set out in paragraphs 14, 15 and 16.

 

(f)      That Council acquires 20 Prince Street, Granville being Lot X Deposited Plan 412709 on the terms and conditions as set out in paragraphs 14, 15 and 16.

 

(g)     That Council acquires 22 Prince Street, Granville being Lot 10 Deposited Plan 72942 on the terms and conditions as set out in paragraphs 14, 15 and 16.

 

(h)     That Council delegate authority under section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993 the Chief Executive Officer to execute any documents required for the completion of this matter

 

(i)      That, if required, the CEO can delegate authority under section 378 of the Local Government Act 1993 to execute any documents required for the completion of this matter.

 

(j)      Further, that 14, 16 and 18 Albert Street, Granville and 18, 20 and 22 Prince Street, Granville be classified as community land in accordance with section 31(2) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

Procedural Motion

 

3208

RESOLVED      (Esber/Wearne)

 

That the meeting resume into Open Session.

 

21.    REPORTS OF RESOLUTIONS PASSED IN CLOSED SESSION

 

The Chief Executive Officer read out the resolutions for Items 20.2 to 20.4.

 


 

22.    CONCLUSION OF MEETING

 

The meeting terminated at 9.47 pm.

 

THIS PAGE AND THE PRECEDING 30 PAGES ARE THE MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, 26 APRIL 2021 AND CONFIRMED ON MONDAY, 10 MAY 2021.

 

 

 

 

 

Chairperson

 


 

Accessible

 

10 May 2021

 

13.1           FOR NOTATION: Variations to Standards under Clause 4.6 of Parramatta LEP 2011, Auburn LEP 2010, Holroyd LEP 2013, The Hills LEP 2012, Hornsby LEP 2013................................................................................................................... 42


Council 10 May 2021                                                                                                        Item 13.1

ACCESSIBLE

ITEM NUMBER         13.1

SUBJECT                  FOR NOTATION: Variations to Standards under Clause 4.6 of Parramatta LEP 2011, Auburn LEP 2010, Holroyd LEP 2013, The Hills LEP 2012, Hornsby LEP 2013.

REFERENCE            F2009/00431 - D07851185

REPORT OF              Development Assessment Manager       

 

PURPOSE:

 

To provide Council with information each month on development applications determined where there has been a variation in development standards under Clause 4.6 of the Local Environment Plans.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the report be received and noted.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.      During the reporting period 15 March 2021 to 11 April 2021, there were three (3) Development Applications where there was a variation to a development standard under Clause 4.6. Refer to Attachment 1 for further details.

 

2.      Under Clause 4.6 of the relevant Local Environmental Plan (LEP) applying to the local government area of the City of Parramatta, development consent may be granted for development even though the development would contravene a development standard such as a height and/or floor space ratio standard contained within an LEP.

 

3.      A report is presented to Council each month on any development consent issued where the development does not comply with a development standard.  This report follows the reporting requirements prescribed in Planning Circular PS08-014 issued by the (then) NSW Department of Planning.

 

4.      Controls within Development Control Plans (DCP) are not development standards as a DCP is not an “environmental planning instrument”.

 

ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCE

 

5.      There are no issues, options or consequence for Council associated with this report.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

6.      There are no consultation and timing considerations for Council associated with this report.

 

Stakeholder Consultation

 

7.      The following stakeholder consultation has been undertaken in relation to this matter:

 

Date

Stakeholder

Stakeholder Comment

Council Officer Response

Responsibility

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

Councillor Consultation

 

8.      The following Councillor consultation has been undertaken in relation to this matter:

 

Date

Councillor

Councillor Comment

Council Officer Response

Responsibility

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL

 

9.      There are no legal implications for Council associated with this report.


FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL

 

10.    There are no financial implications for Council associated with this report.

 

 

FY 20/21

FY 21/22

FY 22/23

FY 23/24

Operating Result

 

 

 

 

External Costs

 

 

 

 

Internal Costs

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Result

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Source

NA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CAPEX

 

 

 

 

CAPEX

 

 

 

 

External

 

 

 

 

Internal

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Total CAPEX

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Source

NA

 

 

 

 

 

Claire Stephens

A/Group Manager Development and Traffic Services

 

Paul Perrett

Chief Financial Officer

 

David Birds

A/Executive Director City Planning & Design

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Attachments:

1

Development Application Variations under SEPP 1 - 15 March 2021 - 11 April 2021

3 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL


Item 13.1 - Attachment 1

Development Application Variations under SEPP 1 - 15 March 2021 - 11 April 2021

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Thriving

 

10 May 2021

 

16.1           FOR APPROVAL: Draft CBD Parking Strategy.......................................... 50


Council 10 May 2021                                                                                                        Item 16.1

THRIVING

ITEM NUMBER         16.1

SUBJECT                  FOR APPROVAL: Draft CBD Parking Strategy

REFERENCE            F2021/00521 - D07965892

REPORT OF              Development Manager Property Development Group        

 

 

PURPOSE:

 

To seek Council’s endorsement of the draft CBD Parking Strategy and its recommendations and the draft CBD Parking Strategy be publicly exhibited.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)     That Council approve the draft CBD Parking Strategy and the recommendations contained within the strategy to be publicly exhibited for 30 days.

 

(b)     Further, that Council receive a subsequent report including the findings of the public exhibition to approve the final CBD Parking Strategy and its implementation.

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.      Parramatta is growing into Sydney’s Central City a strategic Centre of services and infrastructure which will drive employment and growth.

2.      As the Parramatta CBD grows the strategic approach to parking needs to adapt to reflect the significant change contemplated in the Community Strategic Plan and evident through the current scale of development activity in the City.

3.      The required adaptation in parking strategy is influenced by the supply and demand factors arising from the CBD’s growth and the City’s strategic planning objectives detailed in the CBD Planning Proposal and Integrated Transport Plan.

4.      A draft CBD Parking Strategy modelled using 2019 as the ‘base year’ (as 2020 was distorted by COVID19) has been prepared to inform the recommendations and implementation plan.

5.      The CBD Parking Strategy has been peer reviewed by a specialised traffic consultant with considerable knowledge of public sector parking and transport   (Ken Kanofski Advisory).

 

ISSUES/OPTIONS/CONSEQUENCES

 

6.      Modelling using 2019 as the ‘base year’ (as 2020 was distorted by COVID19) adopting a ‘do nothing’ approach, and taking into consideration supply and demand impacts, indicates there is a parking deficit in future years, arising primarily from the growth in office worker numbers.

7.      To provide a pro rata number of car spaces, based on 2019 parking supply levels the CBD would require an additional 5 large multi-level car parks by 2024 /25.

8.      The draft CBD Parking Strategy recommends adopting a multi-faceted approach outlined in annexure A, sections 7 (Opportunities and Options), 8 (Recommendation) 9 (Draft Implementation Plan). Together with the allocation of capital and resources to support implementation of the recommendations.

9.      The draft CBD parking strategy will remain a ‘live’ document to be updated and amended as the market recovers from the impact of COVID19 and any ongoing consequences on the demand for parking in the CBD are understood.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

Stakeholder Consultation

 

10.    The following stakeholder consultation has been undertaken in relation to this matter:

 

Date

Stakeholder

Stakeholder Comment

Council Officer Response

Responsibility

September – October 2020

Local Member for Parramatta Geoff Lee

Expressed concern at the loss of on-Street and multi-level parking. Is interested to consider the draft when available

Draft CBD Parking Strategy to be presented to Local Member for Parramatta Geoff Lee on the 23rd April 2021

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

Parramatta Chamber of Commerce Schon Condon

Wants to ensure that carparking is available to service the business needs and retail need particular for eat street.

Draft CBD Parking Strategy to be presented to Parramatta Chamber of Commerce May 2021

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

Westfield Parramatta Centre Manger Adam Dillon

Interested in the strategy and potential for their business to increase long stay casual parking

Further investigation to be conducted should CoP consider this as an option

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

Jones Lang La Salle Margaret Bolshinsky

Potential may exist to make available private parking for public use

N/A

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

Secure Parking -Tony McMahon

Provided insights into carpark efficiency, upgrades and the importance of technology in new and end of use facilities in purpose built carparking

N/A

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

Australian Turf Club – Matt Sharman

Have the capacity to provide carparking on city fringe in the order of 600 spots (weekdays), however will be subject to the annual events programmed.

Further investigation to be conducted should CoP consider this as an option

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

Parramatta Leagues Club – Bevan Paul

Have the capacity to provide carparking on city fringe in the order of 500 car spaces (weekdays). Spaces may reduce or carparking time may differ on game days for NRL and A-league.

Further investigation to be conducted should CoP consider this as an option

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

Metro West – David Hobart

Supportive of the strategy

N/A

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

Parramatta Light Rail – Tim Dewey

Supportive of the strategy

N/A

Property Development Group

September – October 2020

 

Transport for NSW – Lara Kirchner

Supportive of the strategy

N/A

Property Development Group

 

 

 

 

Councillor Consultation

 

11.    The following Councillor consultation has been undertaken in relation to this matter:

 

Date

Councillor

Councillor Comment

Council Officer Response

Responsibility

15 March 2021

Deputy Lord Mayor Garrard & Councillor Issa

The draft Parking Strategy contemplates that 70% of working population will return to the office. The Deputy Lord Mayor’s and Councillor Issa’s view is that Parramatta CBD is heavily Govt. employment focused and the mandate is for everyone to return to the office (from a Govt. perspective).

Justin Day noted that the document will remain live and can be updated to reflect live data as the market recovers from the impact of COVID19 and any ongoing consequences on the demand for parking in the CBD are understood

Property Development Group

15 March 2021

Deputy Lord Mayor Garrard

Question raised on what the split between private jobs and public Govt. Jobs in the CBD is.

Current data as per REMPLAN suggest that the public sector makes up 27.2% of the work force in the CBD

Property Development Group

15 March 2021

Councillor Prociv

Noted that the Chamber of commerce is particularly keen to be involved in the parking discussion

Justin Day noted that we had consulted with them and planned to do so again along with the Local Member and Business Parramatta

Property Development Group

15 March 2021

Councillor Tyrrell & Councillor Davis

Suggested that we make the Rosehill option for supplementary parking a priority to change behaviour

Justin Day noted that this is part of the recommendations and dialogue would continue subject to draft CBD Parking Strategy endorsement

Property Development Group

 

 

 

 

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL

 

12.    There are no legal implications for Council to consider in this report

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL

 

13.    If Council resolves to approve this report in accordance with the proposed resolution, the financial impact on the budget are set out in the table below.

 

14.    The table below summarises the financial impacts on the budget arising from approval of this report.

 

 

FY 20/21

FY 21/22

FY 22/23

FY 23/24

Operating Result

 

 

 

 

External Costs

 

 

 

 

Internal Costs

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Result

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Source

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CAPEX

 

 

 

 

CAPEX

 

 

 

 

External

 

 

 

 

Internal

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Total CAPEX

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Source

 

 

 

 

 

15.    Costs associated with putting the CBD parking strategy report on exhibition is funded with existing budget from Property Development Group and no additional costs are required.

 

Michael Ghobrial

Development Manager Property Development Group

 

Justin Day

Group Manager Property Development

 

Paul Perrett

Chief Financial Officer

 

Bryan Hynes

Executive Director Property & Place

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Draft Parramatta CBD Parking Strategy

45 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

 


Item 16.1 - Attachment 1

Draft Parramatta CBD Parking Strategy

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Innovative

 

10 May 2021

 

17.1           FOR APPROVAL: Draft Development Control Plan and Draft Planning Agreement for 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead......................................................... 102

 

17.2           FOR APPROVAL: Draft Development Control Plan for the Telopea Precinct for Public Exhibition............................................................................................. 207


Council 10 May 2021                                                                                                        Item 17.1

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER         17.1

SUBJECT                  FOR APPROVAL: Draft Development Control Plan and Draft Planning Agreement for 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead

REFERENCE            F2021/00521 - D07546223

REPORT OF              Project Officer Land Use       

 

APPLICANT:             Hamptons Property Services Pty Ltd 

LANDOWNER:         Owners Corporation of Strata Plan 47006

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CONSIDERED BY SYDNEY CENTRAL CITY PLANNING PANEL:  Nil

PURPOSE:

 

The purpose of this report is:

 

·      To seek Council’s endorsement of a draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement for land at 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead,

·      To allow exhibition of the draft Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement in conjunction with the Planning Proposal endorsed by Council on 9 September 2019.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)         That Council endorse the draft site-specific Development Control Plan for the land at 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead, as provided at Attachment 1, for the purpose of public exhibition. 

(b)         That Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to commence the legal drafting of a Planning Agreement in accordance with the Letter of Offer as provided in Attachment 2, and terms outlined in this report on behalf of Council for the purpose of public exhibition.

(c)          That the draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement be placed on public exhibition concurrently with the updated Planning Proposal in Attachment 3, for a period of 28 days and that a report be provided to Council on the outcomes of the public exhibition.

(d)         Further, that Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to correct any minor inconsistencies or anomalies of an administrative nature relating to the draft site-specific Development Control Plan and draft Planning Agreement documentation that may arise during the drafting and exhibition process.

 


 TIMELINE 

SITE DESCRIPTION

1.   The subject site is located at 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead on SP 47006 as shown in Figure 1. It has an area of approximately 14,300sqm and is bound by Windsor Road to the west, high-density residential development along Campbell Street to the north, Northmead High School to the east, and North Gate Apartments at 23-25 North Rocks Road, which face James Ruse Drive to the south.

 

Figure 1: Subject site at 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PLANNING PROPOSAL MATTERS               

2.   In September 2016, an initial Planning Proposal was lodged with Council that requested an increase to the maximum floor space ratio and maximum height of buildings controls for the site.

3.   The Planning Proposal endorsed by Council on 9 Sept 2019 seeks to amend the planning controls in Parramatta (former The Hills) LEP 2012 as shown below in Table 1.

Table 1: Planning Proposal for 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead

Parramatta (former The Hills) LEP 2012

Current Controls

Planning Proposal for exhibition

Zoning

R4 High Density Residential (13,950sqm), part SP2 Infrastructure (350sqm)

No change

Maximum Building Height (HOB)

16 metres (5 storeys)

30 metres (9 storeys)

Maximum Floor Space Ratio

(FSR)

N/A *

1.8:1

Maximum Gross Floor Area (GFA)

(approx. 20,925sqm – Officer estimate)

25,110sqm

Maximum Dwelling yield*

Council Calculation=

(Maximum GFA / 85sqm for high density dwellings)

270 dwellings (Applicant’s PP report)

246 (Council calculation)

308 dwellings (Applicant’s reference scheme)

294 dwellings (Council calculation)

*The Planning Controls applied to this part of the LGA which was formerly part of the Hills LGA do not set a maximum FSR .Instead the FSR achievable is primarily determined by compliance with maximum height and relevant DCP controls

Gateway Determination

4.   On 8 November 2019, the Department of Planning Industry and Environment (DPIE) issued a Gateway Determination for the Planning Proposal (see Attachment 4). The Gateway Determination included two (2) conditions which are required to be completed prior to public exhibition. These require Council to:

1)   Consult with Caltex on the appropriate timing and requirements of a Safety Management Study (SMS) given the site’s proximity to a gas pipeline,

2)   Update the Planning Proposal to reflect:

a.   labelling on Maximum Building Height (HOB), and

b.   maximum storeys and legend for floor space ratio (FSR)

(details shown at Attachment 3).

5.   Gateway Condition 1 required Council Officers to work with DPIE’s Hazards Team and Caltex on the requirements and timing for a Safety Management Study relevant to future development on the subject site. This was required by the Planning Proposal because part of the site lies within the notification area due to its proximity to the gas pipeline shown in Figure 2.  Council received advice from Caltex on 9 January 2020 which stated that:

“no SMS is required, this is the case because the development does not significantly change the existing land use, the pipeline corridor is already at the highest sensitivity level at location and the development is behind a very large building (i.e 25 North Rocks Road, North Rocks) relative to the pipeline route”.

 

Figure 2: Subject site (in yellow), gas pipeline (in green) and nearby sites (in grey)

 

6.   DPIE’s Hazards Team confirmed on 16 January 2020 that the approach proposed by Caltex and Council was acceptable for the purpose of public exhibition. Future development will still require a detailed pipeline assessment at Development Application stage under Division 12A Pipelines and pipeline corridors, Infrastructure SEPP 2007.

7.   Gateway Condition 2 requires minor notation changes for the Planning Proposal. It requires Council to update the Planning Proposal to reflect the maximum height and storeys achievable under the proposed controls within the proposed 30m height limit. It also requires an update to the legend on the FSR Map to reflect the correct labelling of the proposed FSR of 1.8:1 (S2) in accordance with DPIE’s LEP mapping requirements.

8.   Generally, a maximum building height of 30 metres can accommodate up to 9 storeys. This remains the LEP control across the entire site. There are also more detailed height controls in the site-specific DCP that show where on the site the maximum height can be achieved and where a lower height will be required to maintain adequate sunlight and amenity to existing nearby dwellings in the apartment block to the south, as well as the proposed new dwellings and communal space on site. This analysis results in a lower building height towards the middle of the site of up to 7-8 storeys as shown in the Built Form Controls in Attachment 1 and Figure 3 below.

Figure 3: Building heights proposed for future development in draft site-specific DCP

9.   On 21 July 2020, DPIE’s Place team indicated that if the draft site-specific DCP was exhibited concurrently with the Planning Proposal this would satisfy Gateway Condition 2a requiring the building heights to be conveyed in storeys. Detailed provisions in relation to building height are included as part of the site-specific DCP in Attachment 1.

10. The updated Planning Proposal results in no changes to the LEP amendment and no changes to height of the building envelope and is consistent with the application endorsed by Council on 9 September 2019. Council Officers have updated the Planning Proposal as shown at Attachment 3 for the purpose of reflecting the Gateway Determination conditions for the public exhibition.

DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN

11. After the matter was considered by Council in 2019 the concept design evolved following further analysis and investigation in partnership with the applicant. The amended concept design involves the following amendments compared to that included in the report when Council considered the Planning Proposal:-

i.    Increasing the northern setback from 9 metres to 12 metres to accommodate the two-way accessway, parking and verge including a shared pedestrian/cycle path for improved traffic and transport accessibility,

ii.   Increasing building separation between the U-shaped buildings to accommodate 30m wide passive communal open space areas with rear setback slightly reduced from a range between 24m and 34m to a range between 20m and 30m (see Figure 4).

Figure 4: Setback, separation and maximum storeys diagram

 

12. The amended Concept Design does not generate any change to the heights of buildings or density of development permitted when compared to the previous version.

 

13. The site-specific Development Control Plan, as provided at Attachment 1 is based on the amended concept design described above. Its overarching objectives are to:

 

i.    Orientate the future residential building envelope so amenity impacts for the site and surrounding properties are addressed, primarily the design seeks to maximize solar access to future dwellings on the subject site and minimize overshadowing to the units in the apartment building to the south,

ii.   Improve local accessibility by delivering a new two-way accessway for safer transport movements and local connectivity, and

iii.  Provide open space for passive recreation with deep soil and landscaping.

 

14. Objectives and controls for future residential building envelopes propose two U-shaped apartment building envelopes of 7 to 9 storeys in height, which are oriented to the north with setbacks greater than 20 metres to Windsor Road and Northmead High School (as shown in Figure 4 above). The massing and orientation of development enables solar access, setbacks and open space above what could be achieved under current planning controls as well as adequate privacy within dwellings and to neighbouring sites.

15. Council and the applicant propose an accessway within the 12-metre northern setback. The accessway will both operate like a driveway to service the development and appear like a local street for visitors to the site. Public access will be secured by an unencumbered 24/7 public access easement. An indicative location of the through site link as well as the proposed internal vehicular circulation of the site are shown in Figure 5. This accessway will be designed as follows:

i.    Two-way vehicle traffic to ingress and egress from the site,

ii.    Kerbside parking for visitors, and

iii.   3-m wide shared pathway with nature verge that continues to the eastern boundary.

Figure 5: Access to the subject site

 

16. Council’s Parramatta Ways Walking Strategy aims to create a safe and attractive walking network, which offers a variety of local walking opportunities and supports our community and the environment. It shows desired long-term connection from North Rocks Road to Campbell Street, Northmead. This long term connection would run from North Rocks Road through adjoining sites to the the south of the subject site then along the rear of the subject site and through the adjacent high school to join to Campbell Street. The location of this future pathway and property impacts is shown in Figure 6 below.

 

Figure 6: Parramatta Ways Strategy with future connectivity for subject site

17. This pathway has not yet been established on the adjacent school or neighbouring residential property to the south. Constraints such as mature trees and ground level change along the school boundary means the shared-path cannot be accommodated along the existing easement which runs along the same boundary but on the school side of the boundary. Providing the pathway on the subject site will result in a more usable path with less environmental impacts. This right of access will be provided as future-proofing in anticipation that the other parts of the connection on adjoining sites will be pursued in the future to finalise the entire link.

18. The draft DCP also contains controls that require carparking access to be located within the building envelope to maximise new open space and landscaped areas within the site. It includes a requirement for utility provisions such as loading bays or service vehicle areas, and building service/plant areas to be adequately screened from any public domain areas.

19. The draft site-specific DCP has been drafted in accordance with the urban design, traffic and open space advice provided to date. Council officers are satisfied that the site-specific controls in the draft DCP will result in a better planning outcome than what could be achieved under current controls should a Development Application be lodged for the site.

DRAFT PLANNING AGREEMENT

20. Negotiations have been undertaken with the applicant regarding a Draft Planning Agreement for the subject site in accordance with the Council resolution dated 9 September 2019. A Letter of Offer was provided to Council on 15 December 2020 (see Attachment 2). The section below details the results of the negotiation.

Land Value Uplift

21. Given the subject site was already zoned R4 – High Density Residential, a better quality development outcome was essential in achieving strategic merit for increasing density as part of a site-specific Planning Proposal. The Planning Proposal and Draft DCP outline how future development will benefit from more open space, better urban design, increasing permeability and better solar access and outlook.

22. By amending the planning controls and introducing a site-specific DCP for the site in this way, it increases the quantity and quality of high-density floor space for the entire site, which generates a more valuable development outcome overall. Therefore, the amount of land value uplift is based upon the following justification:

i.    An additional 4,185sqm of high-density residential GFA permissible on the site, and

ii.   An increase in the quality for all high-density residential floorspace proposed on the site. This will benefit all future high-density apartments under the proposed controls and increases the value rate for each square metre of high-density residential GFA allowed on the site, not just the additional permissible amount.

23. Council engaged an independent valuation consultant (BEM Property) to assess the applicant’s valuation figures as part of the land value-uplift process. The valuation details are provided in Table 2.

Table 2: Value uplift assessment

Uplift Analysis

Amount

Valuation under current controls

GFA Max. 20,925sqm @ $1,073/sqm

$22,453,000

Valuation under proposed controls

GFA Max. 25,110sqm @ 1,125/sqm

$28,249,000

Council value uplift review

$5,796,000

VPA Policy Minimum Requirement (50% land value uplift)

$2,898,000

Current Planning Agreement Offer (50%)

$2,898,000

Planning Agreement Offer

24. Council’s Planning Agreements Policy states that the value of the Planning Agreement is to equate to 50% of the land value uplift, which is the rate applicable for Planning Proposals outside the Parramatta CBD. Council officers have carried out negotiations with the applicant based upon Council’s endorsed position in relation to the land value uplift achieved under the Planning Proposal and Draft DCP. The Draft Planning Agreement is required to make a minimum contribution of $2,898,000 to be consistent with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy for sites outside the Parramatta CBD.

 

25. On 15 December 2020, Council received a Letter of Offer from the applicant. The Planning Agreement Offer meets the requirements for Planning Proposals outside CBD and equates to the minimum 50% land value uplift.  Items proposed as part of the offer are included in Table 3.

Table 3: Summary of Planning Agreement Offer

 

Item

Costs for Planning Agreement

Value attributing public benefit

1.

3m-wide shared pathway along the eastern boundary at the rear of the site

$25,200 (estimate)

$25,200

2.

3m-wide shared pathway adjacent to new access road and buildings

$72,000 (estimate)

$14,400 (20% of total cost)

3.

Monetary Contribution towards outdoor fitness equipment in Speers Road Reserve

$100,000 (subject to CPI)

$100,000

4.

Monetary Contribution towards provision of Affordable Housing

$579,000 (subject to CPI)

$579,000

5.

Public access easements for proposed pathways

LRS  Fees & Charges

N/A

6.

Remaining Contribution

$2,179,400

$2,179,400

Staging

75% of the monetary contribution prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate (CC)

25% of the monetary contribution prior to the issue of any occupation certificate (OC) (interim or final)

Yes

Yes

Security

Bank Guarantees could be alternatively provided

Yes

Yes

Costs

Applicant agrees to pay Council’s legal costs

Yes

N/A

Other

Section 7.11, 7.12, and 7.24 contributions apply

Yes

N/A

 

Total

2,955,600

$2,898,000

26. Notably, the items in the Planning Agreement Offer are not proposed for Council ownership, or maintenance.  The ongoing costs associated with the delivery, ownership, maintenance and depreciation of the two shared pathways will be the responsibility of the developer and future residential strata scheme.

27. The developer will pay the cost of construction of the new two-way accessway and the 3m-wide shared pathways with unencumbered 24/7 public access easements and these will be required to be delivered in accordance with the standards of Council and Transport for NSW (where intersecting with Windsor Road).

28. The cost for the new vehicular accessway is excluded from the value of public benefit because it is required to support the proposed development and will principally be used by future residents and visitors to the site, not the wider community. The cost for the shared-pathways and easements are partially included as they contribute to increased permeability for pedestrians and cyclists in the surrounding area.

29. Items relating to monetary contributions (or alternative bank guarantees) will be subject to indexation to reflect increases in the Consumer Price Index between the execution of the agreement and timing payments as required by Part 5.11 of Council’s Planning Agreements Policy. Monetary contributions towards Item 3 and 4 will be paid as part of the 75% payment required prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

30. Council’s Transport, Open Space and Property & Development Group have reviewed the above values for accuracy and consider them consistent with the previously adopted position by Council (9 September 2019) and Gateway Determination scheme.  Should Council accept the Planning Agreement offer, the written agreement will be legally drafted with a plain English explanatory note which will be agreed to by both parties prior to public exhibition.

DPIE Planning Agreements Practice Note

31. On 12 February 2021, DPIE released a Planning Agreements Practice Note that has implications for the future negotiations of planning agreements and must be a consideration for Council (see Attachment 5). The practice note outlines that value capture should not be the ‘primary’ purpose of Planning Agreements. Notably, the practice note does not currently prevent Council from taking into consideration the increased value of land as part of a Planning Agreement under the Transitional Arrangements, provided it is not ‘primary’ purpose of the Planning Agreement. 

32. The primary purpose of this Planning Agreement is to achieve increased accessibility for future residents of the site and community in the surrounding Northmead and North Rocks area. As noted, improved accessibility will be achieved by constructing a two-way accessway for vehicles and two 3m-wide shared paths covered by 24/7 public access easements. This will establish an alternate route to Windsor Road, which is highly urbanised and subject to high volumes of traffic, and improve connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists in the area.

33. The remaining $2,179,400 of monetary contributions as part of this Planning Agreement is included so the Planning Agreement is consistent with the minimum requirements of Councils Planning Agreements Policy. This monetary contribution will contribute towards Council’s infrastructure planning and strategies such as the Community Infrastructure Strategy and development contributions plans.  The draft Planning Agreement contribution is in addition to Section 7.11/7.12 development contributions payable with respect to any future redevelopment of this site.

34. Given the Planning Agreement Offer was received prior to the release of DPIE’s Planning Agreements Practice Note, the Planning Agreement may be subject to the Transitional Arrangements of the Practice Note. These state that the Planning Agreement must be initially endorsed by Council, legally drafted and placed on public exhibition prior to 1 July 2021 to ensure consistency with both Council’s Planning Agreement Policy and DPIE’s Planning Agreements Practice Note.

35. It is recommended that the CEO be granted delegated authority to finalise the legal drafting of the planning agreement on behalf of Council. Should Council resolve to endorse the draft Planning Agreement offer, a draft legal agreement and explanatory note will be prepared for the purposes of a concurrent public exhibition with the associated planning proposal and draft DCP for the site.

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

36. Pending Council’s resolution on this matter, the Planning Proposal, draft DCP and draft Planning Agreement will be publicly exhibited with the Planning Proposal. The exhibition will be conducted in accordance with the Gateway determination and the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The outcome of the public exhibition will then be reported to Council.

 

Stakeholder Consultation

 

37. The following stakeholder consultation has been undertaken in relation to this matter:

Date

Stakeholder

Stakeholder Comment

Council Officer Response

Responsibility

13, 17 & 23 March 2020

Urban Design and Natural Resources & Open Space

Design Workshop- Review of draft DCP prepared by the applicant

Amendments to draft objectives, principles, controls and figures towards intended planning and development outcome on site.

City Planning

3 April 2020 / 8 April 2020

Applicant

DCP assessment is satisfactory and agreed upon.  However, unsatisfied with land value uplift assessment of VPA.

DCP confirmed for public exhibition purposes.

 

VPA negotiations on land value uplift amount continue.

City Planning

22 May 2020 / 9 June 2020

Applicant

Amount of land value uplift being negotiated.

Applicant agreed on value of VPA on 9 June 2020.

Council provide justification for land value uplift of $5,796,000 and $2,898,000 of contributions (as in this report).

City Planning/ Property Development Group

17 June 2020

Social Outcomes

Opportunities for affordable housing contribution in accordance with Council’s policy. i.e. dwelling asset or monetary contribution

A $579,000 monetary contribution for affordable housing is offered given the site’s location is not desirable for a housing asset, which is consistent with the Affordable Housing Policy.

City Planning

23 March 2020 / 14 August 2020 / 13 November 2020

City Assets, Transport Planning & Parramatta Ways

New accessway,  public accessibility and shared-paths to provide connectivity in broader precinct

Two 3m-wide shared pathways, valued at $120/sqm should be wholly located within the subject site and protected via an unencumbered 24/7 public access easement. Public benefit attributes 20% for the E-W path and 100% for the N-S path.

City Planning

26 November 2020 / 15 December 2020

Applicant and Property Development Group

No objections raised to the items in the VPA offer or land value uplift amount. No assets being delivered to Council, no ongoing maintenance obligations.

Minor changes regarding value attributing public benefit for the two 3m-wide pathways, description of easements and staging of contribution.

City Planning/ Property Development Group

8 April 2021

Finance

The monetary and CAPEX contributions are not included in the current adopted four-year budget and if resolved, will be include with the budget process or as part of quarterly review.

Revenue anticipated for FY21/22 and FY22/23. CAPEX for two 3m-wide shared paths with depreciation of $500.

City Planning/Finance

Councillor Consultation

38. The following Councillor consultation has been undertaken in relation to this matter:

Date

Councillor Comment

Council Officer Response

Responsibility

9 September 2019

Council endorsed the Planning Proposal to request a Gateway Determination and that a site-specific DCP be prepared and VPA be negotiated.

The Planning Proposal request has not changed following Gateway Determination. The DCP & VPA have been prepared and negotiated in accordance with the resolution.

City Planning

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION FOR COUNCIL

 

39. The financial implications for Council associated with this report include the costs of reviewing the submissions and finalising the report.  These costs are funded from the City Planning budget.

40. If Council resolves to approve this report in accordance with the recommendation, Council will be in a position to receive a monetary contribution of $2,858,400 should a residential development proceed (i.e. $100k for outdoor fitness equipment at Speers Road Reserve, $579k towards affordable housing, $2,179,400 remaining monetary contribution). The construction cost for the proposed footpaths has an ascribed public benefit value of $39,600, as this item will be publicly accessible and remain within the private ownership of the proposed residential strata scheme. This contribution is not included in the current adopted four-year budget and if resolved, will be included with the budget process or as part of quarterly review.

41. The monetary contribution in the Planning Agreement would be delivered in addition to Section 7.12 contributions payable with respect to any redevelopment of the site. The costs of registering the agreement and associated easements on the title of land and transfer of monetary contribution or bank guarantee will be paid by the applicant.

42. The monetary contribution will be staged with 75% of the monetary value prior to issue of Construction Certificate. The remaining 25% will be trigged prior to issue of any Occupation Certificate.

43. If Council resolves to approve this report, staff will determine the appropriate use of funds to deliver a capital project in line with the section 7.12 plans and report to Council with a recommendation at a later date. The capital works will incur future maintenance and depreciation expenditure that will be determined as part of the project planning process.

44. The table below represents the estimated timing of the additional contribution to be received if Council resolves to approve this report.

 

FY 20/21

FY 21/22

FY 22/23

FY 23/24

F24/25

Revenue Contribution

 

$2,143,800

(75%)

$714,600 (25%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Result

 

 

 

 

 

External Costs

 

 

 

 

 

Internal Costs

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Result

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Source

 

 

VPA Contribution

General revenue

General revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

CAPEX

 

 

 

 

 

CAPEX

 

 

 

 

 

External

 

 

 

 

 

Internal

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Total CAPEX

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Source

 

 

 

 

 

45. The costs associated with the preparation, exhibition and finalisation of the Planning Proposal, draft DCP and draft Planning Agreement are internal resources and consultancy costs. The developer will reimburse any consultancy costs relating to the VPA, which will then result in nil cost to Council for this item.

 

CONCLUSION

46. It is recommended that Council endorse the Draft Development Control Plan and Draft Planning Agreement Offer for 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead and that the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to prepare the legal drafting in accordance with the Letter of Offer provided in Attachment 2 on behalf of Council for the purpose of public exhibition.

47. If endorsed, the draft DCP and draft Planning Agreement will be publicly exhibited concurrently with the Planning Proposal for 23-25 Windsor Road, Northmead for a minimum of 28 days. A further report will be prepared for Council on the outcome of the public exhibition period.

Kieren Lawson

Project Officer Land Use

 

Michael Rogers

Land Use Planning Manager

 

Robert Cologna

Acting Group Manager, City Planning

 

David Birds

Acting Executive Director, City Planning & Design

 

Paul Perrett

Chief Financial Officer

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Draft Development Control Plan - for exhibition

13 Pages

 

2

Draft Planning Agreement Offer - for exhibition

3 Pages

 

3

Planning Proposal following Gateway - for exhibition

48 Pages

 

4

Gateway Determination

6 Pages

 

5

DPIE Planning Agreements Practice Note (February 2021)

21 Pages

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL


Item 17.1 - Attachment 1

Draft Development Control Plan - for exhibition

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item 17.1 - Attachment 2

Draft Planning Agreement Offer - for exhibition

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item 17.1 - Attachment 3

Planning Proposal following Gateway - for exhibition

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item 17.1 - Attachment 4

Gateway Determination

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item 17.1 - Attachment 5

DPIE Planning Agreements Practice Note (February 2021)

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council 10 May 2021                                                                                                        Item 17.2

INNOVATIVE

ITEM NUMBER         17.2

SUBJECT                  FOR APPROVAL: Draft Development Control Plan for the Telopea Precinct for Public Exhibition

REFERENCE            F2021/00521 - D07947043

REPORT OF              Team Leader Land Use Planning

PREVIOUS ITEMS             8.9 - Telopea Master Plan - Council - 13 Mar 2017 6:00pm

                                      0.0 - Telopea Planned Precinct - Council - 11 Feb 2019 6.30pm

                                      13.7 - Telopea Master Plan - Council - 18 Dec 2017 6.30pm       

 

 

PURPOSE:

 

To seek Council’s endorsement to place the draft Development Control Plan for the Telopea Precinct on public exhibition.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

(a)     That Council endorse the Telopea Precinct draft Development Control Plan (DCP) provided at Attachment 1 and the repeal of existing controls relating to Telopea in Section 4.1.11 of the Parramatta DCP 2011 for public exhibition purposes.

 

(b)     That the draft DCP be placed on public exhibition for a minimum period of 28 days and that Council undertakes the following engagement:

i.    Letters to property owners/occupiers and key stakeholders notifying them of the public exhibition;

ii.   Exhibition of the draft DCP on Council’s Participate Parramatta website;

iii.  Notification of Draft DCP public exhibition in the local paper;

iv.  Hard copies of the draft DCP available at Council’s Customer Service Centre and Dundas, Epping and Parramatta Libraries; and

v.   A series of four out of hours phone ‘book a planner’ sessions during the exhibition period.

 

(c)     That a report be prepared to Council on the outcome of the public exhibition period prior to the finalisation of the draft DCP.

 

(d)     Further, that Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to correct any minor anomalies of a non-policy and administrative nature relating to the draft DCP that may arise.

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.      The Telopea Precinct (the Precinct) is located to the east of the former Telopea heavy-rail station and future Telopea Light Rail Stop, as shown in Figure 1.

 

2.      The precinct has a total area of sixty-four (64) hectares of which forty-five (45) hectares is developable land in private or Land and Housing Corporation (LAHC) ownership. The precinct currently contains approximately 1,400 dwellings, of which approximately 640 are government-owned social housing dwellings, 152 are dwellings operated by community housing providers as affordable housing and approximately 570 dwellings are in private ownership. The Precinct contains a range of existing detached dwellings, duplexes, townhouses and some low scale residential flat buildings. The tallest buildings are three residential towers (9 storeys each), which are within LAHC ownership, along Sturt Street directly opposite Telopea Light Rail Stop.

 

3.      Telopea is characterised by its steep topography, which falls from the ridgeline at the future light rail corridor to the south west.  It also features established vegetation and canopy trees and is bounded by existing open and natural spaces, including Sturt and Acacia Parks, Ponds Creek Reserve and the Rapanea Forest. Key established points of interest include Telopea Public School, Waratah shops (at Evans Street) and Council’s Dundas Branch Library and Neighbourhood Centre at 21 Sturt Street. Refer Figure 1 for locations.

 

Figure 1: An aerial map of the precinct (outlined in blue) with key attributes labelled

 

4.      Precinct planning for Telopea has been underway since 2015, with involvement from Council, LAHC and the (then) Department of Planning and Environment at various times. Table 1 below summarises the timeframe and key milestones for planning for Telopea Precinct and Attachment 2 provides a more detailed history.

 

Table 1: Summary of Planning History of Telopea

 

Timeframe

Planning Milestones

July 2015

·    Council and Land and Housing Corporation (LAHC) entered into a partnership to develop a Telopea Master Plan which aimed at setting the vision and outcomes for urban renewal of Telopea, including identifying improved local infrastructure.

13 March 2017

·    Council (under Administration) endorsed the Master Plan for the purpose of informing the future Telopea planning process.

Mid - Late 2017

·    The (then) Department of Planning and Environment declared Telopea a ‘Priority Precinct’ and subsequently exhibited the Telopea Precinct Proposal (Stage 1) and supporting technical studies in late 2017.

18 December 2017

 

·    Council endorsed a submission providing in principle support for Stage 1 of the Precinct Proposal (Stage 1) but underscored that:

a)   Further analysis was required given proposed density controls were set to the upper limit;

b)   A development control plan (DCP) was not yet resolved; and

c)   Local infrastructure requirements and a new development contributions plan and were not yet resolved.

19 December 2018

·    The NSW Government introduced new planning controls (via an amendment to the Parramatta LEP 2011) for the Telopea precinct which have the potential to realise the delivery of 4,500 new homes (10,000 residents) and a new retail precinct. The rezoning resulted in amendments to the planning controls including changes to land use zoning, density (floor space ratio) and height of buildings (detailed below). The rezoning did not include a DCP or contributions framework.

December 2019

·    Frasers Property and Hume Housing were announced as LAHC’s development partner for the redevelopment of the majority of LAHC owned properties within the Telopea Precinct.

18 December 2021

·    Amendments made to the SEPP (State and Regional Development) 2011 that allowed development (>$100m) on or behalf of LAHC to be deemed ‘State Significant Development’.

12 February 2021

·    Council was notified by the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) that LAHC intends to lodge a Concept Plan and Stage 1A (detailed development) for the Telopea Estate Redevelopment.

 

5.      As summarised in Table 1 above, the current planning controls contained in the Parramatta Local Environmental Plan (PLEP) 2011 are as a result of the 2018 rezoning.  Generally the highest density (floor space ratio (FSR)) and height of buildings are located adjacent to the Light Rail station and within the Core area – allowing shop top housing or residential flat buildings in the corridor between the light rail stop and the existing shops. ranging from 22 storeys, at the light rail station down to 1 to 2 storey multi-unit dwellings at the edges of the precinct. The precinct’s floor space ratio and height of buildings maps are provided below in Figures 2 and 3 respectively.

 

Figure 2: Telopea Precinct – Summary Maximum Floor Space Ratio Map

 

 

Figure 3: Telopea Precinct – Summary Maximum Height of Buildings Map

 

6.      The planning controls also allow for incentive FSR and height of building controls in order to incentivise site amalgamation or the provision of community facilities. Figures 2 and 3 show the respective Areas and incentives as follows:

a)      Area A (refer height and FSR map): An additional 1:1 FSR (totaling 3:1) and 12 metres of building height (totaling 40 metres) can be achieved when all sites within Area A are amalgamated and a footpath/road connection is provided.

b)      Area B (refer height and FSR map): Community facilities are to be excluded from the calculation of FSR on sites in Area B and an additional 5 metres of building height (totaling a split of 70 metres and 50 metres) if retail, business or community facilities are provided on the ground floor.

c)      Area C (refer FSR map): An additional 0.3:1 (totaling 2:1) can be achieved if sites within Area C are amalgamated to a minimum size of 2,000 square metres.

 

7.      Clause 6.12 of the Parramatta LEP 2011 sets out design excellence provisions with the Telopea Precinct, development must demonstrate how it meets design excellence criteria. Furthermore, development higher than 55 metres or with a capital value of over $100m must hold an architectural design competition.

8.      The rezoning of Telopea also included the insertion of two clauses into the Parramatta LEP 2011 that were not previously exhibited by the Department. The clauses are summarised as follows:

·        Clause 6.18: Development consent cannot be granted for sites within the Telopea Precinct until a DCP has been developed for the precinct that addresses the criteria contained within the clause. Note that this clause allows for minor development, such as dwelling houses, dual occupancies and secondary dwellings to proceed ahead of a precinct DCP being prepared.

·        Clause 8.1: Development consent cannot be granted for residential development within the Telopea Precinct unless the Secretary of the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment certifies that satisfactory arrangements have been made to contribute to the provision of State infrastructure.

 

9.      Since the release of the new planning controls, Council Officers have worked with LAHC in the preparation of the new precinct DCP that responds to the new planning controls and that seek to align the future development of the precinct with the endorsed Telopea Master Plan.

 

Voluntary Planning Agreement

 

10.    In December 2019, Frasers Property and Hume Housing were announced as LAHC’s development partner for the Telopea Precinct. Telopea is a part of the Communities Plus Program under which LAHC engages private sector developers and community housing providers to design, fund and build social, affordable and private housing. As each development is completed, new social housing properties are handed over to LAHC.

 

11.    In June 2020, Frasers submitted to Council its first letter of offer to enter into a Planning Agreement. The offer included the delivery of community infrastructure and several other works-in-kind. Council Officers support elements of the offer in-principle. However, there are significant revisions which need to be made. A future report will be considered by Council in relation to the Planning Agreement.

 

State Significant Development Application

 

12.    On 18 December 2020, an amendment was made to the State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011 that allowed development on or behalf of LAHC to be deemed ‘State Significant Development’ if it has a capital investment value over $100 million. This means that the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) is the consent authority for any Development Applications which meet this criteria.

 

13.    On 12 February 2021, Council was notified by DPIE that LAHC has requested a Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) for a Concept Plan and Stage 1A (detailed development) for the Telopea Estate Redevelopment. A SEARs lists out the documents needed to accompany a State Significant Development (SSD) Application, and signifies the commencement of the SSD process.  SEARs was issued on 9 April 2021 to the applicant by DPIE. 

 

14.    The Concept Proposal by LAHC includes the following:

a)      A mixed-use development of approx. 4,700 dwellings, including 1,000 social, affordable and market dwellings;

b)      7,000sqm retail precinct with a new supermarket, food and beverage, specialty retail & a childcare facility;

c)      Proposed combined library and community centre;

d)      Proposed combined Church, Residential Aged Care Facility and Independent living unit’s facility;

e)      Delivery of new public open space, including a new light rail plaza and hill top park, Elyes pedestrian link; and

f)       Road and intersection upgrades & cycle way upgrades.

 

The Concept Proposal relates refer to the dark red area shown in Figure 4 below.

 

15.    The detailed proposal for Stage 1A of the redevelopment applies to the following:

a)      Residential flat buildings up to ten storeys in height containing a total of 452 apartments on Lot C9;

b)      a new public park;

c)      a new road crossing of the light rail corridor; and

d)      a new plaza adjacent to Telopea Station.

 

The detailed proposal relates to the light red show at Figure 4 below.

 

Map

Description automatically generated

Figure 4: Land application of the Concept Application and Stage 1 Detailed Application (source Scoping Report for SSD Application, LAHC 2021)

 

16.    The application applies to LAHC owned land, Council’s pathways, roads and 21 Sturt St (Dundas Library site) and Telopea Christian Church (16 Shortland St). However, at the time of writing this report LAHC had not indicated if it is seeking land owners consent or using its power under the Housing Act 2001 to compulsorily acquire Council’s land.

 

17.    Legal advice obtained by Council officers offers that in relation to the lodgment of the SSD Application which pertains to Council’s land that:

a.   LAHC are a statutory body under the Housing Act 2001 and a ‘public authority’ under the relevant roads and planning legislation; and

b.   Development applications usually require land owner’s consent, but Landowner’s Consent is not required for development applications made by a “public authority” under clause 49(2) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000).

 

18.    Furthermore, the legal advice in relation to LAHC powers to acquire / purchase Council owned land is that:

a)   LAHC has compulsory acquisition powers (section 22 Housing Act 2001), including “to acquire land for present or future residential development and public purposes” and the land acquired does not need to be used for “public purposes” and can be developed by others or sold to others by LAHC; and

b)   Acquisition process is governed by the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991.

 

19.    Council Officers have asked LAHC to clarify their intentions (and relevant legal mechanism) through both the VPA and SSD process for Council owned land. It is noted that Council may still object or make submission in relation to the SSD Application and Council may object to compensation offered in the event of compulsory acquisition.

 

20.    It is expected that the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIS) will be lodged with DPIE by Frasers and LAHC in May / June 2021 and shortly thereafter will be placed on public exhibition. It is at this time Council will have the opportunity to put in a formal submission to the DPIE.

 

21.    The LAHC Frasers proposal deviates from the outcomes envisioned under the Telopea Master Plan, most notably the following discrepancies:

a.   The pedestrianisation of Eyles Street between Wade Street and close to Benaud Lane and the creation of a pedestrian spine from Benaud Place to Sturt Street, which includes new public parks and a retail plaza;

b.   Introduction of a new street called ‘Wade Lane’, which was not envisaged by the Master Plan;

c.   Introduction of ‘New Marshall Street’ with its route different from that envisaged by the Master Plan. 

d.   Items a), b) and c) above would require the closure and use of Council’s public roads;

e.   The location of the new community centre and library between the new Wade Lane and New Marshall Street (just north of the existing Council facility) and associated use of 21 Sturt Street (Council land) as part of the LAHC/Frasers development; and

f.    A new neighbourhood park at Polding Place of approximately 2,500sqm.

 

Refer Figures 5 and 6 which indicates key differences between the Telopea Master Plan and LAHC / Frasers proposal.

 

22.    Furthermore, it is anticipated that LAHC and Frasers will avail of the FSR bonuses available under the State Environmental Planning Policies - Affordable Rental Housing (SEPP ARH) and Seniors Living. In particular SEPP ARH may be applied across the LAHC owned land, regardless of the tenure or type of housing that is being delivered. Therefore allowing on any individual sites up to 20% or 0.5:1 additional FSR above what is permitted under the PELP 2011. The implications are as follows:

a.   Additional ‘unplanned’ ‘bonus dwellings’ on LAHC land of between 900-1,000 dwellings (this is based on Council Officer estimates and it is expected that when the EIS is lodged as part of the SSD Application, this will clarify additional dwellings numbers).

b.   Impact of additional FSR on built form, e.g. reduced setbacks and/or additional height.

 

Diagram, engineering drawing, map

Description automatically generated

Figure 5: Extract from ‘Request for SEARS Concept Drawings’ (LAHC/Frasers), accessed from DPIE Major Project website – February 2021. Blue markings indicate areas of difference between Figure 6 below (Council Officers).

 

Map

Description automatically generated

Figure 6: Extract from the Telopea Master Plan 2017 (LAHC/City of Parramatta Council)

 

23.    In light of the ongoing negotiations in relation to the VPA and that the State Significant Development (SSD) is in early stages of the process, Council Officers recommend that the Draft DCP largely reflect Council’s endorsed Telopea Master Plan. The draft DCP (and future final DCP) may be used as a supporting guide for Council’s future formal responses in relation to the VPA and SSD.  It is noted that this would not preclude Council from supporting the LAHC and Frasers proposal in the future, if Council wishes to do so.

 

 

DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN

 

24.    The draft Telopea Precinct DCP (refer Attachment 1) has been developed using a collaborative approach between various Council Departments. It has been subject to numerous revisions in order to reach the current version. The draft DCP is largely reflective of Telopea Master Plan and aims to support the planning controls for the Telopea Precinct contained within the Parramatta LEP 2011. 

 

25.    It is noted that under Clause 6.18 the finalisation of a DCP for Telopea will ensure that development applications for residential flat buildings and the like can be determined. These will principally relate to private applicants (as LAHC have chosen the State Significant Development pathway as described above). Clause 6.18 of the Parramatta LEP 2011 also sets out the criteria that should be addressed in the Draft DCP, and this is summarised in Attachment 3.

 

26.    Currently Section 4.1.11 Towns and Neighbourhood Centres of the Parramatta Development Control Plan 2011 contains existing controls relating to Telopea Precinct which in were put in place in 2011.  This was four years prior to the commencement of the Telopea Master Plan process and the subsequent Priority Precinct and rezoning process carried out by the (then) Department of Planning and Environment.  These DCP provisions are no longer reflective of the current planning controls in the Parramatta LEP 2011 for the Telopea Precinct.  As such is it recommended that these controls be repealed if the Telopea Precinct DCP is adopted by Council.

 

27.    The following provides an overview of the contents of the Draft DCP.

 

Scope and Primary DCP Objectives

 

28.    The Draft DCP relates to the Telopea Precinct, which is shown in Figure 8. The area which will contain the tallest and densest buildings and retail areas is know as The Core and is shown in blue line outline.

 

29.    The draft DCP is underpinned by the outcomes of the Telopea Master Plan and responds to the planning controls contained in the Parramatta LEP 2011. Key objectives of the Draft DCP are to ensure that future development:

a)      Creates a vibrant, cohesive and safe mixed-use precinct which delivers shared civic spaces, community facilities and services and retail facilities.

b)      Has the potential to deliver new open spaces, public domain, pedestrian links and streets which provides amenity and aids in navigating the topography of the precinct.

c)      Includes buildings that respond to the topography, landscape and solar access, and improve safety and connectivity.

d)      Promotes the reduction of water and energy consumption, reduces impact on urban heat and improves pedestrian comfort;

e)      Maximises opportunities for future planting of trees and retention of existing significant trees within the public and private domain.

 

Map

Description automatically generated

Figure 5: Telopea precinct – Application area of Draft DCP

 

Council owned land

 

30.    Council owned land within Telopea is at 21 Sturt Street (the current Dundas Community Centre and Library) and the land between the existing Waratah Shops and the formed section of Evans Road (also known as Benaud Place). These are shown in shaded blue at Figure 5.

 

31.    The Draft DCP recognises that as part of the transformation of the Telopea Precinct, that a new community centre and library will be required to meet the community needs in the medium to long term. The Draft DCP acknowledges that Council will investigate the future of 21 Sturt Street, this includes the option of building new community facilities on the current site and the potential relocation of community facilities to alternative sites.

 

32.    In relation to the Council owned-land between the existing Waratah Shops and the formed section of Evans Road (also known as Benaud Place), the Draft DCP details that Council would consider the potential to consolidate with adjoining private land owners as part of a future mixed use or residential development (only if the road reserve is no longer required to provide access to adjoining privately owned sites).  Should the Council land be consolidated, then any subsequent development should retain an area of adjacent green space or public domain to complement the development. As described in paragraph 6(a) above, this aims to complement the density and height incentive controls for amalgamation of this land and Waratah Shops in the Parramatta LEP 2011.

 

 

Traffic and Transport

33.    The Draft DCP recognises that although the precinct will have improved and reliable public transport when the Parramatta Light Rail opens in 2023, Telopea is a suburban centre and will require adequate off street car parking. As such residential accommodation car parking rates are set in line with the Roads and Maritime Services’ Guide to Traffic Generating Developments (2002) for Metropolitan Subregional Centres. It is noted that the State Environmental Planning Policy Affordable Rental Housing (SEPP ARH) determines car parking rates for social and affordable housing.

 

34.    In relation to active transport, requirements are to provide bicycle parking and the identification of new off road and shared cycleways and new cycle and pedestrian links within the precinct.

 

35.    Future proofing for electric vehicle charging within buildings is also included in the Draft DCP. These draft controls aim to ensure that apartment unit owners/occupiers and or body corporates can both technically and affordably accommodate electric vehicle charging infrastructure in the future. It is noted that although similar draft controls for electric vehicles have been endorsed for the Draft Melrose Park North DCP, this is the first precinct based DCP comprising multiple-landowners (as opposed to a single developer) to include these draft controls.

 

Built Form – The Core

36.    The Draft DCP recognises that the built form and land use typology (mixed use development) differs within the Core Area and requires specific design objectives, principles and controls (noting that this area will largely be informed by the SSD Application). Key design principles and controls for The Core include:

a)      Requirements for the lodgment of a Concept Application prior to or concurrently with any detailed development application and associated information required to be submitted for this area;

b)      Considerations for the potential redevelopment of Waratah Shops, including amalgamation of lots (including Council owned land), solar access, consolidated vehicular access, and public access through to Elyse Street;

c)      Controls relating to setbacks from the street, tower setbacks and breaks in buildings to ensure high density built form interacts well with the public domain; and

d)      Controls relating to basements, retaining walls and apartments that may be built below street level, which ensure that new development responds to the topography of the site and maximises solar access.

 

Built Form – The Precinct

37.    The Draft DCP objectives, design principles and controls relate to residential flat buildings of between 5 storeys and 9 storeys. Key controls relate to:

a.   Provision of 4 to 6 metres front setback controls and minimum 10 metres or 15% of site length (whichever is greater), rear setback controls with basements largely contained within the building footprint to ensure developments maximise deep soil and landscape areas (including retention of trees) in the front and rear setbacks.

b.   Allowing consistent breaks in buildings and provision of through site links to form opportunities for solar access, views across the Dundas Valley and provide a comfortable neighbourhood environment; and

c.   Provisions relating to the response of the building to the topography, including car parking basement structure design above ground, vehicular crossings, retaining walls, landscaping.

 

Public Domain

38.    The key objective of the Draft DCP is to provide quality public domain and open spaces which provide universal access and connections across the Precinct. Design principles and controls relate to the submission of Public Domain Plans with DAs and design requirements for public spaces, including any publicly accessible spaces (but not in Council’s ownership) and the Arrival Plaza.

 

Tree Protection and Enhancement

39.    Telopea is characterised by mature trees and it is the objective of the Draft DCP to maintain this natural amenity and preserve and enhance the tree canopy within Telopea. Specific controls are in place to ensure that new developments are designed to minimize the removal of existing protected mature trees. Where removal of a tree may provide built form, heritage or public domain outcomes removal may be accepted, however replacement trees shall be incorporated to Council’s specifications.

 

Natural Environment and Heritage

40.    The Draft DCP includes controls which ensure new development must consider minimising the impact on the heritage and archaeological significance of the listed items in Telopea. This includes the State heritage site, known as known as Redstone, Acacia Park, which is listed as an archaeological site under the Parramatta LEP 2011, and the Rapanea Community Forest which is listed as a local heritage item under the Parramatta LEP 2011.

 

Sustainability

41.    The Draft DCP requires that new development install a dual reticulation system, that is dual piping, to support the immediate or future connection to a recycled water network. The purpose is to ensure that future change-over to an alternative water supply can be achieved without significant civil or building work, disruption or cost. 

 

42.    The Draft DCP requirement for dual piping is similar to what will be achieved within the Parramatta CBD and is underpinned by a letter of support from Sydney Water which notes that they “expect to manage most of GPOP’s water locally via a new integrated water and resource recovery facility to be built in the Camellia industrial precinct. Noting that “this facility and network have been identified as priority infrastructure for the next five to ten years in the Government’s draft ‘A City Supported by Infrastructure Place-based Infrastructure Compact Pilot’ (November 2019).”

 

43.    The Draft DCP includes a series of urban heat controls relating to reflectivity of building roofs, podiums and facades are included and aim to reduce and remove heat from the urban environment. The controls provide that through use of building materials, glazing, orientation, shading, awnings and greening that the impact on the ambient heat in the environment can be greatly reduced. It is noted that although similar draft controls for urban heat have applied in the Draft Melrose Park North DCP and for design competitions and development applications within the Parramatta CBD, this is the first precinct based DCP comprising multiple-landowners (as opposed to a single developer) to include these draft controls.

 

44.    The Draft DCP includes controls relating to water sensitive urban design and stormwater treatment targets, in line with recently adopted DCPs and SOPA guidelines, in order to increase water quality that may impact local parks and waterways.

 

 

CONSULTATION & TIMING

 

Stakeholder Consultation

 

45.    The following stakeholder consultation has been undertaken in relation to this matter:

 

Date

Stakeholder

Stakeholder Comment

Council Officer Response

Responsibility

Early 2019 to present.

Land and Housing Corporation, Frasers & internal sections of Council 

Various comments in relation to finalising the draft DCP

Extensive consultation has been undertaken to date with internal sections of Council and LAHC and Frasers (since early 2020) in order to progress the draft DCP.

 

This includes numerous meetings and detailed correspondence between parties. The draft DCP does not represent the fully agreed position between Council officers and LAHC and Frasers proponent for the purposes of seeking Council endorsement, as the LAHC/Frasers proposal represents a deviation from the Council endorsed Telopea Master Plan.

City Planning

 

Councillor Consultation

 

46.    The following Councillor consultation has been undertaken in relation to this matter:

 

Date

Councillor

Councillor Comment

Council Officer Response

Responsibility

16 September 2020

All

Council Officers to Finalise Draft DCP and Report to Council for endorsement and to continue with analysis of VPA Offer and prepare further briefing for Councillors.

Draft DCP for consideration as part of this Council report. VPA discussions ongoing and future briefings to be scheduled. 

City Planning and Design & Property Development Group

24 February 2021

All

Councillors asked questions in relation to community infrastructure, traffic and transport works, upgrades to public domain and further consultation with Ward Councilors.

Comments from Councillors were integrated into Council Officer response to Draft SEARs and circulated to the Councillors via briefing note on 5 March 2021.

 

Further Ward Councillor briefing was undertaken on 30 March 2021.

City Planning

5 March 2021

All

 

Comments on Draft SEARS circulated via Briefing Note

City Planning

30 March 2021

Epping & Dundas Ward

Councillors raised issues in relation to the future of Council owned land, timeframe for the delivery of community infrastructure, and recognise importance of DCP in accepting private land owners DAs. Councillors request update in 4-6 weeks of this meeting.

Comments are largely relevant to ongoing VPA discussions. Future briefings will be scheduled.

City Planning and Design & Property Development Group

 

 

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL

 

47.    Allowing the Draft DCP to be placed on exhibition will go some way to satisfying Cause 6.18 of the Parramatta LEP 2011 which only allows development consent to be granted for sites within the Telopea Precinct when a DCP is in place. However DAs cannot be determined until the DCP is formally endorsed and Clause 6.18 is fully satisfied.

 

48.    The State Significant Development Application has legal implications for the use of Council roads and land (as detailed in paragraphs 17 to 19 above) and will be subject to further clarification from LAHC and any subsequent legal advice which will be provided to Council at a future date in relation to this matter.

 

DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN

 

49.    On 30 November 2020, Council endorsed a new Draft Development Contributions (Outside Parramatta CBD) Plan to be placed on public exhibition. Subsequently the draft Plan has been placed on public exhibition between 17 March 2021 and 16 April 2021.

 

50.    The Draft Contributions Plan applies to development within the Telopea Precinct, and the works schedule identifies the infrastructure needed to support the growth in the Telopea Precinct. The infrastructure needs are based on the Telopea Master Plan, as well as Council’s strategic documents such as the Community Infrastructure Plan. 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL

 

51.    The financial implications for Council associated with this report include the costs of placing the plans on public exhibition.  These costs are funded from the City Planning budget.

 

52.    The decision being made by Council to endorse the draft Development Control Plan for exhibition will have no direct impact on the budget.

 

53.    As described above, it is acknowledged that a Planning Agreement Letter of Offer has been submitted and is being assessed by Council Officers. At the time the Planning Agreement is executed (post exhibition) Council can then plan to incorporate the infrastructure and other Planning Agreement deliverables into Council budget and asset management strategies.

 

 

FY 20/21

FY 21/22

FY 22/23

FY 23/24

Operating Result

 

 

 

 

External Costs

 

 

 

 

Internal Costs

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Result

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Source

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CAPEX

 

 

 

 

CAPEX

 

 

 

 

External

 

 

 

 

Internal

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Total CAPEX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Source

 

 

 

 

 

 

NEXT STEPS

 

54.    If endorsed, the draft DCP will be placed on public exhibition for a minimum of 28 days in accordance with statutory timeframes.

55.    Following public exhibition, submissions will be considered by Council Officers and a summary of the submissions will be reported to Council. If the submissions result in major amendments to the draft DCP, Council may be required to re-exhibit the draft DCP. If the amendments are minor in nature, the final DCP will be reported to Council for finalisation and will amend Section 4 of the Parramatta Development Control Plan 2011.

 

Bianca Lewis

Team Leader Land Use Planning

 

Robert Cologna

Acting Group Manager, City Planning

 

Paul Perrett

Chief Financial Officer

 

David Birds

Acting Executive Director, City Planning & Design

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

Attachments:

1

Draft Development Control Plan Telopea Precinct

41 Pages

 

2

Planning History Telopea Precinct

8 Pages

 

3

Draft DCP addressing Clause 6.18(3) PLEP 2011

1 Page

 

 

 

REFERENCE MATERIAL

 


Item 17.2 - Attachment 1

Draft Development Control Plan Telopea Precinct

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item 17.2 - Attachment 2

Planning History Telopea Precinct

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item 17.2 - Attachment 3

Draft DCP addressing Clause 6.18(3) PLEP 2011

 

PDF Creator 


 

Notices of Motion

 

10 May 2021

 

18.1           NOTICE OF MOTION: Re-establishment of the Wentworth Point Working Group.......................................................................................................................... 278


Council 10 May 2021                                                                                                        Item 18.1

NOTICE OF MOTION

ITEM NUMBER         18.1

SUBJECT                  NOTICE OF MOTION: Re-establishment of the Wentworth Point Working Group

REFERENCE            F2021/00521 - D08019264

FROM                          Councillor Prociv       

 

MOTION

That a report be prepared, and brought to Council, on the re-establishment the Wentworth Point Working Group.

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.      At a recent meeting of residents at Wentworth Point a request was made that Council re-form the Wentworth Point Working Group, established in 2014 by Auburn Council.

 

2.      Residents feel that the re-establishment of the Working Group will allow them to address issues affecting their community directly to Council.

 

3.      Residents have also requested that a newly formed Wentworth Point Residents Group be consulted on the Terms of Reference, including membership, of a re-formed Working Group.

 

Patricia Prociv

Councillor

 

 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PROPERTY & PLACE RESPONSE

 

1.      A written staff response will be provided in a supplementary agenda prior to the Council meeting.

 

FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

 

2.      A written staff response will be provided in a supplementary agenda prior to the Council meeting.

 

 

Bryan Hynes

Executive Director Property & Place

 

Paul Perrett

Chief Financial Officer

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments:

There are no attachments for this report.

 


 

Questions with Notice

 

10 May 2021

 

19.1           QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE: Questions Taken on Notice from Council Meeting - 26 April 2021.................................................................................................. 282


Council 10 May 2021                                                                                                        Item 19.1

QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE

ITEM NUMBER         19.1

SUBJECT                  QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE: Questions Taken on Notice from Council Meeting - 26 April 2021

REFERENCE            F2021/00521 - D08022341

FROM                          Governance Manager        

 

QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE FROM THE COUNCIL MEETING OF 26 APRIL 2021

Item

Subject

Councillor

Question

12.3

Public Exhibition of the DPOP, Budget and Fees and Charges

Garrard

Does the Voluntary Pensioner Rebate Policy form part of the documents placed on public exhibition?

Has Council harmonised the Voluntary Pensioner Rebate Policy?

 

BACKGROUND

 

1.      Paragraph 9.23 of Council’s Code of Meeting Practice states:

 

“Where a councillor or council employee to whom a question is put is unable to respond to the question at the meeting at which it is put, they may take it on notice and report the response to the next meeting of the Council.”

 

STAFF RESPONSE

 

2.      Staff responses to the questions taken on notice at the Council Meeting of 26 April 2021 are provided below:

 

Item

Subject

Councillor

Question

Response

Executive Director

12.3

Public Exhibition of the DPOP, Budget and Fees and Charges

Garrard

Does the Voluntary Pensioner Rebate Policy form part of the documents placed on public exhibition?

Has Council harmonised the Voluntary Pensioner Rebate Policy?

The Voluntary Pensioner Rebate Policy for the City of Parramatta was applicable to all ratepayers who satisfied the criteria from the date of amalgamations.

The Voluntary Pensioner Rebate Policy is found on Council’s website and has been included in the budget and forms part of the rates calculation in the Delivery Program & Operating Plan.

Executive Director, Corporate Services

 

 

Patricia Krzeminski

Governance Manager

 

Michael Tzimoulas

Executive Director Corporate Services

 

 

Brett Newman

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments: