MINUTES
OF THE Meeting of City of Parramatta
Council HELD IN THE CLOISTER FUNCTION ROOMS, ST PATRICK’S
CATHEDRAL 1 MARIST PLACE, PARRAMATTA ON Monday,
9 November 2020 AT 6.30pm
PRESENT
The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors
Benjamin Barrak, Phil Bradley (6:32pm), Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Michelle
Garrard (Deputy Lord Mayor), Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies (6:33pm), Sameer
Pandey, Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill Tyrrell, Andrew Wilson, Lorraine Wearne and
Martin Zaiter.
1. OPENING
MEETING
The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, opened the meeting at 6.31pm.
2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
OF THE TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS
The
Lord Mayor, acknowledged the Burramattagal people of The Darug Nation as the
traditional custodians of this land, and paid respect to their ancient culture
and their elders past and present.
3. WEBCASTING
ANNOUNCEMENT
The Lord Mayor, advised that this public meeting is being
recorded and streamed live on the internet. The recording will also be archived
and made available on Council’s website.
4. OTHER
RECORDING OF MEETING ANOUNCEMENT
No other announcements were made.
5. CONFIRMATION
OF MINUTES
|
SUBJECT: Minutes
of the Council Meeting held on 26 October 2020
|
2964
|
RESOLVED (Esber/Tyrrell)
That the minutes be taken as read and be accepted as a true
record of the Meeting.
|
|
Note: Councillor Bradley arrived at 6:32pm during confirmation
the minutes of the Council Meeting held on 26 October 2020.
|
6. APOLOGIES/REQUESTS
FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE
There were no apologies or requests for leave of absence
made at this meeting.
7. DECLARATIONS
OF INTEREST
Councillor Barrak declared a non-pecuniary
and less than significant interest in Item 14.1 being Belmore Park Masterplan, as
he lives nearby at Sorrell Street, North Parramatta. He remained in the
Chamber during debate and voting on the matter.
Councillor Esber declared a pecuniary interest in Item 17.3 being
Draft Planning Strategy for North-East Planning Investigation Area, as his
office is located within the Planning Investigation Area. He retired from
the Chamber and took no part in the debate or vote thereon.
Councillor Esber declared a pecuniary interest in Item 17.5 being
Post-exhibition: Planning Proposal, Development Control Plan and Planning
Agreement for 12 Hassall Street, Parramatta, as he has family who worked
with the applicant. He retired from the Chamber and took no part in the
debate or vote thereon.
Councillor Zaiter declared a non-pecuniary but significant
interest in Item 17.3 being Draft Planning Strategy for North-East Planning
Investigation Area, as he provides accounting services for a client who may
have a potential relationship in the area under investigation. He retired
from the Chamber and took no part in the debate or vote thereon.
Note: Councillor Barrak arrived at 6:33pm during Declarations
of Interest.
8. Minutes of the Lord Mayor
8.1
|
SUBJECT National
Asbestos Awareness Week 2020
REFERENCE F2019/03630
- D07736252
REPORT OF Lord
Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer
|
2965
|
RESOLVED (Dwyer/Wilson)
(a) That Council notes that large amounts of asbestos are still
present in Australian homes, workplaces and the built environment. Homes
built or renovated before 1990 have a good chance of containing asbestos, as
do public and commercial buildings.
(b) That Council
notes that exposure to asbestos fibres can cause deadly cancers. There is no
known safe minimum level of exposure to asbestos fibres.
(c) That Council
notes that one way to be exposed to asbestos today is through Do-It-Yourself
(DIY) renovation or home maintenance activities. Furthermore, research shows
that during COVID-19 home improvements, maintenance and small jobs have
increased exponentially.
(d) That Council
notes the likelihood of asbestos being improperly disposed of in household
bins when residents are unaware of asbestos.
(e) That Council
participates in Asbestos Awareness Week 2020, 23-29 November 2020, and engage
in awareness-raising activities throughout the Council area during this time
through:
a. Website, media releases, social media campaign, Lord
Mayor’s column, internal and external publications.
(f) That Council note a review of Council’s asbestos
management and contaminated lands policies is currently underway, to ensure
they provide the most up to date information, as provided by State and
Federal governments and local government associations.
(g) Further, that Council write to the NSW Premier regarding the 2017 NSW
Ombudsman’s report into the state of asbestos management in NSW,
requesting the Premier advise Council and the community how the NSW
Government intends to implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations.
|
9. Public Forum
9.1
|
SUBJECT PUBLIC
FORUM 1 Rescission Motion: Item 18.1 Council Meeting 26 October 2020 - Tree
Canopy in Parramatta CBD
REFERENCE F2019/04433
- D07736488
FROM: Margaret McCartney
|
|
Speaking against
Rescission of Motion
Dear Lord Mayor and Councillors
I am speaking on behalf of
Epping Civic Trust. We object to this Rescission Motion.
When the original Motion was
passed at the October 26 Council meeting, our members and our wider community
were delighted. We applauded the Council for acting proactively to monitor,
manage and improve the tree canopy.
There is no doubt that something
has to be done. The tree canopy in the Parramatta LGA is being lost to
development at an alarming rate, and doing nothing, the effect of rescinding
this Motion, surely cannot be an option. Council may also find this work is
imperative once the NSW Government’s Draft Greener Places Design
Guide is implemented, as this document stipulates the tree canopy
percentages to be achieved.
I acknowledge some Councillors
have expressed concerns in relation to the costs for undertaking the Tree
Canopy Motion. However, in this era when the climate is warming and acting to
limit warming is a key global political issue, why would any Council want to
act against a Motion that will contribute to cooling of its LGA? Surely
the risks posed to residents, including death from high temperatures,
outweigh the costs.
I note Councillor Jefferies
expressed concerns that the Motion is “a back door” to make it
harder for residents to remove trees. I would like to advocate for it
to be seen as a positive step for increasing tree plantings rather than
blocking tree removal. It is about improving the environment for
current and future generations. It also represents a unique opportunity for
Councillors to review Council’s tree management systems and
processes.
This may even result in finding
ways in which to better utilise technology and thereby decrease running
costs. In any event, the Executive Director, City Assets and Operations
response indicates that much of the work required has already been started,
or is well underway.
Please consider the many
benefits of having trees in the communities you represent including how they
contribute greatly towards the amenity, property prices, wildlife habitat and
beauty of the LGA.
We strongly urge Councillors to
allow the original Motion of October 26 to stand so the reports proposed can
be undertaken. This represents good governance.
STAFF RESPONSE
No staff response
provided.
|
9.2
|
SUBJECT PUBLIC
FORUM 2 Item 17.2 Response to Submissions and Amended Proposal Report for the
Powerhouse Museum Parramatta
REFERENCE NCA/2/2020
- D07736899
FROM: Suzette
Meade
|
|
Members of North Parramatta Residents Action Group, heritage
experts from all over NSW strongly oppose the recent proposal to 'relocate'
Parramatta’s historic Willow Grove to an unidentified location within
the historic Cumberland Hospital site.
The reason Annie Gallagher an entrepreneurial Parramatta
business owner built Willow Grove in Phillip Street is that it was the
premier address for the commercial and professional class of Parramatta and
around the corner from her haberdashery business in Church Street.
In this week’s National Trust publication
Conservation Director (and architect) David
Burdon said “ We believe that a great deal of Willow
Grove’s significance relates directly to its location beside the
Parramatta River. In the 2017 Civic Link Framework Plan, Willow Grove and its
landscape setting was a fitting termination point to a 490m long, 20m wide
proposed new 'green, pedestrianised public space and cultural spine that
connects public life from the heart of Parramatta CBD to the River'.
Willow Grove is a cement rendered brick building, which will
suffer catastrophic damage should it be removed. Any relocated building will
effectively be a full-scale replica of brand new construction in order to
meet current building regulations. A few sad, salvaged elements will be all
that will remain.”
The significance of Willow Grove will be irrevocably
diminished by:
1. Loss of setting and dislocation of
historic context.
2. Loss of original fabric - most of the
bricks will not survive, the plaster is gone, the horsehair ceilings. Tiles
at risk of cracking. There would be so much replacement it would no longer be
considered a relocation or a minor reconstruction but a replica, what is left
lacks integrity and original fabric.
This is not a good conservation outcome.
With very little original fabric and no setting what is left?
Without the proponent , iNSW supplying any assessment of the
method of relocation, future location and the impact of the heritage
significance of Willow Grove, how can Parramatta Council conditionally
support the relocation of this heritage building - which is only described by
a mere sentence on the Mitigation Measure table in the response to
submissions report dated 8th October 2020.
Parramatta can have our heritage remain in its original setting
as the community are passionately fighting for and have a new museum in our
cities future. We do not have to choose between the two.
STAFF RESPONSE
No staff response
provided.
|
10. Petitions
10.1
|
SUBJECT Elevated
Zebra Crossing at Darcy Road Public School
REFERENCE F2020/03010
FROM Sameer
Pandey
|
|
A petition signed by the public was tabled at the Council
Meeting and reads:
“We have observed a significant increase in
pedestrian and motor vehicle traffic near Darcy Road Public School during
last 6 months. Many students who used to catch school bus are now being
dropped either by their parents by car or they are walking to school.
At the junction of Fyall Avenue and Darcy Road, there
is a kids park on one corner and a community center on another corner. There
is also a childcare across the road on Darcy Road at this juncture. All of
this results in increased pedestrian traffic specially during the school
times.
There are number of families and students crossing the
road at this junction in very unsafe conditions. Childcare staff carry the
children to the Cumberland highway Red light in order to cross at the signal.
P&C executives have been at this junction and
noticed the pedestrian traffic on multiple occasions.
As a result P&C is raising an online petition in this
matter which will be presented to council to propose a new elevated zebra
crossing at this place. This will create a more safer space for our kids,
students and families who lives in the vicinity.”
|
2966
|
RESOLVED (Pandey/Wilson)
That the petition be received and a copy of the petition be
circulated to all Councillors.
|
11. Rescission Motions
Note: The Lord Mayor vacated the Chair at 6:45pm prior to
consideration of Item 11.1.
The Deputy Lord Mayor, Councillor Garrard, assumed the
Chair at 6:45pm.
11.1
|
SUBJECT RESCISSION
MOTION: Item 18.1 Council Meeting 26 October 2020 - Tree Canopy in
Parramatta CBD
REFERENCE F2019/04433
- D07719561
REPORT OF Councillor
Dwyer
|
|
MOTION (Dwyer/Tyrrell)
That the
resolution of the Council held on 26 October 2020 in relation to Item 18.1 -
– Tree Canopy in Parramatta CBD, namely:
That Council:
1. Prepare a report, including a target
and timeframe, to prioritise tree canopy increase in Parramatta CBD which currently
has a very low proportion of tree canopy of between 10% to 12% compared to
our target of 40% across the Local Government Area.
2. Report on feasibility of a significant
tree register for both private and public trees including native trees 3-5m
high.
3. Provide a report on development
controls to monitor tree replacement and maintenance of newly planted trees
that were planted in newer developments as a result of removing existing
trees, including recommendations for improvement.
4. Provide a report on what we can do
through our DCP to incorporate and encourage private tree planting within the
CBD.
5. Provide a report, based on recent
investigation and research work, on types/species of trees that are suitable
to reduce urban heat.
6. Develop a community recognition program
for tree plantation.
7. Prepare a report on a community
recognition program for tree plantation.
8. Report on development of a program to
encourage local residents to volunteer for tree plantation and maintenance.
9. Prepare a report to be completed by
February 2021 outlining a strategy to:
i) improve the protection of trees
and heritage gardens within Heritage Conservation Areas across the LGA,
ii) increase street tree plantings
across the LGA. The report is to include possible State and Federal funding
sources.
iii) Implement a LGA wide education
program on the important role trees play in creating a sustainable, liveable
and cooler city while also adding value to real estate. The objective of the
education program is to dispel myths amongst residents about trees and native
wildlife, improve tree maintenance and tree selection while informing
residents about incentives including, but not limited to, the DPIE Free Tree
Giveaway and City of Parramatta tree program.
be and is
hereby rescinded.
|
|
Procedural Motion
|
2967
|
RESOLVED (Garrard/Dwyer)
That the meeting be adjourned for five (5) minutes.
|
Note: The meeting was adjourned at 7:22pm for a short
recess.
2968
|
RESOLVED (Garrard/Dwyer)
That the meeting resume.
|
The meeting resumed at 7:30pm with the following Councillors
in attendance: The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors Benjamin
Barrak, Phil Bradley, Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Michelle Garrard (Deputy Lord
Mayor), Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies, Sameer Pandey, Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill
Tyrrell, Andrew Wilson, Lorraine Wearne and Martin Zaiter.
|
The motion moved by Councillor Dwyer and seconded by Councillor
Tyrrell on being put was declared CARRIED on the Deputy Lord Mayor’s
Casting Vote.
|
2969
|
RESOLVED (Dwyer/Tyrrell)
That the resolution of the Council held on 26
October 2020 in relation to Item 18.1 - – Tree Canopy in Parramatta
CBD, namely:
That
Council:
1. Prepare a report,
including a target and timeframe, to prioritise tree canopy increase in
Parramatta CBD which currently has a very low proportion of tree canopy of
between 10% to 12% compared to our target of 40% across the Local Government
Area.
2. Report on
feasibility of a significant tree register for both private and public trees
including native trees 3-5m high.
3. Provide a report on
development controls to monitor tree replacement and maintenance of newly
planted trees that were planted in newer developments as a result of removing
existing trees, including recommendations for improvement.
4. Provide a report on
what we can do through our DCP to incorporate and encourage private tree planting
within the CBD.
5. Provide a report,
based on recent investigation and research work, on types/species of trees
that are suitable to reduce urban heat.
6. Develop a community
recognition program for tree plantation.
7. Prepare a report on
a community recognition program for tree plantation.
8. Report on
development of a program to encourage local residents to volunteer for tree
plantation and maintenance.
9. Prepare a report to
be completed by February 2021 outlining a strategy to:
i) improve the
protection of trees and heritage gardens within Heritage Conservation Areas
across the LGA,
ii) increase
street tree plantings across the LGA. The report is to include possible State
and Federal funding sources.
iii) Implement a LGA
wide education program on the important role trees play in creating a
sustainable, liveable and cooler city while also adding value to real estate.
The objective of the education program is to dispel myths amongst residents
about trees and native wildlife, improve tree maintenance and tree selection
while informing residents about incentives including, but not limited to, the
DPIE Free Tree Giveaway and City of Parramatta tree program.
be
and is hereby rescinded.
|
Note: The Lord Mayor resumed the Chair at 7:47pm after consideration
of Item 11.1.
|
Procedural Motion
|
2970
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Esber)
That Items 12.1, 12.2, 13.1 and 14.1 be resolved en bloc.
|
12. Fair
12.1
|
SUBJECT FOR
NOTATION: Minutes of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory
Committee meetings held on 28 July and 25 August 2020
REFERENCE F2017/00358
- D07683938
REPORT OF Community
Capacity Building Officer
|
2971
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Esber)
(a) That Council
note the minutes of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory
Committee Meetings held on 28 July and 25 August 2020
(b) That Council
note the resignation of two Advisory Committee members in August 2020 and the
Committee’s resolution to continue with ten (10) members until the
dissolution of the Committee on 3 September 2021.
(c) Further, that Council note
the Committee’s resolution that it gives its in‑principle support
to the City of Parramatta Draft Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Employment Strategy 2020-2023, welcomes the current effort and looks forward
to receiving the results of its implementation in due course.
|
12.2
|
SUBJECT FOR
NOTATION: Variations to Standards under Clause 4.6 of Parramatta LEP 2011,
Auburn LEP 2010, Holroyd LEP 2013, The Hills LEP 2012, Hornsby LEP 2013 and
SEPP 1
REFERENCE F2009/00431 - D07250477
REPORT OF Group Manager -
Development and Traffic Services
|
2972
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Esber)
That the report be received and noted.
|
13. Accessible
13.1
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Outdoor Dining Policy Workshop - Request to Defer
REFERENCE F2017/01168
- D07678943
REPORT OF Group
Manager Regulatory Services
|
2973
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Esber)
(a) That Council
resolve to agree to postpone the previously requested workshop to review the
Outdoor Dining Policy, initially resolved at the Council meeting of 9
September 2019, Item 19.1, until the completion of the Parramatta Light Rail
(PLR) construction phase (proposed between June-Sept 21) on Church Street.
(b) That the Outdoor
Dining Enforcement Policy also be included in the workshop review at the same
time as the Outdoor Dining Policy.
|
14. Green
14.1
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Belmore Park Masterplan
REFERENCE F2019/03574
- D07687401
REPORT OF Manager
Open Space and Natural Resources
|
2974
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Esber)
(a) That the draft
Belmore Park Masterplan Report (Attachment 1) be placed on public exhibition
for 28 days in the City of Parramatta Library, Council’s Customer
Service Centre and on Council’s website.
(b) That temporary
signage be placed at Belmore Park advising of the public exhibition period.
(c) That sporting
user groups, associations, community groups, adjoining residents and members
of the community who previously provided contact details for further project
updates be directly notified of the exhibition period.
(d) Further, that a report be
submitted to Council upon the completion of the public exhibition period for
consideration and assessment of the public submissions.
|
|
Note: Councillor Barrak declared a non-pecuniary and
less than significant interest in this matter and remained in the Chamber during
consideration and voting on the matter.
|
15. Welcoming
Nil
16. Thriving
Nil
17. Innovative
17.1
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Establishment of the 5/7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group
REFERENCE F2016/06643
- D07669104
REPORT OF Construction
Manager
|
|
MOTION (Tyrrell/Issa)
(a) That Council
approve the establishment of the 5 & 7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group
as an advisory group of Council as outlined in this report.
(b) That Council
appoint the Lord Mayor of the day and Councillors Garrard, Issa and Wilson
(with Councillors Pandey and Zaiter as Alternates), along with the Director,
Property & Place and Executive Director, Community Services to the 5
& 7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group for the period of the current
Council term.
(c) Further, that the Terms of
Reference for the 5 & 7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group be adopted by
Council as per Attachment 1 of this report.
|
|
AMENDMENT (Esber/Wearne)
(a) That Council
approve the establishment of the 5 & 7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group
as an advisory group of Council as outlined in this report.
(b) That Council
appoint all interested Councillors, along with the Director, Property &
Place and Executive Director, Community Services to the 5 & 7 Parramatta
Square Advisory Group for the period of the current Council term.
(c) Further, that the Terms of
Reference for the 5 & 7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group be adopted by
Council as per Attachment 1 of this report.
The amendment moved by Councillor Esber and seconded by
Councillor Wearne on being put was declared LOST on the Lord Mayor’s Casting
Vote.
The motion moved by Councillor Tyrrell and seconded by
Councillor Issa on being put was declared CARRIED on the Lord Mayor’s
Casting Vote.
|
2975
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Issa)
(a) That Council
approve the establishment of the 5 & 7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group
as an advisory group of Council as outlined in this report.
(b) That Council
appoint the Lord Mayor of the day and Councillors Garrard, Issa and Wilson
(with Councillors Pandey and Zaiter as Alternates), along with the Director,
Property & Place and Executive Director, Community Services to the 5
& 7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group for the period of the current
Council term.
(c) Further, that the Terms of
Reference for the 5 & 7 Parramatta Square Advisory Group be adopted by
Council as per Attachment 1 of this report.
Note: A Notice of Motion of
Rescission signed by Councillors Esber, Prociv and Pandey was lodged after
the close of the meeting in relation to this matter.
|
|
Note: Councillors Bradley and Wearne requested that
their names be recorded as having voted against the decision taken on this matter.
|
17.2
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Response to Submissions and Amended Proposal Report for the
Powerhouse Parramatta
REFERENCE NCA/2/2020
- D07700078
REPORT OF City
Transformation Manager
|
|
MOTION (Prociv/Davis)
(a) That
Council reaffirm its support for a museum noting the significant investment
in new cultural infrastructure, jobs and the economy of Sydney’s
Central River City.
(b) That
Council note the Proponent’s Response seeks to retain St George’s
Terraces and relocate Willow Grove, as an alternative to its demolition.
(c) That
Council note the Response does not include sufficient information on the
method of relocation, future location or the impact of the heritage
significance of Willow Grove to allow for an assessment of the proposed
relocation and therefore Council does not support the relocation of Willow
Grove and reaffirms its support for the retention of Willow Grove and St
George’s Terraces as part of the museum design.
(d) That
Council approve the letter (at Attachment 1) to the DPIE replying to the
Response and note the letter includes:
i. several
design concerns including, but not limited to, flooding impacts, the
undercroft, the podium landscape and the public domain; and
ii. other
matters including Civic Link and the interface with Council land.
(e) Further,
that Council approve the following amendments to the letter (at
Attachment 1):
i. Council’s
position that Willow Grove and St George’s Terrace be retained in their
current location and incorporated into the redesign of the building; and
ii. confirmation
that Council receives and notes the recommendations of the Heritage Advisory
Committee meeting of 22 October 2020 when it reiterated its previous position
of opposing the relocation of Willow Grove in reply to Infrastructure
NSW’s ‘Response to Submissions and Amended Proposal
Report’.
iii. Council’s
opposition of further reduction of the 20 metre wide Civic Link from 13.5m to
11.5m between the Museum’s Eastern and Western Buildings.
|
|
AMENDMENT (Tyrrell/Zaiter)
(a) That
Council reaffirm its support for the Powerhouse Parramatta noting the
significant investment in new cultural infrastructure, jobs and the economy
of Sydney’s Central River City.
(b) That
Council note the Proponent’s Response seeks to retain St George’s
Terraces and relocate Willow Grove, as an alternative to its demolition.
(c) That
Council note the Response does not include sufficient information on the
method of relocation, future location or the impact of the heritage
significance of Willow Grove to allow for an assessment of the proposed
relocation.
(d) That,
if the Proponent’s final submission proposes to relocate Willow Grove,
then Council conditionally support the relocation of Willow Grove, rather
than its demolition, subject to an assessment of the method of relocation,
future location and the impact of the heritage significance of Willow Grove.
(e) That
Council approve the letter (at Attachment 1) to the DPIE replying to the
Response and note the letter includes:
a. the
conditional support set out above in paragraph (d);
b. several
design concerns including flooding impacts, the undercroft, the podium
landscape and the public domain;
c. other
matters including Civic Link and the interface with Council land.
(f) That
Council acknowledges City of Parramatta long connection with heritage and our
desire to retain those connections where possible.
(g) That
Council acknowledges and gives unconditional support in that the only current
suitable location for the Powerhouse Museum is its current proposed location
and no other location within the City of Parramatta has immediate connections
for transport, Schools, workers, businesses and the community. Any other
proposed location would ensure that the Museum would be a white elephant and
not reach its full potential.
(h) That
if we are faced with no other choice with the complete demolition and loss of
Willow Grove or relocation as proposed by the NSW State Government, Council
gives unconditional support to the said relocation.
(i)
That while Council acknowledges a number of submissions in
response to the EIS against the proposed Powerhouse Museum, it should be
acknowledged that the vast majority of these submissions were from outside of
Parramatta LGA and while important should carry minimal weight than the
submissions received from within the Parramatta LGA. It’s must be
acknowledged that the current population of the Parramatta LGA is
approximately 234,000 and that the vast majority did not provide submissions.
(j) That
Council congratulate and acknowledge the dedication and hard work of the NSW
State Government and in particular Minister Harwin for seeing this project
through to completion.
(k) That
Council encourages the NSW State Government works to resolve the outstanding
issues raised by Council and proceed with the project as a matter of urgency
to not only bring jobs to Parramatta but to deliver this world class
institution to the people of Western Sydney.
(l) Further
that, without further delay, the proposed letter attached to the motion
be amended to reflect Council’s position and that this letter be signed
by the Lord Mayor and CEO and the Lord Mayor also write to the parties
mentioned above advising them of Council’s position.
|
|
Note:
1. Councillor
Esber left the Chamber at 8:33pm and returned at 8:38pm during consideration
of this matter.
3. Councillor
Pandey left the Chamber at 8:33pm and returned at 8:36pm during consideration
of this matter.
4. Councillor
Zaiter left the Chamber at 8:33pm and returned at 8:33pm during consideration
of this matter.
5. Councillor
Issa left the Chamber at 8:35pm and returned at 8:39pm during consideration
of this matter.
|
|
Procedural Motion
|
2976
|
RESOLVED (Esber/Tyrrell)
That the meeting be adjourned for ten (10) minutes.
|
Note: The meeting was adjourned at 8:51pm for a short
recess.
|
Procedural Motion
|
2977
|
RESOLVED (Esber/Tyrrell)
That the meeting resume.
|
The meeting resumed at 8:58pm with the following Councillors
in attendance: The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors Benjamin
Barrak (9.00pm), Phil Bradley (8.59pm), Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Michelle
Garrard (Deputy Lord Mayor), Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies, Sameer Pandey
(9.00pm), Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill Tyrrell, Andrew Wilson (9.00pm), Lorraine
Wearne and Martin Zaiter.
|
The amendment moved by Councillor Tyrrell and seconded by
Councillor Zaiter on being put was declared CARRIED on the Lord Mayor’s
Casting Vote.
The amendment then became the motion.
The motion moved by Councillor Tyrrell and seconded by
Councillor Zaiter on being put was declared CARRIED on the Lord Mayor’s
Casting Vote.
|
2978
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Zaiter)
(a) That Council reaffirm its
support for the Powerhouse Parramatta noting the significant investment in
new cultural infrastructure, jobs and the economy of Sydney’s Central
River City.
(b) That Council note the
Proponent’s Response seeks to retain St George’s Terraces and
relocate Willow Grove, as an alternative to its demolition.
(c) That Council note the
Response does not include sufficient information on the method of relocation,
future location or the impact of the heritage significance of Willow Grove to
allow for an assessment of the proposed relocation.
(d) That, if the
Proponent’s final submission proposes to relocate Willow Grove, then
Council conditionally support the relocation of Willow Grove, rather than its
demolition, subject to an assessment of the method of relocation, future
location and the impact of the heritage significance of Willow Grove.
(e) That Council approve the
letter (at Attachment 1) to the DPIE replying to the Response and note the
letter includes:
a. the conditional support set
out above in paragraph (d);
b. several design concerns
including flooding impacts, the undercroft, the podium landscape and the
public domain;
c. other matters including Civic
Link and the interface with Council land.
(f) That Council
acknowledges City of Parramatta long connection with heritage and our desire
to retain those connections where possible.
(g) That Council acknowledges
and gives unconditional support in that the only current suitable location
for the Powerhouse Museum is its current proposed location and no other
location within the City of Parramatta has immediate connections for
transport, Schools, workers, businesses and the community. Any other proposed
location would ensure that the Museum would be a white elephant and not reach
its full potential.
(h) That if we are faced with no
other choice with the complete demolition and loss of Willow Grove or
relocation as proposed by the NSW State Government, Council gives
unconditional support to the said relocation.
(i)
That
while Council acknowledges a number of submissions in response to the EIS
against the proposed Powerhouse Museum, it should be acknowledged that the
vast majority of these submissions were from outside of Parramatta LGA and
while important should carry minimal weight than the submissions received
from within the Parramatta LGA. It’s must be acknowledged that the
current population of the Parramatta LGA is approximately 234,000 and that
the vast majority did not provide submissions.
(j) That Council
congratulate and acknowledge the dedication and hard work of the NSW State
Government and in particular Minister Harwin for seeing this project through
to completion.
(k) That Council encourages the
NSW State Government works to resolve the outstanding issues raised by
Council and proceed with the project as a matter of urgency to not only bring
jobs to Parramatta but to deliver this world class institution to the people
of Western Sydney.
(l) Further that, without
further delay, the proposed letter attached to the motion be amended to
reflect Council’s position and that this letter be signed by the Lord
Mayor and CEO and the Lord Mayor also write to the parties mentioned above advising
them of Council’s position.
Note: A Notice of Motion of
Rescission signed by Councillors Prociv, Bradley and Pandey was lodged after
the close of the meeting in relation to this matter.
|
|
Note: Councillor Bradley requested that his name be
recorded as having voted against the decision taken on this matter.
|
|
Procedural Motion
|
2979
|
RESOLVED (Esber/Tyrrell)
That Council amend the order of business to consider Item
17.4 prior to Item 17.3.
|
17.4
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Gateway Request: Planning Proposal for land at 112 Wharf Road and
30 & 32 Waratah Street, Melrose Park and 82 Hughes Avenue, Ermington
REFERENCE RZ/1/2020
- D07680403
APPLICANT/S Holdmark Property Group
OWNERS Holdmark
Property Group
REPORT OF Senior Project Officer
Land Use Planning
|
2980
|
RESOLVED (Esber/Tyrrell)
(a) That Council
approve the Planning Proposal at Attachment 1 for the purposes of it being
forwarded to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) to
request the issuing of a Gateway Determination which seeks to amend
Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 by:
1. Rezoning 112 Wharf
Road, 32 Waratah Street and 82 Hughes Avenue from IN1 General Industrial to
part R4 High Density Residential and part RE1 Public Recreation.
2. Rezoning 30 Waratah
Street from IN1 General Industrial to RE1 Public Recreation.
3. Amending the maximum
building height from 12m to a combination of 34m, 45m and 77m (approximately
8, 12 and 22 storeys respectively).
4. Amending the Floor
Space Ratio (FSR) on the East site from 1:1 to 1.66:1.
5. Amending
the FSR on the West site from 1:1 to 1.79:1.
6. Inserting a
site-specific provision in Part 6 Additional local provisions –
generally of PLEP 2011 and amending the Additional Local Provisions map
to include the land to ensure:
6. 1 That design excellence provisions
be applicable to buildings of 55m and above in height without the provision
of bonuses.
6.2 A minimum of 1,000m2 of
non-residential floor space is to be provided within the site to serve the
local retail and commercial needs of the incoming population.
7. Amending the Land
Reservation Acquisition map to reflect areas of open space to be dedicated to
Council.
8. Inserting
provisions into PLEP 2011 to ensure that the number of dwellings approved at
the development application stage aligns with the delivery of the required
infrastructure as identified by Council and in the Transport Management and
Accessibility Plan (TMAP) as per the implementation plans endorsed by Council
on 12 August 2019.
9. Amending
Schedule 1 Additional Permitted Uses to permit ‘food and drink
premises’ in the R4 High Density Residential zone.
(b) That the
Planning Proposal be forwarded to the DPIE for a Gateway determination.
(c) That a
site-specific Development Control Plan (DCP) be prepared and reported to
Council prior to formal exhibition of the Planning Proposal.
(d) That Council
delegates authority to the CEO to commence negotiations to enter into a
planning agreement with the applicant in relation to infrastructure provision
required to support the proposal and that any planning agreement entered into
is:
1. in addition to
developer contributions payable; and
2. reported to
Council prior to public exhibition.
(e) That the site-specific
DCP and Planning Agreement be publicly exhibited concurrently with the
Planning Proposal should Gateway determination be issued.
(f) That
Council advises the DPIE that the Chief Executive Officer will not be seeking
to exercise the plan-making delegations for this Planning Proposal as
authorised by Council on 26 November 2012.
(g) That Council
note the Local Planning Panel’s advice to Council is in support of the
Planning Proposal (refer to Attachment 1), which is consistent with
the Council Officer’s recommendation in the report.
(h) Further, that
Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to correct any
minor anomalies of a non-policy and administrative nature that may arise
during the plan-making process.
DIVISION A
division was called, the result being:
AYES: Councillors Barrak, Dwyer, Esber, Garrard, Issa,
Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell and Zaiter
NOES: Councillors Bradley, Davis, Wearne and Wilson
|
Note:
1. Councillor
Esber declared a pecuniary interest in Item 17.3 and left the Chamber at 9:23pm
prior to consideration of the matter and did not take part in the debate or
vote thereon.
2. Councillor
Zaiter declared a non-pecuniary but significant interest in Item 17.3 and left
the Chamber at 9:23pm prior to consideration of the matter and did not take
part in the debate or vote thereon.
17.3
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Draft Planning Strategy for North-East Planning Investigation Area
REFERENCE F2020/01908
- D07679908
REPORT OF Team
Leader –Land Use Planning
|
|
MOTION (Issa/Tyrrell)
(a) That
Council endorse the Draft Planning Strategy for the North-East Planning
Investigation Area provided at Attachment 1 for the purposes of public
exhibition (noting that it contains six (6) built form options).
(b) That
the Draft Planning Strategy for the North-East Planning Investigation Area
(PIA) be publicly exhibited for a minimum period of 28 days and that Council
use the following engagement tools and methods at a minimum:
i. Notification
letters to landowners and occupiers (including owners and occupiers of
individual apartments within strata buildings) inside the North-East PIA
boundary; and landowners and occupiers within a 200m buffer of the North-East
PIA boundary;
ii. Consultation
with Council’s Heritage Advisory Committee;
iii. Consultation
with relevant public authorities, including the Department of Planning,
Industry and Environment (DPIE), Transport for NSW and the NSW Heritage
Office;
iv. Copy
of the exhibition documents at Council’s Customer Service Centre and
Parramatta Library;
v. Public
notice on City of Parramatta corporate website, and ‘Participate
Parramatta’ City of Parramatta Council website; and
vi. Free
text response to enable an online submission.
(c) That
Council delegate authority to the CEO to correct any minor anomalies or
errors of a non-policy and administrative nature relating to the Draft
Planning Strategy prior to exhibition.
(d) Further,
that a subsequent report be prepared to Council detailing the outcomes of
the public exhibition period, the findings of the economic feasibility
study and an assessment of the planning merits.
|
|
AMENDMENT (Davis/Barrak)
(a) That Council endorse
the Draft Planning Strategy for the North-East Planning Investigation Area
provided at Attachment 1 for the purposes of public exhibition (noting
that it contains six (6) built form options).
(b) That
the Draft Planning Strategy for the North-East Planning Investigation Area
(PIA) be publicly exhibited for a minimum period of 28 days and that Council
use the following engagement tools and methods at a minimum:
i. Notification
letters to landowners and occupiers (including owners and occupiers of
individual apartments within strata buildings) inside the North-East PIA
boundary and landowners and occupiers within a 200m buffer of the North-East
PIA boundary;
ii. Consultation
with Council’s Heritage Advisory Committee;
iii. Consultation
with relevant public authorities, including the Department of Planning,
Industry and Environment (DPIE), Transport for NSW and the NSW Heritage
Office;
iv. Copy
of the exhibition documents at Council’s Customer Service Centre and
Parramatta Library;
v. Public
notice on City of Parramatta corporate website, and ‘Participate
Parramatta’ City of Parramatta Council website;
vi. Free
text response to enable an online submission;
vii. “Phone
A Planner” during the period of exhibition;
viii. Incorporate
a video on the website of a narrated slideshow;
ix. Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQ) to be included on the website;
x. Explore
the possibility of a Notice of Public Exhibition to be placed in the
Parramatta News and Parramatta Times; and
Xi. Include in this website area and
exhibited Appendix 1, the related recommendations of the Department of
Planning commissioned GML Heritage independent Peer Review.
(c) That Council
delegate authority to the CEO to correct any minor anomalies or errors of a
non-policy and administrative nature relating to the Draft Planning Strategy
prior to exhibition.
(d) Further,
that a subsequent report be prepared to Council detailing the outcomes of
the public exhibition period, the findings of the economic feasibility study
and an assessment of the built form options against the weighted assessment
criteria described in Section 7 of the Draft Planning Strategy, together with
an updated Draft Planning Strategy (including a single recommended option).
The amendment moved by Councillor Davis and seconded by
Councillor Barrak on being put was declared CARRIED.
DIVISION A
division was called, the result being:
AYES: Councillors
Barrak, Bradley, Davis, Pandey, Prociv, Wearne and Wilson
NOES: Councillors
Dwyer, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies and Tyrrell
The amendment
then became the motion.
The motion moved by Councillor Davis and seconded by
Councillor Barrak on being put was declared CARRIED.
DIVISION A
division was called, the result being:
AYES: Councillors
Barrak, Bradley, Davis, Pandey, Prociv, Wearne and Wilson
NOES: Councillors
Dwyer, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies and Tyrrell
|
2981
|
RESOLVED (Davis/Barrak)
(a) That
Council endorse the Draft Planning Strategy for the North-East Planning
Investigation Area provided at Attachment 1 for the purposes of public
exhibition (noting that it contains six (6) built form options).
(b) That the Draft Planning
Strategy for the North-East Planning Investigation Area (PIA) be publicly
exhibited for a minimum period of 28 days and that Council use the following
engagement tools and methods at a minimum:
i. Notification letters to
landowners and occupiers (including owners and occupiers of individual
apartments within strata buildings) inside the North-East PIA boundary and
landowners and occupiers within a 200m buffer of the North-East PIA boundary;
ii. Consultation with
Council’s Heritage Advisory Committee;
iii. Consultation with relevant
public authorities, including the Department of Planning, Industry and
Environment (DPIE), Transport for NSW and the NSW Heritage Office;
iv. Copy of the exhibition
documents at Council’s Customer Service Centre and Parramatta Library;
v. Public notice on City of
Parramatta corporate website, and ‘Participate Parramatta’ City
of Parramatta Council website;
vi. Free text response to enable
an online submission;
vii. “Phone A Planner”
during the period of exhibition;
viii. Incorporate a video on the website of a
narrated slideshow;
ix. Frequently Asked Questions
(FAQ) to be included on the website;
x. Explore the possibility of a
Notice of Public Exhibition to be placed in the Parramatta News and
Parramatta Times; and
Xi. Include in this website area and exhibited Appendix
1, the related recommendations of the Department of Planning commissioned GML
Heritage independent Peer Review.
(c) That
Council delegate authority to the CEO to correct any minor anomalies or
errors of a non-policy and administrative nature relating to the Draft
Planning Strategy prior to exhibition.
(d) Further, that a
subsequent report be prepared to Council detailing the outcomes of the public
exhibition period, the findings of the economic feasibility study and an
assessment of the built form options against the weighted assessment criteria
described in Section 7 of the Draft Planning Strategy, together with an
updated Draft Planning Strategy (including a single recommended option).
|
Note: Councillor Zaiter returned to the Chamber at
9:59pm after consideration of Item 17.3.
17.5
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Post-exhibition: Planning Proposal, Development Control Plan and
Planning Agreement for 12 Hassall Street, Parramatta
REFERENCE RZ/15/2016
- D07251579
REPORT OF A/Team
Leader Land Use Planning
|
2982
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Issa)
(a) That Council
receives and notes the submissions made during the public exhibition of the
Planning Proposal, draft Development Control Plan (DCP) and draft Planning
Agreement at 12 Hassall Street, Parramatta (a summary of submissions is
provided at Attachment 1).
(b) That Council
endorse for finalisation the Planning Proposal for land at 12 Hassall Street,
Parramatta (provided at Attachment 2, and subject to the clarification
outlined in b.iii.C below), which seeks to amend Parramatta Local
Environmental Plan 2011 as follows:
i. Increase
maximum building height (HOB) from 72 metres to 192 metres
ii. Increase
the mapped floor-space ratio (FSR) control from 8:1 to 14.5:1
iii. Add site
specific provisions which allow for a maximum total of 16:1 FSR inclusive of
all bonuses as follows:
A. That the mapped
FSR of 14.5:1 is inclusive of the Design Excellence bonus under Clause 7.10
of PLEP 2011.
B. Requirement for a
minimum 1:1 Commercial FSR to be provided within the mapped 14.5:1 FSR.
C. Provision of a
0.5:1 FSR bonus provided high-performing buildings standards are met (including
clarification prior to submitting for finalisation that the bonus only
applies in the case of a mixed-use residential development, and that the
standards for other land uses are mandatory).
D. Provision
outlining an additional 1:1 FSR for non-residential floor-space
iv. Add a
site-specific clause which requires the development to demonstrate
appropriate transition to nearby heritage items or conservation areas.
v. Provision outlining
a maximum parking rate for residential and commercial/community uses as
follows:
1. Residential uses:
Studios – 0.1 spaces/dwelling
1 bedroom – 0.3 spaces/dwelling
2 bedroom – 0.7 spaces/dwelling
3+ bedrooms – 1 space/dwelling
2. Commercial/community uses:
M= (G x A) / (50 x T) where
M is the maximum number of parking spaces
G is the gross floor area of all commercial and community
uses in the building in sqm
A is the site area in square metres and
T is the total gross floor area of all buildings on the
site in sqm
vi. Inclusion of a
satisfactory arrangements clause to enable the funding of state
infrastructure (as required by the Gateway determination for this Planning
Proposal)
vii. Amend Clause 7.6
Airspace Operations of the Parramatta LEP 2011 to ensure Clause 7.6 applies
to this site by inserting the site area on the Special Provisions Area Map in
the LEP.
(c) That Council
submit the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Industry and
Environment (DPIE) for finalisation once Council has endorsed the DCP for
finalisation and the Planning Agreement has been executed by Council.
(d) That Council
endorse the DCP at Attachment 3 for finalisation and insertion into Section
4.3.3 – Parramatta City Centre of Parramatta Development Control Plan
2011, subject to amendments to the controls relating to car parking and
access.
(e) That Council
delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to finalise the draft
Planning Agreement at Attachment 4, and to sign the Planning Agreement on
Council’s behalf.
(f) That
Council officers write to DPIE to advise them of Council’s resolution
on this matter and to request that DPIE considers commencing finalisation processes
(such as legal drafting and map-making) prior to the formal submission of the
Planning Proposal referred to in c. above. (Note: The reason for making this
request is to expedite plan-making processes.)
(g) That Council
delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to make any minor
amendments and corrections of a non-policy and administrative nature that may
arise during the plan amendment process, relating to the Planning Proposal,
Development Control Plan and Planning Agreement.
(h) Further, that
Council note that the Parramatta Local Planning Panel’s advice to
Council (Attachment 5) is consistent with the recommendations of this report.
DIVISION A
division was called, the result being:
AYES: Councillors Barrak, Dwyer, Garrard, Issa, Jefferies,
Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell, Wearne and Zaiter
NOES: Councillors Bradley, Davis and Wilson
|
|
Note:
1. Councillor
Garrard left the Chamber at 10pm and returned at 10:02pm during consideration
of this matter.
2. Councillor
Esber returned to the Chamber at 10:03pm after consideration of Item 17.5
|
18. Notices of Motion
18.1
|
SUBJECT NOTICE
OF MOTION: Safety of Pedestrians and Food Delivery Bike Riders
REFERENCE F2019/04433
- D07721514
FROM Councillor Pandey
|
2983
|
RESOLVED (Pandey/Barrak)
(a) That Council note:
(i) Community concerns related to the safety of delivery
riders and pedestrians within the City of Parramatta.
(ii) Council
note the risks from traffic, accidents and fatalities related to food
delivery bike riders in Sydney in recent times.
(iii) Increase
in food delivery bike riders due to COVID-19.
(iv) Concerns
raised by residents for delivery riders use of footpaths. The riding of
bicycles on the footpath poses a safety hazard to pedestrians, particularly
those with limited mobility, the visually impaired and parents with prams.
(b) Further,
that a report be provided on:
(i) Safety and Community awareness measures that council may
implement to improve the safety of pedestrians and delivery riders.
(ii) Current
relevant programs to improve awareness and safety.
(iii) Role
of council in enforcing NSW Road Rule 250 in collaboration with LAC.
(iv) Educational
and signage programs on safe riding to be conducted with providers of food
delivery rider platforms such as Menulog, UberEats, Deliveroo, Dominos and
other major providers.
(v) Means of direct engagement with riders, given the fact
that food delivery platforms have not been proactive and have not shown
interest in rider and community safety.
(vi) The feasibility of registration of
cyclists in consultation with State Government.
|
19. Questions with Notice
19.1
|
SUBJECT QUESTIONS
WITH NOTICE: Questions Taken On Notice from Council Meeting - 26 October 2020
REFERENCE F2019/04433
- D07718987
FROM Governance Manager
|
QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE FROM THE COUNCIL MEETING OF
26 OCTOBER 2020
Item
|
Subject
|
Councillor
|
Question
|
Response
|
Executive Director
|
14.1
|
Single Use Plastics
|
Issa
|
1.
What has this program cost
Council since September 2018, excluding grants?
2.
What is the breakdown of
resources that apply to the recommendations outlined in the report?
|
This matter was deferred
for a report detailing further information. A response to these
questions will be incorporated into that report, anticipated to be reported
to Council at the 30 November Council Meeting.
|
John Warburton
|
17.1
|
Post Exhibition:
Development Control Plan for land at 2 O’Connell Street, Parramatta
|
Bradley
|
1.
What minor administrative
changes were being made to finalising the planning agreement in readiness
of execution (reference paragraph 14 of the report)?
|
The administrative changes
referred to in the report relate to the description of the Local
Environmental Plan amendment being sought under the Planning
Proposal. The changes involve correcting the wording in the Planning
Agreement to match the Planning Proposal as endorsed by Council. The
changes are administrative in nature and within the parameters set by
Council’s resolution on 11 May 2020 that Council authorise the Chief
Executive Officer to make any minor amendments and corrections of a
non-policy and administrative nature that may arise during the plan
amendment process relating to the Planning Proposal, DCP and Planning
Agreement.
|
Jennifer Concato
|
18.1
|
NOM: Tree Canopy in
Parramatta CBD
|
Zaiter
|
1.
Under the current tree day
program, where residents can attend the nursery and be provided with 2 x trees,
what is the cost to Council for this current program?
|
Council currently runs two
free tree giveaways a year, these events are held at Council’s
Cowells Lane Nursery located in Ermington. The events runs from
8:00am to 12:00pm and are held on the first Saturday of March and the first
Saturday of September. Under the program residents are entitled to receive
two trees at each event. The total cost to run each event is approximately
$6,000. The total cost each financial year is approximately $12,000.
|
John Warburton
|
|
20. CLOSED SESSION
2984
|
RESOLVED (Tyrrell/Esber)
That members of the press and public be excluded
from the meeting of the Closed Session and access to the correspondence and
reports relating to the items considered during the course of the Closed
Session be withheld. This action is taken in accordance with Section 10A(s)
of the Local Government Act, 1993 as the items listed come within the
following provisions:-
1 FOR
APPROVAL: Tender 15/2020 North Rocks Road at Alkira Road, Carlingford - Road
Widening, Traffic Signal Installation and associated works. (D07564217) - This
report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local
Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a
confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial
position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage
on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.
2 FOR
APPROVAL: Tender 17/2020 Supply and Installation of LED Sports Lighting and
Associated Works at Carlingford High School Oval, Carlingford. (D07669717) - This
report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local
Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if
disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is
conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
|
|
Procedural Motion
|
2985
|
RESOLVED (Bradley/Jefferies)
That Items 20.1 and 20.2 be
resolved en bloc.
|
20.1
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Tender 15/2020 North Rocks Road at Alkira Road, Carlingford - Road
Widening, Traffic Signal Installation and associated works
REFERENCE F2019/04434
- D07564217
REPORT OF Manager
Capital Projects
|
2986
|
RESOLVED (Bradley/Jefferies)
(a) That Council approve the appointment of the preferred proponent for the road
widening, traffic signal installation and associated works at North Rocks
Road at Alkira Road, Carlingford for the contract sum as outlined in
paragraph 17 of the report.
(b) That all unsuccessful
tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in this matter.
(c) Further, that Council
delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to finalise and execute all
necessary documents.
|
20.2
|
SUBJECT FOR
APPROVAL: Tender 17/2020 Supply and Installation of LED Sports Lighting and
Associated Works at Carlingford High School Oval, Carlingford
REFERENCE F2020/01893
- D07669717
REPORT OF Manager
Capital Projects
|
2987
|
RESOLVED (Bradley/Jefferies)
(a) That Council approve the appointment of the preferred
proponent for the supply and installation of LED Sports Lighting and
associated work at Carlingford High School Oval, Roselea Way, Carlingford for
the contract sum as outlined in paragraph 15 of the report.
(b) That all
unsuccessful tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in this matter.
(c) Further, that
Council delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to finalise and
execute all necessary documents.
|
|
Procedural Motion
|
2988
|
RESOLVED (Esber/Tyrrell)
That the meeting resume into Open Session.
|
21. REPORTS OF RESOLUTIONS PASSED IN CLOSED
SESSION
The Chief Executive Officer read out the resolutions for
Items 20.1 and 20.2.
22. CONCLUSION OF MEETING
The meeting terminated at 10:23pm.
THIS PAGE AND
THE PRECEDING 25 PAGES ARE THE MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MONDAY,
9 NOVEMBER 2020 AND CONFIRMED ON MONDAY, 30 NOVEMBER 2020.
Chairperson