MINUTES OF THE Meeting of Parramatta City Council HELD IN THE Council Chamber, CIVIC PLACE, PARRAMATTA ON Monday, 25 June 2012 AT 6:45 pm
The Acting Lord Mayor, Councillor A A Wilson in the Chair and Councillors P B Barber (arrived 6.47 pm), A Bide, J Chedid (arrived 6.47 pm and retired 9.47 pm), G J Elmore, P Esber (retired 9.49 pm), J D Finn, P J Garrard, A Issa, OAM MP, M A Lack, S D Lloyd, P K Maitra and M D McDermott.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS
The Acting Lord Mayor, Councillor A A Wilson acknowledged the Burramattagal Clan of The Darug, the traditional land owners of Parramatta and paid respect to the elders both past and present.
FOUNDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Acting Lord Mayor also acknowledged the colonial heritage of Parramatta and recognised the contribution of the early settlers in laying the foundations of this great and historic city.
MIGRANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Acting Lord Mayor further acknowledged the many migrants that have come to Parramatta and now call it home.
All these elements holistically make Parramatta what it is today.
MINUTES
|
SUBJECT Minutes of the Council (Development) Meeting held on 12 June 2012 |
|
|
13191 |
That the minutes be taken as read and be accepted as a true record of the Meeting. |
APOLOGIES
13192 RESOLVED (Lloyd/Issa OAM MP)
That an apology be received and accepted for the absence of the Lord Mayor, Councillor L E Wearne and C X Lim.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
1 Councillor J D Finn declared a pecuniary interest in relation to Item 8.2 of Economy and Development regarding 45 Eleanor Street, Rosehill as Councillor Finn is both the owner of the property and the applicant.
2 Councillor J D Finn declared a pecuniary interest in relation to Item 10.2 of Community and Neighbourhood regarding Housing NSW Strategic Partnership Minutes as Councillor Finn is an employee of HousingNSW.
1 |
REFERENCE F2012/00430 FROM Omar Besiso |
|
“1. On 20th of June 2012 the Land and Environment Court held that council staff without lawful authority amended the SIPP November 2011 adopted by Council on 12 December 2011 to the SIPP December 2011.
a Please identify the names and positions of those council officers who drafted the Dec 2011 docs without authority.
b Please identify the names and positions that instructed and authorised the staff to create the December 2011 document unlawfully.
2. On 20th of June 2012 the Land and Environment Court held that council staff without lawful authority amended the SIPP November 2011 adopted by council on 12 Dec 2011 to the SIPP April 2012.
a Please identify the names and positions of those council officers who drafted the Dec 2011 docs without authority.
b Please identify the names and positions that instructed and authorised the staff to create the December 2011 document unlawfully.
3. According to channel 10 media report on 21st of June 2012 council’s spokesman advised channel 10 that smoking ban will be brought back to council floor for voting within the next 2 weeks.
a Please identify the name and position of the council’s spokesman.
b. Pursuant to what authority does any council officer take it upon themselves to dictate to the councillor’s the subject matter and timing of motions to be put to the councillor’s?
4. Is it acceptable to the elected councillor’s for a member of staff, under the title of a spokesman, notifies the media of what their intended course of actions by the council?”
|
By Mr Maurice Doria, General Counsel:-
“Dear Mr Besiso
Thank you for your public forum questions regarding the Land & Environment Court decision concerning the smoking in public places policy. This decision was delivered on 21 June 2012 and has been the subject of some media commentary.
Your public forum questions repeatedly refer to action being taken without lawful authority. This does not accurately reflect the Court’s decision.
Executive Summary
The Court has found that PCC has the power to impose smoking bans over outdoor dining areas and can do this by way of conditions in approvals issued under the Roads Act and the Local Government Act (LG Act). The Court has also found that no smoking provisions included in approvals issued under the Roads Act and the LG Act (many of which expire on 30 June 2012) to be invalid. As a result of the Court’s findings, it is proposed to bring a report to Council recommending some minor adjustment to the policy documents to address the issues identified by the Court’s decision.
Court Decision
These legal proceedings involved technical arguments between the parties regarding whether PCC had power to prohibit smoking in outdoor dining areas.
Below is a summary of main contentions pressed by applicant in the proceedings and the Court’s findings:
· Notices under section 632 of the LG Act – The applicants asserted that PCC caused notices to be erected under section 632 of the LG Act and those notices prohibited smoking in the outdoor dining areas. The erection of a section 632 notice exposes persons smoking in the vicinity of those notices to the risk of regulatory prosecution. The applicants asserted that the erection of the section 632 notices was unlawful. The Court found that PCC did not attempt to erect section 632 notices. The Court’s decision rejects the applicant’s contention.
· Approval under section 68 of the LG Act – The applicant’s asserted that PCC had no power to include a provision in approvals issued under section 68 of the LG Act which prohibited smoking in an outdoor dining area. The Court found that PCC did have the power to include such a provision because it was reasonably capable of being regarded as related to the purpose for which the function of Council was being exercised. The Court’s decision rejects the applicant’s contention.
· Approval under section 125 of the Roads Act – The applicant’s asserted that PCC had no power to include a provision in approvals issued under section 125 of the Roads Act which prohibited smoking in an outdoor dining area located on a public road. The Court found that PCC did have the power to include such a provision because of the broad grant of power conferred by the Roads Act. The Court’s decision rejects the applicant’s contention.
· Uncertain commencement date – The applicant’s asserted that there was uncertainty as to dates for commencement of enforcement of the smoking ban conditions because of the language used in the 12 December 2011 council resolution. The Court found that there was no uncertainty. The Court’s decision rejects the applicant’s contention.
· Purport development consent variation – One of the applicant’s asserted that smoking prohibition condition in the approvals issued under section 68 of the LG Act operated to amend the development consents issued by PCC to one of the applicant’s in October 2009. The Court found that approvals issued under different legislation do not operate to amend a development consent. The Court’s decision rejects the applicant’s contention.
· Exercise of delegation – The Smoking in Public Places Policy included in the business papers for the 12 December 2011 council meeting was described as the ‘November 2011’ version. At the Council meeting held on 12 December 2011 PCC extended the operation of the policy beyond the places described in the report (that is, taxi ranks and other locations). This required the policy instrument to be updated and resulted in a version described as the ‘December 2011’ version. In revising the policy document to reflect the council resolution other administrative changes were made to ensure PCC’s policy direction was accurately recorded in the policy document. One of these changes was to include a description of smoking that aligned with the description of that term contained in the Smoke Free Environment Act. There was no deviation from PCC’s policy position established by the 12 December 2011 council resolution. The Court has applied an extremely narrow analysis and found that the inclusion of a clear description of ‘smoking’ was not what PCC adopted thereby casting doubt on the smoking ban provisions that appear in the approvals under issued under the Roads Act and the LG Act. The Court’s decision finds against PCC in relation to this contention.
Practical Consequence
The practical consequence of the Court decision is that PCC (and the over 30 other council in NSW who have taken similar action) has the power to implement a smoking prohibition in outdoor dining areas. However, the no smoking provisions in some approvals currently held by some business operators are invalid. This irregularity is simply overcome and it is intended to bring a report to council in the near future to address this situation because PCC’s policy position established by the 12 December 2011 council resolution mandates that smoking is not to occur in outdoor dining areas.
Specific questions
Turning now to your specific questions:
1 (a) & (b) – The above outline of the Court decision explains the situation. Staff performance issues are a matter for the CEO.
2 (a) & (b) – The answer to question 1 applies because the question has been repeated.
3 (a) & (b) – Council’s media policy requires that media contact be initiated through Council’s Media Adviser. You can contact Council’s Media Adviser by phone (9806 5083) or by email (media@parracity.nsw.gov.au).
4 All public commentary has been in accordance with the PCC’s existing policies.”
|
|
|
NOTE: 1 Councillor P B Barber (6.47pm) and J Chedid (6.47pm) arrived at the meeting during consideration of this matter.
2 Councillors P Esber, S D Lloyd and P K Maitra left the meeting at 6.47pm and returned at 6.49pm during consideration of this matter. |
PETITIONS
1 |
REFERENCE 2004/07969 FROM Dundas Valley Rugby Union Club |
|
|
That the petition be received and noted. |
2 |
SUBJECT 45 - 49 Spurway Street - Erection of Boarding House REFERENCE DA/109/2012 FROM A Boulos and others |
|
|
That the petition be received and noted. |
PASSING OF MARY FERGUSON, WIFE OF JACK FERGUSON
The Chamber observed one minute’s silence to acknowledge the passing of Mrs Mary Ferguson, wife of Jack Ferguson.
The Acting Lord Mayor then noted that appropriate condolences had been forwarded to the family of the late Mrs Mary Ferguson.
Economy and Development
8.4 |
SUBJECT Common Property, 37 Midson Road Eastwood (Lachlan Macquarie Ward) DESCRIPTION Construction of 12 dwellings fronting Carrington Crescent, Avondale Way and King Way. REFERENCE DA/53/2012 - Lodged 27 January 2012 APPLICANT/S AVJBOS Eastwood Developments Pty Ltd OWNERS Community Association DP 270605 REPORT OF Manager Development Services REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COUNCIL The application has been referred to Council as the application seeks variations of greater than 10% to Clause 4.4 of Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011. |
|
RESOLVED (Issa OAM MP/Esber)
|
(a) That Council supports the variation to Clause 4.4 of the PLEP 2011 under the provisions of clause 4.6. (b) Further, that Council as the consent authority grant development consent to Development Application No. DA/53/2012 for construction of 12 dwellings fronting Carrington Crescent, Avondale Way and King Way at Common Property, 37 Midson Road, EASTWOOD NSW 2122 for a period of five (5) years for physical commencement to occur from the date on the Notice of Determination subject to the conditions contained in attachment 1.
|
|
|
DIVISION The result being:
AYES Councillors P B Barber, A Bide, J Chedid, G J Elmore, P Esber, J D Finn, P J Garrard, A Issa, OAM, MP, M A Lack, S D Lloyd, P K Maitra and M D McDermott.
NOES The Acting Lord Mayor, Councillor A A Wilson.
|
Environment and Infrastructure
Community and Neighbourhood
Governance and Corporate
Notices of Motion
ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
In accordance with Council's decision of 23 October 2000 (Minute No 5712) the meeting adjourned at 8.37 pm for a period of 16 minutes.
RESUMPTION OF MEETING
The meeting resumed in the Council Chamber at 8.53 pm, there being in attendance The Acting Lord Mayor, Councillor A A Wilson and Councillors P B Barber, A Bide, J Chedid G J Elmore, J D Finn, P J Garrard, MP, M A Lack, S D Lloyd, M D McDermott and P K Maitra.
11.2 Proposed sale of road fronting 76-84 Railway Terrace, Merrylands (D02385778) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business (Deferred from Open Council).
1 Review of land reserved for acquisition. (D02393785) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
2 Parramatta Arts Fellowship 2012. (D02390796) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (a) of the Local Government act 1993 as the report contains personnel matters concerning particular individuals.
3 Report Required under section 339 of the Local Government Act 1993 in respect of contractual conditions of senior staff. (D02394778) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (a) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains personnel matters concerning particular individuals.
4 Real Estate Agent Panel Tender 16/2012. (D02392200) - This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government Act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.
Note
Councillor J Chedid (9.47pm) and Councillor P Esber (9.49pm) retired from the meeting during Items 13.3 and 13.4 of Closed Session respectively.
|
|
|
The meeting terminated at 10.01pm.
THIS PAGE AND THE PRECEDING 22 PAGES ARE THE MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, 25 JUNE 2012 AND CONFIRMED ON MONDAY, 9 JULY 2012.
Lord Mayor