DETERMINATION
The Parramatta Local Planning
Panel refuse DA/456/2020 for the following reasons:
1.
The proposed development
is inconsistent with the following provisions prescribed within Holroyd Local
Environmental Plan 2013:
i)
Clause
1.2 – the development is inconsistent with the aims of the Holroyd
Local Environmental Plan 2013.
ii)
Clause
2.3 - the development is inconsistent with the zone objectives of the R4 High
Density Residential zone.
iii)
Clause
5.10 – the development is inconsistent with the objectives of Clause
5.10 Heritage Conservation.
2.
The proposed development
is inconsistent with the following provisions prescribed within the Holroyd
Development Control Plan 2013:
i)
Part H, Section 1
– Development Requirements for Heritage Items
3.
The proposal fails to
satisfy the relevant considerations under Section 4.15(1)(c) Environmental
Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for built environment, suitability of the
site, and the public interest.
4.
The proposal fails to
satisfy the relevant considerations under Section 4.15(1)(e) Environmental
Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in that the adverse impacts generated by the
development due to non-compliances with the applicable planning controls is
not beneficial for the local community and as such, is not in the wider
public interest.
5.
The Panel finds that this
application and its heritage impact statement has failed to properly address
the impact on the heritage significance of the building noting in particular
that this item is in the vicinity of a number of other similar heritage
items.
6.
The Panel therefore refuses
the application and endorses the reasoning in the Council town planning
report, and agrees with the written objection.
The
Panel decision was unanimous
For: Mary-Lynne Taylor, Paul Berkemeier, Kirrily McDermott,
Tony Reed
Against: Nil
|