MINUTES OF THE Meeting of City of Parramatta Council HELD IN THE CLOISTER FUNCTION ROOMS, ST PATRICK’S CATHEDRAL 1 MARIST PLACE, PARRAMATTA ON Monday, 10 February 2020 AT 6.30pm
These are draft minutes and are subject to confirmation by Council at its next meeting. The confirmed minutes will replace this draft version on the website once confirmed.
PRESENT
The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer and Councillors Benjamin Barrak (6:38pm), Phil Bradley (6:32pm), Donna Davis, Pierre Esber, Michelle Garrard (Deputy Lord Mayor), Paul Han, Steven Issa, Andrew Jefferies (6:49pm), Sameer Pandey, Dr Patricia Prociv, Bill Tyrrell, Andrew Wilson (6:32pm), Lorraine Wearne and Martin Zaiter.
1. OPENING MEETING
The Lord Mayor, Councillor Bob Dwyer, opened the meeting at 6.30pm.
2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS
The Lord Mayor, Councillor Dwyer, acknowledged the Burramattagal people of The Darug Nation as the traditional custodians of this land, and paid respect to their ancient culture and their elders past and present.
3. WEBCASTING ANNOUNCEMENT
The Lord Mayor, Councillor Dwyer, advised that this public meeting is being recorded and streamed live on the internet. The recording will also be archived and made available on Council’s website.
The Lord Mayor further advised that all care will be taken to maintain privacy, however as a visitor in the public gallery, the public should be aware that their presence may be recorded.
4. OTHER RECORDING OF MEETING ANOUNCEMENT
As per Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, the recording of the Council Meeting by the public using any device, audio or video, is only permitted with Council permission. Recording a Council Meeting without permission may result in the individual being expelled from the Meeting.
5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
|
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Council Meeting held on 16 December 2019
|
That the minutes be taken as read and be accepted as a true record of the Meeting. |
6. APOLOGIES/REQUESTS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE
|
SUBJECT Apologies/Requests for leave of absence
|
That the apologies received for the late arrival of Councillors Benjamin and Jefferies, be noted. |
7. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Esber declared a non-pecuniary but significant interest in Item 18.7 being Post Exhibition Outcomes – Planning Proposal and Draft Planning Agreement for land at 189 Macquarie Street, Parramatta as his son works for the applicant. He retired from the meeting during debate and voting on this matter.
8. MATTERS OF URGENCY (if any)
There were no matters of urgency raised at this meeting.
Note:
1. Councillor Wilson arrived at 6:32pm prior to consideration of the Lord Mayoral Minute Condolence Motion – Oatlands Tragedy.
2. Councillor Bradley arrived at 6:32pm prior to consideration of the Lord Mayoral Minute Condolence Motion – Oatlands Tragedy.
9. Minutes of the Lord Mayor
10. Public Forum
|
Note: Councillor Wilson left the meeting at 7:14pm prior to Public Forum 1: Item 18.5 – Gateway Request: Planning Proposal – Properties on the western side of Essex Street, Epping (between Maida and Epping Roads). |
10.1 |
SUBJECT PUBLIC FORUM 1: Item 18.5 - Gateway Request: Planning Proposal - Properties on the western side of Essex Street, Epping (between Maida and Epping Roads)
REFERENCE F2019/02038
FROM Kevin Macdonald
|
|
Hi, my name is Kevin Macdonald and I thank you for the opportunity to address this meeting this evening in relation to Agenda Item 18.5 concerning the western side of Essex Street, Epping (between Maida and Epping Roads).
I am speaking both as a resident property owner in Essex Street, and on behalf of the 20 Property Owners on the Eastern Side of the Essex Street Heritage Conservation Area (HCA), specifically those between Epping Road to the north and Knox Avenue to the south.
As you may be aware, our Group has made representation to Council throughout the consideration of the matter that brings about the proposed Gateway request being considered tonight, specifically Council’s attempts to address the interface issues with Essex Street following the development of the adjoining Forest Grove area.
Due to the limited time I have available to speak, I note that a copy of these speaking notes have been provided to all Councillors, including a copy of the submission we made to Council’s Local Planning Panel (LPP) in their assessment of this matter at their 17 December 2019 Meeting. I will take it that Councillors have reviewed our submissions in preparing for this meeting, and therefore I voice the salient points in this public forum:
As you are aware, the LPP made the unanimous recommendation that Council does not endorse the draft Planning Proposal prepared by Council, noting in their decision that they undertook a site visit to the area: · the importance of the existing significant trees and tree canopies in place within the western side of Essex Street properties under consideration that already provide visual screening and an important scale transition between the adjacent R4 high density residential zone and the heritage conservation area generally · that there will be inevitable loss of trees at the rear of the Essex Street Properties if new dual occupancy dwellings are constructed, and this loss of tree canopy will not only affect the west side of Essex St but also the eastern side [of Essex Street] and the street itself, · that, if approved, this would negatively impact on the character of the [heritage] conservation area, and; · that, if approved, there are only a small number of new sites that could take advantage of the changes to dual occupancy provision, but the impact on the area will be substantial.
Noting these reason, and having reviewed the Council Staff’s Business paper for tonight’s Agenda Item 18.5, we make the following comments relating to the recommendations relating to the potential zone change to the western side of Essex Street: · As stated on Council’s webpage (at https://www.cityofparramatta.nsw.gov.au/business-development/planning/local-planning-panel-lpp), we note that the LPP is an independent Panel mandated within Council to ensure the process of assessment and determination of such planning proposals as being considered tonight are both 1. transparent and accountable and; 2. to assist to address any potential corruption risk and sensitivity or are of strategic importance. However, we note the Council Officers’ recommendation tonight is still as was presented to the LPP, that is to accept the Planning Proposal. Our assessment of the Business Paper for Agenda Item 18.5 reflects a disregard of the Panel’s statement of reasons to not accept the draft planning proposal by Council Staff, as the Paper does not address the concerns identified in the Panel’s statement of reasons for their decision. We ask, therefore, how can Council endorse the recommendations of the Council Officers’, against the advice provided by the Local Planning Panel, particularly after a site visit? · If it is Council’s intention to not endorse the Council Officers’ recommendations tonight and not proceed with the draft Planning Proposal as it has been prepared, we ask that Council’s decision does continue to address the ongoing, unreasonable and detrimental impact upon our properties on the eastern side of Essex Street, as well as those on the western side of the Street, which has now been ongoing since 2014. · If it is Council’s intention to endorse the draft Planning Proposal, as it has been prepared by Council Staff, we ask how Council will address the concerns that have been identified by Council’s own independent panel, the Local Planning Panel, and those issues raised in our submission to the Panel in December 2019? · Specifically, the Panel has identified concerns relating to the potential removal of significant trees and tree canopies; the potential effect on the existing visual screening and scale transition these trees afford not just for the western side of Essex Street but for Essex Street itself; the detrimental impact of any change upon the heritage character of the Street, and; that the proposed change as recommended by Council Officers may affect a small number of Essex Street properties. Issues raised in our previous submission include how the integrity of the Heritage Conservation character is to be maintained noting Council Officer’s recognition that the proposed zoning changes for the western side of Essex Street may have the unintended effect of enabling dual occupancy within properties not assessed by Council. · We ask Council to ensure that the Panel’s identified concerns are addressed before taking any decision to endorse and progress to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment a drafted Planning Proposal for this area of the Essex Street Heritage Conservation Area. · Lastly, we note that Council Staff have for the first time specifically identified in the Business Paper those Essex Street properties they consider could be considered for dual occupancy (see Figure 3 on Page 432). However, we suggest the Paper is not consistent in listing the number of possible properties, reflecting at times 6, 7, 8 or 9 properties. We ask Council Staff to confirm the properties they consider could potentially accommodate a detached dual occupancy prior to the matter being determined.
Finally, noting our comments and concerns above, we ask that in progressing any Planning Proposal for the Essex Street HCA Area between Epping and Maida Roads, Council ensures that a consistency of building form in Essex Street is maintained for both sides of the Street to address the ongoing, unreasonable and detrimental impact upon our properties on the eastern side of Essex Street: Rather than reach a decision that just now moves the detrimental interface issue that has been brought about by the 2014 Epping Urban Activation Precinct (UAP) Project. We would invite Council to include the eastern side of Essex Street in any analysis work for this area, noting all studies and analysis to this point have only included the participation of the western side of Essex Street properties.
We also bring to Council’s attention a concern we have raised with Council Staff about the communication process Council has undertaken to inform the community of the development of this proposal. Property owners on the eastern side of Essex Street have not been included in the notification mailout undertaken by Council to inform affected properties in relation to this matter, even though property owners on the western side of Essex Street have been advised by correspondence. Noting that the properties on the eastern side of Essex Street are both clearly affected parties from this proposal, and that our property owner Group has participated in all community consultations by Council in this matter, we are concerned that in this matter Council have omitted us as affected properties. We await a response from Council to our concern of transparency and due process in this matter.
I thank you for the opportunity to speak this evening.
STAFF RESPONSE
No staff response provided. |
11. Petitions
12. Rescission Motions
Nil
13. Fair
|
|
That Council consider Item 13.4 FOR NOTATION: Report on Minor Property Dealings for the period of December 2019 to January 2020 in closed session in accordance with Section 10A(2)(d) as the discussion may contain commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed: i. prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or ii. confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or iii. reveal a trade secret. |
14. Accessible
15. Green
Nil
16. Welcoming
Nil
17. Thriving
|
|
That the meeting adjourn for a period of 10 minutes.
|
|
|
Note: The meeting was adjourned at 8:21pm for a short recess. |
|
|
That the meeting resume.
|
|
|
The meeting resumed in the Council Chambers at 8:39pm with the following Councillors in attendance: The Lord Mayor, Councillor Dwyer and Councillors Barrak, Bradley, Davis, Esber, Garrard (Deputy Lord Mayor) (8:42pm), Han, Issa, Jefferies, Pandey, Prociv, Tyrrell, Wilson, Wearne and Zaiter. |
18. Innovative
|
Note: Councillor Esber declared a non-pecuniary but significant interest in Item 18.7 and retired from the meeting at 9:13pm prior to debate and voting thereon. |
19. Notices of Motion
19.1 |
SUBJECT NOTICE OF MOTION: Parking Enforcement Sydney Olympic Park
REFERENCE F2020/00037 - D07239595
FROM Councillor Wilson
|
That consideration of this matter be deferred. |
19.2 |
SUBJECT NOTICE OF MOTION: Parking Enforcement During Unusual Hours
REFERENCE F2020/00037 - D07239604
FROM Councillor Wilson
|
That consideration of this matter be deferred. |
20. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Nil
Note: Prior to moving into Closed Session, the Lord Mayor invited members of the public gallery to make representations as to why any item had been included in Closed Session. No member of the gallery requested to make representations.
21. CLOSED SESSION
That members of the press and public be excluded from the meeting of the Closed Session and access to the correspondence and reports relating to the items considered during the course of the Closed Session be withheld. This action is taken in accordance with Section 10A(s) of the Local Government Act, 1993 as the items listed come within the following provisions:- 1 FOR APPROVAL: Integrated Development of 5 and 7 Parramatta Square including Tender 06/2019 - 5&7 Parramatta Square – Design and Construct Contract. (D07157317) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret. 2 FOR APPROVAL: Request for Proposal - Replacement of Library Self Service Technology. (D07149557) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. 3 FOR APPROVAL: Parramatta Brand and Marketing Strategy - Program and Budget. (D07211731) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. 4 FOR NOTATION: Legal Status Report as at 21 January 2020. (D07226281) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (g) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege. |
SUBJECT FOR NOTATION: Report on Minor Property Dealings for the period of December 2019 to January 2020
REFERENCE F2019/00279 - D07089821
REPORT OF Property Services and Space Management Manager
|
|
That the report be received. |
22. REPORTS OF RESOLUTIONS PASSED IN CLOSED SESSION
The Chief Executive Officer declared all Items in Closed session were carried for the resolutions for Items 21.1, 21.2, 21.3 & 21.4 & 13.4.
23. CONCLUSION OF MEETING
The meeting terminated at 10:26 pm.
THIS PAGE AND THE PRECEDING 23 PAGES ARE THE MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2020 AND CONFIRMED ON MONDAY, 24 FEBRUARY 2020.
Chairperson