Item 10.1 - Attachment 5 |
Local Provisions in
Draft Parramatta Local Environment Plan 2008 |
Local provisions in
Draft
Title
of clause |
Clause
detail |
Purpose/intent |
6.1 Special provisions
applying to dual occupancy development |
(1) Despite
any other provisions of this plan, development consent must not be granted
for the purposes of dual occupancy development on land shown on the dual
occupancy prohibited map. (2) Detached dual occupancy development will only be permitted
in relation to the following: (a) buildings
identified as heritage items within Schedule 5 of this Plan (b) areas
identified as heritage conservation areas within Schedule 5 of this Plan (c) sites
with 2 street frontages, where each proposed dwelling has a frontage to a
street. (3) A
dual occupancy shall not be erected in any residential zone on land which has
an area of less than 600 square metres. (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of
sub-clause (3), a dual occupancy may be erected, with development consent, on
a parcel of land shown on the Minimum Lot Size for Dual Occupancy Map, which
has a minimum lot size of 500 square metres. |
Parramatta City Council has
prepared a Residential Development Strategy (RDS) to respond to future
growth. To manage new residential development, the strategy adopted a
‘concentrated growth’ model that supports the principles of the Metropolitan
Strategy. This means more intense housing development will occur in areas or
‘centres’ which can best support such growth (ie; R3 and R4 zones) while
areas outside these areas will retain lower density housing (mainly single
dwellings and dual occupancy housing in the R2 zone). However, there are specific
areas where Council would like to maintain a single dwelling character
without permitting dual occupancies. Council’s existing LEP prohibits dual
occupancies in order to preserve the historic subdivision pattern which gives
rise to the special character area of Clause 36(1) of the current
Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2001 prohibits dual occupancies in these
two areas and it is proposed that these provisions be retained in the draft
Parramatta LEP. Council for most of its LGA
allows single dwelling and dual occupancy housing in its R2 zone. The standard instrument LEP however, does
allow another residential zone which allows detached dwellings and not dual
occupancy. As a consequence, Council is proposing this local clause to
overcome the template limitations. |
|
|
|
6.2Sex Service premises |
(1) Regardless of any other provision of
this plan, premises shall only be erected or used for the purpose of a sex
services premises where they are located: (a) further than 200 metres (measured from
the boundary of the allotment upon which the premises are proposed) of
residences or of any land zoned residential, and (b) further than 200 metres (measured from
the boundary of the allotment upon which the premises are proposed) of any
place of public worship, hospital, school, child care centre, community
facility or recreation area, and (c) further than 50 metres (measured from
the boundary of the allotment upon which the premises are proposed) of a
public utility undertaking, being a railway station entrance, bus stop, taxi
rank, ferry terminal or the like, and (d) subject to subclauses (a) – (c), in
the areas shown on the Sex Services Premises Map. (2) In determining an application to carry
out development for the purpose of sex services premises, the consent
authority must consider the following matters: (a) whether the operation of the sex
services premises will be likely to cause a disturbance in the neighbourhood
because of its size, location, hours of operation, clients or the number of
employees and other people working in it, (b) whether the operation of the sex
services premises will be likely to interfere with the amenity of the
neighbourhood, (c) whether the operation of the sex
services premises will be likely to cause a disturbance in the neighbourhood
when taking into account other sex services premises operating in the
neighbourhood involving similar hours of operation. (3) Development
consent must not be granted to development for the purposes of sex services
premises in a building that contains a dwelling if all or part of the access
to the sex services premises is shared with the dwelling. (4) In
deciding whether to grant consent for the purpose of sex service premises,
the consent authority must also take into account the impact the proposed
development would have on any place that is regularly frequented by children
for educational, recreational or cultural activities that adjoins or is in
view of the proposed development. |
Clause 6.2 of Draft PLEP
2008 is based on sex services premises provisions of Parramatta LEP 2001 (Amendment
No.13). The clause seeks to establish a separation distance between sex
services premises and residential areas or other sensitive uses and to apply
merit based criteria to ensure amenity objectives are met. Areas where sex services are permitted are
mapped in the draft LEP. The clause is necessary to reflect Council’s policy
position. |
|
|
|
6.3 Child Care Centres in
R2 zones |
(1) Regardless of any other
provision of this plan, premises shall not be erected or used for the purpose
of a child care centre in the R2 Low Density Residential zone unless they are
located: (a) within
50 metres of a school; or (b) within 50 metres of land zoned B1, B2, B3
or B4; or (c) within 300 metres of a railway station. |
This clause is about
locating child care centres in proximity of other activities such as schools
or retail/business centres and public transport so as to maximise
opportunities for combined purpose traffic movements. It also maximises
opportunities for public transport use and ensures child care centres are
found in busier locations thus protecting the amenity impacts on quieter
residential areas. Distances are specified in
the clause as Council wants to be very specific and transparent in the
application of this clause and not have a clause which use vague terms such
as “near”. |
|
|
|
6.4 Demolition |
The demolition of a
building or work may be carried out only with consent. Note: The demolition of a building or work may be
identified in this Plan as exempt or complying development. |
This clause is required to
clarify the requirement for development consent for demolition, in the
absence of a definition of this form of development in the land use table
under the template. The clause used is a model clause already settled by
Parliamentary Counsel. |
|
|
|
6.5 Restricted premises |
(1) The objective of this clause is to ensure that restricted
premises are not visually prominent from public places or other locations
regularly frequented by children. (2) Development consent must not be granted for development for the
purpose of restricted premises if the premises would be located on land that
adjoins land, or is separated only by a road from land: (a) within Zone R2 Low Density Residential, R3
Medium Density Residential, R4 High Density Residential or Zone RE1 Public
Recreation, or (b) that is used for community, school
(including pre-school and child care centres), church or children’s sporting
or recreational activities. (3) Development consent may be granted to the
carrying out of development for the purpose of restricted premises only if
the consent authority is satisfied that: (a) no
part of the restricted premises, other than an access corridor, will be
located within 1.5m (measured vertically) from any adjoining footpath,
roadway, arcade or other public thoroughfare, and (b) no
part of the restricted premises or building in which the premises will be
situated will be used as a dwelling unless separate access will be available
to the dwelling, and (c) any signage related to the
premises will be of a size, shape and content that does not interfere with
the amenity of the locality, and (d) no
other objects, products or goods related to the restricted premises will be
visible from outside the premises. (4) In
deciding whether to grant consent for the purpose of restricted premises, the
consent authority must also take into account the impact the proposed
development would have on any place that is regularly frequented by children
for educational, recreational or cultural activities that adjoins or is in
view of the proposed development. |
Under the standard
instrument, restricted premises fall under the umbrella definition of
business premises or retail premises. Business premises are mandatory in the
business zones under the standard instrument and therefore Council cannot
exclude restricted premises in these zones. Therefore, this clause seeks to
limit the location of restricted premises where they are adjoining
residential land or other sensitive land uses frequented by children. These
aspect s of the clause (sub-clauses 1,
2 & 4) is modelled on the clause contained in Penrith City Council’s
draft LEP which has been approved by Parliamentary Counsel. The origins of sub clause
(3) are Clause 78 of SREP 28 and Clause 25 of Parramatta LEP 2001. This part
of the clause seeks to ensure that restricted premises are located on the
first floor of buildings, to limit the public visibility of the restricted
premises and to limit them to buildings that do not have dwellings. This is a
policy position of Council to protect public amenity. |
|
|
|
6.6 Access to development
on public roads |
(1) The objective of this
clause is to enable alternate access to development fronting a classified
road. (2) The consent authority
may grant consent for vehicular access to development that has frontage to a
classified road on land that would otherwise not be allowed such access under
this Plan, but only if it has taken into consideration the following: (a)
whether the access is via a
non-classified road, (b)
whether the access will affect
public safety, (c)
whether the access will have a
detrimental impact on the amenity of the surrounding area, (d)
any plan of Management under
the Local Government Act 1993. |
This clause will facilitate
access to development from roads other than a main road, where the zoning of
the land would preclude this outcome in the absence of this clause. |
|
|
|
6.7 Foreshore Building line |
(1)The
objective of this clause is to ensure that development in the foreshore area
will not impact on natural foreshore processes or affect the significance and
amenity of the area. (2)
Subject to subclause (3), development on the foreshore area is prohibited. (3)Development
consent may be granted for the following: (a)
the extension, alteration or rebuilding of an existing building wholly
or partly in the foreshore area, if the consent authority is satisfied the
extension, alteration or rebuilding will not have an adverse impact on the
amenity or aesthetic appearance of the foreshore, (b)
the erection of a building in the foreshore area, if the levels, depth
or other exceptional features of the site make it appropriate to do so, (c)
development for the purposes of boat sheds, sea retaining walls,
wharves, slipways, jetties, waterway access stairs, swimming pools, fences,
cycleways, walking trails, picnic facilities or other outdoor recreation
facilities. (4) Development
consent must not be granted under subclause (3) unless the consent authority
is satisfied that: (a)
the development will contribute to achieving the objectives for the
zone in which the land is located, and (b)
the appearance of any proposed structure, from both the waterway and
adjacent foreshore areas, will be compatible with the surrounding area, and (c)
the development will not cause environmental harm such as: (i) pollution
or siltation of the waterway, or (ii) an
adverse effect on surrounding uses, marine habitat, wetland areas, flora or
fauna habitats, or (iii) an
adverse effect on drainage patterns, and (d)
the development will not cause congestion of, or generate conflicts
between, people using open space areas or the waterway, and (e)
opportunities to provide continuous public access along the foreshore
and to the waterway will not be compromised, and (f)
any historic, scientific, cultural, social, archaeological,
architectural, natural or aesthetic significance of the land on which the
development is to be carried out and of surrounding land will be maintained. |
This clause is the same
clause as Canada Bay LEP and has been reviewed and accepted by Parliamentary
Counsel. |
|
|
|
6.8 Development on Flood
prone land |
(1). The objectives of this clause are: a) to maintain the existing flood regime and flow conveyance
capacity; and b) to enable safe occupation and evacuation of land in a flood
event; and c) to avoid significant adverse impacts upon flood behaviour; and d) to avoid significant adverse effects on the environment that
would cause avoidable erosion, siltation, destruction of riparian vegetation
or a reduction in the stability of the river bank/watercourse; and e) to limit uses to those compatible with flow conveyance
function and flood hazard. (2) This clause applies to: a) land subject to the discharge of a 1:100 ARI (average
recurrent interval) flood event, and b) land within 500 millimetres in height above (a). (3) Consent
must not be granted to development on land to which this clause applies
unless the consent authority is satisfied that the development: a) will not adversely affect flood behaviour resulting in
detrimental increases in the potential flood affectation of other development
or properties; and b) will not significantly alter flow distributions and velocities
to the detriment of other properties or the environment; and c) will enable safe occupation and evacuation of the land; and d) will not significantly detrimentally affect the environment or
cause avoidable erosion, siltation, destruction of riparian vegetation or a
reduction in the stability of the river bank/watercourse; and e) will not be likely to result in unsustainable social and
economic costs to the flood affected community or general community as a
consequence of flooding; and f) if located in a floodway, (i) is compatible with the flow conveyance
function of the floodway; and (ii) is compatible with the flood hazard within
the floodway. (4). In
this clause, floodway has the same meaning as it has in the Floodplain
Development Manual 2005. |
This clause has been
reviewed and accepted by Parliamentary Counsel. DoP has approved a choice of
3 clauses relating to flood prone land. Clause 6.8 proposes to use
option 3 as the preferred clause because it best represents the flooding
planning data available at Parramatta City Council. |
|
|
|
6.9 Acid Sulfate Soils |
(1) The objective of this
clause is to ensure that development does not disturb, expose or drain acid
sulfate soils and cause environmental damage. (2) Development consent is
required for the carrying out of works described in the Table to this
subclause on land on land shown on the Acid Sulfate Soils Map as being of the
class specified for those works, except as provided by this clause. Class of land Works 1 Any works. 2 Works below natural ground surface. Works by
which the watertable is likely to be lowered 3 Works
more than 1 metre below the natural ground surface. Works
by which the watertable is likely to be lowered more than 1 metre below the
natural ground surface. 4 Works more than 2 metres below the natural
ground surface. Works by which the watertable is likely to be
lowered more than 2 metres below the natural ground surface. 5 Works
within 500 metres of adjacent Class 1,2,3 or 4 land that is below 5 metres
Australian Height Datum by which the watertable is likely to be lowered below
1 metre Australian Height Datum on adjacent
Class 1,2,3 or 4 land. (3) Development consent must not be granted under
this clause for the carrying out of works unless: (a)
an acid sulfate soils management plan has been prepared for the
proposed works in accordance with the Acid Sulfate Soils Manual and has been
provided to the consent authority, and (4) Consent is not required under this clause for
the carrying out of works if: (a)
a preliminary assessment of the proposed works prepared in accordance
with the Acid Sulfate Soils Manual indicates that an acid sulfate soils
management plan need not be carried out for the works, and (b)
the preliminary assessment has been provided to the consent authority
and the consent authority has confirmed the assessment by notice in writing
to the person proposing to carry out the works. (5) Also, development consent is not required under
this clause for the carrying out of any of the following works by a public
authority (including ancillary work such as excavation, construction of
access ways or the supply of power): (a)
emergency work, being the repair or replacement of the works of the
public authority required to be carried out urgently because the work has
been damaged, ceased to function or poses a risk to the environment or to
public health and safety, (b)
routine management work, being the periodic inspection, cleaning,
repair or replacement of the works of the public authority (other than work
that would result in the disturbance of more than 1 tonne of soil), (c)
minor work, being work that costs less than $20,000 (other than
drainage work). (6) Development consent is not required under this
clause to carry out any works unless: (a)
the works involve the disturbance of more than 1 tonne of soil, such
as occurs in carrying out agriculture, the construction or maintenance of
drains, extractive industries, dredging, the construction of artificial water
bodies (including canals, dams and detention basins) or foundations, or flood
mitigation works, or (b)
the works are likely to lower the watertable. |
This Clause is the same
clause as contained in the gazetted Canada Bay LEP and has been reviewed and
accepted by Parliamentary Counsel. |
6.10 Land Slip |
(1) This clause applies to land within Zone R2 and
shown on the Land Slip Map. (2) Before granting consent for development on land
to which this clause applies, the consent authority must take into
consideration the following: (a) in
the case of a proposed building or work, the recommendations of a
geotechnical and structural engineering report that addresses the
geotechnical stability of the land to support such development, and (b) whether
the development is likely to create or worsen any land slip hazard to other
land, and (c) whether
appropriate measures have been taken or are to be taken to ensure that future
works on the land (including construction of driveways, clothes drying
facilities, boundary fences, garden sheds, retaining walls, garden beds and
the like) will not increase the risk of ground movement on the land or other
land. |
The purpose of this clause
is to ensure that sites identified as having the potential risk for landslip
are assessed having regard to this risk when proposed for development. This clause is adapted from
Clause 35 of Parramatta LEP 2001. |
|
|
|
6.11 Excavation and the
filling of land |
(1) The objectives of this
clause are: (a) to ensure that any land excavation or
filling work will not have a detrimental impact on environmental functions
and processes, neighbouring uses, or cultural or heritage items and features,
and (b)
to allow land excavation or filling work of a minor nature without
separate development consent. (2) Development consent is
required to excavate or fill land. (3) Before granting any
such consent, the consent authority must consider the following matters: (a) the likely disruption of, or any
detrimental effect on, existing drainage patterns and soil stability in the
locality, (b) the effect of the proposed development on
the likely future use or redevelopment of the land, (c) the quality of the fill or of the soil to
be excavated, or both, (d) the effect of the proposed development on
the existing and likely amenity of adjoining properties, (e) the source of any fill material or the
destination of any excavated material, (f) the likelihood of disturbing relics, (g) proximity to and potential for adverse
impacts on any watercourse, drinking water catchment or environmentally
sensitive area. (4) Any such consent is not
required for the excavation or filling of land that, in the opinion of the
consent authority, is of a minor nature. |
Clause used is that settled
by Parliamentary Counsel and adopted by West Dapto. Parramatta LEP 2001 has
Clause 23 and SREP 28 has Clause 77 Excavation and Filling of Land |
|
|
|
6.12 Temporary use of
Council land |
(1) Despite any other
provisions of this plan, consent may be granted to development on land within
any zone for any temporary purpose for a maximum period of 52 days, whether
consecutive or not, in any one calendar year. (2) Before granting
a consent referred to in subclause (1), the consent authority must be
satisfied that: (a) the
temporary use is necessary and reasonable for economic use of the land
pending its subsequent development in accordance with this plan, and (b) the
temporary use will not prejudice the subsequent carrying out of development
on the land in accordance with this plan, and (c) the
temporary use does not adversely impact on any adjoining land or the amenity
of the neighbourhood, and (d) appropriate
arrangements are made for the removal of the use and any associated
structures at the end of the period specified in the development consent. |
To allow development on
Council land for a temporary period provided that the proposed development
meets certain criteria. This clause reflects Clause
50 of Parramatta LEP 2001 and the clause used in Canada Bay LEP which has
been accepted by Parliamentary Counsel. |
6.13 Development in
recreation zones |
(1) The consent authority must not grant consent to development within
Zone RE1 or RE2 unless it has taken into consideration all of the following: (a) the
need for the proposed development on that land, (b) whether
the impact of the proposed development will be detrimental to the existing or
future use of the land, (c) any
plan of management that covers the land (d) whether
the proposed development will be secondary and complementary to the use of
the land for recreation, (e) whether
the height and bulk of any proposed building or structure has regard to
existing vegetation and topography, (f) in
the case of public open space, whether the proposed development will
significantly diminish public use and access to public open space, (g) whether
the proposal is compatible with adjacent uses in relation to its height, bulk
and noise generation and any other aspects that might conflict with
surrounding land uses, (h) whether
the proposed development will impact on bushland and remnant bushland. (i) whether
the proposed development will impact on stormwater flow. |
This clause lists a range
of appropriate considerations for development in RE1 and RE2 zones, with an
emphasis on the protection of public benefit of proposed development and
protection of public amenity. This provides assessment criteria for any
activities permitted in the land use table for the RE1 Public Recreation
zone. This clause is adopted
from Parramatta LEP 2001, Clause 46 and SREP 28, Clause 80. |
|
|
|
6.14 Development on land
abutting an Environmental Conservation zone |
(1) The consent authority
must not grant consent to development on land abutting land within Zone E2
unless it has taken into consideration all of the following: (a) the
need to retain any bushland on the land, (b) the
effect of the proposed development on bushland, including the erosion of soils,
the siltation of streams and waterways and the spread of weeds and exotic
plants within the bushland,
overshadowing, overland flows and stormwater runoff, removal or
degradation of existing vegetation, (c) the
requirement for provision of a buffer zone on the abutting land to protect
the bushland area, (d) the
protection of endangered ecological communities and recovery plans prepared
and approved under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995, (e) any
other matters which are relevant to the protection and preservation of the
bushland area. (2) Despite any other
provisions of this plan, no building is to be erected within 6 metres of the
boundary of Zone E2. |
To maintain the quality and
integrity of E2 land by ensuring that adjacent development is undertaken in a
manner that recognises the environmental qualities of these E2 areas. This clause is sourced from
Clause 47 of Parramatta LEP 2001 and Clause 88 of SREP 28. |
|
|
|
6.15 Variation of floor
space ratio when providing public access |
(1) The
objective of this clause is to provide incentives for development to provide
for the dedication of land and construction of public access to provide
improved pedestrian permeability and networks. (2) The
consent authority may consider increasing the maximum floor space ratio as
referred to in clause 22 if the proposed development includes dedication of
land to Council for the purposes of providing public access, and the
construction of the accessway, having regard to whether: (a) the Parramatta Development Control Plan
2008 identifies the land as being required for future public access or
whether in the opinion of the consent authority, there is demonstrable
advantage and local need for public pedestrian access through the development
site, and (b) the pedestrian link will be safe,
accessible and of finishes and materials that will ensure long term
durability and ease of use. (3) For
the purposes of this clause, the maximum floor space may be increased by the
equivalent area represented by 50% of the land area to be dedicated to
Council for public access. (4) For
the purposes of calculating (3) above, site area includes the area of land to
be dedicated to Council. |
Council has prepared
detailed planning controls for certain areas across the LGA, particularly
those where increased residential density is proposed. The intent of the clause in
the draft LEP is to provide an incentive for such linkages to be provided
through a floor space bonus in return for the dedication of that area
identified as a pedestrian link to Council.
This is a more flexible approach than identifying a particular area of
land for acquisition. |
|
|
|
6.16 Places of public
worship |
Despite any other
provisions of this plan, development for the purpose of a place of public
worship is prohibited in Zone R1, R2, R3 or R4 if the number of seats
provided, or the seating capacity of the place, exceeds 250. |
The purpose of this clause
is to ensure that residential areas are protected from the amenity impacts of
large Places of Public Worship. The elected Council is keen
to control the size of churches in residential zones using this clause to
prevent amenity impacts such as traffic, car parking and general disturbances
of noise associated with large congregations. This clause reflects the
current Clause 42 in Parramatta LEP 2001. |
|
|
|
6.17 Environmental
Protection |
(1) The
objectives of this clause are to protect and improve: (a) water
quality within waterways, and (b) stability
of the bed and banks of waterways, and (c) aquatic
and riparian habitats, buffers and their functions, and (d) ecological
processes within waterways and riparian areas, and (e) threatened
aquatic species, communities, populations and their habitats, and (f) scenic
and cultural heritage values of waterways and riparian areas, and (g) the
connectivity of riparian corridors within the LGA. (2) This
clause applies to development on land as identified on the Environmental
Protection Map. (3) Development
consent must not be granted to development on land to which this clause
applies unless the consent authority has considered a report that addresses
the following matters: (a) identification
of any potential adverse impact on: (i) water quality within
the waterway, and (ii) aquatic and riparian
habitats and ecosystems, and (iii) stability of the bed,
shore and banks of the waterway, and (iv) the free passage of
fish and other aquatic organisms within or along the waterway, and (v) habitat of any
threatened species, populations, or ecological communities, and (vi) the removal of any
native vegetation. (b) a
description of all proposed measures to be undertaken to ameliorate any
potential adverse impact. (4) Development
consent must not be granted to development on land to which this clause
applies unless the consent authority is satisfied that the development meets
the objectives of this clause and: (a) the
development is designed, sited and managed to avoid any potential adverse
environmental impact, or (b) if a
potential adverse impact cannot be avoided, the development: (i) is designed and sited so as to have minimum
adverse impact, and (ii) incorporates effective measures so as to have
minimal adverse impact, and (iii) mitigates any adverse impact through the
restoration of any existing disturbed area on the site. |
This clause applies to
mapped areas where waterways are located on privately owned land. An environmental protection clause rather
than the use of zoning is proposed to be applied to waterways and sensitive
landscapes located on privately owned land, to balance the need for riparian
connectivity against the private ownership of land. The core objective of the
environmental protection clause is to maintain ecological processes through
the identification of connected riparian corridors within the City of
Parramatta. Development within these areas, identified on the local
provisions map, will be subject to this clause with more detailed controls
provided in the DCP. The clause ensures proper consideration has been given
the ecology of the waterway. This approach is consistent
with the policy directions set out by the Department of Environment and
Conservation, Department of Primary Industries and the Department of Water
and Energy for the protection of biodiversity values. This clause is based on a
clause contained in Temora Local Environmental Plan that has already been
approved by Parliamentary Counsel. A minor change to the clause has been made
to adapt the clause to an urban LGA, such as the removal of the reference to
stock routes. |
Item 10.1 - Attachment 5 |
Local Provisions in
Draft Parramatta Local Environment Plan 2008 |
Deleted Local
Provisions
Deleted
local provisions from draft Parramatta LEP adopted in 2007 |
Purpose |
Reason
for deletion |
|
|
|
Granny flats in residential
zones |
Purpose of this clause was
to ensure that a granny flat is permissible with consent in any residential zone
subject to the granny flat not exceeding 60 square metres in gross floor
area. |
Standard template
definition “Secondary dwelling” has been introduced. Draft LEP 2008 allows
secondary dwellings with a max floor area of 60 sqm in all residential zones. |
Variation of development
standards in specific circumstances |
Purpose of this clause was
to consider a floor space bonus of 20% for land close to the |
Contrary to Standard instrument,
maximum FSR is specified on the FSR map. In October 2007, DoP will not allow
this clause. |
Historic view corridors |
Clause referred to view
corridors as specified in DCP to ensure views are considered when assessing a
development application. |
DoP does not allow the LEP
to refer to a matter that is in the DCP. As view corridors are addressed in
Draft Parramatta Development Control Plan 2008, they must be considered and
the clause in the LEP is not necessary. |
Retailing of Bulky Goods |
The purpose of this clause was
to ensure that particular goods, classified as Bulky goods development only
occupied floor space greater than or equal to 1000sq.m. |
Definition of Bulky Goods
Retailing requires that there be a large area for handling, display or
storage. |
Council Development |
To specify certain
activities which are carried out on or behalf of a Council that do not
require development consent. |
Addressed in State
Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) Infrastructure. This SEPP came into
effect on 21 December 2007. |
Special Precincts |
Clause referred to Special
Character areas included in the DCP as matters to be considered when
assessing a development application. |
DoP does not allow the LEP
to refer to a matter that is in the DCP. As special character areas are addressed
in Draft Parramatta Development Control Plan 2008, they must be considered
and the clause in the LEP is not necessary. |
Telecommunication
Facilities |
This clause specified the
need for development consent for certain telecommunication facilities. |
Permissibility of
telecommunications facilities is now addressed in State Environmental
Planning Policy (SEPP) Infrastructure. This SEPP came into effect on 21
December 2007. |
Contaminated land |
To ensure contaminated land
is appropriately managed and where necessary rehabilitated as part of a
development assessment. |
This clause duplicated the
requirements of SEPP 55 Remediation of Land. |
Boarding houses |
To ensure that existing
boarding homes are retained in the LGA by preventing the demolition of a
boarding house or it being changed to another permitted use unless certain
criteria as been considered. |
Covered by State
Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP 10 – Retention of Low Cost Housing). |
Neighbourhood shops in R2
Low Density zone |
To limit where permissible in
a zone the size of neighbourhood shops to 60 square metres. |
Addressed by definition in
Standard Template and Clause 5.4(7) of draft Parramatta LEP 2008. Note:
Minimum area allowable under the standard template is 80sqm |
Office development in
industrial zones |
To ensure that office
premises located in, or apart of an industrial zone are ancillary to main
industrial use of the site. |
Permitted as ancillary
development. |
Biodiversity |
To ensure that
consideration is given to the protection of mangroves, threatened species and
other important natural habitats |
Covered by zone objectives. |